Regulation
What’s Next for Crypto Mining in Russia? Leaders Discuss Taxes and Legislation
Russia has been steadily moving towards full regulation of its crypto mining industry, as government officials and industry leaders met at the first forum of the Industrial Mining Association (IMA) in Moscow.
The event, which happened on October 14, involved 70% of Russia’s crypto mining farms, showing that the country is increasingly interested in the sector. The discussions centred mainly on taxation, legal aspects of mining, and impact of crytocurrencies on cross border business transactions.
Taxation Framework for Crypto Miners
The primary discussion point of the forum was the proposal made by the Russian Federal Tax Service (FTS) to introduce a two-tier tax system for crypto-mining companies. The recommended plan to tax miners is proposed to be implemented at two key points.
First, miners will be expected to make a deposit once they get cryptocurrency into their wallets. In the second stage, another tax payment or deduction would be calculated on the basis of the price at which the mined coins are sold or transferred from the wallet.
FTS official Alexey Katyayev noted that there is no final decision on the issue of the taxation system. Nonetheless, crypto mining will not be taxed with Value Added Tax (VAT) since cryptocurrencies are not meant for consumption within the country. Concurrently, individual miners will still be required to pay personal income tax on their profits.
Cross-Border Payments and Experimental Legal Regime
Another key area of discussion at the forum was the possibility of using mined cryptocurrencies for cross-border payments, especially under the Russia crypto mining’s Experimental Legal Regime (ELR). At the present moment, the Bank of Russia is developing the necessary infrastructure for the implementation of cross-border operations with the help of digital currencies.
Nevertheless, there were different views on this matter. Some of the respondents complained that domestic production of crypto mining may not be adequate for export purposes. Some argued that instead of using cryptocurrencies, one should employ other financial digital assets designed for the international market.
Though details on the experimental regime remain scarce, it was agreed that information about the participants and trials’ results should not be made public. Anton Tkachev, Deputy Chairman of the State Duma Committee on Information Policy, noted that the anonymity of the experiment is crucial to avoid possible penalties and retain competitiveness in the Russian cryptocurrency mining sector.
Crypto Mining Registry and Compliance
In an attempt to increase the industry’s transparency, the Russian Federal Tax Service also suggested the creation of a national register of crypto miners. To this end, miners and other companies that engage in the cryptocurrency mining business will be required to provide information such as the location of their data centers, power consumption, and origin of the mining rigs used.
Additionally, they will be required to report their cryptocurrency output and electricity usage. While much of this data will remain confidential, the registry aims to ensure greater oversight and compliance with the law.
According to Katyayev, businesses that engage in crypto mining alongside other sectors such as manufacturing, cannot claim deductions in one area to offset against earnings in the other. However, he pointed out that regulation will enhance competition in the sector through the provision of clear legal framework.
Outlook for Russia’s Crypto Mining Industry
The consensus among forum participants was that crypto mining in Russia has a bright future, especially as the government continues to develop comprehensive regulations.
According to Igor Runets, the CEO of BitRiver, the industry will generate new opportunities in the next 1-2 years as the required facilities for energy-consuming computing like artificial intelligence are set up.
The two features that are likely to make market players list their companies on the stock exchanges include transparency and legal certainty. Timofey Semenov, CEO of Intelion Data Systems, noted that this will open up new capital opportunities for large companies, which is crucial for the further development of Russian crypto mining.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Regulation
Ripple CLO Criticizes Gary Gensler’s Justification For Crypto Lawsuits
Ripple Chief Legal Officer (CLO) Stuart Alderoty has criticized the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Gary Gensler following his attempt to justify the crypto lawsuits that the Commission has instituted. The Ripple CLO’s statement has come amid speculations that Gensler could soon resign as the SEC Chair.
Ripple CLO Criticizes Gary Gensler’s Claim On Crypto Lawsuits
In an X post, the Ripple CLO criticized Gensler’s attempt to justify his four-year-long political crusade to destroy crypto by claiming he just continued what Jay Clayton began. Stuart Alderoty states this is like “burning down the house” and pleading innocence by arguing that Clayton lit the match.
Alderoty was referring to Gary Gensler’s speech in which he discussed the crypto industry. Gensler stated that when he arrived in 2021, the Commission under Jay Clayton had already brought 80 actions, including the Ripple case. The US SEC Chair remarked that this lawsuit was against participants in the crypto markets who were not following the “common-sense rules” of the road.
However, the Ripple CLO believes that the fact that Clayton instituted these lawsuits doesn’t justify all that Gensler has done in his four years as the SEC Chair to hinder the crypto industry’s growth. Gensler is known for his anti-crypto stance and has argued that most crypto assets are securities.
Interestingly, Gensler also hinted in that speech that he would likely resign soon enough as the SEC Chair. Individuals like former SEC official John Reed Stark have called on Gensler to resign since Donald Trump won the US presidential elections.
Meanwhile, the SEC looks to be getting a taste of its medicine. 18 US state attorney generals have filed a lawsuit accusing the SEC of a constitutional overreach in crypto regulation.
The Next SEC Chair Will Be Pro-Crypto
Amid the Ripple CLO’s statement, journalist Eleanor Terrett has confirmed that the next US SEC Chair will be pro-crypto. However, she suggested that the crypto industry and community should focus more on who becomes the next Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Chair.
This came as she cited sources who told Fox Business that the Donald Trump administration is looking to give the CFTC more responsibility regarding crypto regulation. She added that it is unclear how the CFTC will go about this, but it will require more funding than it currently has.
Meanwhile, it is worth mentioning that Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse recently expressed enthusiasm about the shifting regulatory landscape. Ripple CLO Stuart Alderoty had also recently called on Donald Trump to work towards fulfilling his promise of making the US the crypto capital by ending the SEC’s regulation-by-enforcement approach.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Regulation
Manhattan US Attorney To Reduce Crypto Cases After Major Convictions, Prosecutor Reveals
The U.S. Attorney’s Office in Manhattan plans to reduce its focus on cryptocurrency-related crimes. This decision follows a series of major legal victories, according to Scott Hartman, co-chief of the securities and commodities task force at the Southern District of New York (SDNY). These include the high-profile conviction of Sam Bankman-Fried, founder of FTX.
Manhattan US Attorney to Focus Less on Crypto Fraud Amid Leadership Shift
The Manhattan US Attorney’s Office will now slow down on enforcing cases of cryptocurrency scams after it had increased its activity in the previous year. Scott Hartman made this admission during a conference held in New York stating that fewer prosecutors will now be focusing on these kinds of crimes.
He mentioned that the office had dealt with many of the severe fraud issues arising from the market volatility during the 2022 cryptocurrency winter.
Moreover, Hartman clarified that the reduced focus reflects the office’s strategic realignment. This shift comes as other regulatory agencies, such as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), maintain their active roles in monitoring crypto regulations.
Ex-SEC Chair Jay Clayton To Lead Manhattan Attorney’s Office
The cuts in resources for crypto cases occur when there is likely to be a change in leadership at the Manhattan US Attorney’s Office. The new front-runner for the position of U.S. Attorney once Trump gets into office is former SEC Chair, Jay Clayton.
Clayton, who was director of the SEC from 2017 to 2021, took a less confrontational stance than current SEC Chair Gary Gensler did. Notably, the crypto community witnessed a heated debate over the SEC leadership criticizing the current administration approach. As such, several crypto enthusiasts including ex-SEC official John Reed Stark demanded that Gary Gensler resign.
The appointment of Clayton suggests a potential recalibration of priorities within the Manhattan US Attorney’s Office. As the office changes its leadership it is expected that it will shift its attention to other general issues concerning securities and commodities.
Even more so, the Manhattan US Attorney’s Office has hit success in several cases involving the crypto business, among them that of SBF, the former head of FTX. All these legal achievements have defined a significant stage in the fight against crypto fraud.
Hartman noted that the successful handling of major cases allowed the office to adjust its allocation of resources. Moving forward, fewer prosecutors will be tasked with investigating cryptocurrency crimes as the office prioritizes other enforcement.
Despite reducing its focus, the Manhattan US Attorney’s Office emphasized ongoing collaboration with agencies like the SEC and CFTC. Hartman acknowledged that these regulatory bodies ensure continued oversight and enforcement against unlawful activities. This cooperative approach aims to maintain accountability while enabling the office to concentrate on a wider range of legal priorities.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Regulation
Dogecoin Lawsuit Against Elon Musk Ends As Investors Withdraw Appeal
A Dogecoin lawsuit against Elon Musk has come to a close after investors decided to withdraw their appeal. The case, which accused Musk of fraud and insider trading related to the cryptocurrency, had been dismissed earlier this year.
The withdrawal also includes a request to drop related sanctions against Musk’s lawyers, marking the end of a high-profile legal battle in federal court.
Dogecoin Lawsuit Against Elon Musk and Tesla Ends
The Dogecoin lawsuit, originally filed by Dogecoin investors, alleged that Musk and his electric car company Tesla engaged in fraudulent activities to manipulate Dogecoin’s price. Investors claimed Musk’s tweets, public appearances, and statements—including on NBC’s “Saturday Night Live”—were used to profit at their expense.
The investors initially sought $258 billion in damages, amending their complaint four times over two years. However, on August 29, U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein dismissed the case, stating that reasonable investors could not establish securities fraud based on Musk’s public statements. The judge noted that Musk’s comments, such as describing Dogecoin as the “future currency of Earth,” could not be reasonably interpreted as market manipulation or insider trading.
Subsequently, this week, the investors have formally withdrew their appeal and their motion to sanction Musk’s legal team for alleged misconduct. Similarly, Musk and Tesla dropped their motion to sanction the investors’ lawyer for what they called a “frivolous” and ever-changing lawsuit. Both parties as a result filed a stipulation to dismiss the case in Manhattan federal court on Thursday night, pending final approval by Judge Hellerstein.
This Is A Breaking News, Please Check Back For More
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
-
Market24 hours ago
Top Altcoin Gainers — November 2024, Week 2: PNUT Leads
-
Altcoin24 hours ago
Dogecoin to Hit $4 As Elon Musk Says “D.O.G.E. Has Real Potential”
-
Market18 hours ago
What Does Bitcoin NVT Golden Cross Tell About the Price?
-
Regulation18 hours ago
Ripple CLO Criticizes Gary Gensler’s Justification For Crypto Lawsuits
-
Market17 hours ago
SEC’s Gensler Rumored to Step Down Before January 2025
-
Market23 hours ago
Trump’s Policies Could Transform US Crypto
-
Altcoin23 hours ago
SLERF Price Rockets 56% Amid Massive Whale Buying, Rally To Continue?
-
Market22 hours ago
XRP $1 Price Comes Alive for the First Time Since 2021
✓ Share: