Regulation
Danish Regulator To Ban Unhosted Bitcoin (BTC) Wallets
The Danish Financial Supervisory Authority (DFSA) is working towards abolishing unhosted Bitcoin (BTC) wallets as part of its Decentralized Finance (DeFi) guidance.
Denmark Bitcoin Wallet Ban Aligns With MiCA Regulation
The regulator is concerned about the activities of unregulated platforms in the crypto space. Markedly, the DFSA emphasizes the need for all crypto platforms and service providers including interface providers and mobile app developers to be regulated.
DENMARK TO ABOUT TO BAN BITCOIN WALLETS
We have finally reached this point.
In the latest DeFi guidance of Danish FSA, the regulator goes too far: The guidance tries to capture everything in crypto regulation, including your Bitcoin wallet, using “interface” argument. DFSA says… pic.twitter.com/F7jFuLhNqC
— Mikko Ohtamaa (@moo9000) June 26, 2024
Ordinarily, the use of unregulated interfaces violates the legislation embedded in the upcoming Market in Crypto Asset (MiCA) regulatory framework. The partial implementation of the rule is only a few days away. This necessitates that all crypto ventures in the European Union are put in order before then.
As a result of Denmark’s move, no crypto exchanges or trading platforms would be able to offer Bitcoin wallets, DEX interfaces or any other crypto-related products to Danish customers anymore. The only exemption would be for them to get regulated in Denmark.
Two weeks ago, the European Banking Authority (EBA) completed the draft of the technical standards for the prudential matters as per the MiCA regulation. This involved ensuring that all the firms in the EU adhere to the high financial standards.
Some of the amendments include change in own funds requirements, changes in liquidity provisions and very strict recovery plans for the issuers of the crypto assets. Notably, the MiCA regulation affects stablecoins especially those pegged to the United States Dollar.
Will MiCA Squeeze Crypto Out of Existence?
A few market observers and key crypto players opine that these rules are rather rigid.
Mikko Ohtamaa who reported Denmark’s ban on unhosted Bitcoin wallets on X, suggested that the rules in MiCA are outlined to squeeze digital assets out of existence, a sentiment that Gary Gensler, the Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) holds. The DFSA’s intention may be good, but Ohtamaa does not think “overregulation” is the right approach.
“Trying to force everyone to be a regulated intermediate in a peer-to-peer world sounds cool, but you might as well be honest with your talking points and say “In reality we want to ban all cryptocurrencies, we are just sneaky about it” because this is the outcome,” Ohtamaa, known by his affiliation with the Trading Protocol wrote on X.
Read More: Kaspa Price Analysis: Is This the Beginning of Bullish Phase for KAS?
The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Regulation
Former Solicitor General Paul Clement Joins Crypto Industry Fight
A week after Custodia Bank filed an appeal in the 10th Circuit Court challenging the Fed’s power to deny it a master account, former Solicitor General Paul Clement has now filed an amicus brief on behalf of the crypto industry.
Paul Clement Takes Custodia Bank vs Fed Fight Ahead
As said, in the recent Custodia Bank vs. Fed case, Paul Clement filed an Amicus brief on Wednesday, July 3, while supporting the crypto industry. Clement has gained popularity in his recent success in overturning the Chevron Defence in the Supreme Court case in the Supreme Court case involving Loper Bright fishermen.
Also Read: US SEC Takes Major Blow In Chevron Howey Test Case, Implication For Crypto
In this ongoing legal fight, The Digital Chamber (TDC) and the Global Business Blockchain Council-USA (GBBC-USA) have expressed their significant interest and unique perspective. With extensive experience in the digital assets industry, the two organizations have argued that denying state-chartered banks a reliable path to participate in the national banking just because of the involvement with digital assets will threaten the growth and success of the trillion-dollar blockchain industry.
The two organization argue that upholding the lower court’s decision will give politically unaccountable federal officials and unchecked power to stiffle innovation thereby cutting off legitimate businesses from having crucial access to the global financial system.
The District Court stated that the “Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (“FRBKC”) has unreviewable discretion to denynonmember depository institutionsa master account”.
TDC and GBBC argued that despite following the legal boundaries, this court decision set dangerous precedence for any industry that might fall out with the Fed officials.
Paul Clement Raises Constitutional Concerns on Fed’s Structure
In the amicus brief, the former Solicitor General has raised some constitutional questions regarding the Fed’s structure. Clement states: “In sum, by affording Federal Reserve Bank presidents significant and largely unconstrained discretionary power, the district court’s decision raises serious constitutional questions under Article II.”
“The district court’s decision threatens the dual system by granting Federal Reserve Bank officials unreviewable discretion to “effectively crippl[e]” state-chartered banks operating legally,” he added.
Also Read: Custodia Bank CEO Predicts “Rip Roaring” Bitcoin Bull Market
The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Regulation
Kamala Harris Overtakes Biden In Prediction Markets, Has Trump’s Opponent Changed?
Kamala Harris has recently surged ahead of President Joe Biden in the prediction markets. This marks a significant shift in the political landscape as the 2024 U.S. presidential election race intensifies. However, the fight between Republican candidate Donald Trump and Biden isn’t over yet.
Kamala Harris Oversteps Biden In Betting Markets
On Predict It, Kamala Harris U.S. 2024 election winning bets surged to 22 cents while Biden’s dropped to 21 cents. Furthermore, Trump took the lead with a major gap as the bet was priced 59 cents on his win. Nevertheless, it could be too early to deem Harris as Trump’s ultimate opponent.
According to a new Reuters poll, President Biden is now neck-and-neck with his Republican challenger, Donald Trump, in the upcoming November election. This poll also reveals a shifting sentiment among Democrats, with approximately one-third believing Biden should consider stepping aside following a ‘ridiculous’ debate performance.
The debate in question has sparked internal discussions among Democrats. Moreover, some Biden loyalists are now questioning his viability for re-election in 2024. In addition, sources within the party indicate that Vice President Kamala Harris is emerging as the preferred candidate to step in should Biden decide to withdraw from the race.
Biden recently offered an explanation for his debate performance, admitting he “wasn’t very smart” for undertaking extensive travel before the event. “I didn’t listen to my staff… and then I almost fell asleep on stage,” he remarked during an event with Representative Don Beyer. “It’s not an excuse, but an explanation,” he added.
Also Read: U.S. Election Won’t Alter Positive Crypto Regulations, Says Mike Novogratz
The U.S. Election Race Intensifies
The political momentum appears to be shifting towards Trump, who now holds a 3-point advantage over Biden in key battleground states and a 2-point lead nationally. This change underscores a critical dynamic in the race: voter motivation. Currently, Republicans show higher enthusiasm, with more indicating they will “definitely” vote compared to their Democratic counterparts.
Over 90% of Biden and Trump supporters are firmly opposed to voting for the other candidate. Despite this strong partisan divide, the overall stability of the election race has not significantly changed. Biden experienced a brief uptick in support in June after Trump was convicted of felonies in New York. However, this did not significantly alter the broader election dynamics.
In light of the recent debate and shifting polls, the Democratic Party faces a pivotal decision regarding its candidate for the 2024 election. Kamala Harris’s rise in the prediction markets signals growing support within the party and among political analysts. If Biden’s campaign continues to face challenges, Harris may become the Democratic frontrunner.
Also Read: Binance Unveils Changes In Turkey In Compliance With Regulation
The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Regulation
Ripple and Coinbase Use Binance Win to Contest SEC Claims
Coinbase and Ripple Labs are using Binance’s pivotal legal victory to challenge ongoing cases with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Both companies argue that the SEC’s approach needs more clarity and consistency, necessitating formal rulemaking to better define the regulatory perimeter for digital assets.
Ripple, Coinbase Cite Binance Case Against SEC
Ripple Labs and Coinbase have intensified their legal defenses by referencing a recent court order involving Binance, which achieved a partial dismissal in its SEC lawsuit. The companies argue that this precedent highlights the need for the SEC to establish clear regulations. In its latest court filing, Ripple emphasized the judge’s remark that cryptocurrency does not align seamlessly with existing securities laws, such as those established by the 1946 Howey Test. This test is crucial for determining whether a transaction qualifies as an investment contract and thus falls under securities regulation.
Coinbase has concurrently voiced concerns over the SEC’s expansive interpretation of securities laws applied to the crypto industry. The exchange asserts that this broad application could be more extensive and better defined, pushing for a definitive rulemaking process to provide legal clarity. In its appeal, Coinbase cited the recent Binance ruling to bolster its case for rulemaking, arguing that the decision underscores the inconsistencies in current regulatory applications.
Also Read: Bybit Exchange Unveils Support For ASI Alliance, Will FET Rebound?
Coinbase Demands Clarity in SEC Regulatory Battle
The SEC has engaged with various cryptocurrency platforms and assets, deeming some of their operations as securities offerings without proper registration. In the case of Ripple, the SEC’s lawsuit initiated in December 2020 alleged that Ripple raised over $1.3 billion through sales of its XRP token, which the SEC classified as an unregistered security. However, in a significant turn, Judge Analisa Torres ruled that certain “programmatic sales” of XRP did not constitute securities transactions, introducing a nuanced interpretation Ripple now seeks to leverage to challenge broader SEC claims.
Coinbase faces similar regulatory scrutiny. The SEC argues that the platform operated as an unregistered securities exchange, a claim that Coinbase refutes, urging a formal rulemaking process to clarify these regulatory boundaries. Both Coinbase and Ripple use recent judicial outcomes, notably the Binance case, to argue for a more structured and transparent regulatory framework from the SEC, stressing that the current state of affairs is inefficient and unclear.
Crypto Firms Rally Around Binance Court Decision
The partial victory for Binance in its own SEC lawsuit has become a strategic reference point for other crypto entities embroiled in legal challenges with the regulator. Despite Judge Amy Berman Jackson’s decision to proceed with most of the SEC’s claims against Binance, her dismissal of the charge regarding secondary sales of Binance Coin (BNB) as securities has been perceived as a significant legal precedent. Coinbase and Ripple have particularly highlighted this aspect of the ruling in their ongoing litigation.
Further developments are anticipated, with a scheduled conference for the SEC’s case against Binance set for July 9. Meanwhile, Coinbase and Ripple continue to press for regulatory clarity, which they argue is crucial for the industry’s stability and growth.
Also Read: Genesis Digital Is Considering Going Public Via IPO In US: Report
The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
-
Blockchain2 months ago
Hong Kong’s Securities Association Tips Authorities On Crypto Self-Regulation
-
Regulation2 months ago
Terraform Labs Refuses to Pay $5.3 Billion Fine, Says SEC Has No Evidence
-
Altcoin2 weeks ago
Are Solana, Cardano, Polygon Commodities As US SEC Ends Ethereum Investigation?
-
Regulation2 months ago
CFTC Appoints Dr. Ted Kaouk as First Chief AI Officer
-
Market3 weeks ago
Avalanche (AVAX) Under Pressure: Prolonged Downtrend Next?
-
NFT3 weeks ago
New And Upcoming NFT Projects
-
Market2 weeks ago
TON Foundation’s Plan to Onboard 500 Million Users
-
Altcoin2 months ago
10 Years Old Dogecoin Stash Sale Leaves DOGE Owner With Million-Dollar Loss
✓ Share: