Regulation
FDIC Nominee Says Banks Free to Serve Digital Asset Firms
While testifying before the Senate Banking Committee as an FDIC nominee, Christy Goldsmith Romero said that the FDIC should not prescribe who banks can and cannot do business with. This was in response to a question from Senator Cynthia Lummis whether banks should be allowed to provide services to digital asset companies.
FDIC Says Banks Free to Serve Digital Asset
President Biden nominated Christy Goldsmith Romero, an attorney, and a Democrat serving on the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to the FDIC chairmanship. She is expected to take over the position from Martin Gruenberg who is resigning from the agency in light of current and former employees’ misconduct.
🚨This is HUGE 🚨
CL: “Should banks be able to provide services to digital asset companies like payment services?”
CGR: “Yeah, I don’t think it’s the FDIC’s role to tell banks what industries or companies they should be providing services to.”
Watch the full clip below⬇️⬇️⬇️ pic.twitter.com/NicfAz1VCr
— Senator Cynthia Lummis (@SenLummis) July 13, 2024
In the hearing, the Republican Senators criticized Goldsmith Romero for lack of experience in bank supervision and policymaking. But she stood her ground and said that she was ready to obtain more feedback on the planned increases in bank capital, which is an issue dividing banks.
Goldsmith Romero’s comments following Senator Lummis’ question on banks that engage with digital asset companies suggest a possible transition towards a less restrictive regulatory framework for the digital assets industry. She said,
“I don’t think it is the FDIC’s place to dictate to the banks which industries or companies they should do business with.”
Banks to Exclude Crypto Holdings
As reported by Coingape, the SEC has adopted measures that enable banks and brokerages to exclude crypto assets from their balance sheets while managing the related risks. This development occurs as the SEC’s guidance on accounting for crypto assets, SAB 121, is under scrutiny on what companies holding crypto assets on behalf of customers are required to do.
The SEC’s decision provides a new direction for financial institutions on how to address crypto assets without the rigidity of SAB 121.
As a source close to the issue indicates, banks and brokerages have sought legal advice from the SEC, proving that their operations are not similar to the ones described in SAB 121. Consequently, some institutions have been granted exemptions from these rules in order to safeguard customers’ property at times of financial difficulty.
In May, the FDIC Vice Chairman Travis Hill called for the SEC to offer better guidance on regulation of the sector. Hill accused the SEC of overreaching by defining “crypto-assets” too broadly, including blockchain-based assets and tokenized versions of real-world assets.
Read Also: Bitcoin Price Eyes $70k Rally as Long-Term Holders Accumulate at Record Pace
The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Regulation
Texas Court Dismisses Consensys Suit Against SEC on Procedural Basis
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas dismissed Consensys Software Inc.‘s case against the Securities and Exchange Commission. This was after a long legal battle to determine the status of Ethereum and other similar software products.
Texas Court Ends Consensys Suit Against SEC
The U.S. District Court in Fort Worth has thrown out the allegations made by Consensys against the Securities and Exchange Commission in a recent legal move. The court, presided over by Judge Reed O’Connor, ruled on procedural grounds. The judge determined the claims concerning Ethereum classification and the regulatory approach to MetaMask were not ripe for judicial review. This decision effectively puts an end to the current litigation initiated by Consensys in April of this year.
The dismissal focused particularly on the lack of final agency action from the SEC, which the court noted was a requisite for a substantial legal challenge. This procedural dismissal indicates that despite the issues raised, the court decided not to proceed with evaluating the merits of the case.
Legal Battle Over Ethereum and MetaMask
Initially, Consensys challenged the SEC’s classification of Ethereum and its derivatives as securities. The complaint highlighted concerns over the SEC’s focus on MetaMask, a software service provided by Consensys that facilitates crypto transactions and staking.
Despite an earlier notification in June about the SEC dropping its investigation into Ethereum, the broader implications of this regulatory scrutiny remained a contentious issue.
Subsequent to the initial lawsuit, the SEC initiated a separate enforcement action in June, accusing Consensys of operating its MetaMask swaps service without proper registration.
In addition, according to Judge O’Connor, this case lacked the necessary finality from the Securities and Exchange Commission side to be considered ready for court adjudication.
Reactions and Future Regulatory Steps
The court’s decision to dismiss on procedural grounds does not conclude the legal issues surrounding the regulation of Ethereum and other blockchain technologies.
More so, Consensys has expressed its intention to continue advocating for blockchain developers and to challenge the SEC’s actions in other jurisdictions, indicating that the struggle over crypto regulation in the U.S. is far from over. The case’s dismissal in Texas does not preclude the blockchain company from pursuing other legal avenues to address their grievances.
In addition, most recently, a US Bankruptcy judge Brendan Shannon approved Terraform Labs plan to liquidate its assets following an ongoing SEC lawsuit.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Regulation
UN Calls for Global AI Governance As Meta & OpenAI Face Challenges
AI News: The United Nations has issued seven recommendations for reducing the risks of artificial intelligence (AI) based on input from a UN advisory body. The final report of the council’s advisory body focuses on the importance of developing a unified approach to the regulation of AI and will be considered at a UN meeting scheduled for later this month.
AI News: UN Calls for Global AI Governance
The council of 39 experts noted that large multinational corporations have been able to dominate the development of AI technologies given the increasing rate of growth, which is a major concern. The panel stressed that there is an ‘unavoidable’ need for the governance of artificial intelligence on a global scale, since the creation and use of artificial intelligence cannot be solely attributed to market mechanisms.
According to the UN report, to counter the lack of information between the AI labs and the rest of the world, it is suggested that a panel should be formed to disseminate accurate and independent information on artificial intelligence.
The recommendations include the creation of a global AI fund to address the capacity and collaboration differences especially in the developing countries that cannot afford to use AI. The report also provides recommendations on how to establish a global artificial intelligencedata framework for the purpose of increasing transparency and accountability, and the establishment of a policy dialogue that would be aimed at addressing all the matters concerning the governance of artificial intelligence.
While the report did not propose a new International organization for the regulation, it pointed out that if risks associated with the new technology were to escalate then there may be the need for a more powerful global body with the mandate to enforce the regulation of the technology. The United Nation’s approach is different from that of some countries, including the United States, which has recently approved of ‘a blueprint for action’ to manage AI in military use – something China has not endorsed.
Calls for Regulatory Harmonization in Europe
Concurrent with the AI news, leaders, including Yann LeCun, Meta’s Chief AI Scientist and many CEOs and academics from Europe, have demanded to know how the regulation will work in Europe. In an open letter, they stated that the EU has the potential to reap the economic benefits of AI if the rules do not hinder the freedom of research and ethical implementation of AI.
Meta’s upcoming multimodal artificial intelligence model, Llama, will not be released in the EU due to regulatory restrictions, which shows the conflict between innovation and regulation.
“Europe needs regulatory certainty on AI”
An open letter signed by Mark Zuckerberg, me, and a number of European CEOs and academics.The EU is well positioned to contribute to progress in AI and profit from its positive economic impact *if* regulations do not impair open…
— Yann LeCun (@ylecun) September 19, 2024
The open letter argues that excessively stringent rules can hinder the EU’s ability to advance in the field, and calls on the policymakers to implement the measures that will allow for the development of a robust artificial intelligence industry while addressing the risks. The letter emphasizes the need for coherent laws that can foster the advancement of AI while not hindering its growth like the warning on Apple iPhone OS as reported by CoinGape.
OpenAI Restructures Safety Oversight Amid Criticism
In addition, there are concerns about how OpenAI has positioned itself where the principles of safety and regulation of AI are concerned. As a result of the criticism from the US politicians and the former employees, the CEO of the company, Sam Altman, stepped down from the company’s Safety and Security Committee.
This committee was formed in the first place to monitor the safety of the artificial intelligence technology and has now been reshaped into an independent authority that can hold back on new model releases until safety risks are addressed.
The new oversight group comprises individuals like Nicole Seligman, former US Army General Paul Nakasone, and Quora CEO Adam D’Angelo, whose role is to ensure that the safety measures put in place by OpenAI are in line with the organization’s objectives. This United Nations AI news comes at the heels of allegations of internal strife, with former researchers claiming that OpenAI is more focused on profit-making than actual artificial intelligence governance.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Regulation
SEC requests for more time to produce documents in Coinbase case
- SEC reportedly seeks an extension to February 2025 for it to provide case documents to Coinbase.
- Coinbase, Binance and Kraken all facing SEC lawsuits.
The US Securities and Exchange Commission has filed for an extension from the court, asking for more time as it looks to provide documents related to its case against crypto exchange Coinbase. Cointelegraph reported this on Sept. 19
SEC asks for extension
Court documents filed on Sept. 18 reveal that the SEC wants the court to extend the timeline for them to furnish Coinbase with key material by four months.
The regulator filed its request at the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, and if granted, will see it have until February 2025 for the deadline to share over 133,000 documents.
SEC’s court filing comes a month to the end of the initial timeline on Oct. 18, which is when the securities watchdog was to hand over documents as part of the case’s discovery proceedings phase. According to the regulator, an extension will allow it to produce the necessary documents.
SEC has sued several crypto companies
These latest developments in the SEC vs. Coinbase lawsuit adds to several others in recent months and weeks. It includes court filings and verdicts in the regulator’s cases against crypto exchanges Binance and Kraken, which are the other major industry players in a legal battle with the SEC.
Both the courts and US lawmakers have taken issue with the SEC’s use of the term “digital asset securities’. This is part of the main allegations against crypto exchanges, with the regulator alleging securities laws violations by these firms.
The term ‘digital asset security’ does not appear anywhere in any law enacted by Congress or in any rule promulgated by the SEC or in any decision rendered by the Supreme Court. It appears nowhere in the 2 million pages of the Federal Register. If it comes from neither statute… pic.twitter.com/ucSaCzEvOU
— Rep. Ritchie Torres (@RepRitchie) September 19, 2024
In 2020, the agency sued Ripple Labs over the XRP cryptocurrency – a case that dragged for three years before a notable ruling in July 2023 declared XRP not a security. The regulator also reached a $4 billion settlement with Terraform Labs.
A judge denied Kraken’s motion to dismiss the SEC’s lawsuit agaisnt the exchange in August this year.
-
Market3 months ago
TON Foundation’s Plan to Onboard 500 Million Users
-
Altcoin3 months ago
Are Solana, Cardano, Polygon Commodities As US SEC Ends Ethereum Investigation?
-
Regulation5 months ago
CFTC Appoints Dr. Ted Kaouk as First Chief AI Officer
-
NFT3 months ago
New And Upcoming NFT Projects
-
Altcoin3 months ago
2.52 Million Altcoins Are Ruining Crypto’s Future
-
NFT3 months ago
BLUR Is Down 30%, And Whales Are To Blame–Here’s Why
-
Blockchain5 months ago
Hong Kong’s Securities Association Tips Authorities On Crypto Self-Regulation
-
Market3 months ago
Ethena (ENA) Whale Faces $13M Loss With 30% Token Drop
✓ Share: