Regulation
Ripple CEO Garlinghouse Reflects on SEC v Ripple Lawsuit
Brad Garlinghouse, the CEO of Ripple, and Stuart Alderoty, the CLO of Ripple, have recently commented on the one-year anniversary of Judge Torres’ Summary Judgment in the SEC v. Ripple case. This decision marked a pivotal moment in the decision that XRP is not a security.
SEC v Ripple Lawsuit Anniversary
In a post on X (previously Twitter), Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer, Stuart Alderoty, discussed the importance of the Summary Judgment by Judge Torres on 13 July 2023. This significant decision determined that XRP, a cryptocurrency-related to Ripple, is not a security.
As per Alderoty, this decision was significant in the ongoing legal tussle between Ripple and the SEC and brought much-needed relief to the crypto industry.
July 13, 2023 – that day was a very good day – for Ripple and the entire industry. And for me personally, a core memory!
We had the conviction to fight the bully that has harassed and executed an unlawful war on our industry. As I said when it started, I knew we were on the… https://t.co/m4W1eRsIf7
— Brad Garlinghouse (@bgarlinghouse) July 12, 2024
The decision also pointed to the overreach of the SEC under the leadership of Chair Gary Gensler, with other cases, including the recent one involving Binance, citing similar concerns. However, Alderoty pointed out that the courts have been able to curtail the actions of the SEC but noted that the achievement of clarity through the courts is costly and unfeasible in the long-run and calls for legislation.
Ripple’s CEO Brad Garlinghouse Stance
The consequences of Judge Torres’ decision go beyond Ripple. Since the case is not yet closed, and the remedies have not been determined yet, the decision that XRP is not a security will not be challenged by the SEC as they have stated. Garlinghouse also stressed the ability of Ripple and the crypto industry to bounce back, emphasizing that they would be stronger than ever in spite of the SEC’s decision to prosecute.
As pointed out by the CEO of Ripple, in the last year, the SEC under Gensler has beefed up its activities against the crypto industry but has not achieved much success. Garlinghouse added that the SEC’s approach, legal actions, words, and threats have not and will not eliminate the industry.
On the anniversary, Garlinghouse said,
“As I said when it started, I knew that we were on the right side of the law and would be on the right side of history.”
Parties File Administrative Motions
Similarly, according to Coingape, the parties of the Ripple class action lawsuit have filed administrative motions to file under seal. Judge Phyllis Hamilton ordered the parties to address their sealing motions after having previously rejected attempts to redact parts of the parties’ briefs. This process continues with further filings and hearings scheduled to take place in July.
Ripple has pointed out that Judge Torres’ summary judgment in the case of ‘programmatic buyers’ should extend to the present class action suit. The court should, however, rule on these administrative motions separately soon.
Furthermore, the settlement conference has been set before Magistrate Judge Robert Illman with the notice on the exclusion of four experts’ testimony due by July 26.
XRP Price Trend
In the last 24 hours, XRP price has been in a bullish rally, with the price swaying between an intra-day high and low of $0.4774 and $0.4452, respectively.
The XRP price was up 6% from the intra-day at press time, trading at $0.4748. During the rally, XRP’s market capitalization and 24-hour trading volume surged by 6% and 46%, respectively, to $26,500,863,399 and $1,592,515,664.
Read Also: Kraken Executive Says Ethereum ETFs Can Amass $1 Billion Monthly
The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Polymarket, a crypto-based prediction market, is likely to be prohibited by France’s gambling regulator, the ANJ, after a huge amount of bets were placed on the 2024 U.S. presidential election. Since the global audience engaged in prediction platforms, Polymarket experienced a record jump, with $450 million expected to be distributed to users following the victory of Donald Trump.
This increase of betting volume and large stakes has become a matter of concern for the French regulator because the platform offers unlicensed gambling services.
$450 Million in Payouts Expected After U.S. Election Bets
Prediction markets, which are expected to increase their payout to election bettors to around $450m following Donald Trump’s projected win, are attracting increasing attention.
Although conventional polls pointed to a closer contest, prediction markets such as Polymarket and Kalshi recorded a steep rise in Trump’s chances in the last few days, indicating a strong divergence with poll-based expectations.
Among the active users of Polymarket, a French trader called “Theo” made a $26 million bet on Trump’s win and won $49 million. This big bet made Polymarket popular, as the French authorities paid attention to the platform and its popularity among French residents, which led to concerns about the compliance of the platform with French gambling legislation.
France’s ANJ Considers Blocking Access to Polymarket
The ANJ has claimed that Polymarket is involved in gambling which is only allowed in France by licensed operators. According to local media, the regulator has the power to ban access to unlicensed gambling sites and is expected to restrict access to Polymarket soon.
An ANJ insider said: “Polymarket is just betting on something that is completely uncertain, which is exactly what gambling is.”
If put in place, the ban would prevent the usage of the application in France, despite the fact that users can still try to avoid the restriction by connecting to VPN. The ANJ could also try to influence media outlets and directories to stop advertising or linking to Polymarket and, thus, limit its audiences even more.
Regulatory Concerns Over Market Manipulation
The high level of activity on Polymarket has led to speculations that the platform may be used for market manipulation. Two blockchain analysis firms, Chaos Labs and Inca Digital, recently revealed that there was potential wash trading within Polymarket’s U.S. presidential betting market where the same assets are bought and sold to simply create a fake market. This type of trading is rather manipulative and can lead to the distortion of signals on the market and mislead other participants.
The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission also has concerns about prediction markets and put forward a rule in May aiming at stricter regulation of such markets due to the potential for manipulation.
Although no final decision has been reached, regulatory actions could impact Polymarket’s ability to operate freely in other markets, including the U.S.
Kelvin Munene Murithi
Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
FTX co-founder Gary Wang has requested a federal judge not to send him to prison. He noted that he is testifying against the former business partner, Sam Bankman-Fried, someone he has known for a long time in a fraud case.
The lawyer for Wang submitted a sentencing memo in Manhattan federal court wherein he claimed that his client should not be incarcerated as he provided assistance to the prosecutors as well as his role in the scheme was comparatively less.
Wang, who pleaded guilty to fraud and conspiracy when FTX went bankrupt in 2022, is to receive his sentencing on the 20th of November.
FTX Co-Founder Gary Wang Appeals for No Jail Time
The defense counsel for FTX co-founder Gary Wang highlighted his client’s early cooperation with the federal prosecutors as one of the key reasons why the court should consider him for mercy. According to Graff, Wang was one of the first FTX executives to meet with the authorities and share information on the FTX and Alameda Research. Wang gave a testimony in the trial that led to the recent conviction of Bankman-Fried who was sentenced to 25 years in prison.
Speaking at the trial, Wang described how he was ordered to change the code of FTX in order to enable Alameda Research to use the assets of the company’s clients, which is one of the key points of Bankman-Fried’s fraud.
FTX co-founder’s lawyer noted that his involvement in the fraud was less than some of the other former executives, including Caroline Ellison, former CEO of Alameda Research, and Nishad Singh, FTX’s former head of engineering. Wang, his lawyer said, did not start or operate the scheme and was not personally involved in the provision of false information to the investors.
“Gary was not involved in the scheme at its inception, was never provided with details of the scheme, and, in contrast to Bankman-Fried, Ellison and Singh, never engaged in any affirmative action of deception,” Graff wrote.
Sentencing Comparisons to Other Executives
Wang’s attorney argued that a prison sentence would create an “unwarranted sentencing disparity” with Nishad Singh, who avoided jail time after pleading guilty and cooperating with the government. Singh, who faced potential decades-long sentences, was ultimately sentenced to time served and three years of supervised release.
Ellison, another major cooperator, received a two-year prison sentence. FTX co-founder Gary Wang contended that Wang’s level of involvement was even lower than Singh’s, supporting a non-custodial sentence for Wang as well.
Graff also noted Wang’s personal circumstances, stating that Wang is expecting the birth of his first child shortly after his sentencing date. Wang’s attorney suggested that allowing him to remain with his family would align with the court’s treatment of other cooperators in the case.
“Gary wants nothing more than to be a good husband and father and to continue his work to facilitate FTX victims’ recovery,” Graff wrote.
Separately, the U.S. government is working to reclaim approximately $13.25 million in political donations made by FTX executives, including Bankman-Fried and Singh. Judge Lewis Kaplan however granted the government additional time to negotiate the return of these funds, extending discussions with the PACs until January 15, 2025.
Kelvin Munene Murithi
Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a motion seeking judgment in its case against cryptocurrency exchange Kraken, focusing on defenses such as “fair notice” and the “major questions doctrine.”
This move, led by SEC Chairman Gary Gensler’s team, aims to limit further discovery into the agency’s regulatory policies, particularly those affecting the crypto sector. The timing of the filing has drawn attention, as some in the industry view it as a strategic attempt to shield the SEC’s methods from closer examination.
US SEC Files Motion for Judgment Against Kraken
The SEC’s motion seeks to dismiss defenses put forward by Kraken that include the fair notice defense and the major questions doctrine. The fair notice defense argues that Kraken did not receive adequate regulatory guidance regarding its crypto-related activities.
Meanwhile, the major questions doctrine suggests that regulatory agencies, such as the SEC, should not make major policy decisions without clear direction from Congress.
Subsequently, the US SEC’s motion appears intended to prevent further discovery into its policies, which Kraken and other crypto advocates have criticized as inconsistent and unclear. A similar motion was filed in Ripple case, where the US SEC failed to secure a judgment. Michael O’Connor, an attorney representing Kraken expects a similar outcome in the Kraken case, though Kraken has indicated that it has additional defenses should this motion proceed.
This Is A Breaking News, Please Check Back For More
Kelvin Munene Murithi
Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Ethereum Foundation Launches Pectra Tesnet ‘Mekong’, ETH Price Set For $4000
Polymarket Faces Ban in France as US Election Betting Ends
Trump and Lummis Unite on $76 Billion National Bitcoin Reserve
MrBeast faces allegations of crypto insider trading
Why Bitcoin Users Are Moving to Altcoins? As Ethereum Price Jumps 11%
XRP Price Ready to Rally? Signs Point to a Bullish Move
2.52 Million Altcoins Are Ruining Crypto’s Future
Animoca Brands Valuation Tanks 75% In Two Years, Here’s Why
Crypto exchange BingX hacked for $43 million
Are The Big Players Losing Interest?
Coinbase cbBTC Set to go Live on Solana
Hong Kong’s Securities Association Tips Authorities On Crypto Self-Regulation
2.52 Million Altcoins Are Ruining Crypto’s Future
Animoca Brands Valuation Tanks 75% In Two Years, Here’s Why
Crypto exchange BingX hacked for $43 million
Are The Big Players Losing Interest?
Coinbase cbBTC Set to go Live on Solana
Hong Kong’s Securities Association Tips Authorities On Crypto Self-Regulation
-
Market12 hours agoBitcoin Price Pushes Rally Further: Bulls in Full Force
-
Altcoin24 hours ago3 Promising Crypto Coins with 5000% Returns in 2025
-
Altcoin23 hours agoShiba Inu Burn Rate Rockets 3,700% Sparking Optimism, SHIB To Hit $2?
-
Market10 hours agoSolana (SOL) Rallies Strongly, Setting Sights on $200
-
Altcoin22 hours agoRipple CLO Reveals How Donald Trump Can Make US The Crypto Capital
-
Altcoin21 hours agoXRP Price At Risk As Ripple Moves $250M?
-
Ethereum13 hours agoEthereum Analyst Sets $3,400 Target Once ETH Breaks Key Resistance – Details
-
Bitcoin12 hours agoBitcoin Price Might Never Dip Below $70,000 Again After The US Elections, Here’s Why
✓ Share: