Regulation
Coinbase Files Closing Brief In Lawsuit Over SEC Rulemaking Denial
Coinbase, a leading crypto exchange, has filed its closing brief in a lawsuit challenging the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The case centers on the SEC’s denial of rulemaking petition by Coinbase, which the exchange argues is crucial for the digital asset industry. In addition, the brief highlights the regulatory agency’s shift in stance regarding crypto.
Contents Of Coinbase’s Closing Brief
At the heart of Coinbase’s argument is a single, controversial sentence in the SEC’s denial. The SEC’s order merely “disagree[d]” with Coinbase’s concerns about the workability of current SEC rules for digital asset firms. Coinbase claims this disagreement lacks reasoned decision-making. “The SEC’s order must be vacated on this elementary ground alone,” wrote Paul Grewal, Coinbase’s Chief Legal Officer.
Coinbase’s brief describes a troubling pattern of SEC behavior. The SEC has demanded compliance from digital asset firms based on an expansive interpretation of its authority, yet it has refused to establish clear rules to enable such compliance. Instead, the SEC has launched extensive litigation against companies for failing to comply with unclear regulations.
“This pattern of conduct is a purposeful effort to destroy an industry by demanding the impossible and prosecuting companies that fail to achieve it,” the brief asserts. Moreover, Grewal elaborates on the broader implications of the regulatory agency’s stance. In addition, the SEC claims it doesn’t need to make compliance feasible for the industry.
“The SEC apparently views its rules not as tools to enable compliance with federal statutes, but as weapons to dismantle industries it disfavors,” the closing brief states. Moreover, the agency’s justification for its stance includes pointing to its numerous enforcement actions as proof that existing rules are workable.
Furthermore, Coinbase counters that these enforcement actions are merely part of a broader strategy to crush the digital asset industry. “They are a bludgeon—by design,” Coinbase argues. The brief also addresses the inconsistency in the SEC’s approach to digital assets over the years.
Also Read: Coinbase Adds Shiba Inu, FLOKI, BONK In Full-Trading Mode, Prices To Recover?
Shift In SEC Chair Gary Gensler’s Stance
SEC Chair Gary Gensler‘s statements have shifted from acknowledging the lack of a clear regulatory framework for crypto exchanges in 2021 to asserting broad regulatory authority a year later. Additionally, the SEC allowed Coinbase to go public in 2020 without indicating its business model violated securities laws. Now, the SEC is suing Coinbase, claiming those same business practices are unlawful.
Moreover, the crypto exchange emphasizes that the SEC’s shifting positions and inconsistent enforcement actions have created a climate of confusion and uncertainty. For instance, while Bitcoin and Ether are not considered securities, the SEC has not clarified why other digital assets are treated differently. This inconsistency is exemplified by the SEC’s selective targeting of tokens in its enforcement actions.
The SEC’s reliance on its vague “facts and circumstances” standard for determining whether digital assets are securities is another point of contention. Coinbase argues that this standard is too abstract and fails to provide clear guidance. “The SEC has never coherently explained why the facts and circumstances underlying Bitcoin and Ether lead to a different result than the facts and circumstances underlying the tokens it has claimed are securities,” the CEX states.
Moreover, Coinbase highlights that rulemaking is the appropriate mechanism to address these issues. Rulemaking would require the SEC to articulate a clear theory of its regulatory approach, subject it to public comment, and ensure judicial review before enforcement. This process would provide the necessary clarity and fairness for the digital asset industry.
Coinbase’s closing brief underscores the necessity of judicial intervention. In addition, the company urges the court not only to vacate the SEC’s order but also to mandate rulemaking. “Only a court order directing [the SEC] to commence rulemaking will end its caprice,” the brief concludes.
Also Read: XRP Price To Rally 500% As XRP/BTC Witnesses Reversal, Analyst Predicts
The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Regulation
Ex-SEC Lawyer Says XRP Lawsuit Settlement Weeks Away
The crypto community is rife with speculation about an imminent Ripple SEC case settlement as the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) prepares for its first meeting under acting chair Mark Uyeda. However, ex-Securities lawyer Marc Fagel debunked rumors of the settlement. He suggested that those holding out for a resolution will likely be disappointed.
According to the former SEC attorney, the Ripple SEC case settlement is likely to happen after Paul Atkin’s appointment as the SEC Chair. While all eyes are on Thursday’s closed meeting, it remains uncertain whether the XRP lawsuit will reach a conclusion shortly.
Is Ripple SEC Case Settlement Imminent?
In his recent X post, Securities lawyer Marc Fagel dismissed rumors of the Ripple SEC case settlement, which the community expects to follow Thursday’s closed meeting. Asserting that the meeting has nothing to do with the XRP lawsuit, Fagel stated,
This is the same meeting they hold nearly every week. They will vote on recommendations calendared weeks ago. Those expecting something monumental to happen are about to be disappointed.
Further, Fagel clarified the buzz surrounding the Ripple SEC case, positing that a settlement this week is impossible. Instead, he believes the Trump administration might facilitate a resolution, but only after Paul Atkins takes charge.
SEC’s First Closed Meeting with Acting Chair Mark Uyeda
Fagel’s post came in response to Fox Business journalist Eleanor Terrett’s thread, which revealed, “The SEC will hold its first closed meeting since Mark Uyeda took over as acting chair on Thursday.” This follows Mark Uyeda’s launch of a dedicated Crypto Task Force with Commissioner Hester Peirce as the lead. According to the agenda, Uyeda’s meeting would include the institution and settlement of injunctive actions and administrative proceedings, resolution of litigation claims etc.
🚨NEW: The @SECGov will hold its first closed meeting since @MarkUyedaUS took over as acting chair on Thursday.
On the agenda: pic.twitter.com/WMDHzWQIeY
— Eleanor Terrett (@EleanorTerrett) January 21, 2025
Significantly, the potential closed meeting has sparked anticipations of a near-term settlement in the XRP lawsuit. Experts like MetaLawMan expect the SEC’s release of the Inspector General’s report on Bill Hinman’s conflicts of interest shortly. “I can’t think of any reason that simple act of transparency would need to wait for Paul Atkins’ arrival,” added MetaLawMan.
Mark Fagel Predicts a Possible 10-Month Delay in Ripple Case
Recently, Marc Fagel shed light on a possible delay in the Ripple SEC case settlement despite the XRPArmy’s growing optimism. Fagel’s statement that the lawsuit may conclude quickly or drag on for an extended period underscored the case’s uncertain outcome.
Despite the ongoing debate, the community remains optimistic about the lawsuit’s settlement. However, it needs to be seen how the closed meeting will impact Ripple vs SEC.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Regulation
Thailand Boosts Crypto Ambitions, Welcomes Bitcoin ETFs on Local Exchanges
Thailand is witnessing a significant breakthrough in its ambitious vision to establish a digital asset hub. A recent report on Wednesday revealed Thailand’s plans to adopt Bitcoin ETFs, permitting local exchanges to list the exchange-traded funds.
Thailand Prepares for Bitcoin ETF Debut
The Thai Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) plans to approve its first Bitcoin ETF, aligning with the country’s crypto hub vision, Bloomberg reported on January 15.
SEC Secretary-General Pornanong Budsaratragoon posited that the move would allow individual and institutional investors to invest in the Bitcoin vehicles directly.
Promoting the use of cryptocurrencies, Thailand is paving the way for the worldwide adoption of digital assets. During an interview on Tuesday, Pornanong stated,
Like it or not, we have to move along with more adoption of cryptocurrencies worldwide. We have to adapt and ensure that our investors have more options in crypto assets with proper protection.
Although, One Asset Management in Thailand has introduced a fund-of-fund tracking international Bitcoin ETFs, a direct investment tool remains pending approval. The ONE Bitcoin ETF Fund of Funds Unhedged and not for Retail Investors (ONE-BTCETFOF-UI) and was approved by the Thai SEC last year.
Thailand’s Thaksin To Legalize Crypto
The latest development came on the heels of Pheu Thai Party leader Thaksin Shinawatra’s efforts to legalize crypto. Citing the incoming US President Donald Trump’s crypto-friendly approach, Thaksin suggested Thailand embrace a more progressive stance on virtual assets. He also proposed the increased issuance and use of stablecoins.
Digital-asset trading activity in Thailand is picking up amid a wider rally that pushed Bitcoin to a record high of $108,315. Crypto hedge funds had a great last year but failed to give more returns than Bitcoin (BTC), as per Bloomberg
Thailand’s Broader Crypto Vision and Regulations
Thailand has long been striving to solidify its position at the forefront of the global crypto market. In a recent development, the country announced its crypto payment pilot project, with the trial set in Phuket.
While the initiative is expected to be executed within Thailand’s existing legal framework, it bolsters the nation’s crypto vision. The country is broadly looking to boost crypto adoption and Bitcoin ETFs will be welcome move for the local crypto industry.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Regulation
South Korea’s Largest Exchange Upbit Under Sanctions Review by Watchdog
Upbit, South Korea’s largest crypto exchange, is facing increased scrutiny over alleged Know-Your-Customer (KYC) violations. The Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) of South Korea has scheduled a disciplinary hearing on January 21 to evaluate the exchange’s regulatory compliance. As as result, the crypto market could see significant low activity amid the review
FIU Meeting To Assess Upbit’s KYC Violations
Notably, the FIU revealed that the sanctions review meeting would assess the 500k+ suspected KYC breaches discovered during an on-site inspection for the renewal of the virtual asset service provider (VASP).
Reportedly, this sanctions-level meeting for Upbit marks the first hearing of its kind, addressing issues identified during a VASP renewal inspection. This meeting will determine the extent of sanctions Upbit could face, considering factors like lapses in KYC compliance. Analyzing the crypro exchange’s explanation for its alleged violations, the regulator would determine the severity of fines and disciplinary actions against the platform.
Upbit Faces Scrutiny Under South Korea’s FIU
Since August last year, Upbit facing investigations led by the financial watchdog. During the license renewal process, the FIU uncovered 500,000-600,000 cases of unauthorized customer verification procedures. This includes instances of accounts being approved despite the blurred customer name or registration number, making identification impossible.
Though these cases highlight the exchange’s reluctance to follow regulatory standards, it is still uncertain whether they actually mark KYC breaches. However, following the disciplinary meeting, FIU is likely to draw conclusions, particularly based on Upbit’s explanations.
South Korea’s Crypto Regulatory Norms
South Korea has embarked on its journey to establish a crypto-focused regulatory framework. In a recent development, the Financial Services Commission has kicked off discussions on the second phase of crypto regulations, especially targeting stablecoins and customer protection.
South Korea’s recent collaboration with the US and Japan to tackle the growing crypto threats also underscores the nation’s commitment to user security. Last day, the three countries jointly released a paper, warning against the North Korean hackers’ eye on crypto.
The FIU’s meeting on Upbit’s KYC violation marks a significant turning point in South Korea’s regulatory landscape. While the meeting decides its fate in South Korea, it could have a broader impact on global crypto regulations and laws.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
-
Regulation20 hours ago
Acting SEC Chair Uyeda announces new crypto task force
-
Regulation23 hours ago
Tether’s market capitalisation slips as MiCA regulations kick in
-
Regulation18 hours ago
Turkey rolls out new crypto AML regulations
-
Ethereum15 hours ago
ETH breaks $3,900 as Bitcoin spikes past $103k
-
Regulation14 hours ago
Bitpanda becomes first European firm to secure Dubai VARA in-principle approval
-
Blockchain22 hours ago
Jordan Adopts Blockchain Policy To Propel Government Into The Future
-
Regulation16 hours ago
Crypto custody firm Copper withdraws UK registration
-
Market24 hours ago
KStarCoin and Quant traders discuss the benefits of switching to 1Fuel for better ROI
✓ Share: