Connect with us

Regulation

GameStop Short Seller Andrew Left Deleted X Posts Emerge Amid Lawsuit

Published

on


Andrew Left, a prominent short seller known for his role in the GameStop trading frenzy, is currently facing serious legal trouble from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Now, his deleted posts on the social media platform X (formerly Twitter) have resurfaced in a Justice Department indictment. Moreover, the indictment accuses Left of market manipulation and lying to investigators. They also questioned the legality of his past stock commentary and trading practices.

Prosecutor Arguments In GameStop Seller Andrew Left’s Case

Andrew Left and his research firm, Citron Research, gained significant attention during the GameStop short squeeze in early 2021. Left, who had taken a short position on GameStop, publicly criticized the company. He described it as overvalued and predicting its stock price would fall.

However, retail investors, largely mobilized through the Reddit community r/WallStreetBets, drove up GameStop’s stock price. This resulted in substantial losses for short sellers like Left. According to the Justice Department, Andrew Left’s deleted X posts were part of a broader strategy to manipulate the market for his benefit.

Hence, the indictment alleges that Left used the Citron Research account to create “catalysts,” events that could have significant effect on stock prices. Thus, he allegedly profited from his advance knowledge of these market movements.

However, James Spertus, Left’s defense attorney, argued that the indictment misrepresents Left’s actions. Spertus insists that Left’s posts represented his genuine views and that it’s “preposterous” to claim they could significantly move large-cap stocks. Moreover, he argued that Left’s reports included disclaimers advising against trading based on his posts.

Also, the lawyer noted that that all the information Left shared was public, not insider knowledge. In addition, the defense lawyer emphasized that there is no correlation between a stock’s target price and the price at which Left would close his short position. Furthermore, he stated that assuming such a connection is a governmental error, according to a Bloomberg report.

The short seller, who pleaded not guilty in LA this week, is potentially facing decades in prison if found guilty. If the SEC lawsuit against Left goes to trial, it could reveal how short sellers use social media. It might also help distinguish between honest commentary and intentional market manipulation.

Also Read: Do Kwon Faces South Korea Extradition After Court Ruling

Overview of Stock Manipulation By Left

Andrew Left’s indictment details several instances where Left allegedly manipulated stock prices through misleading X posts:

1. Roku Inc.: On January 8, 2019, Left shorted Roku and then labeled the stock “uninvestible” on X. He later deleted the post and replaced it with a more neutral statement. Hence, prosecutors allege this was an intentional effort to manipulate the stock’s price, from which Left profited $700,000.

2. Beyond Meat Inc.: In mid-May 2019, Left built a short position in Beyond Meat. On May 17, he posted disparaging remarks about the company on X. This caused a drop in stock price. He quickly closed his position, earning substantial profits within minutes of his post.

3. American Airlines Group Inc.: On June 5, 2020, Left shorted American Airlines and then posted a negative assessment of the company’s balance sheet. Prosecutors say he closed his position within 43 minutes, making $429,000.

4. Cronos Group Inc.: Left shorted Cronos Group and posted negative comments about the cannabis company on August 30, 2018. Moreover, he began closing his position shortly after his posts, reducing his pre-tweet position by 61% by the end of the day.

5. Tesla Inc.: On October 23, 2018, Left promoted his long position in Tesla stock on X, only to sell more than half of his position minutes later, earning $1 million. He continued to sell off his position over the next trading day, making a total profit of $6.6 million.

6. Nvidia Corp.: On November 20, 2018, Left received a tip and bought Nvidia stock, promoting it on X shortly after. Therafter, he sold all his shares within two hours, making $930,000.

7. Facebook Inc.: On December 26, 2018, Left bought Facebook shares and posted a favorable analysis two days later. He started selling his shares within hours, making $680,000 in profit.

Also Read: Just-In: Elon Musk Faces Legal Hurdles Amid X’s Content Deal Cancelation

✓ Share:

Kritika Mehta

Kritika boasts over 2 years of experience in the financial news sector. Currently working as a crypto journalist at Coingape, she has consistently shown a knack for blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies. Kritika combines insightful analysis with a deep understanding of market trends. With a keen interest in technical analysis, she brings a nuanced perspective to her reporting, exploring the intersection of finance, technology, and emerging trends in the crypto space.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Regulation

Ex-SEC Lawyer Says XRP Lawsuit Settlement Weeks Away

Published

on


The crypto community is rife with speculation about an imminent Ripple SEC case settlement as the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) prepares for its first meeting under acting chair Mark Uyeda. However, ex-Securities lawyer Marc Fagel debunked rumors of the settlement. He suggested that those holding out for a resolution will likely be disappointed.

According to the former SEC attorney, the Ripple SEC case settlement is likely to happen after Paul Atkin’s appointment as the SEC Chair. While all eyes are on Thursday’s closed meeting, it remains uncertain whether the XRP lawsuit will reach a conclusion shortly.

Is Ripple SEC Case Settlement Imminent?

In his recent X post, Securities lawyer Marc Fagel dismissed rumors of the Ripple SEC case settlement, which the community expects to follow Thursday’s closed meeting. Asserting that the meeting has nothing to do with the XRP lawsuit, Fagel stated,

This is the same meeting they hold nearly every week. They will vote on recommendations calendared weeks ago. Those expecting something monumental to happen are about to be disappointed.

Further, Fagel clarified the buzz surrounding the Ripple SEC case, positing that a settlement this week is impossible. Instead, he believes the Trump administration might facilitate a resolution, but only after Paul Atkins takes charge.

SEC’s First Closed Meeting with Acting Chair Mark Uyeda

Fagel’s post came in response to Fox Business journalist Eleanor Terrett’s thread, which revealed, “The SEC will hold its first closed meeting since Mark Uyeda took over as acting chair on Thursday.” This follows Mark Uyeda’s launch of a dedicated Crypto Task Force with Commissioner Hester Peirce as the lead. According to the agenda, Uyeda’s meeting would include the institution and settlement of injunctive actions and administrative proceedings, resolution of litigation claims etc.

Significantly, the potential closed meeting has sparked anticipations of a near-term settlement in the XRP lawsuit. Experts like MetaLawMan expect the SEC’s release of the Inspector General’s report on Bill Hinman’s conflicts of interest shortly. “I can’t think of any reason that simple act of transparency would need to wait for Paul Atkins’ arrival,” added MetaLawMan.

Mark Fagel Predicts a Possible 10-Month Delay in Ripple Case

Recently, Marc Fagel shed light on a possible delay in the Ripple SEC case settlement despite the XRPArmy’s growing optimism. Fagel’s statement that the lawsuit may conclude quickly or drag on for an extended period underscored the case’s uncertain outcome.

Despite the ongoing debate, the community remains optimistic about the lawsuit’s settlement. However, it needs to be seen how the closed meeting will impact Ripple vs SEC.

✓ Share:

Nynu V Jamal

Nynu V Jamal is a passionate crypto journalist with three years of experience in blockchain, web3, and fintech spheres. She has established herself as a knowledgeable and engaging voice in the cryptocurrency and blockchain space. Her experience as an Assistant Professor in English Language and Literature has further added to her quest for crafting informative, well-researched, and accessible content.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

Thailand Boosts Crypto Ambitions, Welcomes Bitcoin ETFs on Local Exchanges

Published

on


Thailand is witnessing a significant breakthrough in its ambitious vision to establish a digital asset hub. A recent report on Wednesday revealed Thailand’s plans to adopt Bitcoin ETFs, permitting local exchanges to list the exchange-traded funds.

Thailand Prepares for Bitcoin ETF Debut

The Thai Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) plans to approve its first Bitcoin ETF, aligning with the country’s crypto hub vision, Bloomberg reported on January 15.

SEC Secretary-General Pornanong Budsaratragoon posited that the move would allow individual and institutional investors to invest in the Bitcoin vehicles directly.

Promoting the use of cryptocurrencies, Thailand is paving the way for the worldwide adoption of digital assets. During an interview on Tuesday, Pornanong stated,

Like it or not, we have to move along with more adoption of cryptocurrencies worldwide. We have to adapt and ensure that our investors have more options in crypto assets with proper protection.

Although, One Asset Management in Thailand has introduced a fund-of-fund tracking international Bitcoin ETFs, a direct investment tool remains pending approval. The ONE Bitcoin ETF Fund of Funds Unhedged and not for Retail Investors (ONE-BTCETFOF-UI) and was approved by the Thai SEC last year.

Thailand’s Thaksin To Legalize Crypto

The latest development came on the heels of Pheu Thai Party leader Thaksin Shinawatra’s efforts to legalize crypto. Citing the incoming US President Donald Trump’s crypto-friendly approach, Thaksin suggested Thailand embrace a more progressive stance on virtual assets. He also proposed the increased issuance and use of stablecoins.

Digital-asset trading activity in Thailand is picking up amid a wider rally that pushed Bitcoin to a record high of $108,315. Crypto hedge funds had a great last year but failed to give more returns than Bitcoin (BTC), as per Bloomberg

Thailand’s Broader Crypto Vision and Regulations

Thailand has long been striving to solidify its position at the forefront of the global crypto market. In a recent development, the country announced its crypto payment pilot project, with the trial set in Phuket.

While the initiative is expected to be executed within Thailand’s existing legal framework, it bolsters the nation’s crypto vision. The country is broadly looking to boost crypto adoption and Bitcoin ETFs will be welcome move for the local crypto industry.

✓ Share:

Nynu V Jamal

Nynu V Jamal is a passionate crypto journalist with three years of experience in blockchain, web3, and fintech spheres. She has established herself as a knowledgeable and engaging voice in the cryptocurrency and blockchain space. Her experience as an Assistant Professor in English Language and Literature has further added to her quest for crafting informative, well-researched, and accessible content.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

South Korea’s Largest Exchange Upbit Under Sanctions Review by Watchdog

Published

on


Upbit, South Korea’s largest crypto exchange, is facing increased scrutiny over alleged Know-Your-Customer (KYC) violations. The Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) of South Korea has scheduled a disciplinary hearing on January 21 to evaluate the exchange’s regulatory compliance. As as result, the crypto market could see significant low activity amid the review

FIU Meeting To Assess Upbit’s KYC Violations

Notably, the FIU revealed that the sanctions review meeting would assess the 500k+ suspected KYC breaches discovered during an on-site inspection for the renewal of the virtual asset service provider (VASP).

Reportedly, this sanctions-level meeting for Upbit marks the first hearing of its kind, addressing issues identified during a VASP renewal inspection. This meeting will determine the extent of sanctions Upbit could face, considering factors like lapses in KYC compliance. Analyzing the crypro exchange’s explanation for its alleged violations, the regulator would determine the severity of fines and disciplinary actions against the platform.

Upbit Faces Scrutiny Under South Korea’s FIU

Since August last year, Upbit facing investigations led by the financial watchdog. During the license renewal process, the FIU uncovered 500,000-600,000 cases of unauthorized customer verification procedures. This includes instances of accounts being approved despite the blurred customer name or registration number, making identification impossible.

Though these cases highlight the exchange’s reluctance to follow regulatory standards, it is still uncertain whether they actually mark KYC breaches. However, following the disciplinary meeting, FIU is likely to draw conclusions, particularly based on Upbit’s explanations.

South Korea’s Crypto Regulatory Norms

South Korea has embarked on its journey to establish a crypto-focused regulatory framework. In a recent development, the Financial Services Commission has kicked off discussions on the second phase of crypto regulations, especially targeting stablecoins and customer protection.

South Korea’s recent collaboration with the US and Japan to tackle the growing crypto threats also underscores the nation’s commitment to user security. Last day, the three countries jointly released a paper, warning against the North Korean hackers’ eye on crypto.

The FIU’s meeting on Upbit’s KYC violation marks a significant turning point in South Korea’s regulatory landscape. While the meeting decides its fate in South Korea, it could have a broader impact on global crypto regulations and laws.

✓ Share:

Nynu V Jamal

Nynu V Jamal is a passionate crypto journalist with three years of experience in blockchain, web3, and fintech spheres. She has established herself as a knowledgeable and engaging voice in the cryptocurrency and blockchain space. Her experience as an Assistant Professor in English Language and Literature has further added to her quest for crafting informative, well-researched, and accessible content.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 coin2049.io