Regulation
Judge Drops Donald Trump Document Charges
A Florida judge has thrown out the classified documents case against former President Donald Trump, arguing that the special counsel Jack Smith was appointed unlawfully. This comes on the scheduled planned appearance of Trump, at the Bitcoin Conference.
Judge Drops Donald Trump Document Charges
On Monday, U. S. District Judge Aileen Cannon said that the appointment of special counsel Jack Smith was unconstitutional and threw out the classified documents case against Donald Trump.
In her 93-page decision, Judge Cannon expressed that there is a violation of the U. S. Constitution’s appointments clause where Senate confirmation is required for such positions as held by Smith.
BREAKING: Judge Cannon has dismissed the Trump documents case, citing violation of appointments clause: pic.twitter.com/GPV9jXYAfZ
— Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney) July 15, 2024
The decision is a legal victory for Trump as his lawyers had argued that the appointment of Smith by the Attorney General without the approval of the Senate was unlawful. The case’s dismissal also extends to the co-defendants of Trump, Walt Nauta, who is the valet, and Carlos De Oliveira, the Mar-a-Lago property manager. The Justice Department is expected to appeal the ruling to the 11th Circuit Federal Appeals Court.
Special Counsel’s Actions
After the ruling by Judge Cannon, the office of special counsel Jack Smith is anticipated to appeal the decision. The validity of Smith’s appointment will remain a subject of legal challenge in the higher courts, possibly up to the Supreme Court of the United States.
Smith is also leading the prosecution of Trump in another federal case in Washington D.C., touching on the 2020 election fraud. Cannon’s decision may be used by Trump’s legal team to question the jurisdiction of Smith in this and other present matters.
Furthermore, this dismissal comes in the wake of a Supreme Court ruling that provided Trump with almost a get out of jail free card when it comes to many things he did while in office. Trump’s legal team however managed to block the appointment of the Special Counsel Smith stating that the congress had not established his position and the senate had not confirm him. Despite this, Smith and his team argued that there is a clear precedent of using special counsels in politically charged investigations.
Nevertheless, the dismissal in Florida did not impact the other criminal cases of Donald Trump. These are the cases in Georgia concerning election interference and a New York state case concerning a 2016 hush money payment. Even though this is a major victory for Trump in Florida, it does not dispel all his legal problems.
Will Trump Attend the Bitcoin Conference?
Despite the legal fight and an assassination attempt and taking out of the alleged sniper, Trump is expected to continue with his public activities. His campaign team confirmed that Trump will be present at the Republican National Convention that is set to commence this week.
Furthermore, Trump is expected to deliver his address at the subsequent Bitcoin Conference in Nashville. The conference organizers were optimistic about his attendance stating that the global Bitcoin community is united.
As reported by Coingape, Donald Trump is in high spirits and has promised to attend the event. Concurrently, the assassination attempt on Trump during the Pennsylvania rally has not in any way stopped Trump from carrying out his planned programs with him congratulating his security detail for their response. The Bitcoin Conference, which is planned for the end of the month, will attract a lot of interest, particularly due to Trump’s attendance.
Read Also: Genesis Trading Unloads More Bitcoin To Coinbase, BTC Recovery In Jeopardy?
The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Regulation
Polymarket Faces French Ban After Massive Bets On US Election Results
Polymarket, a crypto-based prediction market, is likely to be prohibited by France’s gambling regulator, the ANJ, after a huge amount of bets were placed on the 2024 U.S. presidential election. Since the global audience engaged in prediction platforms, Polymarket experienced a record jump, with $450 million expected to be distributed to users following the victory of Donald Trump.
This increase of betting volume and large stakes has become a matter of concern for the French regulator because the platform offers unlicensed gambling services.
$450 Million in Payouts Expected After U.S. Election Bets
Prediction markets, which are expected to increase their payout to election bettors to around $450m following Donald Trump’s projected win, are attracting increasing attention.
Although conventional polls pointed to a closer contest, prediction markets such as Polymarket and Kalshi recorded a steep rise in Trump’s chances in the last few days, indicating a strong divergence with poll-based expectations.
Among the active users of Polymarket, a French trader called “Theo” made a $26 million bet on Trump’s win and won $49 million. This big bet made Polymarket popular, as the French authorities paid attention to the platform and its popularity among French residents, which led to concerns about the compliance of the platform with French gambling legislation.
France’s ANJ Considers Blocking Access to Polymarket
The ANJ has claimed that Polymarket is involved in gambling which is only allowed in France by licensed operators. According to local media, the regulator has the power to ban access to unlicensed gambling sites and is expected to restrict access to Polymarket soon.
An ANJ insider said: “Polymarket is just betting on something that is completely uncertain, which is exactly what gambling is.”
If put in place, the ban would prevent the usage of the application in France, despite the fact that users can still try to avoid the restriction by connecting to VPN. The ANJ could also try to influence media outlets and directories to stop advertising or linking to Polymarket and, thus, limit its audiences even more.
Regulatory Concerns Over Market Manipulation
The high level of activity on Polymarket has led to speculations that the platform may be used for market manipulation. Two blockchain analysis firms, Chaos Labs and Inca Digital, recently revealed that there was potential wash trading within Polymarket’s U.S. presidential betting market where the same assets are bought and sold to simply create a fake market. This type of trading is rather manipulative and can lead to the distortion of signals on the market and mislead other participants.
The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission also has concerns about prediction markets and put forward a rule in May aiming at stricter regulation of such markets due to the potential for manipulation.
Although no final decision has been reached, regulatory actions could impact Polymarket’s ability to operate freely in other markets, including the U.S.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Regulation
FTX Co Founder Gary Wang Appeals For No Jail Time, Here’s Why
FTX co-founder Gary Wang has requested a federal judge not to send him to prison. He noted that he is testifying against the former business partner, Sam Bankman-Fried, someone he has known for a long time in a fraud case.
The lawyer for Wang submitted a sentencing memo in Manhattan federal court wherein he claimed that his client should not be incarcerated as he provided assistance to the prosecutors as well as his role in the scheme was comparatively less.
Wang, who pleaded guilty to fraud and conspiracy when FTX went bankrupt in 2022, is to receive his sentencing on the 20th of November.
FTX Co-Founder Gary Wang Appeals for No Jail Time
The defense counsel for FTX co-founder Gary Wang highlighted his client’s early cooperation with the federal prosecutors as one of the key reasons why the court should consider him for mercy. According to Graff, Wang was one of the first FTX executives to meet with the authorities and share information on the FTX and Alameda Research. Wang gave a testimony in the trial that led to the recent conviction of Bankman-Fried who was sentenced to 25 years in prison.
Speaking at the trial, Wang described how he was ordered to change the code of FTX in order to enable Alameda Research to use the assets of the company’s clients, which is one of the key points of Bankman-Fried’s fraud.
FTX co-founder’s lawyer noted that his involvement in the fraud was less than some of the other former executives, including Caroline Ellison, former CEO of Alameda Research, and Nishad Singh, FTX’s former head of engineering. Wang, his lawyer said, did not start or operate the scheme and was not personally involved in the provision of false information to the investors.
“Gary was not involved in the scheme at its inception, was never provided with details of the scheme, and, in contrast to Bankman-Fried, Ellison and Singh, never engaged in any affirmative action of deception,” Graff wrote.
Sentencing Comparisons to Other Executives
Wang’s attorney argued that a prison sentence would create an “unwarranted sentencing disparity” with Nishad Singh, who avoided jail time after pleading guilty and cooperating with the government. Singh, who faced potential decades-long sentences, was ultimately sentenced to time served and three years of supervised release.
Ellison, another major cooperator, received a two-year prison sentence. FTX co-founder Gary Wang contended that Wang’s level of involvement was even lower than Singh’s, supporting a non-custodial sentence for Wang as well.
Graff also noted Wang’s personal circumstances, stating that Wang is expecting the birth of his first child shortly after his sentencing date. Wang’s attorney suggested that allowing him to remain with his family would align with the court’s treatment of other cooperators in the case.
“Gary wants nothing more than to be a good husband and father and to continue his work to facilitate FTX victims’ recovery,” Graff wrote.
Separately, the U.S. government is working to reclaim approximately $13.25 million in political donations made by FTX executives, including Bankman-Fried and Singh. Judge Lewis Kaplan however granted the government additional time to negotiate the return of these funds, extending discussions with the PACs until January 15, 2025.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Regulation
US SEC Files Motion for Judgment Against Kraken, Challenges Key Defenses
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a motion seeking judgment in its case against cryptocurrency exchange Kraken, focusing on defenses such as “fair notice” and the “major questions doctrine.”
This move, led by SEC Chairman Gary Gensler’s team, aims to limit further discovery into the agency’s regulatory policies, particularly those affecting the crypto sector. The timing of the filing has drawn attention, as some in the industry view it as a strategic attempt to shield the SEC’s methods from closer examination.
US SEC Files Motion for Judgment Against Kraken
The SEC’s motion seeks to dismiss defenses put forward by Kraken that include the fair notice defense and the major questions doctrine. The fair notice defense argues that Kraken did not receive adequate regulatory guidance regarding its crypto-related activities.
Meanwhile, the major questions doctrine suggests that regulatory agencies, such as the SEC, should not make major policy decisions without clear direction from Congress.
Subsequently, the US SEC’s motion appears intended to prevent further discovery into its policies, which Kraken and other crypto advocates have criticized as inconsistent and unclear. A similar motion was filed in Ripple case, where the US SEC failed to secure a judgment. Michael O’Connor, an attorney representing Kraken expects a similar outcome in the Kraken case, though Kraken has indicated that it has additional defenses should this motion proceed.
This Is A Breaking News, Please Check Back For More
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
-
Market23 hours ago
Celestia and GOAT investors turn to Poodlana to try and recoup losses
-
Market24 hours ago
Why Solana Volume Could Be Key In Driving SOL Price Higher
-
Ethereum10 hours ago
Ethereum Analyst Sets $3,400 Target Once ETH Breaks Key Resistance – Details
-
Altcoin23 hours ago
Binance To Delist These Crypto in BTC Trading Pairs
-
Market22 hours ago
Best Solana Airdrops for Early Crypto Access
-
Market9 hours ago
Bitcoin Price Pushes Rally Further: Bulls in Full Force
-
Altcoin22 hours ago
Dogecoin Price To Hit $4 As Elon Musk’s D.O.G.E. May Target US Fed
-
Altcoin21 hours ago
3 Promising Crypto Coins with 5000% Returns in 2025
✓ Share: