Former Treasury Official Criticizes FIT 21 Ahead of House Vote

The Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act (FIT 21) that seeks to legislate the digital assets industry has been criticized by Graham Steele, a former Treasury official as the House of Representatives readies for a vote.

The bill, described as a light-touch regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, does not address Big Tech, contrary to some claims.

FIT 21 Criticized Ahead of House Vote

The FIT 21 Act has generated a lot of discussion among members of the US House of Representatives and other stakeholders as the House prepares for a crucial vote. Graham Steele, a former Treasury official who is said to be eyeing the FDIC Chair position, criticized the bill’s approach to regulating digital assets.

Steele suggests that the legislation may not effectively address the issues of today’s financial technologies. However, some supporters of the bill have not only misrepresented it as an anti-Big Tech bill but also failed to include any specific provisions within the bill to directly regulate these corporations.

Many digital asset organizations such as Coinbase and Kraken have endorsed the bill as a means of providing a clear legal environment. It aims at establishing what should be considered as digital assets and increasing the powers of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to cover these assets. 

However, some of the senior Democrats such as House Financial Services Committee Ranking Member Maxine Waters and House Agriculture Committee Ranking Member David Scott have opposed the idea. They pointed to the fact that the bill threatens established case laws and may bring a certain level of instability in the traditional securities market.

Concerns Over Investor Protections and Overreach

The criticisms of FIT 21 are not only legal but also concern investor protection and the stability of financial markets. An internal email from the office of the Democrat Whip, leaked to Politico, stressed concern that the safe harbor provisions might allow companies to escape requirement of standard securities law, which might result in fraud and manipulation of the market. 

This aspect of the legislation has led the lawmakers to arrange for a briefing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to further deliberate on the consequences.

Further, the legislation has been criticized for the possibility of preventing shareholders from taking legal action against publicly traded organizations and for anticipating state legislation regarding digital assets. Such measures could dilute fiduciary standards and erode the fundamentals of capital markets, as per the information provided by the Democrat Whip’s office.

Market Reactions and Political Dynamics

The discussion of FIT21 raises a more extensive political conversation about cryptocurrencies and digital assets in the United States economy. For instance, the CEO of Galaxy Investment Partners, Mike Novogratz, has pointed out that the Democrats’ stance on the bill might be a huge mistake.

He says that regulating cryptocurrencies should not be a partisan political agenda and should not be politicized. These statements are similar to an increasing trend in the industry to push for the adoption of crypto technologies regardless of the political party involved.

Read Also: Dogecoin Price Analysis: Can DOGE Break $0.2 Resistance Before May Ends?

✓ Share:

Kelvin is a distinguished writer specializing in crypto and finance, backed by a Bachelor’s in Actuarial Science. Recognized for incisive analysis and insightful content, he has an adept command of English and excels at thorough research and timely delivery.

The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.