Regulation
Ex-FTX execs Nishad and Gary to be sentenced in October and November
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7498/b749877a665fbf9a88f5ef0dfe48687237a063e2" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54aec/54aecea0ad3fd6ad47667e290dcf1a8e586a53e3" alt="Ex-FTX execs Nishad and Gary to be sentenced in October and November"
- Nishad Singh and Gary Wang to be sentenced for FTX fraud on Oct. 30 and Nov. 20.
- Their cooperation in Sam Bankman-Fried’s trial may lead to reduced sentences.
- Ryan Salame got 90 months for non-cooperation; Bankman-Fried got 25 years.
Former FTX executives Nishad Singh and Gary Wang, key figures in the dramatic collapse of the FTX cryptocurrency exchange, are scheduled to be sentenced later this year.
US District Judge Lewis Kaplan has set Singh’s sentencing for October 30 and Wang’s for November 20.
Both played pivotal roles in the events leading up to and following the downfall of FTX, one of the most high-profile failures in the cryptocurrency industry.
The fall of FTX
FTX, once a leading cryptocurrency exchange, crumbled in 2022 amidst allegations of massive fraud and financial misconduct.
Nishad Singh, the former engineering director, and Gary Wang, FTX co-founder, were instrumental in the company’s operations. Their actions, along with those of other executives, contributed to significant financial losses for users and investors.
Singh and Wang pleaded guilty to multiple felony counts, including fraud and money laundering, with Singh’s guilty plea recorded in February 2023. They have cooperated extensively with US authorities, which might influence their sentencing outcomes.
During the criminal trial of former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF), their testimonies were crucial.
Singh and Wang’s revelations about the inner workings of FTX and Alameda Research provided valuable insights into the extent of the alleged fraud.
Singh testified that Bankman-Fried had unilateral control over Alameda’s funds and highlighted his growing distrust of the former CEO.
Wang’s testimony shed light on the exchange’s use of hidden code to misrepresent the value of its insurance fund, which failed to cover user losses.
Singh and Wang’s cooperation has led to speculation that they might receive reduced sentences.
Singh and Wang’s testimonies contributed to SBF’s conviction
The testimonies of Singh and Wang, along with that of Caroline Ellison, former CEO of Alameda Research, significantly contributed to the conviction of Sam Bankman-Fried.
Judge Kaplan sentenced Bankman-Fried to 25 years in prison, marking one of the harshest penalties in the cryptocurrency industry to date.
The detailed accounts from Singh and Wang painted a picture of systemic fraud and gross mismanagement at FTX, leading to Bankman-Fried’s downfall.
Ryan Salame, the former co-CEO of FTX Digital Markets, also faced legal repercussions. Unlike Singh and Wang, Salame did not cooperate with authorities, resulting in a 90-month prison sentence. His lack of cooperation and subsequent sentencing underscore the potential benefits of aiding investigations, which Singh and Wang might experience.
As Singh and Wang await their sentencing, the cryptocurrency community remains watchful. Their cooperation and the outcomes of their cases could set significant precedents for how justice is administered in complex financial fraud cases.
Meanwhile, Sam Bankman-Fried remains incarcerated at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, with his legal team preparing to appeal his conviction.
In the meantime, the FTX saga continues to unfold, with bankruptcy proceedings and class-action lawsuits still in progress, as affected parties seek justice and restitution.
Regulation
Utah Moves Closer To Bitcoin Reserve As Bill Advances To Senate Standing Committee
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ed81/7ed81610dabdeda00996d89224002e99f79885bd" alt=""
Utah continues to make strides in its quest to create a strategic Bitcoin (BTC) reserve, as the state’s Blockchain and Digital Innovation Amendments bill – also known as H.B. 230 – cleared its first reading in the Senate yesterday, and has now moved to the Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee for further consideration.
Utah Bitcoin Reserve Bill Passes First Reading In Senate
In a major development that could strengthen Bitcoin’s position as a mainstream store of value, Utah’s H.B. 230 bill has successfully cleared its first reading in the state Senate. According to the official bill tracker, the proposal has now advanced to the Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee, where it will undergo further review before potentially moving to the next stage of the legislative process.
To recall, Utah Representative Jordan Teuscher introduced H.B. 230 on January 21. The bill passed the House in the same month with an 8-1 vote before proceeding to the Senate for its first reading on February 7.
If enacted, the bill would authorize the state treasurer to allocate up to 5% of public funds for investment in “qualifying digital assets.” According to the bill’s criteria, these assets must have maintained a market capitalization of more than $500 billion over the past 12 months and must not be a stablecoin.
Under these strict requirements, Bitcoin is currently the only asset that qualifies. The leading cryptocurrency commands a total market cap of over $1.9 trillion, whereas Ethereum (ETH), the second-largest digital asset by market capitalization, stands at approximately $327 billion, falling short of the proposed $500 billion threshold.
If the bill is enacted, it is expected to go into effect on May 7. Commenting on the legislation’s development, Teuscher wrote in a recent X post:
Thrilled to join with @Dennis_Porter_ to announce HB230 which will allow the state to invest in digital assets. While Utah is the 11th state to introduce similar legislation, we will be the first to pass it. Utah continues to lead the nation in blockchain and digital innovation!
Various States Working Toward BTC Adoption
Teuscher’s statement reflects the broader movement among several US states to incorporate Bitcoin into their financial strategies. Utah is not alone in considering Bitcoin reserves, as more than 25 different states have introduced similar legislative measures aimed at creating a strategic Bitcoin reserve.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1b4a/b1b4a5c2fa956bc79ced846f24551dd308bacd6f" alt="Utah"
In May 2024, New Hampshire State Representative Keith Ammon proposed diversifying the state’s financial reserves by investing in Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Later in October, Florida’s Chief Financial Officer, Jimmy Patronis, urged the state’s pension fund managers to explore Bitcoin investments as part of a broader strategy to strengthen financial resilience.
Similar bills have been introduced in other states, including Alabama, Massachusetts, South Dakota, Ohio, and Oklahoma. At press time, BTC trades at $96,075, up 0.6% in the past 24 hours.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25bba/25bbaa7a99104b37fc3f6c5d2f4c70b7b46d5d14" alt="bitcoin"
Featured Image from Unsplash.com, Charts from Bitcoinlaws and TradingView.com
Regulation
US SEC Faces Backlash as Bybit Hack Highlights Lack of Oversight
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b73bd/b73bd9820616032d39da6df5fe444376e3c39ec2" alt=""
John Reed Stark has pointed out that one of the causes of a rising risk in crypto security is the US SEC cutting back on enforcement activities. This includes a latest attack on crypto trading platform Bybit which compromised and stole $1.5 billion belonging to customers.
The attack, which analysts describe as the largest crypto heist in history, has raised concerns about the lack of regulatory safeguards protecting investors.
US SEC Criticized as Bybit Hack Highlights Security Gaps
According to a recent post on X, Stark criticized the US SEC’s decision to roll back enforcement actions against cryptocurrency platforms. He pointed out that Bybit’s security breach is a direct consequence of weak regulatory oversight, leaving investors unprotected against sophisticated cyberattacks.
The attack on Bybit has been linked to North Korea’s Lazarus Group, a state-sponsored hacking collective known for targeting cryptocurrency exchanges. Analysts at blockchain forensics firm Elliptic reported that the group has stolen billions in crypto over the years, using complex laundering methods to fund North Korea’s missile programs. Without strict cybersecurity requirements enforced by the US SEC, exchanges remain vulnerable to such threats.
EX SEC John Reed Stark added,
“For crypto-exchanges, there’s no regulatory oversight; no consumer protections; no net capital requirements; no licensure of individuals; no US audits, inspections or examinations; no segregation of customer funds; no insurance, no cybersecurity requirements; no transparency; no accountability; no SEC/FDIC/OCC/etc. engagement and the list goes on”
Bybit’s $1.5 Billion Hack Exposes Risks
The Bybit hack has sparked concerns about the broader security risks in the crypto industry. Crypto exchanges lack oversight, unlike traditional financial institutions. They have no mandatory audits, capital reserves, or customer asset protection.
Bybit has responded by securing bridge loans to cover losses and working to recover the stolen assets. However, experts remain skeptical about the likelihood of successful recovery. This incident underscores how the absence of SEC enforcement leaves crypto investors exposed to large-scale losses with no regulatory safeguards.
With the US SEC pulling back from crypto-related investigations and enforcement, investors are left without key protections. The lack of insurance, consumer safeguards, and oversight mechanisms means that customers impacted by breaches like the Bybit hack have limited options for recovering their funds.
As the US SEC changes its regulatory stance, critics raise concerns. They argue that offshore crypto exchanges may still operate with weak security. This regulatory gap increases the risk of further large-scale hacks, placing investors at continued financial risk.
The US SEC decision to halt enforcement actions has sparked debates on crypto regulation. Ongoing cases against major exchanges are now on hold. Some industry participants see reduced oversight as a way to promote innovation. Others warn it increases risks of fraud, security breaches, and financial instability.
Following the recent crypto hack, Bybit has launched a $140 million recovery bounty to track and reclaim stolen funds. The exchange is offering rewards to individuals or organizations that provide information leading to the identification of hackers.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Regulation
Ripple Vs SEC Lawsuit May Take Longer To Settle Than Coinbase, Expert Warns
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4207/e4207720545f594599b64ea1d0c520d8d121a48c" alt=""
Ripple vs SEC lawsuit: The legal battle between Ripple and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) may take more time to resolve than the ongoing case involving Coinbase, legal experts suggest.
With a ruling already in place and other procedural complexities, experts believe that Ripple’s case faces a different set of challenges compared to Coinbase’s recent settlement.
Ripple Vs SEC Lawsuit May Take Longer To Settle
After the US SEC disclosed plans to drop the Coinbase lawsuit, speculations and debate have taken a turn on the potential of the Ripple vs SEC lawsuit outcome and when. However, legal experts have noted the Ripple lawsuit may not be as smooth as Coinbase case. One major factor making the Ripple vs SEC lawsuit more complicated is the ruling already handed down by Judge Torres. According to the filings, Ripple had been ordered to pay a $125 million penalty as part of the settlement with the SEC.
Subsequently, according to experts, the firm’s options now include the possibility of requesting a penalty reduction, which would require both parties to reach an agreement. Legal expert Sherrie, in a recent conversation on X, noted that while a settlement may be reached, it is unlikely that the separation of sales, as stipulated by Judge Torres, would be altered.
Any request to reduce the penalty, she said, would need to be carefully considered by both Ripple and the SEC. Additionally, a request to dismiss the appeal would mean that the original ruling by Judge Torres remains in effect.
“It’s more complicated for Ripple, given the existing ruling. The penalty would still stand unless both parties agree to a reduction,” Sherrie stated.
Ripple Cross-Appeal and Timing Considerations
Ripple vs SEC lawsuit involves more layers due to its cross-appeal, which must also be taken into account. Legal analysts suggest that the timing of Ripple’s upcoming filing—scheduled for April—may be pivotal in determining the case’s trajectory.
Ripple’s request to extend the filing deadline to April 16, 2025, gives further credence to the idea that a resolution may take longer than anticipated. As Ripple’s legal team moves forward with the appeal, both Ripple and the SEC will have to consider how to approach the next steps. As Ripple works toward securing an agreement or a potential settlement, it may continue to assess the possibility of lowering the penalty.
“Ripple’s next filing deadline is in April, which gives both parties more time to negotiate,” said legal expert Bill Morgan.
Ripple lawsuit Appellate Court’s Role
The involvement of the Appellate Court could also extend the timeline for resolving the Ripple vs SEC lawsuit. The court has a panel of three judges who will review and hear the case, a process that takes additional time compared to the procedures of a District Court. This contrasts with the process seen in the Coinbase case, where a settlement was reached more quickly, possibly due to the absence of such complications.
Eleanor Terrett, a FOX journalist, noted that the SEC may also choose to seek an agreement with Ripple at the district court level. The judge overseeing the case, Torres, retains jurisdiction until August 2025, and any changes to the terms of the ruling would require her approval.
“There’s a lot of uncertainty with the Ripple case. The SEC’s next steps are unclear, and any decisions may need Torres’s approval,” said Terrett.
Jeremy Hogan also suggested that Ripple vs SEC lawsuit might take longer to resolve due to the multiple steps involved in the appeal process.
“This isn’t just a straightforward case of settlement or dismissal,” Hogan remarked
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
-
Ethereum22 hours ago
Bitcoin Pepe set to reap big from its virality, fundamentals, and timing
-
Altcoin23 hours ago
Will Pi Coin Surpass XRP Price After Binance Listing?
-
Market22 hours ago
Bybit Assures Stability Amid $5.2 Billion Asset Outflow After Hack
-
Market21 hours ago
Mantle (MNT) Falls 10% as Bybit Hack Rattles Investors
-
Altcoin21 hours ago
Lawyer Estimates Maximum Timeframe for Ripple vs SEC Case Dismissal
-
Altcoin20 hours ago
Litecoin Whales On Buying Spree Sack 930K Coins Amid LTC ETF Buzz, What’s Next?
-
Market19 hours ago
Kanye West is Launching His Token Despite Past Criticism
-
Market18 hours ago
Myanmar Junta Leader’s Social Media Hijacaked for Crypto Fraud
✓ Share: