Connect with us

Regulation

US IRS Faces New Lawsuit Over Crypto Staking Tax Policy

Published

on


The US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is again under legal pressure in relation to taxation of cryptocurrency staking rewards. On October 10, 2024, Josh Jarrett filed a new lawsuit with support of Coin Center and against the agency’s approach of taxing block rewards as income at the time of receipt.

US IRS Faces New Lawsuit Over Crypto Staking Tax

In a filing on Thursday, the IRS is in the spotlight over its position on block rewards, which are newly minted tokens of a cryptocurrency given to validators who add blocks to a blockchain. The agency currently considers these rewards taxable income at the moment they are received, a policy that Jarrett and Coin Center argue is unjust. 

The lawsuit states that the block rewards should be considered new property and should not be taxed as income, and such income should only be taxed when sold or exchanged for cash.

According to Jarrett, the same should apply to other forms of newly created property, for example crops or minerals, which are taxed only when sold. The lawsuit alleges that taxing staking rewards before they are sold leads to overtaxation and places additional and unnecessary regulatory burdens on cryptocurrency node operators.

Previous Attempts to Challenge Policy

This lawsuit is Jarrett’s second shot at trying to sue the IRS for its position on the taxation of staking rewards. He filed another similar case in 2021 when the IRS failed to explain how staking rewards are taxed. The US IRS issued a refund to Jarrett for the previous year’s tax payment but offered no instruction for subsequent tax years.

Instead, in 2023, the agency came out with new guidelines stating that staking rewards would be considered as income when received, in contrast to the refund decision.

Jarrett relies on the Tezos network where validators receive new tokens for the purpose of validating transaction. By the end of the year 2020, he got around 13,000 Tezos tokens through staking. He points out that such tokens must not be considered as income at the moment they are received, as they are new property that cannot be considered as earnings until they are sold.

The current Internal Revenue Service stance on taxing staking rewards affects many bitcoin users and those using other cryptocurrencies that use the proof-of-stake system such as Tezos. The lawsuit points out that the policy is cumbersome to the taxpayers, who are forced to value every reward they acquire for the purpose of the policy regardless of their plans to sell it.

Legislative Efforts and IRS Policy Changes

Concerns have been raised that this treatment is anti-competitive and hinders the deployment of the decentralized networks and innovation. In the networks where a large number of users are engaged in staking, the revenue from staking is split among many stakeholders, thus it is less reasonable to tax the entire value of the newly created tokens as an income.

This move has been made at a time when there is still a debate on the correct legal framework that should govern taxation of digital currencies. In the first half of 2024, a bill that was proposed before the House of Representatives stated that taxes on staking rewards would only be applied when the tokens are sold. 

The lawsuit will seek to make the US IRS change its policy before the legislative process to make it more reasonable.

Moreover, from 2025, the Internal Revenue Service will impose new information reporting obligations on crypto brokers, including exchanges, and other providers of wallets to report customer transactions and gains. These rules will encompass high-value non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and specific stablecoins transactions, which will extend the taxation of digital asset transactions.

✓ Share:

Kelvin Munene Murithi

Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Regulation

Manhattan US Attorney To Reduce Crypto Cases After Major Convictions, Prosecutor Reveals

Published

on


The U.S. Attorney’s Office in Manhattan plans to reduce its focus on cryptocurrency-related crimes. This decision follows a series of major legal victories, according to Scott Hartman, co-chief of the securities and commodities task force at the Southern District of New York (SDNY). These include the high-profile conviction of Sam Bankman-Fried, founder of FTX.

Manhattan US Attorney to Focus Less on Crypto Fraud Amid Leadership Shift

The Manhattan US Attorney’s Office will now slow down on enforcing cases of cryptocurrency scams after it had increased its activity in the previous year. Scott Hartman made this admission during a conference held in New York stating that fewer prosecutors will now be focusing on these kinds of crimes.

He mentioned that the office had dealt with many of the severe fraud issues arising from the market volatility during the 2022 cryptocurrency winter.

Moreover, Hartman clarified that the reduced focus reflects the office’s strategic realignment. This shift comes as other regulatory agencies, such as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), maintain their active roles in monitoring crypto regulations.

Ex-SEC Chair Jay Clayton To Lead Manhattan Attorney’s Office

The cuts in resources for crypto cases occur when there is likely to be a change in leadership at the Manhattan US Attorney’s Office. The new front-runner for the position of U.S. Attorney once Trump gets into office is former SEC Chair, Jay Clayton.

Clayton, who was director of the SEC from 2017 to 2021, took a less confrontational stance than current SEC Chair Gary Gensler did. Notably, the crypto community witnessed a heated debate over the SEC leadership criticizing the current administration approach. As such, several crypto enthusiasts including ex-SEC official John Reed Stark demanded that Gary Gensler resign.

The appointment of Clayton suggests a potential recalibration of priorities within the Manhattan US Attorney’s Office. As the office changes its leadership it is expected that it will shift its attention to other general issues concerning securities and commodities.

 

Hartman noted that the successful handling of major cases allowed the office to adjust its allocation of resources. Moving forward, fewer prosecutors will be tasked with investigating cryptocurrency crimes as the office prioritizes other enforcement.

Despite reducing its focus, the Manhattan US Attorney’s Office emphasized ongoing collaboration with agencies like the SEC and CFTC. Hartman acknowledged that these regulatory bodies ensure continued oversight and enforcement against unlawful activities. This cooperative approach aims to maintain accountability while enabling the office to concentrate on a wider range of legal priorities.

✓ Share:

Ronny Mugendi

Ronny Mugendi is a seasoned crypto journalist with four years of professional experience, having contributed significantly to various media outlets on cryptocurrency trends and technologies. With over 4000 published articles across various media outlets, he aims to inform, educate and introduce more people to the Blockchain and DeFi world. Outside of his journalism career, Ronny enjoys the thrill of bike riding, exploring new trails and landscapes.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

Dogecoin Lawsuit Against Elon Musk Ends As Investors Withdraw Appeal

Published

on


A Dogecoin lawsuit against Elon Musk has come to a close after investors decided to withdraw their appeal. The case, which accused Musk of fraud and insider trading related to the cryptocurrency, had been dismissed earlier this year.

The withdrawal also includes a request to drop related sanctions against Musk’s lawyers, marking the end of a high-profile legal battle in federal court.

Dogecoin Lawsuit Against Elon Musk and Tesla Ends

The Dogecoin lawsuit, originally filed by Dogecoin investors, alleged that Musk and his electric car company Tesla engaged in fraudulent activities to manipulate Dogecoin’s price. Investors claimed Musk’s tweets, public appearances, and statements—including on NBC’s “Saturday Night Live”—were used to profit at their expense.

The investors initially sought $258 billion in damages, amending their complaint four times over two years. However, on August 29, U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein dismissed the case, stating that reasonable investors could not establish securities fraud based on Musk’s public statements. The judge noted that Musk’s comments, such as describing Dogecoin as the “future currency of Earth,” could not be reasonably interpreted as market manipulation or insider trading.

Subsequently, this week, the investors have formally withdrew their appeal and their motion to sanction Musk’s legal team for alleged misconduct. Similarly, Musk and Tesla dropped their motion to sanction the investors’ lawyer for what they called a “frivolous” and ever-changing lawsuit. Both parties as a result filed a stipulation to dismiss the case in Manhattan federal court on Thursday night, pending final approval by Judge Hellerstein.

This Is A Breaking News, Please Check Back For More

✓ Share:

Kelvin Munene Murithi

Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

Chris Giancarlo Dispels US SEC Chair Candidacy Rumor

Published

on


Amid the ongoing race to replace Gary Gensler as the Chairman of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Chris Giancarlo has dispelled rumors that he’s under consideration for the job. Known as “Crypto Dad,” Chris Giancarlo’s name popped up as one of the high-profile regulators capable of replacing the US SEC chair.

US SEC Chair and the Chris Giancarlo Clarification

Besides the general change in leadership that comes with a new administration, Donald Trump plans to fire Gary Gensler right from his first day in office. With Trump’s victory over Kamala Harris, it becomes evident that Gensler is in his last days in office.

Commenting on the trend and his prospect for the role, Chris Giancarlo said he once cleaned up Gensler’s mess at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and has no plans to do it again. It is worth noting that before taking up the US SEC Chair position, Gensler served as the CFTC Chairman from May 26, 2009, to January 3, 2014.

Chris Giancarlo took over from him as CFTC Commissioner on June 16, 2014, for a term expiring on April 13, 2019. He bagged President Donald Trump’s nomination for a full-time role on August 3, 2017. Having served in the same capacity as Gensler, the Crypto Dad said the DC rumors are wrong.

Beyond the US SEC tag, Giancarlo has also debunked claims that he’s in line for the US Treasury Secretary role.

Who Will Replace Gary Gensler? 

Many named Chris Giancarlo a good fit for the SEC chairman role because of his advocacy work in the industry. As reported earlier by Coingape, even pro-XRP lawyer turned-politician John Deaton once endorsed Giancarlo for the Chairmanship role.

As Chris Giancarlo dispelled the rumors, John Deaton noted that the callout shows the damage Gensler did to both the SEC and CFTC.

With Crypto Dad ruling himself out, the top picks now include current SEC Commissioners Mark Uyeda, Hester Peirce, and Robinhood CLO Dan Gallagher, who are the leading candidates for the role. While President Trump may choose a completely new name, what the industry places a premium on is someone with a pro-crypto mindset.

✓ Share:

Godfrey Benjamin

Benjamin Godfrey is a blockchain enthusiast and journalists who relish writing about the real life applications of blockchain technology and innovations to drive general acceptance and worldwide integration of the emerging technology. His desires to educate people about cryptocurrencies inspires his contributions to renowned blockchain based media and sites. Benjamin Godfrey is a lover of sports and agriculture.

Follow him on X, Linkedin

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 coin2049.io