Connect with us

Regulation

XRP Lawyer Says SEC Knows Ripple ODL Sales Are Not Investment Contracts

Published

on


In a recent filing, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) opposed Ripple’s motion to seal and redact evidence related to remedies briefing and documents. Moreover, the SEC urged the court to order the disclosure of Ripple’s business details from the agency’s March 22 remedies briefing.

However, Ripple had previously requested that financial reports, post-complaint XRP institutional sales details, and other sensitive information remain confidential due to the high risks to the firm. Amid the chaos, Bill Morgan, a pro-XRP advocate, underscored that the SEC alredy knows that Ripple’s On-demand Liquidity (ODL) sales aren’t investment contracts.

SEC Mentions Ripple ODL Sales In Filing

Pro-XRP lawyer Bill Morgan shared a snapshot from the SEC’s latest response. The snapshot highlighted, “The same is true for Ripple’s aged securities offering and sales information. Ripple wants to hide the extent to which it offered XRP at discriminatory prices. But the period when Ripple was offering discounts goes back to 2014 and ended in December 2020.”

It added, “Ripple has not shown how the discounts it offered four years ago or more would matter, particularly since Ripple seeks to avoid remedies by claiming it ‘has changed the way it sells XRP and changed its contracts.’” in addition, the SEC emphasized that Ripple’s current contracts are not the ones under scrutiny.

The agency further added, “Indeed, the contracts at issue are not ODL contracts—the only type of Institutional Sales contracts Ripple claims it enters into today… none of Ripple’s current contracts contain lockups. The redactions the SEC opposes thus do not reveal ‘long-term business plans of any kind.’”

Lawyer Explains SEC’s Stance On ODL Sales

Morgan elaborated on the SEC’s position, explaining, “The SEC clarifies that none of the sales to institutions with discounts were ODL contracts.” He added, “The SEC would have reviewed the ODL contracts and observed that they do not have discounts or the features referred to in the summary judgment that made institutional buyer contracts to be investment contracts according to judge Torres.”

Furthermore, Morgan pointed out a key distinction in the nature of ODL contracts. He noted that the ODL contracts require customers to buy XRP at market price and to use the tokens in ODL transactions. Moreover, he emphasized that these customers agree on not holding them as investments. Hence, he questioned why Judge Torres categorized these contracts similarly to other institutional agreements.

The lawyer speculated, “It remains a mystery why Judge Torres lumped them in with the other contracts with Institutions.” In addition, the pro-XRP attorney noted that the SEC knows that its stance on the ODL sales wrong. He stated, “I bet SEC knows the ODL contracts are not investment contracts.” This ongoing legal battle between the SEC and Ripple highlights the complexities surrounding cryptocurrency regulation and the definitions of securities.

Also Read: Ripple SEC Lawsuit: SEC Files Opposition to Sealing XRP Details, Here’s Everything

SEC Files Opposition Against Ripple

On Monday, May 20, the U.S. SEC filed a response opposing part of Ripple’s motion to seal and redact certain documents. The SEC argues that Ripple’s attempt to “conceal financial and securities sales information” is unlawful, as the information is crucial for the remedies phase and public understanding of the penalties.

Whilst, Ripple seeks to redact details such as the amount of its current assets, recent sales figures, revenues and expenses, and discounts offered to institutional investors. However, the SEC contends that these details are essential for determining penalties, injunctive relief, disgorgement, and investor harm. They argue that Ripple has not provided sufficient evidence that making this information public would cause significant harm.

Furthermore, the SEC states that the financial information in question is outdated and that some of it is already publicly available. The regulator also asserts that Ripple’s reliance on previous court sealing approvals does not apply to the current situation. The SEC maintains that transparency is necessary for the court’s decisions and public accountability.

Also Read: XRP Lawsuit: Ripple Moves 50M XRP Ahead Major Deadline, What’s Happening?

✓ Share:

CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.

The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Regulation

US SEC Drops Charges Against Hawk Tuah Girl Hailey Welch

Published

on


Hawk Tuah girl Hailey Welch, known for her association with the controversial $HAWK token, has been cleared of any wrongdoing after a lengthy investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC has decided not to press charges against Welch in connection with the rapid rise and subsequent collapse of the meme-based cryptocurrency.

US SEC Investigation Into Hawk Tuah Girl Concludes Without Charges

The SEC had launched an investigation into the $HAWK token after its dramatic price drop. The token, which was linked to Welch’s viral persona, initially saw a market cap surge to $490 million before crashing by over 90%. Investors who were impacted by the crash filed a lawsuit against those behind the project, alleging that the coin had been promoted and sold without proper registration.

Hawk Tuah girl Hailey Welch, who cooperated fully with the investigation, expressed relief after the SEC’s decision. “For the past few months, I’ve been cooperating with all the authorities and attorneys, and finally, that work is complete,” Welch told TMZ.

Her attorney, James Sallah, confirmed that the SEC had closed the case without any findings against her, adding that there would be no monetary sanctions or restrictions on Welch’s future involvement in cryptocurrency or securities.

This Is A Developing News, Please Check Back For More

✓ Share:

Kelvin Munene Murithi

Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

Sonic Labs To Abandon Plans For Algorithmic USD Stablecoin, Here’s Why

Published

on


Barely a week after hinting at launching an algorithmic USD stablecoin, Sonic Labs is shuttering its plans. Sonic Labs co-founder Andre Cronje revealed that incoming stablecoin regulation in the US contributes to the change of stance.

Sonic Labs Makes U-Turn Over Algorithmic USD Stablecoin

In mid-March, Sonic Labs disclosed plans for a yield-generating algorithmic stablecoin for its blockchain. However, new developments in the US regulatory landscape are forcing the company to ditch its algorithmic stablecoin ambitions.

Sonic Labs co-founder Andre Cronje confirmed the change in direction via an X post following the release of the full draft of the STABLE Act by Congress for clearer oversight. According to the text, lawmakers are pushing for a two-year moratorium on algorithmic stablecoin, souring Sonic Labs plans.

Unlike mainstream stablecoins backed by fiat or other commodities, algorithmic stablecoins rely on smart contracts to maintain their peg. The 2022 implosion of Terra’s ecosystem following the de-pegging of its TerraUSD (UST) algorithmic stablecoin stunned regulators.

“We will no longer be releasing a USD-based algorithmic stablecoin,” said Cronje.

In a light-hearted note, community members teased potential strategies for Sonic Labs to sidestep incoming stablecoin regulation. Apart from the loophole of launching the algorithmic stablecoin before the regulation goes live, Cronje teased an algorithmic dirham that will be denominated in USD.

Industry Players Are Bracing For New Stablecoin Regulations

Stablecoin issuers are steeling themselves for incoming stablecoin regulations in the US. While the GENIUS Act and STABLE Act continue to inch forward, there are common denominators in both bills.

For starters, there is the requirement for equivalent reserves at a 1:1 ratio with both bills steering clear of algorithmic stablecoins. The White House is favoring the GENIUS Act over the STABLE Act as lobbyists rally to stifle the possibility of a Conference Committee.

Authorities are targeting stablecoin regulation to reach Trump in two months as issuers jostle for position. Tether, Circle, and Ripple are staking their claims to lead the US government’s ambitions to rely on stablecoins to maintain the dollar’s dominance.

✓ Share:

Aliyu Pokima

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

FDIC Revises Crypto Guidelines Allowing Banks To Enter Digital Assets

Published

on


The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has updated its guidelines, enabling banks to engage in cryptocurrency-related activities without seeking prior approval. This new policy shift signals a change in the FDIC’s approach to the growing role of digital assets in the banking sector.

New FDIC Guidelines on Crypto-Related Activities

The FDIC has issued a new Financial Institution Letter (FIL-7-2025), which provides updated guidance for banks looking to engage in cryptocurrency activities. The new guidance rescinds the previous policy set out in FIL-16-2022, which required banks to notify the FDIC before engaging in such activities.

Under the new rules, banks can now participate in permissible crypto-related activities without waiting for FDIC approval, as long as they manage the risks appropriately.

This change is seen as a shift in the FDIC’s stance, following the agency’s earlier stance that required prior approval for crypto engagements. FDIC Acting Chairman Travis Hill expressed that this new approach aims to establish a more consistent framework for banks to explore and adopt emerging technologies like crypto-assets and blockchain.

“With today’s action, the FDIC is turning the page on the flawed approach of the past three years,” said Hill in a statement.

This Is A Developing News, Please Check Back For More

✓ Share:

Kelvin Munene Murithi

Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 coin2049.io