Regulation
Why SEC Is Unlikely To Probe Roaring Kitty As He Exploits Loophole
Keith Gill, better known by his online moniker “Roaring Kitty,” is back in the spotlight for his trading activities involving GameStop Corp. (GME). However, Gill is reportedly leveraging a loophole in market regulations, causing concern among market experts. Moreover, legal experts believe that the SEC can’t target Roaring Kitty due to the ‘gap in rules’.
Legal Experts On SEC Vs Roaring Kitty
Daniel Hawke, a partner at Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer and former head of the SEC’s market abuse unit, commented on the matter. He said, “What he’s doing is exploiting a gap in the rules.” This statement underscores the intricacies of Roaring Kitty’s actions, which, while controversial, appear to exploit regulatory grey areas rather than outright breaking the law.
Gill’s influence over retail investors is substantial. He uses his online presence and celebrity status to draw attention to GameStop, encouraging a surge in trading activity. Yet, as Hawke noted, “The rules that exist do not permit the SEC to prosecute that conduct unless there is an element of deception.”
Unlike traditional pump-and-dump schemes, Gill does not explicitly endorse investing in GameStop or make unfounded claims about its financial health. Instead, his posts are often cryptic memes or updates on his trading position. This complicates the SEC’s ability to pursue a case against him.
Moreover, the ambiguity surrounding Roaring Kitty’s actions leaves a significant grey area in market regulation. Furthermore, some market observers accused Gill of market manipulation. On the contrary, others argue that his conduct is not significantly different from that of Wall Street fund managers who publicly discuss their holdings.
Steve Sosnick of Interactive Brokers remarked that Gill’s actions resemble those of an activist investor. This brings into question the fine line between market manipulation and advocacy. Whilst, American Economic Liberties Project’s Matt Stoller took a firmer stance. He stated, “This is obviously market manipulation.”
The flurry of opinions highlights the controversy and complexity of Gill’s situation. Now, the challenge for the SEC is to determine whether Roaring Kitty’s influence and trading activity amount to deception, a key element required for any potential prosecution.
Also Read: GameStop Price Prediction as Roaring Kitty Plans Livestream
Controversy Escalates As Options Data Gets Disclosed
Meanwhile, Roaring Kitty’s trading position in GameStop remains substantial. According to a post on his Reddit account, he holds $557 million in shares and options contracts. However, questions about his trading activities persist, such as whether he is backed by other investors and how he financed his GameStop purchases.
The scale of Roaring Kitty’s position and the scrutiny it attracts add another layer of complexity to his trading strategy and its potential ramifications. The controversy intensified after renowned investor Ross Gerber cautioned Gill about his short-term position in GameStop.
Moreover, Gerber highlighted the risks Gill faces, particularly with his $115.7 million stake in GameStop, including $65.7 million in call options expiring on June 21. In a post on X (formerly Twitter), Gerber stated, “Kitty better be careful exposing such a short-term position with so many enemies. Where would he get all the money… he’s got to sell the options soon.”
Furthermore, SEC Chair Gary Gensler addressed questions about Gill’s activities. He also emphasized that while disclosure is crucial, it “doesn’t necessarily protect a bad actor.” This stance reflects the broader regulatory concern about the need for transparency without providing a shield for potentially harmful market behaviors.
Experts have also pointed out the challenges Roaring Kitty might face in cashing out his GameStop options. The number of open contracts in GameStop surged to 145,000 by the end of May, a significant increase from the 15,000 recorded earlier in the month. Hence, the size of Gill’s position and the heightened attention on GameStop could complicate selling the options or taking delivery of the underlying shares, potentially reducing their value.
Also Read: Meme Coin GameStop ($GME) Jumps 118%, Roaring Kitty Eyes Billionaire Status
The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Polymarket, a crypto-based prediction market, is likely to be prohibited by France’s gambling regulator, the ANJ, after a huge amount of bets were placed on the 2024 U.S. presidential election. Since the global audience engaged in prediction platforms, Polymarket experienced a record jump, with $450 million expected to be distributed to users following the victory of Donald Trump.
This increase of betting volume and large stakes has become a matter of concern for the French regulator because the platform offers unlicensed gambling services.
$450 Million in Payouts Expected After U.S. Election Bets
Prediction markets, which are expected to increase their payout to election bettors to around $450m following Donald Trump’s projected win, are attracting increasing attention.
Although conventional polls pointed to a closer contest, prediction markets such as Polymarket and Kalshi recorded a steep rise in Trump’s chances in the last few days, indicating a strong divergence with poll-based expectations.
Among the active users of Polymarket, a French trader called “Theo” made a $26 million bet on Trump’s win and won $49 million. This big bet made Polymarket popular, as the French authorities paid attention to the platform and its popularity among French residents, which led to concerns about the compliance of the platform with French gambling legislation.
France’s ANJ Considers Blocking Access to Polymarket
The ANJ has claimed that Polymarket is involved in gambling which is only allowed in France by licensed operators. According to local media, the regulator has the power to ban access to unlicensed gambling sites and is expected to restrict access to Polymarket soon.
An ANJ insider said: “Polymarket is just betting on something that is completely uncertain, which is exactly what gambling is.”
If put in place, the ban would prevent the usage of the application in France, despite the fact that users can still try to avoid the restriction by connecting to VPN. The ANJ could also try to influence media outlets and directories to stop advertising or linking to Polymarket and, thus, limit its audiences even more.
Regulatory Concerns Over Market Manipulation
The high level of activity on Polymarket has led to speculations that the platform may be used for market manipulation. Two blockchain analysis firms, Chaos Labs and Inca Digital, recently revealed that there was potential wash trading within Polymarket’s U.S. presidential betting market where the same assets are bought and sold to simply create a fake market. This type of trading is rather manipulative and can lead to the distortion of signals on the market and mislead other participants.
The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission also has concerns about prediction markets and put forward a rule in May aiming at stricter regulation of such markets due to the potential for manipulation.
Although no final decision has been reached, regulatory actions could impact Polymarket’s ability to operate freely in other markets, including the U.S.
Kelvin Munene Murithi
Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
FTX co-founder Gary Wang has requested a federal judge not to send him to prison. He noted that he is testifying against the former business partner, Sam Bankman-Fried, someone he has known for a long time in a fraud case.
The lawyer for Wang submitted a sentencing memo in Manhattan federal court wherein he claimed that his client should not be incarcerated as he provided assistance to the prosecutors as well as his role in the scheme was comparatively less.
Wang, who pleaded guilty to fraud and conspiracy when FTX went bankrupt in 2022, is to receive his sentencing on the 20th of November.
FTX Co-Founder Gary Wang Appeals for No Jail Time
The defense counsel for FTX co-founder Gary Wang highlighted his client’s early cooperation with the federal prosecutors as one of the key reasons why the court should consider him for mercy. According to Graff, Wang was one of the first FTX executives to meet with the authorities and share information on the FTX and Alameda Research. Wang gave a testimony in the trial that led to the recent conviction of Bankman-Fried who was sentenced to 25 years in prison.
Speaking at the trial, Wang described how he was ordered to change the code of FTX in order to enable Alameda Research to use the assets of the company’s clients, which is one of the key points of Bankman-Fried’s fraud.
FTX co-founder’s lawyer noted that his involvement in the fraud was less than some of the other former executives, including Caroline Ellison, former CEO of Alameda Research, and Nishad Singh, FTX’s former head of engineering. Wang, his lawyer said, did not start or operate the scheme and was not personally involved in the provision of false information to the investors.
“Gary was not involved in the scheme at its inception, was never provided with details of the scheme, and, in contrast to Bankman-Fried, Ellison and Singh, never engaged in any affirmative action of deception,” Graff wrote.
Sentencing Comparisons to Other Executives
Wang’s attorney argued that a prison sentence would create an “unwarranted sentencing disparity” with Nishad Singh, who avoided jail time after pleading guilty and cooperating with the government. Singh, who faced potential decades-long sentences, was ultimately sentenced to time served and three years of supervised release.
Ellison, another major cooperator, received a two-year prison sentence. FTX co-founder Gary Wang contended that Wang’s level of involvement was even lower than Singh’s, supporting a non-custodial sentence for Wang as well.
Graff also noted Wang’s personal circumstances, stating that Wang is expecting the birth of his first child shortly after his sentencing date. Wang’s attorney suggested that allowing him to remain with his family would align with the court’s treatment of other cooperators in the case.
“Gary wants nothing more than to be a good husband and father and to continue his work to facilitate FTX victims’ recovery,” Graff wrote.
Separately, the U.S. government is working to reclaim approximately $13.25 million in political donations made by FTX executives, including Bankman-Fried and Singh. Judge Lewis Kaplan however granted the government additional time to negotiate the return of these funds, extending discussions with the PACs until January 15, 2025.
Kelvin Munene Murithi
Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a motion seeking judgment in its case against cryptocurrency exchange Kraken, focusing on defenses such as “fair notice” and the “major questions doctrine.”
This move, led by SEC Chairman Gary Gensler’s team, aims to limit further discovery into the agency’s regulatory policies, particularly those affecting the crypto sector. The timing of the filing has drawn attention, as some in the industry view it as a strategic attempt to shield the SEC’s methods from closer examination.
US SEC Files Motion for Judgment Against Kraken
The SEC’s motion seeks to dismiss defenses put forward by Kraken that include the fair notice defense and the major questions doctrine. The fair notice defense argues that Kraken did not receive adequate regulatory guidance regarding its crypto-related activities.
Meanwhile, the major questions doctrine suggests that regulatory agencies, such as the SEC, should not make major policy decisions without clear direction from Congress.
Subsequently, the US SEC’s motion appears intended to prevent further discovery into its policies, which Kraken and other crypto advocates have criticized as inconsistent and unclear. A similar motion was filed in Ripple case, where the US SEC failed to secure a judgment. Michael O’Connor, an attorney representing Kraken expects a similar outcome in the Kraken case, though Kraken has indicated that it has additional defenses should this motion proceed.
This Is A Breaking News, Please Check Back For More
Kelvin Munene Murithi
Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Solana (SOL) Rallies Strongly, Setting Sights on $200
What The Futures Market Signals For Traders
Will Bulls Push It Higher?
Bitcoin Price Pushes Rally Further: Bulls in Full Force
Bitcoin Price Might Never Dip Below $70,000 Again After The US Elections, Here’s Why
Ethereum Analyst Sets $3,400 Target Once ETH Breaks Key Resistance – Details
2.52 Million Altcoins Are Ruining Crypto’s Future
Animoca Brands Valuation Tanks 75% In Two Years, Here’s Why
Crypto exchange BingX hacked for $43 million
Are The Big Players Losing Interest?
Coinbase cbBTC Set to go Live on Solana
Hong Kong’s Securities Association Tips Authorities On Crypto Self-Regulation
2.52 Million Altcoins Are Ruining Crypto’s Future
Animoca Brands Valuation Tanks 75% In Two Years, Here’s Why
Crypto exchange BingX hacked for $43 million
Are The Big Players Losing Interest?
Coinbase cbBTC Set to go Live on Solana
Hong Kong’s Securities Association Tips Authorities On Crypto Self-Regulation
-
Market17 hours agoCelestia and GOAT investors turn to Poodlana to try and recoup losses
-
Market20 hours agoTraders dump Cardano and IOTA as they move to Vantard
-
Market21 hours agoXRP Market Cap Rose, but Here’s Why It Could Fall Behind DOGE
-
Ethereum20 hours agoEthereum Volatility Soon? Derivatives Exchanges Receive 82,000 ETH In Deposits
-
Altcoin12 hours agoXRP Price At Risk As Ripple Moves $250M?
-
Market19 hours agoBitcoin Price Back On The Rise as Trump Leads the Pack: Rally to Continue?
-
Altcoin19 hours agoTrade COW and CETUS with No Fees
-
Market18 hours agoWhy Solana Volume Could Be Key In Driving SOL Price Higher
✓ Share: