Regulation
Celsius Sues Tether To Clawback $2B Bitcoin Lost In ‘Fraudulent’ Transfers
Celsius Network Ltd. has filed a lawsuit against Tether and its affiliated entities. The lawsuit alleges that the USDT issued conducted “fraudulent” and “preferential” transfers of Bitcoin (BTC) amounting to over $2 billion today. The complaint, lodged in federal bankruptcy court, seeks to reclaim the collapsed estate’s lost Bitcoin due to Tether’s actions during a critical period leading up to the firm’s bankruptcy.
Celsius’ Allegations Against Tether
Celsius, a prominent crypto lender, entered into a loan agreement with Tether Limited in 2020. This arrangement allowed the lender to borrow stablecoins, specifically Tether (USDT) and Euro Tether (EURT), at low-interest rates. In return, the crypto lender posted substantial collateral, including Bitcoin, to secure these loans.
At its peak, the firm had borrowed nearly $2 billion in USDT from Tether, backed by tens of thousands of BTC. The lawsuit focuses on actions taken by Tether during the ninety-day period before the crypto lender filed for bankruptcy on July 13, 2022.
According to the complaint, the USDT issuer demanded and received significant amounts of new collateral from the crypto lender. This totaled 15,658.21 Bitcoin, and further secured new borrowings with an additional 2,228.01 BTC. These actions, characterized as “Preferential Top-Up Transfers” and “Preferential Cross-Collateralization Transfers,” are claimed to have unfairly improved Tether’s position at the expense of other creditors.
Preferential Application Transfer & Breach of Contract
On June 13, 2022, Tether issued a final demand for additional collateral. The crypto lender, in accordance with their agreement, had ten hours to respond. However, stablecoin issuer proceeded to apply the entirety of Celsius’ collateral, i.e., 39,542.42 BTC immediately, without granting the contractually stipulated time.
This action, referred to as the “Preferential Application Transfer,” allegedly allowed Tether to cover its exposure. However, the bankrupt crypto lender was “robbed” of its remaining BTC at a low market value.
Moreover, the lawsuit argues that Tether’s breach of the contract’s 10-hour waiting period resulted in a “fire sale” of the now-bankrupt estate’s Bitcoin, with all 39,542.42 BTC applied against Celsius’ outstanding debt. Tether’s valuation of BTC at $816.82 million is significantly less than its current worth of more than $2 billion.
This caused substantial financial damage to thr crypto lender. The court filing dated August 9 states that Tether sold this Bitcoin at an average price of $20,656.88 each, notably below the market closing BTC price of $22,487.39 on that date.
Crypto Lender Demands Clawback
The lawsuit also contends that Tether’s liquidation of the crypto lender’s Bitcoin was commercially unreasonable. In addition, the complaint highlights that established market practices dictate that such a large block of BTC should be sold over a longer period to minimize price impact and secure better pricing.
Hence, the stablecoin issuer’s actions allegedly violated these practices by selling the BTC hastily and at prices lower than the actual market rates. Furthermore, the premature liquidation barred Celsius from withstanding the market crash. It also eliminated the chance for the automatic stay of bankruptcy to intervene.
Hence, the lawsuit seek “recover” the preferential and fraudulent transfers of Bitcoin. In addition, the crypto lender wants to claim damages for Tether’s alleged breach of contract. Thus, the bankrupt estate is demanding that the court order Tether to return the value of the BTC or its equivalent amount in damages.
Kritika Mehta
Kritika boasts over 2 years of experience in the financial news sector. Currently working as a crypto journalist at Coingape, she has consistently shown a knack for blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies. Kritika combines insightful analysis with a deep understanding of market trends. With a keen interest in technical analysis, she brings a nuanced perspective to her reporting, exploring the intersection of finance, technology, and emerging trends in the crypto space.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Polymarket, a crypto-based prediction market, is likely to be prohibited by France’s gambling regulator, the ANJ, after a huge amount of bets were placed on the 2024 U.S. presidential election. Since the global audience engaged in prediction platforms, Polymarket experienced a record jump, with $450 million expected to be distributed to users following the victory of Donald Trump.
This increase of betting volume and large stakes has become a matter of concern for the French regulator because the platform offers unlicensed gambling services.
$450 Million in Payouts Expected After U.S. Election Bets
Prediction markets, which are expected to increase their payout to election bettors to around $450m following Donald Trump’s projected win, are attracting increasing attention.
Although conventional polls pointed to a closer contest, prediction markets such as Polymarket and Kalshi recorded a steep rise in Trump’s chances in the last few days, indicating a strong divergence with poll-based expectations.
Among the active users of Polymarket, a French trader called “Theo” made a $26 million bet on Trump’s win and won $49 million. This big bet made Polymarket popular, as the French authorities paid attention to the platform and its popularity among French residents, which led to concerns about the compliance of the platform with French gambling legislation.
France’s ANJ Considers Blocking Access to Polymarket
The ANJ has claimed that Polymarket is involved in gambling which is only allowed in France by licensed operators. According to local media, the regulator has the power to ban access to unlicensed gambling sites and is expected to restrict access to Polymarket soon.
An ANJ insider said: “Polymarket is just betting on something that is completely uncertain, which is exactly what gambling is.”
If put in place, the ban would prevent the usage of the application in France, despite the fact that users can still try to avoid the restriction by connecting to VPN. The ANJ could also try to influence media outlets and directories to stop advertising or linking to Polymarket and, thus, limit its audiences even more.
Regulatory Concerns Over Market Manipulation
The high level of activity on Polymarket has led to speculations that the platform may be used for market manipulation. Two blockchain analysis firms, Chaos Labs and Inca Digital, recently revealed that there was potential wash trading within Polymarket’s U.S. presidential betting market where the same assets are bought and sold to simply create a fake market. This type of trading is rather manipulative and can lead to the distortion of signals on the market and mislead other participants.
The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission also has concerns about prediction markets and put forward a rule in May aiming at stricter regulation of such markets due to the potential for manipulation.
Although no final decision has been reached, regulatory actions could impact Polymarket’s ability to operate freely in other markets, including the U.S.
Kelvin Munene Murithi
Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
FTX co-founder Gary Wang has requested a federal judge not to send him to prison. He noted that he is testifying against the former business partner, Sam Bankman-Fried, someone he has known for a long time in a fraud case.
The lawyer for Wang submitted a sentencing memo in Manhattan federal court wherein he claimed that his client should not be incarcerated as he provided assistance to the prosecutors as well as his role in the scheme was comparatively less.
Wang, who pleaded guilty to fraud and conspiracy when FTX went bankrupt in 2022, is to receive his sentencing on the 20th of November.
FTX Co-Founder Gary Wang Appeals for No Jail Time
The defense counsel for FTX co-founder Gary Wang highlighted his client’s early cooperation with the federal prosecutors as one of the key reasons why the court should consider him for mercy. According to Graff, Wang was one of the first FTX executives to meet with the authorities and share information on the FTX and Alameda Research. Wang gave a testimony in the trial that led to the recent conviction of Bankman-Fried who was sentenced to 25 years in prison.
Speaking at the trial, Wang described how he was ordered to change the code of FTX in order to enable Alameda Research to use the assets of the company’s clients, which is one of the key points of Bankman-Fried’s fraud.
FTX co-founder’s lawyer noted that his involvement in the fraud was less than some of the other former executives, including Caroline Ellison, former CEO of Alameda Research, and Nishad Singh, FTX’s former head of engineering. Wang, his lawyer said, did not start or operate the scheme and was not personally involved in the provision of false information to the investors.
“Gary was not involved in the scheme at its inception, was never provided with details of the scheme, and, in contrast to Bankman-Fried, Ellison and Singh, never engaged in any affirmative action of deception,” Graff wrote.
Sentencing Comparisons to Other Executives
Wang’s attorney argued that a prison sentence would create an “unwarranted sentencing disparity” with Nishad Singh, who avoided jail time after pleading guilty and cooperating with the government. Singh, who faced potential decades-long sentences, was ultimately sentenced to time served and three years of supervised release.
Ellison, another major cooperator, received a two-year prison sentence. FTX co-founder Gary Wang contended that Wang’s level of involvement was even lower than Singh’s, supporting a non-custodial sentence for Wang as well.
Graff also noted Wang’s personal circumstances, stating that Wang is expecting the birth of his first child shortly after his sentencing date. Wang’s attorney suggested that allowing him to remain with his family would align with the court’s treatment of other cooperators in the case.
“Gary wants nothing more than to be a good husband and father and to continue his work to facilitate FTX victims’ recovery,” Graff wrote.
Separately, the U.S. government is working to reclaim approximately $13.25 million in political donations made by FTX executives, including Bankman-Fried and Singh. Judge Lewis Kaplan however granted the government additional time to negotiate the return of these funds, extending discussions with the PACs until January 15, 2025.
Kelvin Munene Murithi
Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a motion seeking judgment in its case against cryptocurrency exchange Kraken, focusing on defenses such as “fair notice” and the “major questions doctrine.”
This move, led by SEC Chairman Gary Gensler’s team, aims to limit further discovery into the agency’s regulatory policies, particularly those affecting the crypto sector. The timing of the filing has drawn attention, as some in the industry view it as a strategic attempt to shield the SEC’s methods from closer examination.
US SEC Files Motion for Judgment Against Kraken
The SEC’s motion seeks to dismiss defenses put forward by Kraken that include the fair notice defense and the major questions doctrine. The fair notice defense argues that Kraken did not receive adequate regulatory guidance regarding its crypto-related activities.
Meanwhile, the major questions doctrine suggests that regulatory agencies, such as the SEC, should not make major policy decisions without clear direction from Congress.
Subsequently, the US SEC’s motion appears intended to prevent further discovery into its policies, which Kraken and other crypto advocates have criticized as inconsistent and unclear. A similar motion was filed in Ripple case, where the US SEC failed to secure a judgment. Michael O’Connor, an attorney representing Kraken expects a similar outcome in the Kraken case, though Kraken has indicated that it has additional defenses should this motion proceed.
This Is A Breaking News, Please Check Back For More
Kelvin Munene Murithi
Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Peter Brandt Reveals Why SOL Is Ahead
RCO Finance to Lead in Upcoming Market Rally as Toncoin and Cardano See Further Losses
Will Polygon MATIC Price Hit $1 on AggLayer, Trump Trade?
Ethereum Foundation Launches Pectra Tesnet ‘Mekong’, ETH Price Set For $4000
Polymarket Faces Ban in France as US Election Betting Ends
Trump and Lummis Unite on $76 Billion National Bitcoin Reserve
2.52 Million Altcoins Are Ruining Crypto’s Future
Animoca Brands Valuation Tanks 75% In Two Years, Here’s Why
Crypto exchange BingX hacked for $43 million
Are The Big Players Losing Interest?
Coinbase cbBTC Set to go Live on Solana
Hong Kong’s Securities Association Tips Authorities On Crypto Self-Regulation
2.52 Million Altcoins Are Ruining Crypto’s Future
Animoca Brands Valuation Tanks 75% In Two Years, Here’s Why
Crypto exchange BingX hacked for $43 million
Are The Big Players Losing Interest?
Coinbase cbBTC Set to go Live on Solana
Hong Kong’s Securities Association Tips Authorities On Crypto Self-Regulation
-
Ethereum16 hours agoEthereum Analyst Sets $3,400 Target Once ETH Breaks Key Resistance – Details
-
Market15 hours agoBitcoin Price Pushes Rally Further: Bulls in Full Force
-
Market13 hours agoSolana (SOL) Rallies Strongly, Setting Sights on $200
-
Altcoin24 hours agoXRP Price At Risk As Ripple Moves $250M?
-
Regulation22 hours agoUS SEC Files Motion for Judgment Against Kraken, Challenges Key Defenses
-
Ethereum8 hours agoMrBeast faces allegations of crypto insider trading
-
Regulation19 hours agoFTX Co Founder Gary Wang Appeals For No Jail Time, Here’s Why
-
Regulation17 hours ago
Polymarket Faces French Ban After Massive Bets On US Election Results
✓ Share: