Connect with us

Regulation

US IRS Faces New Lawsuit Over Crypto Staking Tax Policy

Published

4 months ago

on


The US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is again under legal pressure in relation to taxation of cryptocurrency staking rewards. On October 10, 2024, Josh Jarrett filed a new lawsuit with support of Coin Center and against the agency’s approach of taxing block rewards as income at the time of receipt.

US IRS Faces New Lawsuit Over Crypto Staking Tax

In a filing on Thursday, the IRS is in the spotlight over its position on block rewards, which are newly minted tokens of a cryptocurrency given to validators who add blocks to a blockchain. The agency currently considers these rewards taxable income at the moment they are received, a policy that Jarrett and Coin Center argue is unjust. 

The lawsuit states that the block rewards should be considered new property and should not be taxed as income, and such income should only be taxed when sold or exchanged for cash.

According to Jarrett, the same should apply to other forms of newly created property, for example crops or minerals, which are taxed only when sold. The lawsuit alleges that taxing staking rewards before they are sold leads to overtaxation and places additional and unnecessary regulatory burdens on cryptocurrency node operators.

Previous Attempts to Challenge Policy

This lawsuit is Jarrett’s second shot at trying to sue the IRS for its position on the taxation of staking rewards. He filed another similar case in 2021 when the IRS failed to explain how staking rewards are taxed. The US IRS issued a refund to Jarrett for the previous year’s tax payment but offered no instruction for subsequent tax years.

Instead, in 2023, the agency came out with new guidelines stating that staking rewards would be considered as income when received, in contrast to the refund decision.

Jarrett relies on the Tezos network where validators receive new tokens for the purpose of validating transaction. By the end of the year 2020, he got around 13,000 Tezos tokens through staking. He points out that such tokens must not be considered as income at the moment they are received, as they are new property that cannot be considered as earnings until they are sold.

The current Internal Revenue Service stance on taxing staking rewards affects many bitcoin users and those using other cryptocurrencies that use the proof-of-stake system such as Tezos. The lawsuit points out that the policy is cumbersome to the taxpayers, who are forced to value every reward they acquire for the purpose of the policy regardless of their plans to sell it.

Legislative Efforts and IRS Policy Changes

Concerns have been raised that this treatment is anti-competitive and hinders the deployment of the decentralized networks and innovation. In the networks where a large number of users are engaged in staking, the revenue from staking is split among many stakeholders, thus it is less reasonable to tax the entire value of the newly created tokens as an income.

This move has been made at a time when there is still a debate on the correct legal framework that should govern taxation of digital currencies. In the first half of 2024, a bill that was proposed before the House of Representatives stated that taxes on staking rewards would only be applied when the tokens are sold. 

The lawsuit will seek to make the US IRS change its policy before the legislative process to make it more reasonable.

Moreover, from 2025, the Internal Revenue Service will impose new information reporting obligations on crypto brokers, including exchanges, and other providers of wallets to report customer transactions and gains. These rules will encompass high-value non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and specific stablecoins transactions, which will extend the taxation of digital asset transactions.

✓ Share:

Kelvin Munene Murithi

Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Related Topics:
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Regulation

Ripple Vs SEC Lawsuit May Take Longer To Settle Than Coinbase, Expert Warns

Published

19 hours ago

on

February 21, 2025

By


Ripple vs SEC lawsuit: The legal battle between Ripple and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) may take more time to resolve than the ongoing case involving Coinbase, legal experts suggest.

With a ruling already in place and other procedural complexities, experts believe that Ripple’s case faces a different set of challenges compared to Coinbase’s recent settlement.

Ripple Vs SEC Lawsuit May Take Longer To Settle

After the US SEC disclosed plans to drop the Coinbase lawsuit, speculations and debate have taken a turn on the potential of the Ripple vs SEC lawsuit outcome and when. However, legal experts have noted the Ripple lawsuit may not be as smooth as Coinbase case. One major factor making the Ripple vs SEC lawsuit more complicated is the ruling already handed down by Judge Torres. According to the filings, Ripple had been ordered to pay a $125 million penalty as part of the settlement with the SEC.

Subsequently, according to experts, the firm’s options now include the possibility of requesting a penalty reduction, which would require both parties to reach an agreement. Legal expert Sherrie, in a recent conversation on X, noted that while a settlement may be reached, it is unlikely that the separation of sales, as stipulated by Judge Torres, would be altered.

Any request to reduce the penalty, she said, would need to be carefully considered by both Ripple and the SEC. Additionally, a request to dismiss the appeal would mean that the original ruling by Judge Torres remains in effect.

“It’s more complicated for Ripple, given the existing ruling. The penalty would still stand unless both parties agree to a reduction,” Sherrie stated.

Ripple Cross-Appeal and Timing Considerations

Ripple vs SEC lawsuit involves more layers due to its cross-appeal, which must also be taken into account. Legal analysts suggest that the timing of Ripple’s upcoming filing—scheduled for April—may be pivotal in determining the case’s trajectory.

Ripple’s request to extend the filing deadline to April 16, 2025, gives further credence to the idea that a resolution may take longer than anticipated. As Ripple’s legal team moves forward with the appeal, both Ripple and the SEC will have to consider how to approach the next steps. As Ripple works toward securing an agreement or a potential settlement, it may continue to assess the possibility of lowering the penalty.

“Ripple’s next filing deadline is in April, which gives both parties more time to negotiate,” said legal expert Bill Morgan.

Ripple lawsuit Appellate Court’s Role

The involvement of the Appellate Court could also extend the timeline for resolving the Ripple vs SEC lawsuit. The court has a panel of three judges who will review and hear the case, a process that takes additional time compared to the procedures of a District Court. This contrasts with the process seen in the Coinbase case, where a settlement was reached more quickly, possibly due to the absence of such complications.

Eleanor Terrett, a FOX journalist, noted that the SEC may also choose to seek an agreement with Ripple at the district court level. The judge overseeing the case, Torres, retains jurisdiction until August 2025, and any changes to the terms of the ruling would require her approval.

“There’s a lot of uncertainty with the Ripple case. The SEC’s next steps are unclear, and any decisions may need Torres’s approval,” said Terrett.

Jeremy Hogan also suggested that Ripple vs SEC lawsuit might take longer to resolve due to the multiple steps involved in the appeal process.

“This isn’t just a straightforward case of settlement or dismissal,” Hogan remarked

✓ Share:

Kelvin Munene Murithi

Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

ConsenSys Submits Letter to SEC on DeFi Rule Amendment Concerns

Published

20 hours ago

on

February 21, 2025

By


ConsenSys has submitted a letter to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) expressing concerns about the proposed amendments to the definition of “exchange” under U.S. securities laws. The letter, addressed to Commissioner Hester Peirce and the SEC’s Crypto Task Force, requests the removal of the rulemaking from the regulatory agenda.

ConsenSys Challenges US SEC Proposed DeFi Rule Change

According to a recent submission, ConsenSys has urged the SEC to withdraw its proposed rule that expands the definition of an “exchange” to include decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. The company argues that the amendments exceed the SEC’s legal authority.

ConsenSys asserts that the proposed rule violates the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) by improperly broadening the regulatory scope. Additionally, the company claims that the rule conflicts with the U.S. Constitution by imposing regulatory obligations on decentralized protocols that do not fit the traditional definition of an exchange.

SEC’s proposed amendments on DeFi exchanges received substantial opposition during the 2022 comment period. ConsenSys referenced prior submissions made in April 2022 and June 2023, reinforcing its position that blockchain-based systems should not be categorized as traditional financial intermediaries.

The submission to Hester Peirce’s task force comes just weeks after the launch of a dedicated website outlining its role in establishing clear crypto regulations. The new platform provides a way for industry participants, including ConsenSys, to submit input and engage with regulators.

Concerns Over US SEC’s Statutory Authority

Moreover, ConsenSys maintains that the SEC lacks the statutory authority to extend the definition of an exchange to blockchain-based systems. The company argues that the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 defines an exchange as an entity that provides a centralized market for securities transactions. The proposed rule, according to ConsenSys, improperly expands this definition to cover decentralized protocols.

The submission points out that DeFi platforms operate differently from traditional financial exchanges. Rather than facilitating transactions in a centralized manner, these platforms rely on smart contracts and peer-to-peer networks. ConsenSys warns that regulating these decentralized technologies as securities exchanges would create compliance burdens that are incompatible with their structure.

Consequences On Blockchain Innovation

The letter also warns that the amendments could negatively affect blockchain development and DeFi adoption. ConsenSys states that the proposed rule could discourage innovation by imposing regulatory uncertainty on blockchain developers and users.

The crypto company contends that the amendments could force decentralized platforms out of the U.S. market. By treating DeFi protocols as regulated exchanges, developers may face increased legal risks, reducing the incentive to create blockchain-based financial services within the country.

In its submission,  the crypto company has expressed willingness to discuss the issue further with the SEC’s Crypto Task Force. The company emphasized the importance of ensuring that blockchain regulations align with technological realities and legal constraints.

ConsenSys reaffirmed its stance that the SEC’s proposed rule should be removed from the regulatory agenda. With the new Hester Peirce Crypto Task Force, there is hope for ConsenSys and other blockchain firms facing regulatory scrutiny. 

Most recently, the pro-crypto task force influenced the decision to pause the SEC’s lawsuit against Binance for 60 days. The review of cryptocurrency regulations may lead to clearer guidelines, potentially benefiting DeFi platforms.

✓ Share:

Ronny Mugendi

Ronny Mugendi is a seasoned crypto journalist with four years of professional experience, having contributed significantly to various media outlets on cryptocurrency trends and technologies. With over 4000 published articles across various media outlets, he aims to inform, educate and introduce more people to the Blockchain and DeFi world. Outside of his journalism career, Ronny enjoys the thrill of bike riding, exploring new trails and landscapes.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

Coinbase scores major win as SEC set to drop lawsuit

Published

1 day ago

on

February 21, 2025

By


  • Coinbase says the SEC has agreed to dismiss its lawsuit against the US-based crypto exchange.
  • The SEC sued Coinbase in 2023 but with Gary Gensler’s exit, the regulator is eyeing better regulatory approach.

US-based crypto exchange Coinbase is set for a landmark development after the Securities and Exchange Commission reportedly agreed to dismiss its own lawsuit against the exchange.

Coinbase announced the huge news in a blog post on Friday, Feb. 21. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong also shared the development in an interview with CNBC’s Squawk Box.

“SEC staff has agreed in principle to dismiss its unlawful enforcement case against Coinbase, subject to Commissioner approval – righting a major wrong,” Coinbase chief legal officer Paul Grewal wrote.

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong also shared the news via X.

SEC vs. Coinbase ending

According to the exchange, the regulator’s decision to withdraw the case follows a settlement that does not involve any financial penalty against Coinbase. The next move is for the SEC commissioners to ratify the agreement and end a major legal hurdle that set the US crypto market back.

“While dismissal will be a major win for the rule of law – and a clear vindication of our position – most of all it will be a win for the entire industry and the 52 million Americans who have owned a digital asset,” Grewal added.

The SEC filed its lawsuit against Coinbase in 2023, accusing the exchange of operating an unregistered securities exchange. The lawsuit also included allegations of offering unregistered securities.

Coinbase contested the charges and sought a dismissal, with industry players criticizing then SEC Chair Gary Gensler of overreach amid regulation by enforcement approach.Notably, the SEC had also sued Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange by trading volume. Other exchanges to come into the “rogue” agency’s cross-hairs is Kraken.

However, things at the securities watchdog have taken a crypto-friendly turn since Donald Trump’s election and the exit of Gensler and other Commissioners.

Acting chair Mark Uyeda has formed a crypto task force and renamed an enforcement unit amid the quest to balance compliance and the need to protect investors.

Share this article
Categories
Tags





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 coin2049.io