Connect with us

Regulation

Ripple CTO Defends Craig Wright In Satoshi Trial But With A Twist

Published

11 months ago

on


In a surprising twist amid the ongoing legal battles involving Craig Steven Wright, Ripple’s Chief Technology Officer, David Schwartz, has defended his legal team’s arguments. Schwartz recently offered a shocking take on Wright’s controversial claims of being Bitcoin’s pseudonymous creator, Satoshi Nakamoto. The latest statement is poles apart from the Ripple CTO’s previous statements wherein he vehemently criticized Wright.

Ripple CTO On Craig Wright’s Arguments In Satoshi Trial

The conversation began when Hodlonaut, a prominent figure in the crypto community, took to X to highlight a peculiar argument from Wright’s legal team. He stated, “Craig Wright’s lawyers fight for his ‘human right’ to continue ‘identifying’ as Satoshi and asserting that he is.” Moreover, this statement sparked a range of reactions, including a notable response from Schwartz.

Schwartz acknowledged the legal complexity of Wright’s assertions. The Ripple CTO stated, “I hate to say this, but I think they’re right. Craig’s claims that he is Satoshi in conversations don’t fall into any category of speech that the government can prohibit or punish. They’re not fraud. They’re not defamatory.”

This perspective emphasizes the legal distinction between casual claims and fraudulent actions. Furthermore, it suggests that mere assertions of identity in informal contexts may not constitute illegal behavior. However, Schwartz’s defense was not without its caution.

A user questioned whether Wright’s claims amounted to fraud if he sought financial benefit by impersonating Satoshi. Hence, Schwartz clarified his stance stating, “That is fraud.” Nevertheless, the Ripple CTO continued defending the arguments made by Wright’s defense.

Schwartz added, “But him claiming to be Satoshi in casual conversations where he’s not specifically trying to get something of monetary value is not fraud. An injunction preventing him from using any claim to be Satoshi to obtain something of value would be fine.”

In addition, the Ripple CTO further elaborated on the limitations of judicial intervention in such cases. He emphasized that courts are not arbiters of historical truth. Schwartz stated, “Courts don’t get to decide historical questions and then prohibit people from disagreeing with the court’s conclusions.”

The Ripple CTO added, “However, they can issue injunctions prohibiting defamation, fraud, jury tampering, and so on. Claims in conversations don’t fall into any of those categories.”

Also Read: Craig Steven Wright’s Attorney Denies COPA Injunction In Satoshi Nakamoto Case

Update On June 7 Hearing In COPA Vs. CSW Case

COPA’s draft order proposes that Wright “shall not pursue proceedings.” The order aims to prevent him from claiming to be Satoshi Nakamoto in any global legal setting. However, Wright’s legal team, led by Craig Orr KC, sought to change “pursue” to “commence” to allow Wright to defend himself.

Nevertheless, COPA’s Hough KC argued this amendment could create a loophole, allowing friendly parties to sue Wright and revisit the issue. Orr KC invoked Wright’s free speech rights under Article 10 of the Human Rights Act, stating that Wright should be able to claim he is Satoshi. Thereafter, Hough KC countered that the court had found Wright lied about being Satoshi.

The draft order wouldn’t prevent Wright from making such claims privately but restricts public assertions. COPA also seeks to compel Wright to post the court’s findings on various platforms (Twitter, Slack, etc.) for six months. They also suggested referring Wright and others for potential criminal proceedings due to alleged perjury and document forgery.

Orr KC argued that the court’s findings were already widely publicized and accused COPA of seeking revenge and humiliation, claiming COPA had not suffered direct harm. He described COPA’s relief requests as “very wide-ranging, novel, and unprecedented.”

Also Read: Ripple Sparks Speculations With 150M XRP Transfer, What’s Next For XRP Price?

✓ Share:

CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.

The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Related Topics:
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Regulation

John Deaton Lays Out 5 To-Do List

Published

2 days ago

on

April 19, 2025

By


John Deaton, a prominent crypto lawyer, has outlined a five-point plan for regulation by lawmakers in the United States. In his latest post on X, he calls for urgent action to establish clear rules that will support innovation, protect users, and bring stability to the crypto sector.

John Deaton on the Five Crypto Regulation Priorities

Deaton’s first recommendation is to pass a law on stablecoins. He believes this can increase demand for U.S. Treasuries and reduce the cost and delay in sending money across borders. This, he noted, will help the United States play a stronger role in global trade.

John Deaton wants the US. Congress should clearly define which tokens are securities and which are commodities. This will help decide whether the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) should regulate them. Without such clarity, regulators may continue to clash over control, and projects may face confusion.

He also raised the need for crypto exchange regulation. Deaton wants strict rules to ensure customer funds are not mixed with company funds. He suggests that exchanges hold full reserves visible on the blockchain. This way, they can avoid high-risk activities like offering large amounts for lending or using customer funds elsewhere.

In addition, Deaton suggests easing the tax burden. He proposes removing the capital gains tax on small crypto payments and allowing people to pay federal taxes in cryptocurrency without facing more taxes.

Lastly, he urges Congress to revise or remove the Accredited Investor Rule. John Deaton believes the rule locks out too many people from early investment opportunities. He warns that lawmakers must act before the 2026 midterm elections to avoid delays caused by political changes.

Stablecoin Laws May Arrive Very Soon

It is important to add that Deaton’s views support ongoing developments in Congress. A bill known as the GENIUS Act is already being discussed. 

It suggests that the Federal Reserve would manage large banks issuing stablecoins, while state bodies would handle smaller groups. 

According to recent reports, the global market for stablecoins now exceeds $234 billion, raising hopes that new U.S. laws will soon follow. 

As mentioned earlier by President Donald Trump, lawmakers are likely to fasttrack the stablecoin regulation. The current timeline is slated for Q2 this year.

SEC’s Shifting Position on Oversight

The SEC, which once took a hard line on crypto regulation, is now adjusting its stance

CoinGape noted earlier that the era of counterproductive oversight may be ending, as U.S. SEC and CFTC leaders have agreed to work together moving forward.

Historically, the SEC treated most tokens as securities, focusing on enforcement, while the CFTC took a softer approach to the markets. Recent laws like FIT21 aim to give the CFTC more control over decentralized assets.

With both regulatory oversight looking to create more cohesive plans to work, and the new leadership of Paul Atkins, the industry hopes to overcome challenges, reduce uncertainty, and foster greater clarity in crypto regulation.

✓ Share:

Godfrey Benjamin

Benjamin Godfrey is a blockchain enthusiast and journalists who relish writing about the real life applications of blockchain technology and innovations to drive general acceptance and worldwide integration of the emerging technology. His desires to educate people about cryptocurrencies inspires his contributions to renowned blockchain based media and sites. Benjamin Godfrey is a lover of sports and agriculture.

Follow him on X, Linkedin

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

US SEC and Binance Agree To Pause Legal Proceedings for 60 More Days

Published

1 week ago

on

April 12, 2025

By


The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Binance have requested a federal judge to extend the pause in their ongoing legal case for another 60 days.

This decision follows what both parties described as “productive discussions” and will provide more time for further deliberations.

US SEC and Binance Agree To Pause Legal Proceedings

The SEC initially sued Binance in 2023, accusing the exchange and its executives, including former CEO Changpeng Zhao, of violating federal securities laws, who is now the Strategic Advisor to Pakistan’s Crypto Council. The charges centred on Binance’s operation as an unlicensed clearing agency, broker, and exchange.

Additional allegations included the commingling of funds and manipulation of trading volume on Binance.US, its U.S. affiliate. These serious claims led to the ongoing litigation, which was paused multiple times to allow the parties to negotiate and clarify their positions.

Earlier this year, the SEC requested a 60-day pause in the case to allow for discussions around a new crypto task force to clarify how securities law might apply to digital assets. That pause was set to expire on April 14, 2025, but the SEC and Binance have now mutually agreed to extend it for an additional two months.

Reasons for the Continued Binance SEC Pause

The SEC, in its filing, explained that the discussions between both parties had focused on how the work of the newly formed crypto task force could impact the case. The task force, created to address regulatory issues in the cryptocurrency sector, may provide clearer guidance on how U.S. securities law applies to digital assets.

The SEC also pointed out that additional time was needed for authorization from the Commission before making any decisions or revisions in the scope of the case. Binance, for its part, agreed that an extension of the pause was in everyone’s best interest and would help to facilitate the ongoing discussions between the two sides.

“The continued pause is appropriate and in the interest of judicial economy,” the filing stated. Both the SEC and Binance have indicated that they aim to resolve the matter efficiently, without unnecessary delays or complications.

Crypto Task Force’s Role in the Case

The SEC’s newly established crypto task force may shape how digital asset transactions are treated under U.S. law. In a recent statement, Acting SEC Chair Mark Uyeda emphasized the importance of clear regulations for the cryptocurrency market and noted that the task force’s role is to create long-term solutions for regulating crypto trading.

Uyeda also suggested that a “time-limited, conditional exemptive relief framework” might be appropriate to allow innovation in blockchain technology while maintaining regulatory oversight. He encouraged market participants to contribute their views on where such exemptions might be necessary to foster industry growth.

The crypto task force’s efforts may influence how the SEC handles its case against Binance and its broader approach to regulating the digital asset space. The task force aims to ensure that U.S. law can adapt to the rapidly evolving technology behind cryptocurrencies while also protecting investors and ensuring market integrity.

Next Steps in the Legal Proceedings

With the case now paused for another 60 days, the SEC and Binance will continue their discussions and await further guidance from the crypto task force. The next update on the case’s status will come after the 60-day period.

As the pause continues, like the Ripple vs SEC case, stakeholders in the cryptocurrency industry will closely monitor the outcome of the discussions, as the case could set important precedents for future regulatory actions.

The SEC, as a result, has clarified that it is focused on ensuring compliance with securities laws, while Binance has stated its commitment to working within the framework of U.S. regulations.

✓ Share:

Kelvin Munene Murithi

Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

US Senators Reintroduce PROOF Act To Set Reserve Standards for Crypto Firms

Published

1 week ago

on

April 11, 2025

By


As crypto regulation gains ground in the US under pro-crypto President Donald Trump, US Senators are taking further steps to strengthen oversight of digital asset firms. Senators Thom Tillis and John Hickenlooper reintroduced the Proving Reserves of Other Funds (PROOF) Act, which aims to create new standards for transparency and fund management in the cryptocurrency sector.

US Senators Reintroduce PROOF Act Bill

According to Eleanor Terrett, US Senators Tillis and Hickenlooper have renewed their push for the PROOF Act, which was first introduced in 2023. The bill responds to concerns raised by the collapse of FTX, where customer funds were reportedly mixed with the company’s own capital and redirected to affiliated firms.

The PROOF Act would prohibit the co-mingling of customer assets by digital asset custodians and exchanges. It sets requirements for monthly third-party reserve checks, which would ensure that firms hold enough reserves to back customer holdings.

Independent auditing firms would perform these checks, sending the results to the U.S. Department of the Treasury.

Mandatory Proof of Reserves Checks

Under the US Senator’s proposed law, all firms offering digital asset custody or exchange services must undergo monthly Proof of Reserves (PoR) inspections. These checks would verify that firms hold the assets they claim to possess on behalf of their clients.

PoR uses cryptographic tools like Merkle trees and zero-knowledge proofs to verify balances without revealing user data. To ensure transparency, the inspection reports would be made public through the Treasury Department. If a company fails to comply, it will face civil fines that increase with repeated violations.

Although some firms have previously voluntarily shared proof of reserves information, these practices have been inconsistent and often lacked third-party verification. The PROOF Act would create a standardized process across the industry.

Preventing Fund Mismanagement in the Crypto Industry Through The PROOF Act

The US Senators’ renewed effort to pass the PROOF Act follows the financial failure of several crypto companies, most notably FTX. Reports showed that FTX moved customer deposits to its sister firm, Alameda Research, without proper disclosure or reserves, contributing to a major loss of trust in the sector.

Lawmakers aim to reduce the risk of mismanaged or missing funds by introducing strict reserve reporting requirements. The bill, as a result, intends to give customers more confidence that their digital assets are safe and properly accounted for by crypto firms.

The legislation also encourages more responsible behaviour from digital asset institutions by requiring them to follow clearly defined standards. These standards subsequently support regulatory oversight and prevent future financial harm to customers.

SEC Leadership and Regulatory Developments

The reintroduction of the PROOF Act follows Paul Atkins’s appointment as the new Chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the United States. The Senate endorsed Atkins with a 52 to 44 majority in acknowledging his position on precise crypto regulations.

As a result, the Division of Corporation Finance of the SEC published guidance for crypto issuers as a follow-up to Atkins’ confirmation. The guidance also involves disclosure concerning business models and financial statements and risks associated with digital assets that fall under the definition of securities.

Subsequently, Senator Cynthia Lummis, a pro-Bitcoin legislator, has corroborated the development while acknowledging optimism about the future under Atkins. She stated that from her conversation with Atkins, she became confident in his handling of digital asset regulation.

✓ Share:

Kelvin Munene Murithi

Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 coin2049.io