Regulation
Deadline for Biden to Veto SAB 121 Repeal Delayed
The delivery of H.J. Res 109 to President Joe Biden has been delayed, granting him an extended deadline until June 3rd to decide on the repeal of Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 121.
This resolution, which aims at reversing an SEC rule that regulates cryptocurrency custodial services, passed the Senate with the support of both Democrats and Republicans.
Deadline for Biden to Veto SAB 121
H. J. Res 109, the resolution to repeal SAB 121, was passed in the Senate last week with a 60 to 38 vote with 11 Democrats, 1 Independent, and 48 Republicans supporting the measure. The resolution is aimed at the SEC’s rule that would make banks report customer-owned digital currencies as their own assets on balance sheets, an initiative which has received much opposition from the banking and cryptocurrency industries.
Update on #SAB 121 process. We received confirmation that Congress did not send over H.J Res 109, Resolution to repeal SAB 121, to Biden until last night.
That changes 10 day window. @POTUS now has until June 3rd to veto the Resolution (10 day window excluding Sundays). https://t.co/b9RHs8hS7a
— Cody Carbone (@CodyCarboneDC) May 23, 2024
The bill, proposed by the House Majority Whip Rep. Tom Emmer (R-Minn. ), focuses on the financial privacy and aims to curb overreach of government through financial transactions.
After the Senate vote, the resolution was not immediately transmitted to President Biden, altering the standard ten-day veto period to June 3rd. This delay is critical because it occurs during the congressional recess, thus affecting the possibility of a pocket veto and allowing the President ample time for the decision-making process while Congress is in its pro-forma sessions.
Presidential Decision Awaits
President Biden now faces three options regarding the Joint Resolution: He can approve it and sign it into law, he can reject it and veto it, or he can do nothing and it will become law. Initially, President Biden threatened a veto in the Statement of Administration Policy on May 8th arguing about financial regulation and supervision.
Nonetheless, the precedents of previous veto threats show that the first threats do not necessarily lead to the application of the veto, which means the outcomes can be different.
However, the SEC’s rule has been under criticism with critics claiming that it would frustrate innovation and encroach on personal business through the regulation of personal finances.
Industry Reaction and Regulatory Context
The move by the Senate to repeal SAB 121 has however received the backing of the cryptocurrency industry, and particularly Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer, Stuart Alderoty who considered the repeal as a victory against overregulation. SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce, who is often referred to as “Crypto Mom,” also expressed similar sentiments while discussing her concerns about the SEC’s stance on digital asset regulation.
At the same time, Michael Saylor, the CEO of MicroStrategy, has welcomed the Senate’s move, stressing the importance of defending the rights of digital currency holders and avoiding excessive regulation that could undermine the US’s standing in the global financial industry.
Amid this tension, today, Sen Cynthia Lummis restated the growing support for crypto assets in Congress following recent wins of the Senate’s decision to repeal SAB 121 and passage of FIT 21.
Read Also: Crypto Market Correction: $120B Liquidated As BTC, ETH, XRP, Altcoins Price Tumble
The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Polymarket, a crypto-based prediction market, is likely to be prohibited by France’s gambling regulator, the ANJ, after a huge amount of bets were placed on the 2024 U.S. presidential election. Since the global audience engaged in prediction platforms, Polymarket experienced a record jump, with $450 million expected to be distributed to users following the victory of Donald Trump.
This increase of betting volume and large stakes has become a matter of concern for the French regulator because the platform offers unlicensed gambling services.
$450 Million in Payouts Expected After U.S. Election Bets
Prediction markets, which are expected to increase their payout to election bettors to around $450m following Donald Trump’s projected win, are attracting increasing attention.
Although conventional polls pointed to a closer contest, prediction markets such as Polymarket and Kalshi recorded a steep rise in Trump’s chances in the last few days, indicating a strong divergence with poll-based expectations.
Among the active users of Polymarket, a French trader called “Theo” made a $26 million bet on Trump’s win and won $49 million. This big bet made Polymarket popular, as the French authorities paid attention to the platform and its popularity among French residents, which led to concerns about the compliance of the platform with French gambling legislation.
France’s ANJ Considers Blocking Access to Polymarket
The ANJ has claimed that Polymarket is involved in gambling which is only allowed in France by licensed operators. According to local media, the regulator has the power to ban access to unlicensed gambling sites and is expected to restrict access to Polymarket soon.
An ANJ insider said: “Polymarket is just betting on something that is completely uncertain, which is exactly what gambling is.”
If put in place, the ban would prevent the usage of the application in France, despite the fact that users can still try to avoid the restriction by connecting to VPN. The ANJ could also try to influence media outlets and directories to stop advertising or linking to Polymarket and, thus, limit its audiences even more.
Regulatory Concerns Over Market Manipulation
The high level of activity on Polymarket has led to speculations that the platform may be used for market manipulation. Two blockchain analysis firms, Chaos Labs and Inca Digital, recently revealed that there was potential wash trading within Polymarket’s U.S. presidential betting market where the same assets are bought and sold to simply create a fake market. This type of trading is rather manipulative and can lead to the distortion of signals on the market and mislead other participants.
The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission also has concerns about prediction markets and put forward a rule in May aiming at stricter regulation of such markets due to the potential for manipulation.
Although no final decision has been reached, regulatory actions could impact Polymarket’s ability to operate freely in other markets, including the U.S.
Kelvin Munene Murithi
Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
FTX co-founder Gary Wang has requested a federal judge not to send him to prison. He noted that he is testifying against the former business partner, Sam Bankman-Fried, someone he has known for a long time in a fraud case.
The lawyer for Wang submitted a sentencing memo in Manhattan federal court wherein he claimed that his client should not be incarcerated as he provided assistance to the prosecutors as well as his role in the scheme was comparatively less.
Wang, who pleaded guilty to fraud and conspiracy when FTX went bankrupt in 2022, is to receive his sentencing on the 20th of November.
FTX Co-Founder Gary Wang Appeals for No Jail Time
The defense counsel for FTX co-founder Gary Wang highlighted his client’s early cooperation with the federal prosecutors as one of the key reasons why the court should consider him for mercy. According to Graff, Wang was one of the first FTX executives to meet with the authorities and share information on the FTX and Alameda Research. Wang gave a testimony in the trial that led to the recent conviction of Bankman-Fried who was sentenced to 25 years in prison.
Speaking at the trial, Wang described how he was ordered to change the code of FTX in order to enable Alameda Research to use the assets of the company’s clients, which is one of the key points of Bankman-Fried’s fraud.
FTX co-founder’s lawyer noted that his involvement in the fraud was less than some of the other former executives, including Caroline Ellison, former CEO of Alameda Research, and Nishad Singh, FTX’s former head of engineering. Wang, his lawyer said, did not start or operate the scheme and was not personally involved in the provision of false information to the investors.
“Gary was not involved in the scheme at its inception, was never provided with details of the scheme, and, in contrast to Bankman-Fried, Ellison and Singh, never engaged in any affirmative action of deception,” Graff wrote.
Sentencing Comparisons to Other Executives
Wang’s attorney argued that a prison sentence would create an “unwarranted sentencing disparity” with Nishad Singh, who avoided jail time after pleading guilty and cooperating with the government. Singh, who faced potential decades-long sentences, was ultimately sentenced to time served and three years of supervised release.
Ellison, another major cooperator, received a two-year prison sentence. FTX co-founder Gary Wang contended that Wang’s level of involvement was even lower than Singh’s, supporting a non-custodial sentence for Wang as well.
Graff also noted Wang’s personal circumstances, stating that Wang is expecting the birth of his first child shortly after his sentencing date. Wang’s attorney suggested that allowing him to remain with his family would align with the court’s treatment of other cooperators in the case.
“Gary wants nothing more than to be a good husband and father and to continue his work to facilitate FTX victims’ recovery,” Graff wrote.
Separately, the U.S. government is working to reclaim approximately $13.25 million in political donations made by FTX executives, including Bankman-Fried and Singh. Judge Lewis Kaplan however granted the government additional time to negotiate the return of these funds, extending discussions with the PACs until January 15, 2025.
Kelvin Munene Murithi
Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a motion seeking judgment in its case against cryptocurrency exchange Kraken, focusing on defenses such as “fair notice” and the “major questions doctrine.”
This move, led by SEC Chairman Gary Gensler’s team, aims to limit further discovery into the agency’s regulatory policies, particularly those affecting the crypto sector. The timing of the filing has drawn attention, as some in the industry view it as a strategic attempt to shield the SEC’s methods from closer examination.
US SEC Files Motion for Judgment Against Kraken
The SEC’s motion seeks to dismiss defenses put forward by Kraken that include the fair notice defense and the major questions doctrine. The fair notice defense argues that Kraken did not receive adequate regulatory guidance regarding its crypto-related activities.
Meanwhile, the major questions doctrine suggests that regulatory agencies, such as the SEC, should not make major policy decisions without clear direction from Congress.
Subsequently, the US SEC’s motion appears intended to prevent further discovery into its policies, which Kraken and other crypto advocates have criticized as inconsistent and unclear. A similar motion was filed in Ripple case, where the US SEC failed to secure a judgment. Michael O’Connor, an attorney representing Kraken expects a similar outcome in the Kraken case, though Kraken has indicated that it has additional defenses should this motion proceed.
This Is A Breaking News, Please Check Back For More
Kelvin Munene Murithi
Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Polymarket Faces Ban in France as US Election Betting Ends
Trump and Lummis Unite on $76 Billion National Bitcoin Reserve
MrBeast faces allegations of crypto insider trading
Why Bitcoin Users Are Moving to Altcoins? As Ethereum Price Jumps 11%
XRP Price Ready to Rally? Signs Point to a Bullish Move
Solana (SOL) Rallies Strongly, Setting Sights on $200
2.52 Million Altcoins Are Ruining Crypto’s Future
Animoca Brands Valuation Tanks 75% In Two Years, Here’s Why
Crypto exchange BingX hacked for $43 million
Are The Big Players Losing Interest?
Coinbase cbBTC Set to go Live on Solana
Hong Kong’s Securities Association Tips Authorities On Crypto Self-Regulation
2.52 Million Altcoins Are Ruining Crypto’s Future
Animoca Brands Valuation Tanks 75% In Two Years, Here’s Why
Crypto exchange BingX hacked for $43 million
Are The Big Players Losing Interest?
Coinbase cbBTC Set to go Live on Solana
Hong Kong’s Securities Association Tips Authorities On Crypto Self-Regulation
-
Market23 hours agoCelestia and GOAT investors turn to Poodlana to try and recoup losses
-
Altcoin20 hours agoShiba Inu Burn Rate Rockets 3,700% Sparking Optimism, SHIB To Hit $2?
-
Altcoin19 hours agoRipple CLO Reveals How Donald Trump Can Make US The Crypto Capital
-
Altcoin18 hours agoXRP Price At Risk As Ripple Moves $250M?
-
Ethereum10 hours agoEthereum Analyst Sets $3,400 Target Once ETH Breaks Key Resistance – Details
-
Altcoin23 hours agoBinance To Delist These Crypto in BTC Trading Pairs
-
Market22 hours agoBest Solana Airdrops for Early Crypto Access
-
Market9 hours agoBitcoin Price Pushes Rally Further: Bulls in Full Force
✓ Share: