Biden Admin Opposes Bill Challenging SEC’s SAB 121

The Executive Office of US President Joe Biden has announced its intention to veto proposed legislation, H.J. Res. 109, which seeks to allow highly regulated financial firms to act as custodians for Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies by overturning the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 121.

Veto Against Overturning SEC’s SAB 121

H. J. Res. 109, a bill to nullify the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No.121, was strongly objected to by the Biden administration. SAB 121 introduces the limitations for financial institutions regarding the safekeeping of digital assets.

The Executive Office, as a result, indicated that if H.J. Res. 109 were presented to the President, he would veto it on the grounds of disrupting the SEC’s efforts to protect investors and also the broader financial system.

H. J. Res. 109 is a bill that was introduced under the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to nullify SAB 121. This resolution seeks to eliminate obstacles that stop regulated financial institutions from acting as custodians of digital assets in general, including Bitcoin, by overriding this bulletin.

Congressional Support and Opposition

SAB 121 overturn has been called for by US Congressman Patrick McHenry, House Financial Services Committee Chair. He argued that the bulletin is a regulatory overreach by the SEC under the leadership of Gary Gensler.

In addition, McHenry pointed out that SAB 121 places high capital and liquidity requirements on banks, thereby making it impractically expensive for them to custody digital assets, which goes against the traditional asset custody approach.

McHenry’s position is shared by other congressmen and by French Hill in particular, who stated that holding reserves against assets in custody was not a standard practice in the financial industry. Subsequently, they argue that SAB 121’s prescriptions are unfounded and should be eliminated to enable financial institutions to manage digital assets effectively.

However, the Biden administration and proponents of SAB 121 argue that the bulletin is significant in preserving the integrity of financial markets and safeguarding investors from the instability and threats posed by digital assets. They contend that the existing regulatory system, enforced by SAB 121, is necessary to prevent financial instability and maintain a stable market environment.

Industry Reaction and Implications

Cody Carbone, Chief Policy Officer at The Chamber of Digital Commerce, lamented the Biden administration’s decision to veto H. J. Res. 109. He contended that SAB 121 practically prevents trusted custodians from administering digital assets.

In addition, he slammed the SEC for violating the Administrative Procedures Act by issuing the bulletin without public comments or openness.

Concurrently, critics such as Jake Chervinsky noted that SAB 121 violated the CRA and APA to hurt the crypto industry. Moreover, he pointed out that the White House backing SAB 121, especially in an election year, was a relatively poor strategic move, as it might lead to the alienation of the significant stakeholders in the digital asset sector.

Moreover, in an op-ed published earlier this year, Congressmen Mike Flood and Wiley Nickel, both members of the Democratic-Republican Party, accused SAB 121. They emphasized the role heavily regulated institutions should play in digital asset custody to minimize concentration risks and develop a more secure market environment.

Also Read :

✓ Share:

Kelvin is a distinguished writer specializing in crypto and finance, backed by a Bachelor’s in Actuarial Science. Recognized for incisive analysis and insightful content, he has an adept command of English and excels at thorough research and timely delivery.

The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.