Connect with us

Regulation

SEC Insider Reveals Reason Why Agency Eased SAB 121 For Select Entities

Published

on


Recently, certain banks and broker-dealers received exceptions from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to custody crypto assets. This revelation comes despite the standing guidelines of Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 121. Hence, netizens were questioning the actions of the agency and now there is an answer to this ‘bias.’

Why SEC Relaxed SAB 121 Rule For Banks & Brokerages?

The SAB 121 rules remain unchanged according to an SEC spokesperson. For context, SAB 121, issued by the SEC, outlines the accounting and disclosure obligations for companies holding crypto assets on behalf of customers. The guidance is primarily concerned with ensuring that customers’ crypto assets are protected and accounted for appropriately.

This comes handy particularly in scenarios of financial distress like bankruptcy or resolution. Meanwhile, FOX journalist Eleanor Terrett’s inquiry revealed that specific broker-dealers and custody banks have demonstrated to the SEC staff that their operational models differ significantly from those outlined in SAB 121.

According to the spokesperson quoted by Terrett:

“Certain broker dealers and custody banks have sufficiently demonstrated to SEC staff that their fact patterns are different from those described in SAB 121…such as ensuring that customers maintain ownership of their assets even in the case of a resolution or bankruptcy.”

These entities have managed to assure the SEC that they can maintain customer ownership of assets even under adverse conditions. Thus, they earned exceptions to the stringent requirements of SAB 121.

Furthermore, Terrett disclosed that the SEC’s accounting staff, who are responsible for SAB 121, have conducted private discussions with these financial institutions. These discussions, it appears, were not communicated to the SEC Commissioners. These Commissioners are now working to understand the substance of these conversations.

Also Read: GOP Whip Tom Emmer Accuses SEC Chair of Harassment

Industry Backlash On These Exceptions

While the U.S. House continued to hold President Joe Biden’s veto on the anti-SAB 121 bill, the SEC made the above-mentioned landmark decision. The U.S. regulator introduced a new method allowing banks and brokerages to exclude their customers’ crypto holdings from their balance sheets. Banks must, however, ensure that they manage all related risks effectively.

This decision was a positive development in response to the heated debate in Congress over the controversial crypto-accounting guidelines. According to a source at the SEC, the agency’s staff has begun providing guidance on specific arrangements that allow banks to avoid listing crypto holdings as liabilities on their balance sheets.

Popular banks have been in discussions with the SEC over the past year. Hence, they received approval to omit crypto assets from their balance sheets, provided they ensure customer asset protection in the event of bankruptcy. However, the SEC requires banks to implement additional safeguards and internal controls to protect these holdings.

This move ignited significant backlash from the crypto industry for the supposed “bias.” VanEck’s Head of Digital Assets Research, Matthew Sigel, lauded the latest move but also pointed out the flaws. In a post on X, he wrote, “Good news (albeit still a horrific process that now favors big guys vs. repealing SAB121 which would have set a level playing field).”

Furthermore, Custodia Bank CEO Caitlin Long, who has been expressing frustration toward discrimination in obtaining Fed masteraccounts, also chimed in. She wrote, “SEC leadership extracts revenge on the #crypto industry (one day after Ro Khanna’s White House session) by giving the big banks special ‘exceptions’ from #SAB121, while sidelining #crypto companies still subject to it. How are progressives OK with such corporate favoritism?”

Also Read: Stacks Price Soars 9% As SEC Ends Probe On Bitcoin Layer 2 Developer

✓ Share:

Kritika boasts over 2 years of experience in the financial news sector. Currently working as a crypto journalist at Coingape, she has consistently shown a knack for blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies. Kritika combines insightful analysis with a deep understanding of market trends. With a keen interest in technical analysis, she brings a nuanced perspective to her reporting, exploring the intersection of finance, technology, and emerging trends in the crypto space.

The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Regulation

BitClave Investors Get $4.6M Back In US SEC Settlement Distribution

Published

on


BitClave investors have started receiving $4.6 million in repayments from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), following a settlement reached in 2020. The SEC announced on Nov. 20 that payments from the BitClave Fair Fund had been disbursed to eligible investors harmed during the company’s 2017 initial coin offering (ICO).

