Connect with us

Regulation

EU Commission Denies Pre-Warning On Donald Trump And Elon Musk Interview

Published

on


The EU Commission has noted that a letter that was sent from Thierry Breton, the EU Internal Market Commissioner to Elon Musk, owner of the social media platform X was not green-lit by Ursula von der Leyen the commission’s president. 

Subsequently, the letter threatened Musk with legal action under the Digital Services Act (DSA) if content on X endangered EU citizens. It was published on the platform shortly before Musk’s interview with the US presidential candidate Donald Trump.

EU Commission Denies Pre-Warning on Trump Musk Interview

According to a Financial Times report, the EU Commission has denied giving any prior approval to Thierry Breton’s letter to Elon Musk. The letter, shared on X, addressed Musk to the platform’s adherence to the Digital Services Act, including the removal of content with adverse effects on EU citizens.

The Commission also said that neither the timing of the letter, nor its content was cleared with or by the president of the Commission, Ursula von der Leyen or other commissioners.

One of the EU officials who wished to remain anonymous stated that Breton has been known to work autonomously at times, sometimes without the input of other top officials in the Commission. The timing of the letter, which came following Musk’s meeting with Donald Trump, was questioned within the Commission. The letter focused on Musk’s obligation to censor negative content on X because the platform has many users, and one-third of them are in the EU.

Investigation into X’s Compliance with DSA

As of now, the EU Commission is probing X for possible violation of the Digital Services Act, which was enacted in 2022 in response to increasing dependence on social media. This case is linked to the handling of the illegal content and the spreading of the disinformation which are the concerns that are emerging in the EU. The Commission has noted that X’s approach to addressing the issue of problematic content will be crucial in the further investigation.

In his letter, Breton provided specific examples of how content found on X was related to some recent protests and expressed concerns regarding the role of the platform in ensuring that freedom of speech does not lead to public threats. The letter also brought to mind that Musk has certain legal obligations under the DSA, with regards to the measures which need to be taken proportionately to address the issue of amplification of harmful content.

Nonetheless, if the platform is considered to have violated the Digital Services Act, it may be subject to severe sanctions, including fines of up to 6% of the company’s global turnover. Initial revelations of the probe have also accused X of not being clear on its marketing strategies and of deceiving its consumers through the paid subscription-based blue tick verification process.

Elon Musk’s X Probed in Austria and Pushes Antitrust Case

However,  the platform has also faced other legal challenges in Europe apart from the scrutiny of the EU commission. Recently, the Austrian privacy organisation NOYB complained against X to the Irish DPAs claiming that the platform uses personal data for AI training without valid consent from the users. The complaint filed by the privacy activist Max Schrems has led to X being investigated for possible breaches of data protection laws in Austria.

Concurrently, the platform is currently involved in an antitrust lawsuit against several big names and an advertising industry body, accusing them of conspiring to cause harm to the platform.

As reported by Coingape, X’s CEO Linda Yaccarino stated that the lawsuit is against companies such as CVS Health, Mars, and Unilever, all of which are accused of colluding to damage Elon Musk platform and other conservative media organisations.

✓ Share:

Kelvin Munene Murithi

Kelvin is a distinguished writer specializing in crypto and finance, backed by a Bachelor’s in Actuarial Science. Recognized for incisive analysis and insightful content, he has an adept command of English and excels at thorough research and timely delivery.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Regulation

UK to unveil crypto and stablecoin regulatory framework early next year

Published

on


UK to unveil crypto and stablecoin regulatory framework early next year
  • The UK will introduce unified crypto regulations, including stablecoins, in early 2025.
  • New rules aim to simplify oversight and avoid restrictive staking classifications.
  • Labour government aims to compete with EU’s MiCA rules and US pro-crypto policies.

The United Kingdom is set to introduce a comprehensive regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, stablecoins, and crypto staking services in early 2025, marking a pivotal shift in its approach to digital assets.

The announcement was made by the Economic Secretary to the Treasury Tulip Siddiq at City & Financial Global’s Tokenisation Summit in London on November 21.

Initially slated for December 2024, the regulatory rollout was delayed due to the change in government following the election of Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s Labour administration in July 2024.

The upcoming UK crypto regulatory framework

The upcoming framework consolidates regulations for crypto assets into a single, overarching regime, a decision Siddiq described as “simpler and more logical.”

The framework aims to provide clarity in a rapidly growing sector that has faced uncertainty in the UK.

Stablecoins will receive distinct treatment under these regulations, as their functionality does not align with existing payment services rules.

Siddiq highlighted that staking services would also avoid being designated as “collective investment schemes,” a classification that could impose burdensome restrictions.

UK aims to align with the global crypto regulatory landscape

The UK government’s renewed focus on digital asset regulation comes as it seeks to align with global developments. The European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulations will be fully enforced by the end of 2024, offering regulatory certainty that has positioned Europe as an attractive market for the crypto industry.

Meanwhile, the US, under President Donald Trump’s administration, has adopted a markedly pro-crypto stance, including the establishment of a White House “crypto czar” and SEC Chair Gary Gensler’s planned departure in January 2024.

The Labour government has shown its intent to catch up with international competition. In September 2024, it introduced a bill recognizing NFTs, cryptocurrencies, and carbon credits as property.

The new regulatory push reflects the UK’s ambition to regain credibility as a crypto hub while addressing criticisms of the Financial Conduct Authority’s perceived stringent oversight.

By delivering a robust, streamlined framework, the Labour government aims to bolster the UK’s standing in the multibillion-dollar crypto industry.



Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

Gary Gensler To Step Down As US SEC Chair In January

Published

on


In a recent development, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced that Gary Gensler will step down from his position next year. This follows calls for Gensler to resign since Donald Trump won the US presidential elections.

Gary Gensler To Step Down As US SEC Chair

The US SEC announced in a press release that Gary Gensler will depart the Agency on January 20, 2025. The US SEC Chair also confirmed this development in an X post. Interestingly, this comes on the same day that Donald Trump will be inaugurated as the 47th president of the United States.

Following the announcement, Gensler also used the opportunity to reflect on his time at the Commission. He remarked that it has been an “honor of a lifetime” to serve alongside those at the SEC. He also thanked President Biden for the opportunity to serve in the position. Gensler has been the US SEC Chair since April 2021. During his time, he has spearheaded several litigations against the crypto industry.

This includes the long-running legal battle with Ripple, which Gensler took over from his predecessor Jay Clayton, which bordered on whether XRP was a security. Up till now, the Agency continues to reiterate this ‘digital asset securities’ claim.

✓ Share:

Boluwatife Adeyemi

Boluwatife Adeyemi is a well-experienced crypto news writer and editor who has covered topics that cut across DeFi, NFTs, smart contracts, and blockchain interoperability, among others. Boluwatife has a knack for simplifying the most technical concepts and making it easy for crypto newbies to understand. Away from writing, He is an avid basketball lover and a part-time degen.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

BitClave Investors Get $4.6M Back In US SEC Settlement Distribution

Published

on


BitClave investors have started receiving $4.6 million in repayments from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), following a settlement reached in 2020. The SEC announced on Nov. 20 that payments from the BitClave Fair Fund had been disbursed to eligible investors harmed during the company’s 2017 initial coin offering (ICO).

Pro-XRP lawyer and online commentator “MetaLawMan” criticized the SEC’s stance on digital assets, stating on social media, “Here we go again with ‘digital asset securities.’ Unbelievable.” The lawyer’s statement reflects ongoing industry frustrations over the SEC’s regulatory approach to cryptocurrencies.

BitClave Investors Get $4.6M Back in US SEC Settlement

The US SEC assured the public that $4.6 million was returned to investors who filed the claims and were eligible for the refunds. These funds were agreed upon in 2020 after the SEC accused BitClave of conducting an unregistered ICO.

The company’s initial coin offering (ICO) in 2017 brought in $25.5 million in only 32 seconds and distributed its Consumer Activity Token (CAT) to thousands of buyers. The SEC therefore claimed that the ICO was an unregistered securities transaction because potential investors were induced to invest in the CAT token with an expectation of appreciation of its value. 

Under the settlement, BitClave will have to refund the money it raised and also pay $4 million in fines and interest. In between these settlements, John Deaton has accused the regulator of using laws that were set in 1933.

The Fair Fund was therefore created to ensure that the funds are returned to the affected investors. The claims submission period closed in August 2023, and the eligible investors received the information on the claims in March 2024. The Securities and Exchange Commission posted on its social media accounts that the payment has been made, and “the checks are in the mail.”

BitClave Settlement Included Penalties and Token Destruction

In the settlement, BitClave did not accept or reject the accusations made by the SEC but agreed to cough up $29 million. This total consisted of the $25.5 million that was generated in the ICO and the additional $4 million in fines.

Concurrently, the company also committed to burning 1 billion of the catalyst tokens that have not been distributed and to ask exchanges to delist the token.

The Securities and Exchange Commission therefore pointed out that by February 2023, BitClave had only remitted $12m to the Fair Fund, thus leaving questions on the balance of $7.4m. Neither the SEC nor the fund administrator gave further details on the matter, and it is still uncertain as to how the outstanding payment will be collected.

US SEC Maintains Strict Regulatory Stance on Crypto

The US SEC has continued to enforce regulations on crypto companies under the Biden administration, with over 100 enforcement actions taken against the industry. BitClave’s settlement, subsequently, is one of many cases where the regulator has targeted unregistered ICOs and other alleged securities violations.

BitClave’s case, handled under former SEC Chairman Jay Clayton, emphasized the agency’s view that many digital assets fall under securities laws. The CAT white paper described potential value increases, which the regulator argued encouraged speculative investment in an unregistered security.

As the US SEC faces criticism, President-elect Donald Trump has expressed plans to reshape crypto oversight. Trump has promised to remove current SEC Chair Gary Gensler and is reportedly considering creating a new White House position dedicated to cryptocurrency policy. 

✓ Share:

Kelvin Munene Murithi

Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 coin2049.io