Connect with us

Regulation

Kalshi Halts US Election Trading As Court Grants CFTC’s Motion

Published

on


The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has secured an administrative stay on the underlying order in its case against Kalshi, leading to the prediction market halting its US election trading less than 24 hours after it went live. This development comes as crypto natives continue to take a keen interest in the US presidential elections, which analysts say could significantly impact Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.

CFTC Secures Court Win In Case Against Kalshi

The CFTC secured a court win in its case against Kalshi following the court of appeals’ decision to administratively stay the district court’s order pending when they can sufficiently consider the Commission’s motion for a stay pending appeal. US District Judge Jia Cobb had earlier ruled in favor of Kalshi, declaring that the regulator had acted beyond its powers when it prevented the predictions market from listing election bets.

Following the ruling, the CFTC had asked Judge Cobb to prevent Kalshi from launching its election trading platform until she published her full opinion to help the Commission decide whether to appeal. However, the District judge denied the request, which led the regulator to file an emergency motion at the Court of Appeals for a stay of the order, seeing that Kalshi had launched its election markets.

The Court of Appeal’s decision to grant an administrative stay of Judge Cobb’s order ultimately led to Kalshi halting its trading market less than 24 hours after it went live. The appeal court noted that its ruling was not on the merits of the motion. It further ordered Kalshi to file a response to the emergency motion to help the court decide whether to stay the order until the appeal is done.

In a letter addressed to the court in which Kalshi opposed the emergency motion, the platform had made it clear that it was prepared to swiftly respond if the administrative stay was granted to ensure that the court rules by September 16 or as soon as possible.

The Significance Of These Prediction Markets

The CFTC’s case against Kalshi is notable as prediction markets have become significant in the crypto community ahead of the US elections in November. Crypto natives use the sentiments among bettors to determine the likely winner at the polls between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris. Crypto has also become a major topic ahead of the elections, with Trump publicly declaring his support for Bitcoin while Harris remains tight-lipped about where she stands.

In line with this, analysts have continued to make Bitcoin price predictions based on who emerges as the next US president. Bernstein analysts predicted that the BTC price would reach $90,000 if Trump wins, while the leading crypto could drop to as low as $30,000 if Harris wins.

The latest Polymarket data shows that Harris has a 50% chance of becoming the next president while Trump has a 49% chance.

✓ Share:

Boluwatife Adeyemi

Boluwatife Adeyemi is a well-experienced crypto news writer and editor who has covered topics that cut across DeFi, NFTs, smart contracts, and blockchain interoperability, among others. Boluwatife has a knack for simplifying the most technical concepts and making it easy for crypto newbies to understand. Away from writing, Boluwatife is an avid basketball lover and a part-time degen.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Regulation

Federal Reserve Meeting Major Highlights and Key Points

Published

on

By


The Federal Reserve lowered the target range for the federal funds rate by 50 basis points on Wednesday. This action brings the rate to a new range of 4.75% to 5.00%, which is the first decline in four years. The decision is in line with the Fed’s policy of ensuring that inflation is kept in check without jeopardising the stability of the economy.

Federal Reserve’s Justification for Rate Cut

The Federal Reserve announced the rate cut citing recent economic figures that pointed to growth at a steady pace, but with some moderation. Although job creation has slowed down and the unemployment rate has risen marginally, inflation is slowly moving towards the Fed’s target of 2%.

The central bank considers the outlook for the economy as still cloudy however, it views the risks to achievement of the dual mandate as evenly split.

Chair Jerome Powell noted that this decision is a small step to fine-tune policy to help maintain economic conditions. He told the market that the Fed is still determined to meet its employment and inflation targets. In addition, the Fed is likely to go on reviewing the data flow and may change the course of its policy should new economic circumstances occur.

Powell’s Perspective on the Economic Landscape

Jerome Powell noted that the US economy is healthy, and the economic growth is expected to remain strong. Inflation is gradually coming down while the labor market remains robust even as job creation slows down. 

The Fed Chair emphasized that the Fed’s goal is to return inflation to its target level without causing a sharp increase in unemployment, which is typical for disinflation.

The head of the central bank also added that the low interest rate environment that has been observed in the previous years is not expected to continue in the future. Powell admitted that the neutral rate – the interest rate that does not stimulate or hinder economic growth– could be much higher now but it is still unclear just how high it is. This shift is a break from previous monetary policies that have involved extended periods of near-zero interest rates.

Reactions to the Federal Reserve’s Decision

However, the rate cut was not supported by all members of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) as the Fed Governor Michelle Bowman voted for a 25 basis point cut. Nevertheless, the Fed Chair stressed that there was consensus within the committee regarding the need for policy change. He stressed that the decision would be taken from one meeting to another, considering the current and forecasted trends.

Some of the investors have been supportive but many of them have raised their concerns that the 50 basis points cut was too much. Financial markets expressed their reaction with keen interest with the S&P 500 and the Dow Jones setting new highs after the announcement. However, concerns over the size and the time of the cut diminished the rally, as some think that the economy is still quite healthy and did not necessitate such a deep cut.

Moving forward, the Federal Reserve’s Summary of Economic Projections (SEP) indicates that interest rates may fall even more in 2025 and 2026. According to the SEP, rates could be at 4.25% to 4.5% by the end of this year with more possible cuts to follow. According to its current forecasts, the central bank expects interest rates to reach 2.9% by 2026, which may suggest a further softening of monetary policy.

While the Fed decided to decrease rates, Jerome Powell noted that this does not mean that the same trend will persist in the future. He emphasized that each decision will be made based on current and future economic conditions and information. Thus, the market participants should not anticipate the central bank to deliver similar decisions at the subsequent meetings.

Labor Market and Inflation Considerations

The Federal Reserve has also paid keen interest to the labor market leading to this rate cut. As the Fed Chair pointed out, although job creation has decelerated in the past few months, the labor market is still very close to full capacity. However, the Fed is keeping a close eye on these trends, as a sharp decline in job growth could be indicative of an economic decline.

Concurrently, inflation remains the primary concern for the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). The Fed Chair stated that, according to the PCE price index, inflation is projected to decline to 2.2% in August from 2.5% in July. This action takes inflation rate nearer to the Fed’s 2% target, thus strengthening the Fed’s stance on the policy adjustment.

Despite the positive signs, some experts worry that the Fed might be acting too quickly. They argue that the U.S. economy remains robust, with unemployment still relatively low, and that further easing could spark unnecessary risks, such as asset bubbles or overheating in certain sectors. Nevertheless, Jerome Powell maintained that the Fed’s approach has been patient and that its decision to cut rates reflects confidence in inflation’s steady decline.

✓ Share:

Kelvin Munene Murithi

Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

US Lawmakers Slam SEC Chair Gary Gensler Over Airdrop Securities Classification

Published

on

By


Two prominent U.S. lawmakers, House Majority Whip Tom Emmer and House Financial Services Committee Chairman Patrick McHenry, have raised concerns over the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) approach to classifying airdrops as securities. In a letter dated September 2024, they addressed SEC Chair Gary Gensler, questioning the agency’s stance on airdrops.

Contents of Letter To Gary Gensler

The letter highlights the importance of airdrops in the blockchain ecosystem. It describes them as “distributions of a digital asset to early users of a blockchain protocol.” Moreover, the lawmakers stated that crypto airdrops “play a crucial role in the development of a decentralized blockchain ecosystem.”

According to the lawmakers, airdrops incentivize participation in blockchain-based applications, contributing to the network’s decentralization and governance. The letter criticized the SEC under Gary Gensler’s leadership for stifling the growth of blockchain by creating a “hostile regulatory environment.”

The lawmakers argued that the SEC’s actions are making “the goal of decentralization impossible to obtain” and preventing the technology from reaching its full potential. They further allege that by issuing enforcement actions and warnings, the SEC is “putting its thumb on the scale” and precluding U.S. citizens from participating in the development of the internet’s next generation.

In addition, Emmer and McHenry posed a series of pointed questions to Gary Gensler. They sought clarification on the SEC’s interpretation of securities law in relation to airdrops. A key question is whether the SEC believes that giving away digital assets for free could trigger the Howey Test.

For further context, the Howey Test is the legal standard for determining if a transaction qualifies as an investment contract under U.S. law. This question also arises since the assets themselves are not classified as securities.

The lawmakers wrote, “Does the SEC believe that giving away non-security digital assets for free implicates the Howey Test? If so, under what circumstances or arrangements?” The letter also compares crypto asset airdrops to other forms of consumer rewards.

Questions To SEC Chair

The rewards include airline miles or credit card points, which do not fall under the Howey Test. “How does the SEC distinguish between these rewards, given away for free, and digital assets airdropped to an individual?” the lawmakers asked.

Additionally, the letter to Gary Gensler also raises concerns about the potential impact of classifying digital tokens as securities on the broader blockchain ecosystem. Emmer and McHenry pointed out that as networks become more decentralized, token values are driven by “demand for their consumptive use, akin to a commodity.”

They warned that the SEC’s approach could hinder the ability of on-chain applications to function. Hence they asked, “How might classifying these tokens as securities and subjecting each transaction to the scrutiny of the SEC impact the ability for on-chain applications to exist or function?”

The lawmakers also requested data on whether the SEC has quantified the economic impact of classifying digital assets as securities. This comes particularly in terms of potential loss of economic growth and tax revenue. Furthermore, they noted that developers are already blocking American users from participating in airdrops due to the SEC’s regulation.

Emmer and McHenry requested a response from Gensler by September 30, 2024. Meanwhile, the agency gears up for a September 18 congressional hearing on political bias in crypto regulation.

✓ Share:

Kelvin Munene Murithi

Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

US SEC Fines Flyfish Club $750K for NFT Sales Violations

Published

on

By


The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has issued an order against Flyfish Club, LLC, for the unregistered sale of non-fungible tokens (NFTs). The decision has drawn criticism from within the agency itself, highlighting a growing divide over how NFTs and other digital assets should be regulated under U.S. securities laws.

SEC Takes Action Against Flyfish Club Over NFT Sales

The SEC has charged Flyfish Club, a New York-based company, for raising approximately $14.8 million through the sale of around 1,600 NFTs between August 2021 and May 2022. These NFTs were marketed as memberships that would grant holders exclusive access to a planned high-end dining club. 

The regulatory agency’s enforcement action asserts that Flyfish’s NFTs qualify as securities under federal law due to their potential for resale at higher values and the possibility of earning passive income through leasing.

Based on these findings, the regulatory agency’s determined that Flyfish violated Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 by failing to register these NFTs as securities. The order mandates that Flyfish cease and desist from future violations, pay $750,000 in civil penalties, and destroy all NFTs in its possession within ten days.

Dissenting Commissioners Criticize the Decision

However, not all within the US SEC agree with the crackdown. Commissioners Hester Peirce and Mark T. Uyeda issued a joint statement dissenting from the agency’s action, arguing that the NFTs in question were utility tokens rather than securities. According to Peirce and Uyeda, the Flyfish NFTs were designed to provide access to exclusive dining experiences, not as speculative investment vehicles. They contended that the regulatory agency’s reliance on the Howey Test—an assessment used to determine what qualifies as a security—was overly broad in this case.

Hester Peirce and Mark T. Uyeda further argued that the non-fungible tokens offered tangible benefits and that the potential for resale profit should not automatically bring them under the purview of securities law. They raised concerns that the Securities and Exchange Commission intervention might negatively impact NFT holders by complicating the transfer and sale of their memberships.

The commissioners also suggested that the regulatory agency should provide clearer guidelines to allow creators and businesses to innovate with non-fungible tokens without fear of regulatory action. They emphasized that NFTs are a new tool for creators, such as chefs and artists, to monetize their talents and create unique experiences, which should not be stifled by overly rigid regulatory interpretations.

Increasing Scrutiny on NFT and Crypto Platforms

The US SEC’s action against Flyfish Club is part of a broader crackdown on non-fungible tokens and other digital asset platforms. Recently, OpenSea, an NFT marketplace, received a Wells Notice from the regulatory agency, indicating potential legal action over allegations that the digital collectibles traded on its platform could be considered securities.

This follows similar regulatory scrutiny faced by other crypto platforms, such as Coinbase, Kraken, and Uniswap.

Subsequently, these actions have sparked criticism from various stakeholders, including lawmakers and industry experts, who argue that the regulatory agency’s approach under Chair Gary Gensler is overly aggressive. An upcoming congressional hearing titled “Dazed and Confused: Breaking Down the SEC’s Politicized Approach to Digital Assets” will feature testimony from former regulatory agency’s officials and industry leaders, providing further insights into the regulatory agency’s regulatory direction and its potential impact on the future of digital assets.

✓ Share:

Kelvin Munene Murithi

Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 coin2049.io