Pro-XRP lawyer and online commentator “MetaLawMan” criticized the SEC’s stance on digital assets, stating on social media, “Here we go again with ‘digital asset securities.’ Unbelievable.” The lawyer’s statement reflects ongoing industry frustrations over the SEC’s regulatory approach to cryptocurrencies.

BitClave Investors Get $4.6M Back in US SEC Settlement

The US SEC assured the public that $4.6 million was returned to investors who filed the claims and were eligible for the refunds. These funds were agreed upon in 2020 after the SEC accused BitClave of conducting an unregistered ICO.

The company’s initial coin offering (ICO) in 2017 brought in $25.5 million in only 32 seconds and distributed its Consumer Activity Token (CAT) to thousands of buyers. The SEC therefore claimed that the ICO was an unregistered securities transaction because potential investors were induced to invest in the CAT token with an expectation of appreciation of its value. 

Under the settlement, BitClave will have to refund the money it raised and also pay $4 million in fines and interest. In between these settlements, John Deaton has accused the regulator of using laws that were set in 1933.

The Fair Fund was therefore created to ensure that the funds are returned to the affected investors. The claims submission period closed in August 2023, and the eligible investors received the information on the claims in March 2024. The Securities and Exchange Commission posted on its social media accounts that the payment has been made, and “the checks are in the mail.”

BitClave Settlement Included Penalties and Token Destruction

In the settlement, BitClave did not accept or reject the accusations made by the SEC but agreed to cough up $29 million. This total consisted of the $25.5 million that was generated in the ICO and the additional $4 million in fines.

Concurrently, the company also committed to burning 1 billion of the catalyst tokens that have not been distributed and to ask exchanges to delist the token.

The Securities and Exchange Commission therefore pointed out that by February 2023, BitClave had only remitted $12m to the Fair Fund, thus leaving questions on the balance of $7.4m. Neither the SEC nor the fund administrator gave further details on the matter, and it is still uncertain as to how the outstanding payment will be collected.

US SEC Maintains Strict Regulatory Stance on Crypto

The US SEC has continued to enforce regulations on crypto companies under the Biden administration, with over 100 enforcement actions taken against the industry. BitClave’s settlement, subsequently, is one of many cases where the regulator has targeted unregistered ICOs and other alleged securities violations.

BitClave’s case, handled under former SEC Chairman Jay Clayton, emphasized the agency’s view that many digital assets fall under securities laws. The CAT white paper described potential value increases, which the regulator argued encouraged speculative investment in an unregistered security.

As the US SEC faces criticism, President-elect Donald Trump has expressed plans to reshape crypto oversight. Trump has promised to remove current SEC Chair Gary Gensler and is reportedly considering creating a new White House position dedicated to cryptocurrency policy. 

✓ Share:

Kelvin Munene Murithi

Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

US SEC Pushes Timeline For Franklin Templeton Crypto Index ETF

Published

on


US SEC Extends Review Period for Franklin Templeton Crypto Index ETF

Therefore, the

The proposal was first published in the Federal Register on October 8, to kick start a thirty-five (35) days review period. As a result, the review was to end on November 22, 2024. Consequently, the review was to expire on November 22, 2024. However, the SEC’s decision to delay indicates a thorough approach to reviewing the fund’s compliance with crypto regulations.

Meanwhile, no public comments on the proposed rule change have been submitted, leaving the US SEC to focus on internal assessments. This delay concurs with the commission’s conservative approach to the products that are connected with cryptocurrencies. The extra time will allow more detailed research of fund’s organization and market risks.

Franklin Templeton Expands Push Into Cryptocurrency ETFs

Franklin Templeton is broadening its efforts in the cryptocurrency space with its proposed Bitcoin and Ethereum index ETF. The asset manager, which oversees $1.5 trillion in assets, has previously launched a spot Bitcoin ETF and a spot Ethereum ETF. 

If approved, the latest ETF would add to Franklin Templeton’s portfolio of crypto-focused investment products, further diversifying options for institutional.

In addition, Franklin Templeton has taken a major step in its tokenization efforts, announcing the expansion of its Benji tokenization platform to the Ethereum network. This marks the fifth blockchain integration for the platform this year, following launches on Aptos, Avalanche, Arbitrum, and Coinbase’s Base.

Despite the US SEC overall crypto ETF delays, other market players are moving further with their strategies . Last week, Bitwise submitted a registration statement to transform the Bitwise 10 Crypto Index Fund which now manages $1.3 billion into an ETP. It investments in Bitcoin represent 75% of the fund and Ethereum is 16% of the fund; these two assets sum up to 91%.

✓ Share:

Ronny Mugendi

Ronny Mugendi is a seasoned crypto journalist with four years of professional experience, having contributed significantly to various media outlets on cryptocurrency trends and technologies. With over 4000 published articles across various media outlets, he aims to inform, educate and introduce more people to the Blockchain and DeFi world. Outside of his journalism career, Ronny enjoys the thrill of bike riding, exploring new trails and landscapes.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

US DOJ Charges Five Hackers In $6.3M Crypto Hack & Corporate Data Breaches

Published

on


The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) has charged five individuals in connection with a crypto hacking scheme that allegedly stole $6.3 million in cryptocurrency and breached sensitive corporate data.

The charges, announced on Wednesday, stem from a multi-year phishing and hacking operation that targeted employees of major tech firms, telecommunication companies, and cryptocurrency platforms.

US DOJ Charges Five Hackers In $6.3M Crypto Hack

The US DOJ identified the defendants as Ahmed Hossam Eldin Elbadawy, 23, of Texas; Noah Michael Urban, 20, of Florida; Evans Onyeaka Osiebo, 20, of Texas; Joel Martin Evans, 25, of North Carolina; and Tyler Robert Buchanan, 22, a UK citizen arrested in Spain earlier this year. All five have been charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud, aggravated identity theft, and related offenses.

According to prosecutors, the group used phishing text messages to steal employees’ credentials, enabling unauthorized access to corporate systems and cryptocurrency accounts. Buchanan faces additional charges of wire fraud, which carries a potential 20-year prison sentence.

The defendants are accused of targeting at least 45 companies in the U.S., Canada, the UK, and other nations between September 2021 and April 2023. The alleged crypto hack scheme involved spoofing legitimate portals of companies such as Okta and compromising two-factor authentication to obtain sensitive information.

Phishing Attacks and Cryptocurrency Thefts

The hacking operation reportedly involved sending fraudulent SMS messages to employees of victim companies, warning them that their accounts were at risk of deactivation. These messages contained links to phishing websites designed to mimic the companies’ legitimate login portals. Employees who entered their credentials unwittingly gave the hackers access to their accounts and corporate systems.

Once inside the systems, the hackers stole intellectual property, proprietary data, and sensitive personal information. They also used SIM-swapping techniques to bypass additional account protections and reset passwords. The US DOJ stated that one victim alone lost $6.3 million in cryptocurrency due to these attacks.

Akil Davis, Assistant Director of the FBI’s Los Angeles Field Office, emphasized the dangers of phishing scams, saying, “These types of fraudulent solicitations are ubiquitous and rob American victims of their hard-earned money with the click of a mouse.”

US DOJ Links to Notorious Hacking Groups

Security researchers have linked the accused individuals to cybercrime groups known as “0ktapus” and “Scattered Spider,” which are believed to be responsible for previous high-profile attacks. 

These groups reportedly breached hundreds of companies, including Twilio, Coinbase, and Doordash, during a hacking campaign in 2022. They later expanded their operations to target gaming companies such as Riot Games in 2023.

The court documents describe the group as a loosely organized, financially motivated cybercriminal network. Law enforcement officials believe other individuals involved in the operation remain unidentified, with the indictment mentioning unnamed co-conspirators.

Potential Sentences and Ongoing Investigations

If convicted, the defendants face severe penalties. Each could receive a maximum of 20 years in prison for conspiracy to commit wire fraud, up to five years for conspiracy, and an additional mandatory two-year sentence for aggravated identity theft. Prosecutors also revealed that Urban faces fraud charges in a separate federal case in Florida.

Concurrently, former FTX executive Gary Wang recently avoided prison time despite his role in the collapse of the cryptocurrency exchange. Wang admitted to helping write the code that enabled FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried to misappropriate $8 billion in customer funds. Judge Lewis Kaplan ruled that Wang’s cooperation with authorities and lack of personal financial gain justified leniency.

The US DOJ continues to investigate the matter, warning companies to remain vigilant against phishing attempts. U.S. Attorney Martin Estrada stated, “If something about the text or email you receive or the website you’re viewing seems off, it probably is.”

✓ Share:

Kelvin Munene Murithi

Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 coin2049.io