Regulation
Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse Spotlights Another Win Against US SEC, Gensler
Ripple’s CEO, Brad Garlinghouse has called out the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) of hypocrisy in handling cryptocurrency regulations. Garlinghouse made this remark in light of the recent events in the SEC’s lawsuit against Binance where the regulatory body wanted to alter the initial complaint.
Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse Slams SEC
Ripple CEO Garlinghouse has taken a swipe at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for what he says are inconsistent and confusing regulatory practices. In a recent statement, Garlinghouse mentioned the SEC’s hypocritical approach, noting that SEC Chair Gary Gensler said that the rules are clear, but the SEC does not appear to be able to enforce them consistently.
For this reason, Ripple CEO has stated that the SEC’s actions lead to “more industry confusion,”
More evidence of SEC hypocrisy.
Chair Gensler testifies the rules are clear, yet his SEC can’t figure them out and applies them haphazardly, festering more industry confusion.
A political agenda and/or bad faith litigation tactics. Def not a “faithful allegiance to the law”. https://t.co/iX8IdvaW92
— Brad Garlinghouse (@bgarlinghouse) July 30, 2024
This action by the SEC is in a bid to prevent a courtroom ruling on whether SOL, ADA, MATIC, FIL, ATOM, SAND, MANA, ALGO, AXS, and COTI are securities under the Howey Test.
SEC Seeks to Amend Binance Complaint
On Monday, the SEC announced its intention to amend its original complaint against Binance. This development delays a court ruling on whether the tokens are securities.
The SEC’s filing noted that it plans to move to alter the complaint to address “Third Party Crypto Asset Securities” concerns so as not to necessitate an immediate court ruling on the matter. Binance pointed out that the SEC’s decision to amend the complaint indicates that the possible changes are not limited to the tokens in the case.
During this controversy, backing Ripple CEO stance, Former President Donald Trump also joined other critics of the SEC Chair Gary Gensler. At the Bitcoin Conference 2024, Trump announced that if he was to return to power, he would replace Gensler on his first day in office due to what he called the SEC’s “anti-crypto campaign. “
Trump also stated that he will nominate a new SEC chair who will embrace innovation and the future of digital assets in the United States. Other influential personalities in the crypto space agreed with this view, including billionaire Mark Cuban, who called for the removal of Gensler for overstepping his bounds as a regulator.
Ripple vs. SEC Lawsuit Nears Conclusion
At the same time, the legal war between Ripple and the SEC started in December 2020 also seems to be close to a turning point. The partial victory that Ripple secured in 2023 when a judge stated that XRP does not satisfy all elements of the Howey Test for securities when sold to the general public is the preparation for the final decision.
However, there are still some concerns regarding the sales of XRP to institutional investors. However, the Ripple CEO, Brad Garlinghouse, remain hopeful that the matter will be resolved while legal analysts expect that there may be an appeal after the court’s final ruling.
Judge Phyllis Hamilton of the U. S. District Court for the Northern District of California also permitted a civil lawsuit against Ripple to go to trial. This lawsuit claims that Ripple CEO engaged in securities fraud by making false statements during an interview in 2017. Nevertheless, Ripple’s legal representatives continue to argue that XRP does not fall under the Howey Test and is therefore not a security, a position in line with Judge Analisa Torres’s decision made in the previous year.
Read Also: Binance Labs Invests In This Liquid Staking Protocol
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Regulation
Polymarket Faces French Ban After Massive Bets On US Election Results
Polymarket, a crypto-based prediction market, is likely to be prohibited by France’s gambling regulator, the ANJ, after a huge amount of bets were placed on the 2024 U.S. presidential election. Since the global audience engaged in prediction platforms, Polymarket experienced a record jump, with $450 million expected to be distributed to users following the victory of Donald Trump.
This increase of betting volume and large stakes has become a matter of concern for the French regulator because the platform offers unlicensed gambling services.
$450 Million in Payouts Expected After U.S. Election Bets
Prediction markets, which are expected to increase their payout to election bettors to around $450m following Donald Trump’s projected win, are attracting increasing attention.
Although conventional polls pointed to a closer contest, prediction markets such as Polymarket and Kalshi recorded a steep rise in Trump’s chances in the last few days, indicating a strong divergence with poll-based expectations.
Among the active users of Polymarket, a French trader called “Theo” made a $26 million bet on Trump’s win and won $49 million. This big bet made Polymarket popular, as the French authorities paid attention to the platform and its popularity among French residents, which led to concerns about the compliance of the platform with French gambling legislation.
France’s ANJ Considers Blocking Access to Polymarket
The ANJ has claimed that Polymarket is involved in gambling which is only allowed in France by licensed operators. According to local media, the regulator has the power to ban access to unlicensed gambling sites and is expected to restrict access to Polymarket soon.
An ANJ insider said: “Polymarket is just betting on something that is completely uncertain, which is exactly what gambling is.”
If put in place, the ban would prevent the usage of the application in France, despite the fact that users can still try to avoid the restriction by connecting to VPN. The ANJ could also try to influence media outlets and directories to stop advertising or linking to Polymarket and, thus, limit its audiences even more.
Regulatory Concerns Over Market Manipulation
The high level of activity on Polymarket has led to speculations that the platform may be used for market manipulation. Two blockchain analysis firms, Chaos Labs and Inca Digital, recently revealed that there was potential wash trading within Polymarket’s U.S. presidential betting market where the same assets are bought and sold to simply create a fake market. This type of trading is rather manipulative and can lead to the distortion of signals on the market and mislead other participants.
