Regulation
Judge orders the U.S. SEC to pay $1.8M in Debt Box case dismissal
- Judge dismisses U.S. SEC’s case against Debt Box, orders SEC to pay $1.8 million in fees.
- The Ruling cites SEC’s bad faith conduct in obtaining asset freeze order.
- Debt Box calls the court’s decision a significant victory against regulatory overreach.
In a significant legal victory for Digital Licensing, the firm known as Debt Box, a federal judge has dismissed the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) civil lawsuit and ordered the regulatory body to pay approximately $1.8 million in fees.
The ruling, handed down on May 28 by Judge Robert Shelby in the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, marks a notable rebuke of the SEC’s actions in this case.
The U.S. SEC on the receiving end
The fees include roughly $1 million for attorney fees and costs, and an additional $750,000 for receiver fees and costs.
This order followed a March court decision that found the SEC had engaged in “bad faith conduct” by seeking a temporary restraining order to freeze Debt Box’s assets based on inaccurate information. This misconduct led the court to threaten sanctions against the commission.
Judge Shelby’s ruling mandated that the SEC cover all attorney fees and costs resulting from the erroneous ex parte relief, with the exception of one $649 fee which he deemed inappropriate.
Debt Box, in a statement released via X, hailed the decision as a major triumph, stating, “This is a significant win for us. It means that the SEC cannot proceed with the case as it stands.”
What was the Debt Box case all about?
The SEC’s lawsuit, initially filed in July 2023, accused Debt Box of orchestrating an illegal $50 million cryptocurrency scheme.
However, Debt Box countered with documentation suggesting that the SEC had made false statements and misrepresentations, which led to the improper restraining order.
This case drew considerable attention within the cryptocurrency community, highlighting issues of regulatory overreach.
Meanwhile, the SEC continues to pursue legal actions against several other crypto firms, including Binance, Kraken, Ripple, and Coinbase.
In response, lawmakers are advocating for clearer regulatory frameworks for digital assets, with proposed legislation like the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act aiming to address these concerns.
Regulation
US SEC Publishes Grayscale’s Digital Large Fund Cap Filing In Federal Register
The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has published Grayscale’s 19b-4 filing for its Digital Large Cap Fund in the Federal Register. This significant development has officially kickstarted the US SEC’s review process for the asset manager’s application to convert this fund into an ETF.
US SEC Publishes Grayscale’s Filing In Federal Register
Grayscale announced in a press release that the US SEC has published the NYSE’s 19b-4 filing to list and trade its Digital Large Cap Fund as an Exchange-Traded Product (ETP) in the Federal Register.
This formally initiates the review process for the Commission to review and possibly approve the application. As noted in the press release, this review process can take up to 240 days before the regulator must decide whether to approve or deny the application.
If the US SEC approves the NYSE’s proposed rule change, it would be the first time a national securities exchange would list and trade shares of multi-crypto asset ETPs. The SEC’s acknowledgment of the 19b-4 filing just comes around two weeks after the asset manager filed to convert the Digital Large Cap Fund into an ETF.
According to Grayscale, as of November 1, the GDLC currently holds over $530 million in assets under management (AuM) for the fund. The fund holds Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, XRP, and Avalance, which are weighted according to their respective market caps.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Regulation
Former SEC Official Criticizes Wells Notice Against Immutable
Former SEC official Marc Fagel has voiced concerns over the Securities and Exchange Commission’s recent issuance of a Wells Notice to Immutable, an Ethereum-based Web3 gaming company. Immutable claims that the Wells Notice arrived with limited prior communication or explanation, marking a sharp departure from what is typically a more extensive investigative process.
Fagel commented that it is unusual for the SEC to issue such notices without first conducting a thorough investigation, suggesting that this approach could be “risky.”
Former SEC Official Questions Rapid Wells Notice Issued to Immutable
Immutable announced it had received a sudden Wells Notice from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The notice, which serves as a formal alert for potential enforcement action, cited alleged securities law violations related to private IMX token sales in 2021. However, the specifics of these alleged violations were minimally detailed in the notice, sparking questions about the SEC’s procedural approach.
Former SEC Official Marc Fagel commented on the surprise issuance, noting that it’s uncommon for the agency to send such a notice without preliminary investigation. In typical cases, companies expect several months of interviews or exchanges before receiving a Wells Notice, and Fagel stated that deviating from this standard practice could be seen as “risky.”
In a heated discussion on the X platform, the former SEC official added,
“BTW, it’s hard to believe the SEC would Wells without conducting sufficient investigation to support the claims; way too risky outside the TRO scenario. That said, I’ve heard plenty of anecdotes about the crypto unit dropping a Wells out of the blue, which is kinda scuzzy.”
Wells Notice Reflects SEC’s “Regulation by Enforcement” Strategy
The crypto sector has witnessed similar actions, with companies such as Coinbase, Consensys, and Crypto.com also receiving Wells Notices. The sudden notice aligns with a broader trend criticized as “regulation by enforcement.” Here, the agency proceeds with legal action rather than establishing clear compliance guidelines.
Immutable pointed out that its interaction with the SEC was exceptionally brief before the Wells Notice was issued. More so, they noted that it lacked meaningful explanation, containing fewer than 20 words specifying the alleged securities violations.
The Securities and Exchange Commission approach has caused considerable frustration within the crypto community. Fagel highlighted that the SEC’s surprising strategy of issuing Wells Notices abruptly in the crypto sector has become increasingly common.
ConsenSys Responds to SEC Claims on MetaMask
In parallel, blockchain company ConsenSys recently filed a response to the SEC’s claims regarding alleged securities violations by MetaMask. ConsenSys disputed the allegations, stating that MetaMask’s product embodies essential blockchain principles. It allows users to interact in a decentralized way. The company also reinforced its commitment to defending its product and technology within the legal framework.
Notably, under SEC Chair Gary Gensler, crypto firms have reported heightened compliance burdens. Regulatory enforcement actions have cost the industry an estimated $400 million, according to the Blockchain Association. These reports aligns with what the former SEC official, Marc Fagel, terms as “scuzzy”.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Regulation
Why A 25Bps Cut Is “Pretty Straightforward”
Former Cleveland Fed President Loretta Mester recently discussed a potential Fed rate cut at the November FOMC meeting. She said that a 25 basis point (bps) cut seems pretty straightforward at this point and explained why.
A 25bps Fed Rate Cut Is “Pretty Straightforward”
Loretta Mester mentioned during a CNBC interview that a 25 basis point Fed rate cut seems pretty straightforward at this point, considering that inflation has come down quite a bit from its peak even though it is not yet at the US Federal Reserve’s 2% target.
She alluded to all the recent inflation data since the September FOMC meeting, which she claimed doesn’t change the base narrative that inflation has come down and the growing confidence that it will continue to trend downward.
The former Fed president also noted that the unemployment rate is moderating, and the job data shows that the labor market is healthy. As such, she remarked that the Fed should be trying to implement monetary easing policies as the US economy normalizes.
Mester’s comments come amid the release of the US job data, which showed that the non-farm payroll rose by 12,000 in October, lower than the expected 110,000. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate remained unchanged at 4.1%.
Commenting on this, the former Cleveland Fed president said that the lower-than-expected job figures were likely due to the hurricanes in the United States last month. She added that she is glad the unemployment rate remained unchanged as it showed that the US economy isn’t as weak as the non-farm payroll suggested.
Like Mester, traders seem confident that a 25bps Fed rate cut should be the Fed’s next step. FedWatch tool data shows there is a 99.8% probability of the Federal Reserve cutting interest rates by 25 bps at its November FOMC meeting.
The Significance Of The Fed’s Decision
A 25bps Fed rate cut is significant as it could be the catalyst for a Bitcoin price rise past its current all-time high (ATH) of $73,700. Bitcoin and the broader crypto market reacted positively in September following the 50 bps rate cut at the September FOMC meeting.
It is worth mentioning that a Fed Rate cut decision will come just two days after the November 5 US presidential elections. As such, the aftermath of the elections, coupled with a rate cut, is the perfect recipe for a BTC and crypto market rally.
Crypto stakeholders like BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes have suggested that the crypto community should focus even more on the Fed’s decision rather than the US election. Arthur Hayes claimed that the US election outcome won’t impact BTC. Instead, he remarked that money printing and increased US debt issuance could ultimately boost Bitcoin.
However, according to a CoinGape market analysis, the Bitcoin price could suffer an 8% to 13% correction should Kamala Harris win the election. Meanwhile, if Donald Trump wins, BTC could easily surge past its ATH and rise to as high as $80,000.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
-
Market24 hours ago
4 Upcoming Crypto Airdrops to Boost Your Portfolio
-
Market23 hours ago
3 Altcoins to Watch in the First Week of November 2024
-
Market19 hours ago
Solana (SOL) Hints at Bearish Shift: Is Drop on The Horizon?
-
Market17 hours ago
XRP Price Gears Up: Is a Major Move on the Horizon?
-
Market16 hours ago
Will Elon Musk Dogecoin Influence Lead the Price Toward $0.20?
-
Market13 hours ago
a16z Pledges $23 Million for 2026 Pro-Crypto Election Effort
-
Bitcoin8 hours ago
What $2.2 Billion Means for Market
-
Market21 hours ago
Will Support Kick In Soon?
✓ Share: