Connect with us

Market

MiCA vs Trump’s Crypto Policy: Battle for Crypto Dominance

Published

on



Since‬‭ the‬‭ implementation‬‭ of‬‭ MiCA‬‭ in‬‭ the‬‭ EU‬‭ and‬‭ the‬‭ shift‬‭ in‬‭ US‬‭ policy‬‭ under President‬‭ Trump,‬‭ both‬‭ jurisdictions‬‭ have‬‭ progressed‬‭ in‬‭ crypto‬‭ legislation,‬‭ albeit‬‭ with‬‭ distinct‬‭ approaches. Europe got a head start by becoming the first to establish a comprehensive and unified regulatory framework for crypto-assets. Meanwhile, the US is catching up, with more capital to offer and a larger user base.

Manouk Termaaten, CEO of Vertical Studio AI, and Erwin Voloder, Head of Policy at the European Blockchain Association, shared their perspectives with BeInCrypto on the areas where the EU and the US are demonstrating leadership in the high-stakes development of crypto legislation and who will ultimately set the pace for global crypto regulation.

EU’s MiCA and Early Regulatory Certainty

By implementing the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation on December 30, 2024, the European Union made history as the first jurisdiction to create a complete regulatory structure for crypto-assets that applies to all its member nations.

Since then, leading companies like Standard Chartered, MoonPay, BitStaete, Crypto.com, and OKX, to name a few, have secured their licenses.

The United States, in turn, was slower to act. Instead of lobbying for comprehensive crypto legislation, industry leaders have concentrated on getting approval from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Under the Biden administration, that turned out to be a particularly hard feat.

“The EU definitely had a first-mover advantage in getting regulatory certainty out the gate with MiCA. Especially since at the time, the US was retreating from leadership in the digital asset space and the industry was facing what amounted to persecution back home in many cases,” Voloder told BeInCrypto.

Former SEC Chair Gary Gensler became known within the walls of the crypto industry as being particularly hostile toward the technology, taking a controversial regulation-by-enforcement policy stance. Crackdowns became common, and many innovators packed their bags and moved abroad, seeking opportunities in friendlier jurisdictions. 

“The US relied on existing agencies like the SEC instead of building a unified crypto law.‬‭ Remember, Gary Gensler almost cracked down on the market and caused massive fear but‬‭ never managed to get anything through. This does not mean regulation will never come and‬‭ creates legal uncertainty that’s driven many projects overseas,” Termaaten said.

Now, under Trump, things have taken quite a turn.

How Does the US Approach Crypto Innovation?

The Trump administration aims to foster a predictable environment for US crypto innovation and expansion through clear regulatory frameworks. It strongly emphasizes keeping that innovation within the United States to establish its global leadership.

In pursuit of this goal, the administration has created working groups and task forces to develop detailed regulatory frameworks, including stablecoins and crypto asset classification guidelines.

“What we’ve seen under the Trump administration so far has been a complete roll-back of Biden-era regulations and weaponization of the agencies against crypto in favour of a light- touch, pro-innovation stance. He’s dismantling the DOJ’s Crypto Enforcement Team, the SEC’s new Crypto-Asset Task Force has a new mandate, under new leadership in Commissioner Pierce, and there’s ongoing investigations in the House against the systematic de-banking of digital assets businesses, and banks with revelations coming to light almost weekly,” Voloder explained.

As part of this new chapter in crypto regulation, the United States intends to forge its path, developing distinct crypto regulations rather than adopting the EU’s MiCA framework. Its intent diverges significantly from the European approach.

MiCA’s Regulatory Framework in the EU

MiCA‬‭ provides‬‭ the‬‭ EU‬‭ with‬‭ a‬‭ comprehensive‬‭ and‬‭ unified‬‭ regulatory‬‭ framework‬‭ for‬‭ crypto‬‭ assets,‬‭ extending‬‭ bank-like‬‭ rules‬‭ focused‬‭ on‬‭ financial‬‭ stability‬‭ and‬‭ consumer‬‭ protection.‬‭ 

The regulation mandates‬‭ licensing‬‭ for‬‭ crypto‬‭ service‬‭ providers‬‭ and‬‭ stablecoin‬‭ issuers,‬‭ aligning‬‭ them‬‭ with‬‭ traditional‬‭ finance‬‭ and‬‭ supporting‬‭ the‬‭ creation of a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) as a digital‬‭ euro‬‭ to‬‭ safeguard‬‭ monetary‬‭ sovereignty.‬‭

“The EU treats crypto as part of its traditional financial system– it’s cautious, centralized, and‬‭ prioritizes regulation through MiCA and the upcoming digital euro (CBDC),” Termaaten told BeInCrypto.

The US, however, operates with a contrasting attitude.

US Focus on Private Innovation and Opposition to CBDCs

Trump has clearly stated that he intends to eliminate any regulations that promote CBDCs, citing concerns about government overreach and the erosion of financial freedom.

The United States now charts a policy course that champions blockchain technology through private innovation while firmly opposing CBDCs. This stance is underscored by a recent executive order in which the White House argues that CBDCs “threaten the stability of the financial system, individual privacy, and the sovereignty of the United States.”

Trump has also clarified that stablecoins are the priority for innovation, as they can help reinforce US dollar dominance. 

Meanwhile, a notably fragmented approach has characterized the advancement of crypto legislation in the US. The absence of nationwide regulations has allowed certain states to establish an early lead, but others continue to lag in pursuing crypto innovation.

“The US, especially‬‭ under Trump’s recent shift, is leaning harder into private-sector innovation, explicitly opposing a‬‭ CBDC and focusing on blockchain as a new tech frontier, which the USA will be the capital from.‬‭ The EU’s approach is about control and stability; the US’s is about flexibility and economic‬‭ leadership through innovation. Both aim to protect consumers, but through very different‬‭ methods,” Termaaten said. 

These fundamentally different philosophies also allow for the analysis of which regulations yield the most favorable outcomes.

What are the Financial Burdens of MiCA Compliance?

The significant investment companies must make to obtain a MiCA operating license has drawn scrutiny. Though member states set varying fees, these are generally steep. 

“[There are] high costs that are not in proportion compared to the gain for a business. It also just adds‬‭ a layer of legal complexity most projects dont want to bring into their project. At Vertical AI, we‬‭ decided it’s strategic to proceed with becoming compliant, but others could just geo-block EU‬‭ users to avoid the burden,‭” Termaaten told of his personal experience.

MiCA mandates minimum capital requirements based on the crypto services offered. These range from €50,000 for advisory and order-related services to €125,000 for exchange and trading platforms and up to €150,000 for custody services. Businesses must maintain this capital as a financial safeguard.

Beyond minimum capital requirements, companies must factor in government and legal fees, local presence costs, bank setups, and ongoing operational costs. 

“MiCA is an expensive regulation. Compliance in Europe can be an exorbitant expense and I think the main challenge going forward at least for start-ups is justifying the high up-front costs of advisory, licensing, auditing etc., when many of these companies have a fixed burn they need to manage. The last thing you want to be doing as a start-up is piling all of your capital into compliance when that money could have been put to better use developing/refining your product and your GTM,” Voloder told BeInCrypto. 

In contrast, the US allows crypto companies greater leeway to innovate.

Flexible Regulatory Stance and Private Sector Innovation in the US

While the European Union’s MiCA regulation establishes a comprehensive and structured regulatory environment, the United States has opted for a more flexible regulatory stance. 

This approach prioritizes the growth of private blockchain innovation, aiming to encourage rapid development and technological advancement within the crypto industry by providing a less restrictive regulatory environment.

“The US favors letting the private sector innovate, especially with USD-backed‬‭ stablecoins, which it believes can expand dollar dominance globally. This approach avoids‬‭ centralization while still enabling digital payments innovation. It’s very much a “let the market‬‭ lead” philosophy. In my opinion, the way to go with crypto,” Termaaten told BeInCrypto.

Should the US continue developing crypto-friendly legislation, it will quickly position itself to outpace Europe in this regulatory race.

“The EU still leads in terms of finalized law (MiCA), but the US is regaining‬‭ ground by openly backing the crypto industry and promising regulatory clarity. If that clarity turns‬‭ into actual, friendly regulation, the US will become more attractive than the EU– especially for‬‭ developers and fintech firms who value speed and scale + access to more venture capital,” Termaaten said, adding that, “While the EU is a large‬‭ crypto market, the US still dominates in capital, user base, and market liquidity.”

This contrasting approach, favoring a more agile and less burdensome regulatory environment, illustrates the fundamental differences in how each jurisdiction envisions the future of digital finance.

Will the US or EU Ultimately Secure Global Leadership?

While the European Union secured an early advantage in the global crypto regulatory landscape through the comprehensive and unified framework of MiCA, its thoroughness and the significant financial investment required for licensing have inadvertently created barriers to rapid innovation. 

This situation has opened a window of opportunity for the United States, particularly with the shift in administration under Trump. By adopting a more permissive and innovation-centric approach, dismantling perceived regulatory obstacles, and prioritizing private blockchain development, the US is quickly emerging as the preferred jurisdiction for crypto innovation. 

Despite Europe’s regulatory clarity, the US’s focus on flexibility, coupled with its robust capital markets and extensive user base, positions it to potentially eclipse the EU as the true leader in fostering the next wave of crypto advancements, provided it can deliver on its promise of clear and supportive legislation.

Disclaimer

Following the Trust Project guidelines, this feature article presents opinions and perspectives from industry experts or individuals. BeInCrypto is dedicated to transparent reporting, but the views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of BeInCrypto or its staff. Readers should verify information independently and consult with a professional before making decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and ConditionsPrivacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.



Source link

Market

Tokens Big Players Are Buying

Published

on


Crypto whales are making bold moves heading into May 2025, and three tokens are standing out: Ethereum (ETH), Artificial Superintelligence Alliance (FET), and Onyxcoin (XCN). All three have seen a noticeable uptick in large-holder accumulation over the last week, signaling growing interest from big players despite recent volatility.

While ETH and XCN are both coming off sharp corrections, whale buying suggests confidence in a potential rebound. Meanwhile, FET is riding renewed momentum in the AI sector, with whale activity accelerating alongside rising prices.

Ethereum (ETH)

The number of Ethereum crypto whales—wallets holding between 1,000 and 10,000 ETH—has been steadily climbing since April 15. Back then, there were 5,432 such addresses.

That number has now risen to 5,460, the highest count since August 2023. At the same time, the concentration of ETH held by these whales is also hitting new highs, signaling growing accumulation by large holders.

While this can be interpreted as confidence in Ethereum’s long-term value, it also raises concerns about centralization and potential selling pressure if whales decide to take profits.

Number of Addresses Holding Between 1,000 and 10,000 ETH.
Number of Addresses Holding Between 1,000 and 10,000 ETH. Source: Santiment.

Ethereum price is currently down more than 19% over the last 30 days. If the correction continues, the price could retest support at $1,535. Losing that level might send ETH toward deeper support at $1,412 or even $1,385.

However, if the trend reverses, key resistance zones lie at $1,669 and $1,749—with a potential push toward $1,954 if bullish momentum builds.

In this context, the growing dominance of whales could act as either a stabilizing force or a looming risk, depending on how they respond to market shifts.

Artificial Superintelligence Alliance (FET)

The number of FET whales—wallets holding between 10,000 and 1,000,000 tokens—increased from 572 on April 13 to 586 by April 19.

This steady growth in large holders points to rising confidence among bigger players. It comes at a time when the broader AI crypto narrative is showing signs of a rebound.

Key AI coins like FET, TAO, and RENDER have all increased over 9% in the last seven days, with FET itself gaining more than 8% in the past 24 hours and 13.5% over the week. This suggests a possible comeback for the artificial intelligence narrative in crypto.

Number of Addresses Holding Between 100,000 and 1,000,000 FET.
Number of Addresses Holding Between 100,000 and 1,000,000 FET. Source: Santiment.

If this momentum continues, FET could push toward resistance at $0.659. A clean breakout from that level could open the door to further gains, with $0.77 and $0.82 as the next potential targets.

On the flip side, if the rally stalls, FET might drop back to test support at $0.54. A breakdown below that could send it as low as $0.44.

With whale activity heating up and the AI sector showing renewed strength, FET’s next move could be a key signal for where the narrative heads next.

Onyxcoin (XCN)

Onyxcoin was one of the standout performers in January, but its momentum has faded in recent months. After a strong bounce—up of over 57% in the last 30 days, the token is now correcting, down 19% in the past seven days.

Despite this pullback, accumulation continues. The number of crypto whales holding between 1 million and 10 million XCN has grown from 528 on April 16 to 541, suggesting some large holders may be buying the dip.

Number of Addresses Holding Between 1,000,000 and 10,000,000 XCN.
Number of Addresses Holding Between 1,000,000 and 10,000,000 XCN. Source: Santiment.

If the correction deepens, XCN could lose support at $0.0165. A drop below that may open the door to further declines toward $0.0139 and $0.0123.

But if the trend flips back upward, the token could first test resistance at $0.020. A strong breakout from there might lead to a move toward $0.027. With whale activity on the rise and volatility returning, XCN’s next move could be decisive.

Disclaimer

In line with the Trust Project guidelines, this price analysis article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. BeInCrypto is committed to accurate, unbiased reporting, but market conditions are subject to change without notice. Always conduct your own research and consult with a professional before making any financial decisions. Please note that our Terms and ConditionsPrivacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.



Source link

Continue Reading

Market

1 Year After Bitcoin Halving: What’s Different This Time?

Published

on


Bitcoin (BTC) is now one year past its most recent halving, and this cycle is shaping up to be unlike any before it. Unlike previous cycles where explosive rallies followed the halving, BTC has seen a far more muted gain, up just 31%, compared to 436% over the same timeframe in the last cycle.

At the same time, long-term holder metrics like the MVRV ratio are signaling a sharp decline in unrealized profits, pointing to a maturing market with compressing upside. Together, these shifts suggest Bitcoin may be entering a new era, defined less by parabolic peaks and more by gradual, institution-driven growth.

A Year After the Bitcoin Halving: A Cycle Unlike Any Other

This Bitcoin cycle is unfolding noticeably differently than previous ones, signaling a potential shift in how the market responds to halving events.

In earlier cycles—most notably from 2012 to 2016 and again from 2016 to 2020—Bitcoin tended to rally aggressively around this stage. The post-halving period was often marked by strong upward momentum and parabolic price action, largely fueled by retail enthusiasm and speculative demand.

The current cycle, however, has taken a different route. Instead of accelerating after the halving, the price surge began earlier, in October and December 2024, followed by consolidation in January 2025 and a correction in late February.

This front-loaded behavior diverges sharply from historical patterns where halvings typically acted as the catalyst for major rallies.

Several factors are contributing to this shift. Bitcoin is no longer just a retail-driven speculative asset—it’s increasingly seen as a maturing financial instrument. The growing involvement of institutional investors, coupled with macroeconomic pressures and structural changes in the market, has led to a more measured and complex response.

Bitcoin Cycles Comparison.
Bitcoin Cycles Comparison. Source: Bitcoin Cycles Comparison.

Another clear sign of this evolution is the weakening strength of each successive cycle. The explosive gains of the early years have become harder to replicate as Bitcoin’s market cap has grown. For instance, in the 2020–2024 cycle, Bitcoin had climbed 436% one year after the halving.

In contrast, this cycle has seen a much more modest 31% increase over the same timeframe.

This shift could mean Bitcoin is entering a new chapter. One with less wild volatility and more steady, long-term growth. The halving may no longer be the main driver. Other forces are taking over—rates, liquidity, and institutional money.

The game is changing. And so is the way Bitcoin moves.

Nonetheless, it’s important to note that previous cycles also featured periods of consolidation and correction before resuming their uptrend. While this phase may feel slower or less exciting, it could still represent a healthy reset before the next move higher.

That said, the possibility remains that this cycle will continue to diverge from historical patterns. Instead of a dramatic blow-off top, the outcome may be a more prolonged and structurally supported uptrend—less driven by hype, more by fundamentals.

What Long-Term Holder MVRV Reveals About Bitcoin’s Maturing Market

The Long-Term Holder (LTH) MVRV ratio has always been a solid measure of unrealized profits. It shows how much long-term investors are sitting on before they start selling. But over time, this number is falling.

In the 2016–2020 cycle, LTH MVRV peaked at 35.8. That signaled massive paper profits and a clear top forming. By the 2020–2024 cycle, the peak dropped sharply to 12.2. This happened even as Bitcoin price hit fresh all-time highs.

In the current cycle, the highest LTH MVRV so far is just 4.35. That’s a massive drop. It shows long-term holders aren’t seeing the same kind of gains. The trend is clear: each cycle delivers smaller multiples.

Bitcoin’s explosive upside is compressing. The market is maturing.

Now, in the current cycle, the highest LTH MVRV reading so far has been 4.35. This stark drop suggests long-term holders are experiencing much lower multiples on their holdings compared to previous cycles, even with substantial price appreciation. The pattern points to one conclusion: Bitcoin’s upside is compressing.

BTC Long-Term Holders MVRV.
BTC Long-Term Holders MVRV. Source: Glassnode.

This isn’t just a fluke. As the market matures, explosive gains are naturally harder to come by. The days of extreme, cycle-driven profit multiples may be fading, replaced by more moderate—but potentially more stable—growth.

A growing market cap means it takes exponentially more capital to move the price significantly.

Still, it’s not definitive proof that this cycle has already topped out. Previous cycles often included extended periods of sideways movement or modest pullbacks before new highs were reached.

With institutions playing a larger role, accumulation phases could stretch longer. Therefore, peak profit-taking may be less abrupt than in earlier cycles.

However, if the trend of declining MVRV peaks continues, it could reinforce the idea that Bitcoin is transitioning away from wild, cyclical surges and toward a more subdued but structured growth pattern.

The sharpest gains may already be behind, especially for those entering late in the cycle.

Disclaimer

In line with the Trust Project guidelines, this price analysis article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. BeInCrypto is committed to accurate, unbiased reporting, but market conditions are subject to change without notice. Always conduct your own research and consult with a professional before making any financial decisions. Please note that our Terms and ConditionsPrivacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.



Source link

Continue Reading

Market

VOXEL Climbs 200% After Suspected Bitget Bot Glitch

Published

on



Voxies (VOXEL), a little-known gaming token, surged by over 200% within 24 hours on April 20 following a suspected malfunction in Bitget’s trading system.

The unexpected glitch led to an explosive spike in activity, pushing the VOXEL/USDT contract’s trading volume to an eye-watering $12.7 billion. According to Coingecko data, this significantly outpaces Bitcoin’s $4.76 billion volume on the same platform.

Bitget Trading Error Reportedly Lets Users Earn Six-Figure Profits

The unprecedented spike drew attention across the crypto space, particularly given that VOXEL is a relatively obscure free-to-play blockchain game token with a market cap under $30 million.

According to on-chain analyst Dylan, the Bitget bot repeatedly executed trades within the narrow $0.125 to $0.138 price range. Savvy traders quickly caught on, using just $100 to scalp profits exceeding six figures.

Reports suggest that the glitch allowed some users to walk away with tens or even hundreds of thousands of USDT in a matter of hours.

In response, Bitget’s spokesperson Xie Jiayin confirmed the platform was aware of the irregular activity and has launched an internal investigation. The company also noted that affected accounts may face temporary restrictions, urging users to contact in-app support for further assistance.

“Every platform, at every stage of development, may encounter challenges and uncertainties, yet these are an inevitable part of the journey. Bitget will provide the event details and resolution within 24 hours,” Jiayin added.

Meanwhile, the incident has sparked criticism from market experts and traders, many of whom question Bitget’s internal safeguards and technical maturity.

Several community members have criticized Bitget’s response to the issue. Some have claimed that the exchange’s decision to forcibly settle VOXEL contracts at discounted rates breached user trust. Bitget’s hybrid custody model is also receiving backlash following the incident.

“The platform’s product design reveals concerning flaws: a hybrid custody risk pool exposes users to systemic risks, and unrestricted position sizes open the door to manipulation. If these issues are not addressed, more altcoins could be weaponized against Bitget—potentially making it the next catastrophic failure in the crypto space,” one analyst stated.

Meanwhile, the timing of the incident is also notable. VOXEL is currently listed on Binance’s “Vote to Delist” program. The campaign aims to improve transparency and give the community a voice in token listings.

Overall, the Bitget incident has amplified concerns about potential market manipulation involving the token and highlighted the broader risks tied to centralized exchanges.

Disclaimer

In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and ConditionsPrivacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 coin2049.io