The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission also has concerns about prediction markets and put forward a rule in May aiming at stricter regulation of such markets due to the potential for manipulation.
Although no final decision has been reached, regulatory actions could impact Polymarket’s ability to operate freely in other markets, including the U.S.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Regulation
FTX Co Founder Gary Wang Appeals For No Jail Time, Here’s Why
FTX co-founder Gary Wang has requested a federal judge not to send him to prison. He noted that he is testifying against the former business partner, Sam Bankman-Fried, someone he has known for a long time in a fraud case.
The lawyer for Wang submitted a sentencing memo in Manhattan federal court wherein he claimed that his client should not be incarcerated as he provided assistance to the prosecutors as well as his role in the scheme was comparatively less.
Wang, who pleaded guilty to fraud and conspiracy when FTX went bankrupt in 2022, is to receive his sentencing on the 20th of November.
FTX Co-Founder Gary Wang Appeals for No Jail Time
The defense counsel for FTX co-founder Gary Wang highlighted his client’s early cooperation with the federal prosecutors as one of the key reasons why the court should consider him for mercy. According to Graff, Wang was one of the first FTX executives to meet with the authorities and share information on the FTX and Alameda Research. Wang gave a testimony in the trial that led to the recent conviction of Bankman-Fried who was sentenced to 25 years in prison.
Speaking at the trial, Wang described how he was ordered to change the code of FTX in order to enable Alameda Research to use the assets of the company’s clients, which is one of the key points of Bankman-Fried’s fraud.
FTX co-founder’s lawyer noted that his involvement in the fraud was less than some of the other former executives, including Caroline Ellison, former CEO of Alameda Research, and Nishad Singh, FTX’s former head of engineering. Wang, his lawyer said, did not start or operate the scheme and was not personally involved in the provision of false information to the investors.
“Gary was not involved in the scheme at its inception, was never provided with details of the scheme, and, in contrast to Bankman-Fried, Ellison and Singh, never engaged in any affirmative action of deception,” Graff wrote.
Sentencing Comparisons to Other Executives
Wang’s attorney argued that a prison sentence would create an “unwarranted sentencing disparity” with Nishad Singh, who avoided jail time after pleading guilty and cooperating with the government. Singh, who faced potential decades-long sentences, was ultimately sentenced to time served and three years of supervised release.
Ellison, another major cooperator, received a two-year prison sentence. FTX co-founder Gary Wang contended that Wang’s level of involvement was even lower than Singh’s, supporting a non-custodial sentence for Wang as well.
Graff also noted Wang’s personal circumstances, stating that Wang is expecting the birth of his first child shortly after his sentencing date. Wang’s attorney suggested that allowing him to remain with his family would align with the court’s treatment of other cooperators in the case.
“Gary wants nothing more than to be a good husband and father and to continue his work to facilitate FTX victims’ recovery,” Graff wrote.
Separately, the U.S. government is working to reclaim approximately $13.25 million in political donations made by FTX executives, including Bankman-Fried and Singh. Judge Lewis Kaplan however granted the government additional time to negotiate the return of these funds, extending discussions with the PACs until January 15, 2025.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Regulation
US SEC Files Motion for Judgment Against Kraken, Challenges Key Defenses
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a motion seeking judgment in its case against cryptocurrency exchange Kraken, focusing on defenses such as “fair notice” and the “major questions doctrine.”
This move, led by SEC Chairman Gary Gensler’s team, aims to limit further discovery into the agency’s regulatory policies, particularly those affecting the crypto sector. The timing of the filing has drawn attention, as some in the industry view it as a strategic attempt to shield the SEC’s methods from closer examination.
US SEC Files Motion for Judgment Against Kraken
The SEC’s motion seeks to dismiss defenses put forward by Kraken that include the fair notice defense and the major questions doctrine. The fair notice defense argues that Kraken did not receive adequate regulatory guidance regarding its crypto-related activities.
Meanwhile, the major questions doctrine suggests that regulatory agencies, such as the SEC, should not make major policy decisions without clear direction from Congress.
Subsequently, the US SEC’s motion appears intended to prevent further discovery into its policies, which Kraken and other crypto advocates have criticized as inconsistent and unclear. A similar motion was filed in Ripple case, where the US SEC failed to secure a judgment. Michael O’Connor, an attorney representing Kraken expects a similar outcome in the Kraken case, though Kraken has indicated that it has additional defenses should this motion proceed.
This Is A Breaking News, Please Check Back For More
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
-
Market20 hours ago
Celestia and GOAT investors turn to Poodlana to try and recoup losses
-
Market23 hours ago
Traders dump Cardano and IOTA as they move to Vantard
-
Ethereum23 hours ago
Ethereum Volatility Soon? Derivatives Exchanges Receive 82,000 ETH In Deposits
-
Market22 hours ago
Bitcoin Price Back On The Rise as Trump Leads the Pack: Rally to Continue?
-
Altcoin22 hours ago
Trade COW and CETUS with No Fees
-
Market21 hours ago
Why Solana Volume Could Be Key In Driving SOL Price Higher
-
Ethereum8 hours ago
Ethereum Analyst Sets $3,400 Target Once ETH Breaks Key Resistance – Details
-
Altcoin20 hours ago
Binance To Delist These Crypto in BTC Trading Pairs
✓ Share: