Regulation
Regulatory Challenges Force Apple to Pause AI Enhancements in Europe
![](https://coin2049.io/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Apple-rolling-out-Apple-Pay-Later-for-short-term-no-interest-no-fee-loans.jpg)
Apple has announced a delay in the rollout of its new AI features, dubbed “Apple Intelligence,” within the European Union. Citing stringent EU regulations, the tech giant confirmed it would withhold several key AI enhancements and iPhone functionalities due to the Digital Markets Act’s requirements. This decision reflects growing tensions between tech companies and regulatory frameworks aimed at ensuring market competition and user privacy.
Apple Halts AI Rollout Due to EU Laws
The EU’s Digital Markets Act, which seeks to regulate large digital platforms identified as “gatekeepers,” is central to Apple’s recent decision. This legislation enforces greater competition and aims to prevent conflicts of interest by imposing certain obligations on these platforms. Apple’s concern revolves around the interoperability requirements, which they believe might compromise product integrity, user privacy, and data security. Consequently, the company has decided not to launch three significant features in the EU market this year, potentially affecting millions of users and influencing hardware sales.
Furthermore, Apple is grappling with specific provisions that mandate allowing third-party app installations and control over user data usage. These changes are poised to alter how Apple operates, forcing them to adapt their business model and technical approach in Europe. This regulatory pressure comes at a time when Apple had planned to enhance its devices with features such as iPhone Mirroring and SharePlay Screen Sharing, but this was postponed due to these legal constraints.
Also Read: Could Japan’s Banking Crisis Trigger Another Bitcoin Rally? Arthur Hayes Think So
Security Concerns Rise with New EU Rules
The Digital Markets Act reshaped how companies like Apple interact with the market and significantly expanded consumer rights. Under this act, users can install apps from competing app stores and make decisions regarding using their data across different services. These provisions aim to empower consumers but present challenges for established tech giants accustomed to controlling their ecosystems.
In response, Apple is considering allowing the installation of third-party app stores on its devices, a move speculated upon since 2023. While this could open up new markets and opportunities for app developers, cybersecurity experts express concerns about the risks this could pose to user safety. These adjustments require Apple to balance compliance with innovation, ensuring they can still offer robust, secure products under the new EU rules.
Also Read: Spot Ethereum ETF S-1 Amendments In from 8 Firms, What’s Next?
The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Regulation
Former Solicitor General Paul Clement Joins Crypto Industry Fight
![](https://coin2049.io/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Custodia-Bank-CEO-Caitlin-Long.webp.webp)
A week after Custodia Bank filed an appeal in the 10th Circuit Court challenging the Fed’s power to deny it a master account, former Solicitor General Paul Clement has now filed an amicus brief on behalf of the crypto industry.
Paul Clement Takes Custodia Bank vs Fed Fight Ahead
As said, in the recent Custodia Bank vs. Fed case, Paul Clement filed an Amicus brief on Wednesday, July 3, while supporting the crypto industry. Clement has gained popularity in his recent success in overturning the Chevron Defence in the Supreme Court case in the Supreme Court case involving Loper Bright fishermen.
Also Read: US SEC Takes Major Blow In Chevron Howey Test Case, Implication For Crypto
In this ongoing legal fight, The Digital Chamber (TDC) and the Global Business Blockchain Council-USA (GBBC-USA) have expressed their significant interest and unique perspective. With extensive experience in the digital assets industry, the two organizations have argued that denying state-chartered banks a reliable path to participate in the national banking just because of the involvement with digital assets will threaten the growth and success of the trillion-dollar blockchain industry.
The two organization argue that upholding the lower court’s decision will give politically unaccountable federal officials and unchecked power to stiffle innovation thereby cutting off legitimate businesses from having crucial access to the global financial system.
The District Court stated that the “Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (“FRBKC”) has unreviewable discretion to denynonmember depository institutionsa master account”.
TDC and GBBC argued that despite following the legal boundaries, this court decision set dangerous precedence for any industry that might fall out with the Fed officials.
Paul Clement Raises Constitutional Concerns on Fed’s Structure
In the amicus brief, the former Solicitor General has raised some constitutional questions regarding the Fed’s structure. Clement states: “In sum, by affording Federal Reserve Bank presidents significant and largely unconstrained discretionary power, the district court’s decision raises serious constitutional questions under Article II.”
“The district court’s decision threatens the dual system by granting Federal Reserve Bank officials unreviewable discretion to “effectively crippl[e]” state-chartered banks operating legally,” he added.
Also Read: Custodia Bank CEO Predicts “Rip Roaring” Bitcoin Bull Market
The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Regulation
Kamala Harris Overtakes Biden In Prediction Markets, Has Trump’s Opponent Changed?
![](https://coin2049.io/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/1229228819.webp.webp)
Kamala Harris has recently surged ahead of President Joe Biden in the prediction markets. This marks a significant shift in the political landscape as the 2024 U.S. presidential election race intensifies. However, the fight between Republican candidate Donald Trump and Biden isn’t over yet.
Kamala Harris Oversteps Biden In Betting Markets
On Predict It, Kamala Harris U.S. 2024 election winning bets surged to 22 cents while Biden’s dropped to 21 cents. Furthermore, Trump took the lead with a major gap as the bet was priced 59 cents on his win. Nevertheless, it could be too early to deem Harris as Trump’s ultimate opponent.
According to a new Reuters poll, President Biden is now neck-and-neck with his Republican challenger, Donald Trump, in the upcoming November election. This poll also reveals a shifting sentiment among Democrats, with approximately one-third believing Biden should consider stepping aside following a ‘ridiculous’ debate performance.
The debate in question has sparked internal discussions among Democrats. Moreover, some Biden loyalists are now questioning his viability for re-election in 2024. In addition, sources within the party indicate that Vice President Kamala Harris is emerging as the preferred candidate to step in should Biden decide to withdraw from the race.
Biden recently offered an explanation for his debate performance, admitting he “wasn’t very smart” for undertaking extensive travel before the event. “I didn’t listen to my staff… and then I almost fell asleep on stage,” he remarked during an event with Representative Don Beyer. “It’s not an excuse, but an explanation,” he added.
Also Read: U.S. Election Won’t Alter Positive Crypto Regulations, Says Mike Novogratz
The U.S. Election Race Intensifies
The political momentum appears to be shifting towards Trump, who now holds a 3-point advantage over Biden in key battleground states and a 2-point lead nationally. This change underscores a critical dynamic in the race: voter motivation. Currently, Republicans show higher enthusiasm, with more indicating they will “definitely” vote compared to their Democratic counterparts.
Over 90% of Biden and Trump supporters are firmly opposed to voting for the other candidate. Despite this strong partisan divide, the overall stability of the election race has not significantly changed. Biden experienced a brief uptick in support in June after Trump was convicted of felonies in New York. However, this did not significantly alter the broader election dynamics.
In light of the recent debate and shifting polls, the Democratic Party faces a pivotal decision regarding its candidate for the 2024 election. Kamala Harris’s rise in the prediction markets signals growing support within the party and among political analysts. If Biden’s campaign continues to face challenges, Harris may become the Democratic frontrunner.
Also Read: Binance Unveils Changes In Turkey In Compliance With Regulation
The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Regulation
Ripple and Coinbase Use Binance Win to Contest SEC Claims
![](https://coin2049.io/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Ripple-Labs-Inc.jpg)
Coinbase and Ripple Labs are using Binance’s pivotal legal victory to challenge ongoing cases with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Both companies argue that the SEC’s approach needs more clarity and consistency, necessitating formal rulemaking to better define the regulatory perimeter for digital assets.
Ripple, Coinbase Cite Binance Case Against SEC
Ripple Labs and Coinbase have intensified their legal defenses by referencing a recent court order involving Binance, which achieved a partial dismissal in its SEC lawsuit. The companies argue that this precedent highlights the need for the SEC to establish clear regulations. In its latest court filing, Ripple emphasized the judge’s remark that cryptocurrency does not align seamlessly with existing securities laws, such as those established by the 1946 Howey Test. This test is crucial for determining whether a transaction qualifies as an investment contract and thus falls under securities regulation.
Coinbase has concurrently voiced concerns over the SEC’s expansive interpretation of securities laws applied to the crypto industry. The exchange asserts that this broad application could be more extensive and better defined, pushing for a definitive rulemaking process to provide legal clarity. In its appeal, Coinbase cited the recent Binance ruling to bolster its case for rulemaking, arguing that the decision underscores the inconsistencies in current regulatory applications.
Also Read: Bybit Exchange Unveils Support For ASI Alliance, Will FET Rebound?
Coinbase Demands Clarity in SEC Regulatory Battle
The SEC has engaged with various cryptocurrency platforms and assets, deeming some of their operations as securities offerings without proper registration. In the case of Ripple, the SEC’s lawsuit initiated in December 2020 alleged that Ripple raised over $1.3 billion through sales of its XRP token, which the SEC classified as an unregistered security. However, in a significant turn, Judge Analisa Torres ruled that certain “programmatic sales” of XRP did not constitute securities transactions, introducing a nuanced interpretation Ripple now seeks to leverage to challenge broader SEC claims.
Coinbase faces similar regulatory scrutiny. The SEC argues that the platform operated as an unregistered securities exchange, a claim that Coinbase refutes, urging a formal rulemaking process to clarify these regulatory boundaries. Both Coinbase and Ripple use recent judicial outcomes, notably the Binance case, to argue for a more structured and transparent regulatory framework from the SEC, stressing that the current state of affairs is inefficient and unclear.
Crypto Firms Rally Around Binance Court Decision
The partial victory for Binance in its own SEC lawsuit has become a strategic reference point for other crypto entities embroiled in legal challenges with the regulator. Despite Judge Amy Berman Jackson’s decision to proceed with most of the SEC’s claims against Binance, her dismissal of the charge regarding secondary sales of Binance Coin (BNB) as securities has been perceived as a significant legal precedent. Coinbase and Ripple have particularly highlighted this aspect of the ruling in their ongoing litigation.
Further developments are anticipated, with a scheduled conference for the SEC’s case against Binance set for July 9. Meanwhile, Coinbase and Ripple continue to press for regulatory clarity, which they argue is crucial for the industry’s stability and growth.
Also Read: Genesis Digital Is Considering Going Public Via IPO In US: Report
The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
-
Blockchain2 months ago
Hong Kong’s Securities Association Tips Authorities On Crypto Self-Regulation
-
Regulation2 months ago
Terraform Labs Refuses to Pay $5.3 Billion Fine, Says SEC Has No Evidence
-
Regulation2 months ago
CFTC Appoints Dr. Ted Kaouk as First Chief AI Officer
-
Altcoin2 weeks ago
Are Solana, Cardano, Polygon Commodities As US SEC Ends Ethereum Investigation?
-
Market3 weeks ago
Avalanche (AVAX) Under Pressure: Prolonged Downtrend Next?
-
NFT3 weeks ago
New And Upcoming NFT Projects
-
Market2 weeks ago
TON Foundation’s Plan to Onboard 500 Million Users
-
Altcoin2 months ago
10 Years Old Dogecoin Stash Sale Leaves DOGE Owner With Million-Dollar Loss
✓ Share: