Connect with us

Regulation

Coinbase Files Closing Brief In Lawsuit Over SEC Rulemaking Denial

Published

on


Coinbase, a leading crypto exchange, has filed its closing brief in a lawsuit challenging the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The case centers on the SEC’s denial of rulemaking petition by Coinbase, which the exchange argues is crucial for the digital asset industry. In addition, the brief highlights the regulatory agency’s shift in stance regarding crypto.

Contents Of Coinbase’s Closing Brief

At the heart of Coinbase’s argument is a single, controversial sentence in the SEC’s denial. The SEC’s order merely “disagree[d]” with Coinbase’s concerns about the workability of current SEC rules for digital asset firms. Coinbase claims this disagreement lacks reasoned decision-making. “The SEC’s order must be vacated on this elementary ground alone,” wrote Paul Grewal, Coinbase’s Chief Legal Officer.

Coinbase’s brief describes a troubling pattern of SEC behavior. The SEC has demanded compliance from digital asset firms based on an expansive interpretation of its authority, yet it has refused to establish clear rules to enable such compliance. Instead, the SEC has launched extensive litigation against companies for failing to comply with unclear regulations.

“This pattern of conduct is a purposeful effort to destroy an industry by demanding the impossible and prosecuting companies that fail to achieve it,” the brief asserts. Moreover, Grewal elaborates on the broader implications of the regulatory agency’s stance. In addition, the SEC claims it doesn’t need to make compliance feasible for the industry.

“The SEC apparently views its rules not as tools to enable compliance with federal statutes, but as weapons to dismantle industries it disfavors,” the closing brief states. Moreover, the agency’s justification for its stance includes pointing to its numerous enforcement actions as proof that existing rules are workable.

Furthermore, Coinbase counters that these enforcement actions are merely part of a broader strategy to crush the digital asset industry. “They are a bludgeon—by design,” Coinbase argues. The brief also addresses the inconsistency in the SEC’s approach to digital assets over the years.

Also Read: Coinbase Adds Shiba Inu, FLOKI, BONK In Full-Trading Mode, Prices To Recover?

Shift In SEC Chair Gary Gensler’s Stance

SEC Chair Gary Gensler‘s statements have shifted from acknowledging the lack of a clear regulatory framework for crypto exchanges in 2021 to asserting broad regulatory authority a year later. Additionally, the SEC allowed Coinbase to go public in 2020 without indicating its business model violated securities laws. Now, the SEC is suing Coinbase, claiming those same business practices are unlawful.

Moreover, the crypto exchange emphasizes that the SEC’s shifting positions and inconsistent enforcement actions have created a climate of confusion and uncertainty. For instance, while Bitcoin and Ether are not considered securities, the SEC has not clarified why other digital assets are treated differently. This inconsistency is exemplified by the SEC’s selective targeting of tokens in its enforcement actions.

The SEC’s reliance on its vague “facts and circumstances” standard for determining whether digital assets are securities is another point of contention. Coinbase argues that this standard is too abstract and fails to provide clear guidance. “The SEC has never coherently explained why the facts and circumstances underlying Bitcoin and Ether lead to a different result than the facts and circumstances underlying the tokens it has claimed are securities,” the CEX states.

Moreover, Coinbase highlights that rulemaking is the appropriate mechanism to address these issues. Rulemaking would require the SEC to articulate a clear theory of its regulatory approach, subject it to public comment, and ensure judicial review before enforcement. This process would provide the necessary clarity and fairness for the digital asset industry.

Coinbase’s closing brief underscores the necessity of judicial intervention. In addition, the company urges the court not only to vacate the SEC’s order but also to mandate rulemaking. “Only a court order directing [the SEC] to commence rulemaking will end its caprice,” the brief concludes.

Also Read: XRP Price To Rally 500% As XRP/BTC Witnesses Reversal, Analyst Predicts

✓ Share:

CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.

The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Regulation

Former Solicitor General Paul Clement Joins Crypto Industry Fight

Published

on

By


A week after Custodia Bank filed an appeal in the 10th Circuit Court challenging the Fed’s power to deny it a master account, former Solicitor General Paul Clement has now filed an amicus brief on behalf of the crypto industry.

Paul Clement Takes Custodia Bank vs Fed Fight Ahead

As said, in the recent Custodia Bank vs. Fed case, Paul Clement filed an Amicus brief on Wednesday, July 3, while supporting the crypto industry. Clement has gained popularity in his recent success in overturning the Chevron Defence in the Supreme Court case in the Supreme Court case involving Loper Bright fishermen.

Also Read: US SEC Takes Major Blow In Chevron Howey Test Case, Implication For Crypto

In this ongoing legal fight, The Digital Chamber (TDC) and the Global Business Blockchain Council-USA (GBBC-USA) have expressed their significant interest and unique perspective. With extensive experience in the digital assets industry, the two organizations have argued that denying state-chartered banks a reliable path to participate in the national banking just because of the involvement with digital assets will threaten the growth and success of the trillion-dollar blockchain industry.

The two organization argue that upholding the lower court’s decision will give politically unaccountable federal officials and unchecked power to stiffle innovation thereby cutting off legitimate businesses from having crucial access to the global financial system.

The District Court stated that the “Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (“FRBKC”) has unreviewable discretion to denynonmember depository institutionsa master account”.

TDC and GBBC argued that despite following the legal boundaries, this court decision set dangerous precedence for any industry that might fall out with the Fed officials.

Paul Clement Raises Constitutional Concerns on Fed’s Structure

In the amicus brief, the former Solicitor General has raised some constitutional questions regarding the Fed’s structure. Clement states: “In sum, by affording Federal Reserve Bank presidents significant and largely unconstrained discretionary power, the district court’s decision raises serious constitutional questions under Article II.”

“The district court’s decision threatens the dual system by granting Federal Reserve Bank officials unreviewable discretion to “effectively crippl[e]” state-chartered banks operating legally,” he added.

Also Read: Custodia Bank CEO Predicts “Rip Roaring” Bitcoin Bull Market

✓ Share:

Bhushan is a FinTech enthusiast and holds a good flair in understanding financial markets. His interest in economics and finance draw his attention towards the new emerging Blockchain Technology and Cryptocurrency markets. He is continuously in a learning process and keeps himself motivated by sharing his acquired knowledge. In free time he reads thriller fictions novels and sometimes explore his culinary skills.

The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

Kamala Harris Overtakes Biden In Prediction Markets, Has Trump’s Opponent Changed?

Published

on

By


Kamala Harris has recently surged ahead of President Joe Biden in the prediction markets. This marks a significant shift in the political landscape as the 2024 U.S. presidential election race intensifies. However, the fight between Republican candidate Donald Trump and Biden isn’t over yet.

Kamala Harris Oversteps Biden In Betting Markets

On Predict It, Kamala Harris U.S. 2024 election winning bets surged to 22 cents while Biden’s dropped to 21 cents. Furthermore, Trump took the lead with a major gap as the bet was priced 59 cents on his win. Nevertheless, it could be too early to deem Harris as Trump’s ultimate opponent.

According to a new Reuters poll, President Biden is now neck-and-neck with his Republican challenger, Donald Trump, in the upcoming November election. This poll also reveals a shifting sentiment among Democrats, with approximately one-third believing Biden should consider stepping aside following a ‘ridiculous’ debate performance.

The debate in question has sparked internal discussions among Democrats. Moreover, some Biden loyalists are now questioning his viability for re-election in 2024. In addition, sources within the party indicate that Vice President Kamala Harris is emerging as the preferred candidate to step in should Biden decide to withdraw from the race.

Biden recently offered an explanation for his debate performance, admitting he “wasn’t very smart” for undertaking extensive travel before the event. “I didn’t listen to my staff… and then I almost fell asleep on stage,” he remarked during an event with Representative Don Beyer. “It’s not an excuse, but an explanation,” he added.

Also Read: U.S. Election Won’t Alter Positive Crypto Regulations, Says Mike Novogratz

The U.S. Election Race Intensifies

The political momentum appears to be shifting towards Trump, who now holds a 3-point advantage over Biden in key battleground states and a 2-point lead nationally. This change underscores a critical dynamic in the race: voter motivation. Currently, Republicans show higher enthusiasm, with more indicating they will “definitely” vote compared to their Democratic counterparts.

Over 90% of Biden and Trump supporters are firmly opposed to voting for the other candidate. Despite this strong partisan divide, the overall stability of the election race has not significantly changed. Biden experienced a brief uptick in support in June after Trump was convicted of felonies in New York. However, this did not significantly alter the broader election dynamics.

In light of the recent debate and shifting polls, the Democratic Party faces a pivotal decision regarding its candidate for the 2024 election. Kamala Harris’s rise in the prediction markets signals growing support within the party and among political analysts. If Biden’s campaign continues to face challenges, Harris may become the Democratic frontrunner.

Also Read: Binance Unveils Changes In Turkey In Compliance With Regulation

✓ Share:

Kritika boasts over 2 years of experience in the financial news sector. Currently working as a crypto journalist at Coingape, she has consistently shown a knack for blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies. Kritika combines insightful analysis with a deep understanding of market trends. With a keen interest in technical analysis, she brings a nuanced perspective to her reporting, exploring the intersection of finance, technology, and emerging trends in the crypto space.

The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

Ripple and Coinbase Use Binance Win to Contest SEC Claims

Published

on

By


Coinbase and Ripple Labs are using Binance’s pivotal legal victory to challenge ongoing cases with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Both companies argue that the SEC’s approach needs more clarity and consistency, necessitating formal rulemaking to better define the regulatory perimeter for digital assets.

Ripple, Coinbase Cite Binance Case Against SEC

Ripple Labs and Coinbase have intensified their legal defenses by referencing a recent court order involving Binance, which achieved a partial dismissal in its SEC lawsuit. The companies argue that this precedent highlights the need for the SEC to establish clear regulations. In its latest court filing, Ripple emphasized the judge’s remark that cryptocurrency does not align seamlessly with existing securities laws, such as those established by the 1946 Howey Test. This test is crucial for determining whether a transaction qualifies as an investment contract and thus falls under securities regulation.

 

Coinbase has concurrently voiced concerns over the SEC’s expansive interpretation of securities laws applied to the crypto industry. The exchange asserts that this broad application could be more extensive and better defined, pushing for a definitive rulemaking process to provide legal clarity. In its appeal, Coinbase cited the recent Binance ruling to bolster its case for rulemaking, arguing that the decision underscores the inconsistencies in current regulatory applications.

 

Also Read: Bybit Exchange Unveils Support For ASI Alliance, Will FET Rebound?

Coinbase Demands Clarity in SEC Regulatory Battle

The SEC has engaged with various cryptocurrency platforms and assets, deeming some of their operations as securities offerings without proper registration. In the case of Ripple, the SEC’s lawsuit initiated in December 2020 alleged that Ripple raised over $1.3 billion through sales of its XRP token, which the SEC classified as an unregistered security. However, in a significant turn, Judge Analisa Torres ruled that certain “programmatic sales” of XRP did not constitute securities transactions, introducing a nuanced interpretation Ripple now seeks to leverage to challenge broader SEC claims.

 

Coinbase faces similar regulatory scrutiny. The SEC argues that the platform operated as an unregistered securities exchange, a claim that Coinbase refutes, urging a formal rulemaking process to clarify these regulatory boundaries. Both Coinbase and Ripple use recent judicial outcomes, notably the Binance case, to argue for a more structured and transparent regulatory framework from the SEC, stressing that the current state of affairs is inefficient and unclear.

Crypto Firms Rally Around Binance Court Decision

The partial victory for Binance in its own SEC lawsuit has become a strategic reference point for other crypto entities embroiled in legal challenges with the regulator. Despite Judge Amy Berman Jackson’s decision to proceed with most of the SEC’s claims against Binance, her dismissal of the charge regarding secondary sales of Binance Coin (BNB) as securities has been perceived as a significant legal precedent. Coinbase and Ripple have particularly highlighted this aspect of the ruling in their ongoing litigation.

 

Further developments are anticipated, with a scheduled conference for the SEC’s case against Binance set for July 9. Meanwhile, Coinbase and Ripple continue to press for regulatory clarity, which they argue is crucial for the industry’s stability and growth.

 

Also Read: Genesis Digital Is Considering Going Public Via IPO In US: Report

✓ Share:

Maxwell is a crypto-economic analyst and Blockchain enthusiast, passionate about helping people understand the potential of decentralized technology. I write extensively on topics such as blockchain, cryptocurrency, tokens, and more for many publications. My goal is to spread knowledge about this revolutionary technology and its implications for economic freedom and social good.

The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2024 coin2049.io