Connect with us

Regulation

Ripple CEO Slams US SEC For XRP Security Claim In Bitnomial Case

Published

on


Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has accused the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) of ignoring a court decision that determined XRP is not a security as the regulator still claims. He made the remarks following the agency’s stand in the Bitnomial case which saw the crypto derivatives exchange go to court against the SEC over the classification of XRP futures.

Ripple CEO Slams US SEC For XRP Security Claim

Brad Garlinghouse voiced his anger regarding the US SEC’s actions in a post on X (formerly Twitter), noting that the agency does not seem to care that, according to a court’s decision, XRP is not a security. He pointed out that the agency’s behavior proves that it thinks it can act beyond the law, questioning the regulator’s responsibility.

Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer Stuart Alderoty also commented on the agency’s position in the Bitnomial case saying that one has to wonder about the legitimacy of a regulatory agency that simply ignores a court decision. According to Alderoty, the US SEC has embarked on unconstitutional aggressive measures in the case and this further erodes the credibility of the agency.

He cited a rather worrying situation where a regulatory body after being defeated in court orders compliance through threats of enforcement in clear disregard of court orders.

Bitnomial Lawsuit Challenges US SEC’s XRP Futures Stance

The case in Bitnomial involves the US SEC’s assertion that XRP futures are ‘security futures,’ which subjects them to more rules than those set by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). 

Bitnomial, a crypto derivatives exchange, declared that the XRP futures should fall under the jurisdiction of CFTC only, as XRP has not been registered as a security. In its complaint filed with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Bitnomial claimed that the SEC’s requirement of the company to register as a national securities exchange is an undue regulatory burden.

Aligning with the Ripple CEO, the exchange also noted that the SEC’s position is in direct conflict with the court’s decision in the case where the court held that XRP itself was not a security. Bitnomial’s challenge is the latest in a long-standing feud between the agency and the crypto industry over the agency’s approach to regulating digital assets.

Concerns Over Regulatory Overreach

The Bitnomial case is the latest development in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ongoing efforts to regulate cryptocurrencies. Despite losing the court battle with Ripple, the agency’s continued insistence that XRP is a security has drawn widespread criticism from the crypto community.

Aligning with the Ripple CEO, Pro-XRP lawyer Bill Morgan and other legal experts have accused the SEC of overreaching its authority and disregarding legal precedents.

Concurrent with Ripple CEO, John Deaton, who represented XRP holders in the Ripple case, also criticized the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s conduct. He pointed out that the agency has been found to act “arbitrary and capricious” in its enforcement, a severe legal standard to meet. Deaton also referenced a recent case involving the crypto firm Digital Licensing (Debt Box), where the SEC was sanctioned for misconduct, further adding to concerns about the agency’s regulatory practices.

✓ Share:

Kelvin Munene Murithi

Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Regulation

Ripple Chairman Donated $1M XRP To Kamala Harris Amid SEC Lawsuit

Published

on

By


Ripple Chairman Chris Larsen has made a notable $1 million cryptocurrency donation in XRP to support U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris. This is the first time that Harris has received a donation in the form of cryptocurrency and underlines Ripple’s backing of the candidate, even as the firm faces ongoing litigation with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Ripple Chairman Chris Larsen Endorses Kamala Harris

According to the Federal Election Commission (FEC) disclosures, Larsen donated to Future Forward USA, a main super PAC supporting Kamala Harris for president in the 2024 election. Also, the Ripple co-founder has recently signed a letter backing up Kamala Harris as a candidate. 

According to the report of September, 88 business executives signed the letter including the big personalities like Box CEO Aaron Levie, Yelp CEO Jeremy Stoppelman, and former 21st Century Fox CEO James Murdoch.

ImageImage

This comes at a time when cryptocurrency firms are operating in the grey area regarding the legal framework that governs operations in the industry, and this makes Larsen’s action of supporting a particular candidate a big deal. Ripple’s backing of Vice President Harris differentiates it from other companies that have supported candidates with positive attitudes towards crypto laws.

Former Ripple Board Member Joins Harris Campaign

Ripple Chairman’s support extends beyond financial contributions. In the first week of August, Gene Sperling who previously served on the Ripple board also endorsed Kamala Harris. 

Before this, Sperling was associated with the Biden administration and then shifted towards the Harris’ campaign, strengthening the bond between the cryptocurrency company and the candidate.

Sperling joining Vice President Harris’ team brings in the experience in economic policy and could be a sign that the two may work on financial technology and digital asset regulation. Nonetheless, Ripple has not disclosed any further about its participation in the Harris’ campaign than Larsen’s contribution and endorsement.

Ongoing XRP-SEC Lawsuit 

The donation and endorsement come in the middle of a long legal battle between Ripple and the SEC where the latter accused Ripple of conducting an unregistered securities sale through XRP. While a court decision from last week stated that XRP is not a security, the case remains open, with Ripple responding to the cross-appeal, and SEC standing by the accusations.

Such concerns that Ripple and other cryptocurrency companies are grappling with have given rise to debates over the necessity of well-defined legal frameworks. This has made some stakeholders in the industry to support candidates who may have inclined towards supporting cryptocurrencies, however, Ripple Chairman has decided to support Harris which is a completely different strategy.

