• Robinhood says the SEC has ended the regulator’s probe into Robinhood Crypto.
• SEC issued a Wells Notice to Robinhood Crypto in May 2024.
• SEC’s closing of the Robinhood Crypto investigation comes days after the agency closed a similar probe against Opensea.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission has dropped its investigation into Robinhood’s digital assets arm.

Robinhood announced via blog post on Monday, Feb. 24 that the SEC has closed its enforcement action probe against the company.

“We applaud the staff’s decision to close this investigation with no action,” said Dan Gallagher, chief legal officer of Robinhood Markets.

The SEC’s decision to end its investigation into Robinhood comes just days after another platform, Opensea, said the regulator was ending its probe.

Both Robinhood and Opensea received ‘Wells Notices’ from the SEC in 2024.

Last week, crypto exchange Coinbase also announced the regulator had agreed to dismiss the lawsuit it had filed against the US-based company in 2023.

SEC closes Robinhood probe

In the blog post on Monday, Robinhood said it received communication from the SEC’s Enforcement Division on Friday, Feb. 21.

The letter detailed the agency’s decision to end the investigation into Robinhood Crypto, with no further action. SEC’s Wells Notice alleged potential securities laws violations by the trading platform.

However, Robinhood maintained it had not violated any securities laws and did not offer securities to users.

“This investigation never should have been opened,” Gallagher added. “Robinhood Crypto always has and will always respect federal securities laws and never allowed transactions in securities. As we explained to the SEC, any case against Robinhood Crypto would have failed. We appreciate the formal closing of this investigation, and we are happy to see a return to the rule of law and commitment to fairness at the SEC.”

The SEChas taken a more pro-crypto innovation stance since the exit of former chair Gary Gensler. President Donald Trump’s appointment of pro-crypto individuals into positions at the agency has helped this shift, including the establishment of a crypto task force by acting chair Mark Uyeda.

• Montana House has rejected the Bitcoin reserve bill.
• The Bitcoin reserve bill aimed for $50M in crypto.
• The house cited risk to taxpayer funds.

On February 22, 2025, Montana’s House of Representatives decisively voted down House Bill No. 429, a proposal that aimed to establish Bitcoin (BTC) as a state reserve asset.

The 41-59 vote marked a significant setback for advocates of integrating cryptocurrency into Montana’s financial strategy, highlighting a deep divide over the role of digital assets in public finance.

Introduced by Representative Curtis Schomer earlier in February, the bill sought to diversify the state’s investment portfolio by creating a special revenue account. This account would have allowed the state treasurer to allocate up to $50 million for investments in stablecoins, precious metals, and cryptocurrencies with a market capitalization exceeding $750 billion over the past year, a threshold currently met only by Bitcoin.

Supporters argued that such a move could yield higher returns than traditional bond investments, positioning Montana as a forward-thinking player in the evolving financial landscape.

Montana house representatives wary of risks involved

Despite clearing the House Business and Labor Committee on February 19 with a 12-8 vote, backed by Republicans and opposed by Democrats, the bill faced stiff resistance during its second reading in the House.

Fiscal conservatives, including many Republicans, voiced concerns over the speculative nature of Bitcoin, emphasizing the state’s duty to protect taxpayer money.

Representative Steven Kelly captured this sentiment during the House Floor Session, stating, “It’s still taxpayer money, and we’re responsible for it. We need to protect it. These types of investments are way too risky.”

Representative Jane Gillette echoed these doubts, pointing out that the bill lacked clear guidelines on how the funds would be managed, while Representative Bill Mercer warned that Bitcoin’s history of dramatic price swings made it an imprudent choice for public funds.

On the other side, advocates like Representative Lee Demming argued that embracing digital assets could safeguard Montana’s reserves against inflation and bolster long-term financial growth, a perspective shared by Bitcoin proponents nationwide.

The rejection of HB 429 effectively kills the proposal for now, requiring any future efforts to start anew in Montana’s legislature.

US states push for Bitcoin reserves

Montana’s decision stands in contrast to a growing trend among US states exploring Bitcoin as a reserve asset.

Approximately 24 states, including Utah, Arizona, Oklahoma, Texas, and Ohio, have introduced similar legislation, with Utah’s HB230 making the most progress by allowing up to 5% of public funds to be invested in digital assets.

Nationally and globally, the push for Bitcoin reserves is gaining traction, with countries like Switzerland, Brazil, Japan, and Russia also weighing the cryptocurrency’s potential as a strategic asset.

Dennis Porter, CEO of the Satoshi Action Fund, which collaborated with Montana legislators like Schomer and Senator Daniel Zolnikov, expressed disappointment with Montana’s move but remained optimistic about the broader movement. He noted that Bitcoin’s decentralized structure and limited supply make it an attractive hedge against economic uncertainty.