Connect with us

Regulation

How New Jersey’s Potential NFT Regulation Can Set Poor Precedent

Published

on


For the first time, we’re seeing an individual U.S. state (in this case, New Jersey) pursue NFT-specific regulation in what is bound to be a messy situation.

A state bill, titled the ‘Digital Asset and Blockchain Technology Act,’ has already passed assembly and is on its way to the Senate – where speculators have largely expressed belief that it will pass.

Let’s dive into all you need to know regarding this bill and it’s potential implications on NFTs and crypto.

New Jersey: No Stranger To Crypto Enforcement

New Jersey is not foreign to the concept of ‘cracking down on crypto.’ There’s a variety of examples of this, but one recent memory surrounds the now defunct CeFi platform, Celsius. Celsius was based in New Jersey, and the state was one of the first to put the clamps on Celsius’ operations. Several other states, such as Alabama and Texas, followed suit, and less than a year later, Celsius operations closed and the company was chalked up as another 2022 bear market domino to fall.

Now, state regulators are back again, this time looking to establish a “Nationwide Multistate Licensing System” for NFT issuers. At it’s face, should this bill pass, it looks to be little more than an unnecessary, unenforceable piece of regulation that will serve little good to independent creators and collectors in the state.

Crypto's coming out strong to start 2023; is it a massive bull trap, or a sign of changing times? | Source: CRYPTOCAP:TOTAL on TradingView.com

What It Means For Crypto Users

Crypto users that are based in the state of New Jersey, according to the language in the proposed bill, will not be able to “engage in a digital asset business activity” as a business or individual in the state without registering for a license. The licensure oversees anything from custodial services to “issuing a digital asset” – i.e., something as simple as minting and selling an NFT.

Crypto and NFTs are littered with nuance, making regulation a near necessity but simultaneously, a massively difficult task. While custodial services that are managing processes around tokens on behalf of customers is undoubtedly an area that deserves regulation, that regulation should not encompass works from an independent visual designer who wants to mint an NFT collection. It’s unfortunate that New Jersey legislators are not working to establish terms that differentiate these two worlds.

Furthermore, there is plenty to be said for enforcing this sort of regulation. While enforceability against major firms, like the aforementioned Celsius, is much more manageable, the feasibility of enforcing this bill is unclear – and the legislation leaves us with more questions than answers.

Crypto communities are notorious fans of anonymity and living ‘internet-first,’ where geographical bounds are far from essentially and less identity-defining than ever before. It leaves us with the belief that for the general public, it will be difficult – if not impossible – for regulators to manage.

At best, perhaps it can set guardrails for corporate entities engaging in the space.



Source link

Regulation

US SEC Hester Peirce Breaks Silence On Coinbase Lawsuit Dismissal

Published

on


US SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce has spoken out following the dismissal of the civil enforcement action against Coinbase. The case, which accused the cryptocurrency exchange of failing to register as a securities platform, was dropped with prejudice on February 27. Hester Peirce, known for her pro-crypto stance, expressed her disagreement with the initial lawsuit, criticizing the SEC’s regulatory approach toward the crypto industry.

US SEC Hester Peirce Criticizes Regulation by Enforcement

US SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce has stated that she did not support the enforcement action against Coinbase, arguing that it was part of a broader SEC strategy to regulate the crypto industry through enforcement rather than formal rulemaking. She emphasized that regulatory clarity should come from the SEC’s policy divisions, not from enforcement actions.

According to Peirce, the previous SEC leadership’s decision to rely on enforcement created uncertainty, which she believes harmed the American public and the crypto industry. She argued that the unclear regulatory environment discouraged law-abiding innovators while allowing bad actors to exploit the system.

US SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce stated,

“Environments in which the law is unclear are havens for bad actors and hostile territory for law-abiding people legitimately trying to solve society’s problems and meet its needs.”

Impact on the Crypto Industry and Legal Costs

US SEC’s Hester Peirce argued that the SEC’s enforcement-heavy strategy led to costly legal battles for crypto companies, diverting resources away from innovation. She noted that instead of focusing on product development, many industry participants were forced to navigate complex legal frameworks to avoid regulatory penalties.

The enforcement action against Coinbase focused on the exchange’s listing of tokens that the SEC claimed were unregistered securities under the Howey Test.

US SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce criticized the SEC’s broad interpretation of the Howey Test, saying it created confusion within the industry. She stated that token issuers and other stakeholders were left to interpret regulatory intentions from hints in various SEC complaints.

New Approach with the Crypto Task Force

The dismissal of the Coinbase case coincides with the SEC’s decision to adopt a new regulatory approach. The Commission has established a Crypto Task Force, which will focus on developing a clearer regulatory framework for digital assets.

Peirce praised this change, noting that the policy staff, rather than enforcement personnel, will now lead public engagements to create workable crypto regulations.

US SEC’s Hester Peirce emphasized that this strategic shift does not mean the SEC will stop using enforcement actions when necessary. However, she welcomed the focus on creating transparent regulations, which she believes will better serve the public and the industry.

“This new approach drives today’s dismissal of the charges against Coinbase,” Peirce said, “but it does not signal an end to the Commission’s use of its enforcement tool in appropriate cases.”

Meme Coins Not Classified as Securities

Concurrently, the US SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance clarified its stance on meme coins, stating that transactions involving these assets do not constitute the offer and sale of securities. Meme coins, inspired by internet memes and trends, are typically bought for entertainment or cultural purposes, with their value driven by market speculation.

According to the Division, meme coins lack the characteristics of traditional securities since they do not generate income or confer rights to profits or assets. However, the SEC warned that fraudulent conduct related to meme coins could still face enforcement actions under other federal and state laws, according to a bill released yesterday.

Moreover, the dismissal of the Coinbase lawsuit is part of a series of recent resolutions in high-profile SEC crypto cases. The SEC also dropped enforcement actions against Opensea and Gemini, while closing its investigation into Robinhood Crypto without pursuing further action. Additionally, legal experts are speculating that the ongoing case against Ripple may soon be resolved, with both parties potentially agreeing to drop their appeals.

✓ Share:

Kelvin Munene Murithi

Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

CME Group to Roll Out Solana (SOL) Futures on March 17

Published

on


The CME group has announced plans to launch Solana (SOL) futures on its derivatives marketplace on March 17. This is significant because it could easily pave the way for the approval of the Solana ETFs.

CME Group To Launch Solana (SOL) Futures On March 17

In a press release, the CME group, the world’s leading derivatives marketplace, announced that it plans to launch Solana (SOL) futures on March 17, subject to regulatory approval. Market participants will be able to trade both a micro-sized contract (25 SOL) and larger-sized contract (500 SOL).

Speaking on this development, the CME Group’s Global Head of Cryptocurrency Giovanni Vicioso said,

With the launch of our new SOL futures contracts, we are responding to increasing client demand for a broader set of regulated products to manage cryptocurrency price risk. As Solana continues to evolve into the platform of choice for developers and investors, these new futures contracts will provide a capital-efficient tool to support their investment and hedging strategies.

Per the announcement, the SOL futures will be cash-settled and based on the CME CF Solana-Dollar Reference Rate, which serves as a reference rate of the Solana price in USD. Solana will become the third crypto on the derivatives platform, alongside Bitcoin and Ethereum.

Significance Of The SOL Futures Launch

The CME Group’s launch of the Solana futures is significant as it could pave the way for the US SEC to approve the pending SOL ETF applications. Commenting on this development, the president of the ETF store Nate Geraci, also confirmed that the Solana futures launch “bodes well” for SOL ETF prospects.

Before now, the SEC, under Gary Gensler, had argued that crypto ETFs are easily susceptible to market manipulation. However, the court in Grayscale’s case against the Commission ruled that the futures and spot markets are correlated. If the SOL futures market launches, the Commission has no reason to deny a Solana spot ETF.

✓ Share:

Boluwatife Adeyemi

Boluwatife Adeyemi is a well-experienced crypto news writer and editor who has covered topics that cut across DeFi, NFTs, smart contracts, and blockchain interoperability, among others. Boluwatife has a knack for simplifying the most technical concepts and making it easy for crypto newbies to understand. Away from writing, He is an avid basketball lover and a part-time degen.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

Upbit Operator Dunamu Files Appeal Against FIU Over New Customer Transaction Suspension

Published

on


South Korean crypto exchange Upbit’s operator, Dunamu, has challenged the sanctions imposed by the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) by filing an appeal with the Seoul Administrative Court. As part of the legal action, Dunamu filed a lawsuit seeking to overturn the business suspension order and to halt the execution of the sanctions.

Upbit Operator Dunamu Seeks to Halt FIU’s Sanctions, Files Lawsuit

In a recent development, Dunamu, South Korean crypto exchange Upbit’s operator, filed an appeal against the Financial Intelligence Unit. The appeal seeks to cancel the business suspension order imposed by the FIU. In addition, the platform requests the court for a stay of execution, halting the implementation of the agency’s disciplinary actions.

Keeping specific details undisclosed, a Dunamu official stated,

We made a careful decision, and it is difficult to talk about the specific details…We will faithfully explain during the trial.

Dunamu Faces Business Suspension Order over Regulatory Obligations

Recently, South Korea’s FIU announced disciplinary actions against Dunamu citing its failure to meet key regulatory obligations. On Tuesday, the agency asked the platform to end business operations for three months. As part of the development, Dunamu would face restrictions on new customers’ crypto transactions.

In detail, the regulator banned Dunamu from facilitating new users to transfer cryptocurrencies from and to other exchanges from March 7 to June 6, 2025. However, the platform’s existing customers could continue trading activities during the suspension period.

Along with the business suspension order, the FIU also took disciplinary actions against Dunamu’s executives. Notably, the regulator sent a warning to CEO Lee Sirgo and dismissal orders or cautions for eight other employees.

Notably, South Korea’s increasing scrutiny over crypto platforms comes amid the US SEC’s loosened regulations. Recently, the SEC dropped multiple crypto lawsuits involving Coinbase, Robinhood, Uniswap, and Tron Foundation.

Upbit’s Crypto Regulatory Violations: Insights

Significantly, the FIU alleged Upbit and its operator breached several key regulations, including virtual asset transaction rules, customer verification requirements, and suspicious transaction reporting mandates. In particular, the regulator found Dunamu facilitating over 45,000 crypto transactions with 19 unregistered overseas virtual asset service providers.

In addition, the platform failed to adhere to the customer verification rules on a massive scale. In January, the FIU suspended Upbit’s operations, citing Know-Your Customer (KYC) violations. The agency also warned the company over violating the Specific Financial Transaction Information Act.

✓ Share:

Nynu V Jamal

Nynu V Jamal is a passionate crypto journalist with three years of experience in blockchain, web3, and fintech spheres. She has established herself as a knowledgeable and engaging voice in the cryptocurrency and blockchain space. Her experience as an Assistant Professor in English Language and Literature has further added to her quest for crafting informative, well-researched, and accessible content.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 coin2049.io