Regulation
Elon Musk’s Companies Revenue Under Risk As EU Warns Heavy Penalties

The European Union (EU) has warned Elon Musk’s social media platform X sternly, indicating that it could face substantial fines. These penalties may extend to revenue generated from X and Musk’s other enterprises, such as SpaceX and Neuralink. This measure could amplify the financial risks for Musk’s businesses under the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA).
European Union Targets Elon Musk’s Empire with Potential Revenue-Based Fines
Recent reports reveal that the European Union (EU) is contemplating imposing fines on Elon Musk’s X platform, potentially including revenues from his myriad other business ventures in the calculations. This approach comes under the Digital Services Act, which empowers the bloc to fine online platforms up to 6% of their annual global revenue for violations such as inadequate content moderation and transparency failures.
Hence, the potential fines could incorporate earnings from Musk’s companies like Space Exploration Technologies Corp. and Neuralink Corp., escalating the financial stakes. This approach suggests an aggressive regulatory posture in which Musk himself could be considered the liable entity rather than just the X platform.
However, it is important to note that Tesla Inc. remains outside the purview of these potential fines, as it is a publicly-traded company not under Musk’s full control.
Navigating EU Regulations: X Platform Avoids DMA Scrutiny
These developments come even as Musk’s X platform managed to evade regulations under the EU’s Digital Markets Act last month due to its minimal market impact. However, the platform continues to face scrutiny for its content moderation practices.
Moreover, the ongoing scrutiny stems from the platform’s struggles with controlling harmful content and misinformation. These challenges are magnified by the platform’s global reach and the high visibility and influence of its owner, Elon Musk.
Despite bypassing the requirements of the Digital Markets Act, X is still in the regulatory spotlight. The European Union’s Digital Services Act (DSA) is still a major regulatory concern, especially with the recent revenue-inclusion warning. The DSA ensures that digital platforms operate transparently and are held accountable for the content they host.
In addition, Elon Musk’s Tesla recently transferred its Bitcoin holdings, aggregating to a value of $760 million. The move involved reallocating its publicly known Bitcoin stash across multiple transactions, marking the company’s first such financial activity in over two years. These movements sparked speculation regarding the intentions behind them.
In spite of the Tesla CEO’s continued troubles with the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA), Musk has maintained strong support for Trump in the coming US elections. This has led Musk to offer a substantial $75 million donation to America PAC, boosting Donald Trump’s presidential campaign.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Regulation
US SEC Drops Charges Against Hawk Tuah Girl Hailey Welch

Hawk Tuah girl Hailey Welch, known for her association with the controversial $HAWK token, has been cleared of any wrongdoing after a lengthy investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC has decided not to press charges against Welch in connection with the rapid rise and subsequent collapse of the meme-based cryptocurrency.
US SEC Investigation Into Hawk Tuah Girl Concludes Without Charges
The SEC had launched an investigation into the $HAWK token after its dramatic price drop. The token, which was linked to Welch’s viral persona, initially saw a market cap surge to $490 million before crashing by over 90%. Investors who were impacted by the crash filed a lawsuit against those behind the project, alleging that the coin had been promoted and sold without proper registration.
Hawk Tuah girl Hailey Welch, who cooperated fully with the investigation, expressed relief after the SEC’s decision. “For the past few months, I’ve been cooperating with all the authorities and attorneys, and finally, that work is complete,” Welch told TMZ.
Her attorney, James Sallah, confirmed that the SEC had closed the case without any findings against her, adding that there would be no monetary sanctions or restrictions on Welch’s future involvement in cryptocurrency or securities.
This Is A Developing News, Please Check Back For More
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Regulation
Sonic Labs To Abandon Plans For Algorithmic USD Stablecoin, Here’s Why

Barely a week after hinting at launching an algorithmic USD stablecoin, Sonic Labs is shuttering its plans. Sonic Labs co-founder Andre Cronje revealed that incoming stablecoin regulation in the US contributes to the change of stance.
Sonic Labs Makes U-Turn Over Algorithmic USD Stablecoin
In mid-March, Sonic Labs disclosed plans for a yield-generating algorithmic stablecoin for its blockchain. However, new developments in the US regulatory landscape are forcing the company to ditch its algorithmic stablecoin ambitions.
Sonic Labs co-founder Andre Cronje confirmed the change in direction via an X post following the release of the full draft of the STABLE Act by Congress for clearer oversight. According to the text, lawmakers are pushing for a two-year moratorium on algorithmic stablecoin, souring Sonic Labs plans.
Unlike mainstream stablecoins backed by fiat or other commodities, algorithmic stablecoins rely on smart contracts to maintain their peg. The 2022 implosion of Terra’s ecosystem following the de-pegging of its TerraUSD (UST) algorithmic stablecoin stunned regulators.
“We will no longer be releasing a USD-based algorithmic stablecoin,” said Cronje.
In a light-hearted note, community members teased potential strategies for Sonic Labs to sidestep incoming stablecoin regulation. Apart from the loophole of launching the algorithmic stablecoin before the regulation goes live, Cronje teased an algorithmic dirham that will be denominated in USD.
Industry Players Are Bracing For New Stablecoin Regulations
Stablecoin issuers are steeling themselves for incoming stablecoin regulations in the US. While the GENIUS Act and STABLE Act continue to inch forward, there are common denominators in both bills.
For starters, there is the requirement for equivalent reserves at a 1:1 ratio with both bills steering clear of algorithmic stablecoins. The White House is favoring the GENIUS Act over the STABLE Act as lobbyists rally to stifle the possibility of a Conference Committee.
Authorities are targeting stablecoin regulation to reach Trump in two months as issuers jostle for position. Tether, Circle, and Ripple are staking their claims to lead the US government’s ambitions to rely on stablecoins to maintain the dollar’s dominance.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Regulation
FDIC Revises Crypto Guidelines Allowing Banks To Enter Digital Assets

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has updated its guidelines, enabling banks to engage in cryptocurrency-related activities without seeking prior approval. This new policy shift signals a change in the FDIC’s approach to the growing role of digital assets in the banking sector.
New FDIC Guidelines on Crypto-Related Activities
The FDIC has issued a new Financial Institution Letter (FIL-7-2025), which provides updated guidance for banks looking to engage in cryptocurrency activities. The new guidance rescinds the previous policy set out in FIL-16-2022, which required banks to notify the FDIC before engaging in such activities.
Under the new rules, banks can now participate in permissible crypto-related activities without waiting for FDIC approval, as long as they manage the risks appropriately.
This change is seen as a shift in the FDIC’s stance, following the agency’s earlier stance that required prior approval for crypto engagements. FDIC Acting Chairman Travis Hill expressed that this new approach aims to establish a more consistent framework for banks to explore and adopt emerging technologies like crypto-assets and blockchain.
“With today’s action, the FDIC is turning the page on the flawed approach of the past three years,” said Hill in a statement.
This Is A Developing News, Please Check Back For More
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
-
Altcoin21 hours ago
Dogecoin Price Set To Reach $1 As Once In A Year Buy Opportunity Returns
-
Market24 hours ago
Coinbase to Rival Binance With BNB Perpetual Futures
-
Market23 hours ago
SatLayer CEO Luke Xie Talks Bitcoin Restaking and DeFi’s Future
-
Altcoin23 hours ago
Blessing or Curse for the Crypto Market?
-
Market22 hours ago
Hedera Falls 4% as Bears Dominate: What’s Next for HBAR?
-
Regulation18 hours ago
FDIC Revises Crypto Guidelines Allowing Banks To Enter Digital Assets
-
Altcoin22 hours ago
Why the US SEC Is Delaying the Ripple Case?
-
Ethereum21 hours ago
Ethereum Fails To Break $2,100 Resistance – Growing Downside Risk?
✓ Share: