Connect with us

Regulation

Elon Musk’s Companies Revenue Under Risk As EU Warns Heavy Penalties

Published

on


The European Union (EU) has warned Elon Musk’s social media platform X sternly, indicating that it could face substantial fines. These penalties may extend to revenue generated from X and Musk’s other enterprises, such as SpaceX and Neuralink. This measure could amplify the financial risks for Musk’s businesses under the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA).

European Union Targets Elon Musk’s Empire with Potential Revenue-Based Fines

Recent reports reveal that the European Union (EU) is contemplating imposing fines on Elon Musk’s X platform, potentially including revenues from his myriad other business ventures in the calculations. This approach comes under the Digital Services Act, which empowers the bloc to fine online platforms up to 6% of their annual global revenue for violations such as inadequate content moderation and transparency failures.

Hence, the potential fines could incorporate earnings from Musk’s companies like Space Exploration Technologies Corp. and Neuralink Corp., escalating the financial stakes. This approach suggests an aggressive regulatory posture in which Musk himself could be considered the liable entity rather than just the X platform. 

However, it is important to note that Tesla Inc. remains outside the purview of these potential fines, as it is a publicly-traded company not under Musk’s full control.

Navigating EU Regulations: X Platform Avoids DMA Scrutiny

These developments come even as Musk’s X platform managed to evade regulations under the EU’s Digital Markets Act last month due to its minimal market impact. However, the platform continues to face scrutiny for its content moderation practices. 

Moreover, the ongoing scrutiny stems from the platform’s struggles with controlling harmful content and misinformation. These challenges are magnified by the platform’s global reach and the high visibility and influence of its owner, Elon Musk.

Despite bypassing the requirements of the Digital Markets Act, X is still in the regulatory spotlight. The European Union’s Digital Services Act (DSA) is still a major regulatory concern, especially with the recent revenue-inclusion warning. The DSA ensures that digital platforms operate transparently and are held accountable for the content they host.

In addition, Elon Musk’s Tesla recently transferred its Bitcoin holdings, aggregating to a value of $760 million. The move involved reallocating its publicly known Bitcoin stash across multiple transactions, marking the company’s first such financial activity in over two years. These movements sparked speculation regarding the intentions behind them. 

In spite of the Tesla CEO’s continued troubles with the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA), Musk has maintained strong support for Trump in the coming US elections. This has led Musk to offer a substantial $75 million donation to America PAC, boosting Donald Trump’s presidential campaign.

✓ Share:

Ronny Mugendi

Ronny Mugendi is a seasoned crypto journalist with four years of professional experience, having contributed significantly to various media outlets on cryptocurrency trends and technologies. With over 4000 published articles across various media outlets, he aims to inform, educate and introduce more people to the Blockchain and DeFi world. Outside of his journalism career, Ronny enjoys the thrill of bike riding, exploring new trails and landscapes.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Regulation

Ripple CLO Criticizes Gary Gensler’s Justification For Crypto Lawsuits

Published

on


Ripple Chief Legal Officer (CLO) Stuart Alderoty has criticized the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Gary Gensler following his attempt to justify the crypto lawsuits that the Commission has instituted. The Ripple CLO’s statement has come amid speculations that Gensler could soon resign as the SEC Chair.

Ripple CLO Criticizes Gary Gensler’s Claim On Crypto Lawsuits

In an X post, the Ripple CLO criticized Gensler’s attempt to justify his four-year-long political crusade to destroy crypto by claiming he just continued what Jay Clayton began. Stuart Alderoty states this is like “burning down the house” and pleading innocence by arguing that Clayton lit the match.

Alderoty was referring to Gary Gensler’s speech in which he discussed the crypto industry. Gensler stated that when he arrived in 2021, the Commission under Jay Clayton had already brought 80 actions, including the Ripple case. The US SEC Chair remarked that this lawsuit was against participants in the crypto markets who were not following the “common-sense rules” of the road.

However, the Ripple CLO believes that the fact that Clayton instituted these lawsuits doesn’t justify all that Gensler has done in his four years as the SEC Chair to hinder the crypto industry’s growth. Gensler is known for his anti-crypto stance and has argued that most crypto assets are securities.

Interestingly, Gensler also hinted in that speech that he would likely resign soon enough as the SEC Chair. Individuals like former SEC official John Reed Stark have called on Gensler to resign since Donald Trump won the US presidential elections.

Meanwhile, the SEC looks to be getting a taste of its medicine. 18 US state attorney generals have filed a lawsuit accusing the SEC of a constitutional overreach in crypto regulation.

The Next SEC Chair Will Be Pro-Crypto

Amid the Ripple CLO’s statement, journalist Eleanor Terrett has confirmed that the next US SEC Chair will be pro-crypto. However, she suggested that the crypto industry and community should focus more on who becomes the next Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Chair.

This came as she cited sources who told Fox Business that the Donald Trump administration is looking to give the CFTC more responsibility regarding crypto regulation. She added that it is unclear how the CFTC will go about this, but it will require more funding than it currently has.

Meanwhile, it is worth mentioning that Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse recently expressed enthusiasm about the shifting regulatory landscape. Ripple CLO Stuart Alderoty had also recently called on Donald Trump to work towards fulfilling his promise of making the US the crypto capital by ending the SEC’s regulation-by-enforcement approach.

✓ Share:

Boluwatife Adeyemi

Boluwatife Adeyemi is a well-experienced crypto news writer and editor who has covered topics that cut across DeFi, NFTs, smart contracts, and blockchain interoperability, among others. Boluwatife has a knack for simplifying the most technical concepts and making it easy for crypto newbies to understand. Away from writing, He is an avid basketball lover and a part-time degen.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

Manhattan US Attorney To Reduce Crypto Cases After Major Convictions, Prosecutor Reveals

Published

on


The U.S. Attorney’s Office in Manhattan plans to reduce its focus on cryptocurrency-related crimes. This decision follows a series of major legal victories, according to Scott Hartman, co-chief of the securities and commodities task force at the Southern District of New York (SDNY). These include the high-profile conviction of Sam Bankman-Fried, founder of FTX.

Manhattan US Attorney to Focus Less on Crypto Fraud Amid Leadership Shift

The Manhattan US Attorney’s Office will now slow down on enforcing cases of cryptocurrency scams after it had increased its activity in the previous year. Scott Hartman made this admission during a conference held in New York stating that fewer prosecutors will now be focusing on these kinds of crimes.

He mentioned that the office had dealt with many of the severe fraud issues arising from the market volatility during the 2022 cryptocurrency winter.

Moreover, Hartman clarified that the reduced focus reflects the office’s strategic realignment. This shift comes as other regulatory agencies, such as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), maintain their active roles in monitoring crypto regulations.

Ex-SEC Chair Jay Clayton To Lead Manhattan Attorney’s Office

The cuts in resources for crypto cases occur when there is likely to be a change in leadership at the Manhattan US Attorney’s Office. The new front-runner for the position of U.S. Attorney once Trump gets into office is former SEC Chair, Jay Clayton.

Clayton, who was director of the SEC from 2017 to 2021, took a less confrontational stance than current SEC Chair Gary Gensler did. Notably, the crypto community witnessed a heated debate over the SEC leadership criticizing the current administration approach. As such, several crypto enthusiasts including ex-SEC official John Reed Stark demanded that Gary Gensler resign.

The appointment of Clayton suggests a potential recalibration of priorities within the Manhattan US Attorney’s Office. As the office changes its leadership it is expected that it will shift its attention to other general issues concerning securities and commodities.

 

Hartman noted that the successful handling of major cases allowed the office to adjust its allocation of resources. Moving forward, fewer prosecutors will be tasked with investigating cryptocurrency crimes as the office prioritizes other enforcement.

Despite reducing its focus, the Manhattan US Attorney’s Office emphasized ongoing collaboration with agencies like the SEC and CFTC. Hartman acknowledged that these regulatory bodies ensure continued oversight and enforcement against unlawful activities. This cooperative approach aims to maintain accountability while enabling the office to concentrate on a wider range of legal priorities.

✓ Share:

Ronny Mugendi

Ronny Mugendi is a seasoned crypto journalist with four years of professional experience, having contributed significantly to various media outlets on cryptocurrency trends and technologies. With over 4000 published articles across various media outlets, he aims to inform, educate and introduce more people to the Blockchain and DeFi world. Outside of his journalism career, Ronny enjoys the thrill of bike riding, exploring new trails and landscapes.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

Dogecoin Lawsuit Against Elon Musk Ends As Investors Withdraw Appeal

Published

on


A Dogecoin lawsuit against Elon Musk has come to a close after investors decided to withdraw their appeal. The case, which accused Musk of fraud and insider trading related to the cryptocurrency, had been dismissed earlier this year.

The withdrawal also includes a request to drop related sanctions against Musk’s lawyers, marking the end of a high-profile legal battle in federal court.

Dogecoin Lawsuit Against Elon Musk and Tesla Ends

The Dogecoin lawsuit, originally filed by Dogecoin investors, alleged that Musk and his electric car company Tesla engaged in fraudulent activities to manipulate Dogecoin’s price. Investors claimed Musk’s tweets, public appearances, and statements—including on NBC’s “Saturday Night Live”—were used to profit at their expense.

The investors initially sought $258 billion in damages, amending their complaint four times over two years. However, on August 29, U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein dismissed the case, stating that reasonable investors could not establish securities fraud based on Musk’s public statements. The judge noted that Musk’s comments, such as describing Dogecoin as the “future currency of Earth,” could not be reasonably interpreted as market manipulation or insider trading.

Subsequently, this week, the investors have formally withdrew their appeal and their motion to sanction Musk’s legal team for alleged misconduct. Similarly, Musk and Tesla dropped their motion to sanction the investors’ lawyer for what they called a “frivolous” and ever-changing lawsuit. Both parties as a result filed a stipulation to dismiss the case in Manhattan federal court on Thursday night, pending final approval by Judge Hellerstein.

This Is A Breaking News, Please Check Back For More

✓ Share:

Kelvin Munene Murithi

Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 coin2049.io