The cryptocurrency community appears divided on political affiliations, with some leaders supporting candidates perceived to be more favorable towards digital assets. For instance, Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson recently suggested that a Republican administration might be more favorable to the industry, citing Donald Trump’s involvement with crypto projects and the regulatory stance of current officials.

Meanwhile, prediction markets such as Polymarket show Donald Trump holding a slight edge over Vice President Harris regarding winning odds. As of recent trading, Trump is leading with a 54.2% chance of winning the 2024 election, indicating a shift in sentiment among crypto investors and market participants.

✓ Share:

Kelvin Munene Murithi

Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

Bitnomial Sues SEC Over XRP Futures, Cites CFTC As Primary Regulator

Published

on

By


Bitnomial, a cryptocurrency derivatives exchange, has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) over the regulatory authority concerning XRP futures contracts. The lawsuit disputes the SEC’s claim that XRP futures are “security futures,” which would place them under the agency’s jurisdiction.

This legal action follows Ripple’s own ongoing battle with the SEC over the classification of XRP, with Bitnomial seeking clarity on which regulator has authority over crypto derivatives.

Bitnomial Sues US SEC Over XRP Futures Status

In its lawsuit, Bitnomial asserts that the SEC is overstepping its bounds by labeling XRP futures as “security futures,” which would subject them to joint regulation by both the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). The exchange had filed for the approval of an XRP-US Dollar futures contract in August, soon after a federal judge ruled that XRP sales on secondary markets did not constitute securities.

The SEC, however, contacted Bitnomial following the filing, stating that XRP futures fell under the purview of both regulatory bodies and that Bitnomial must comply with additional requirements. According to the lawsuit, the SEC insisted that the exchange would need to register as a national securities exchange before offering the futures contract.

Bitnomial disagrees with the SEC’s classification of XRP, maintaining that the digital asset is not an investment contract and should be regulated by the CFTC, not the SEC. The lawsuit asks the court to rule that XRP futures are not securities futures and prevent the SEC from enforcing its claim.

This Is A Breaking News, Please Check Back For More

✓ Share:

Kelvin Munene Murithi

Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

US IRS Faces New Lawsuit Over Crypto Staking Tax Policy

Published

on

By


The US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is again under legal pressure in relation to taxation of cryptocurrency staking rewards. On October 10, 2024, Josh Jarrett filed a new lawsuit with support of Coin Center and against the agency’s approach of taxing block rewards as income at the time of receipt.

US IRS Faces New Lawsuit Over Crypto Staking Tax

In a filing on Thursday, the IRS is in the spotlight over its position on block rewards, which are newly minted tokens of a cryptocurrency given to validators who add blocks to a blockchain. The agency currently considers these rewards taxable income at the moment they are received, a policy that Jarrett and Coin Center argue is unjust. 

The lawsuit states that the block rewards should be considered new property and should not be taxed as income, and such income should only be taxed when sold or exchanged for cash.

According to Jarrett, the same should apply to other forms of newly created property, for example crops or minerals, which are taxed only when sold. The lawsuit alleges that taxing staking rewards before they are sold leads to overtaxation and places additional and unnecessary regulatory burdens on cryptocurrency node operators.

Previous Attempts to Challenge Policy

This lawsuit is Jarrett’s second shot at trying to sue the IRS for its position on the taxation of staking rewards. He filed another similar case in 2021 when the IRS failed to explain how staking rewards are taxed. The US IRS issued a refund to Jarrett for the previous year’s tax payment but offered no instruction for subsequent tax years.

Instead, in 2023, the agency came out with new guidelines stating that staking rewards would be considered as income when received, in contrast to the refund decision.

Jarrett relies on the Tezos network where validators receive new tokens for the purpose of validating transaction. By the end of the year 2020, he got around 13,000 Tezos tokens through staking. He points out that such tokens must not be considered as income at the moment they are received, as they are new property that cannot be considered as earnings until they are sold.

The current Internal Revenue Service stance on taxing staking rewards affects many bitcoin users and those using other cryptocurrencies that use the proof-of-stake system such as Tezos. The lawsuit points out that the policy is cumbersome to the taxpayers, who are forced to value every reward they acquire for the purpose of the policy regardless of their plans to sell it.

Legislative Efforts and IRS Policy Changes

Concerns have been raised that this treatment is anti-competitive and hinders the deployment of the decentralized networks and innovation. In the networks where a large number of users are engaged in staking, the revenue from staking is split among many stakeholders, thus it is less reasonable to tax the entire value of the newly created tokens as an income.

This move has been made at a time when there is still a debate on the correct legal framework that should govern taxation of digital currencies. In the first half of 2024, a bill that was proposed before the House of Representatives stated that taxes on staking rewards would only be applied when the tokens are sold. 

The lawsuit will seek to make the US IRS change its policy before the legislative process to make it more reasonable.

Moreover, from 2025, the Internal Revenue Service will impose new information reporting obligations on crypto brokers, including exchanges, and other providers of wallets to report customer transactions and gains. These rules will encompass high-value non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and specific stablecoins transactions, which will extend the taxation of digital asset transactions.

✓ Share:

Kelvin Munene Murithi

Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 coin2049.io