Regulation
Cardano’s Charles Hoskinson & Ex-Ripple Alum Offer Fiery Critique On Biden’s Dementia
In a recent social media exchange, prominent figures in the cryptocurrency world voiced sharp criticisms regarding President Joe Biden’s cognitive health. Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson and former Ripple director Sean McBride joined the conversation. Moreover, they expressed concerns about Biden’s mental fitness and the Democratic Party’s handling of his candidacy.
Charles Hoskinson & Former Ripple Director Take Aim At Biden
On X, Charles Hoskinson ignited the debate by highlighting what he saw as the irony in media outlets now scrutinizing Biden’s performance. In addition, he criticized the Democratic Party for not holding a primary that could have revealed Biden’s cognitive decline. He stated that voters were left with no real choice.
Furthermore, Hoskinson suggested that the lack of a primary amounted to the party making decisions for the voters. Additionally, the Cardano founder presented them with a stark choice between “a dementia puppet or the party deciding for you.” However, a user on X countered Hoskinson’s claims. They argued that while there were no debates, it is not unusual for an incumbent president to avoid serious primary challenges.
They also pointed out that recent incumbents like Trump, Obama, Bush, and Clinton did not face significant primary debates either. Hoskinson responded by questioning the legitimacy of the primaries. In addition, he suggested that when super delegates indicate that even 100% of the votes wouldn’t guarantee a win for a candidate, it undermines the democratic process.
Fox Business journalist Charles Gasparino also weighed in, expressing his discomfort with people diagnosing Biden with dementia on social media. He emphasized the severity of the situation if Biden is indeed experiencing significant mental decline and it is being concealed by those around him. Gasparino argued that such a cover-up could be one of the most significant presidential scandals, potentially rivaling Watergate, due to the implications for national leadership.
McBride, picking up on Gasparino’s points, bluntly asserted that it is “obvious” Biden is suffering from dementia. Moreover, the former Ripple alum asserted that Democratic elites have been covering up the extent of his decline. In addition, he drew a parallel between the administration’s actions against Donald Trump’s campaign and the Watergate scandal.
Also Read: Charles Hoskinson Flags Major Ongoing AI Censorship Trend
45% Democrats Vote For Presidential Candidate Replacement
The debate over Biden’s cognitive health has intensified, especially as he prepares for a critical election period. During a debate watch at an assisted living facility in Washington, residents were visibly concerned about Biden’s performance. Moments such as his inexplicable remark, “We finally beat Medicare,” left viewers questioning his capability.
The perception of older voters is crucial for Biden, as they are a demographic that turns out in large numbers at the polls. In the 2020 election, Biden lost voters aged 65 and older to Donald Trump by a narrow margin and is now aggressively courting this group. However, incidents that highlight his age-related vulnerabilities are likely to hinder these efforts.
In addition, recent polls indicate a growing unease among Democratic voters about Biden’s viability as the party’s nominee. Furthermore, a CBS News poll revealed that 45% of Democratic voters think Biden should step aside and not seek re-election. This sentiment reflects broader concerns within the party about Biden’s ability to lead effectively amid ongoing questions about his mental acuity.
Also Read: Trump Vs Biden: Mark Cuban and ChatGPT Predicts Best Pick For President
The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Regulation
Polymarket Faces French Ban After Massive Bets On US Election Results
Polymarket, a crypto-based prediction market, is likely to be prohibited by France’s gambling regulator, the ANJ, after a huge amount of bets were placed on the 2024 U.S. presidential election. Since the global audience engaged in prediction platforms, Polymarket experienced a record jump, with $450 million expected to be distributed to users following the victory of Donald Trump.
This increase of betting volume and large stakes has become a matter of concern for the French regulator because the platform offers unlicensed gambling services.
$450 Million in Payouts Expected After U.S. Election Bets
Prediction markets, which are expected to increase their payout to election bettors to around $450m following Donald Trump’s projected win, are attracting increasing attention.
Although conventional polls pointed to a closer contest, prediction markets such as Polymarket and Kalshi recorded a steep rise in Trump’s chances in the last few days, indicating a strong divergence with poll-based expectations.
Among the active users of Polymarket, a French trader called “Theo” made a $26 million bet on Trump’s win and won $49 million. This big bet made Polymarket popular, as the French authorities paid attention to the platform and its popularity among French residents, which led to concerns about the compliance of the platform with French gambling legislation.
France’s ANJ Considers Blocking Access to Polymarket
The ANJ has claimed that Polymarket is involved in gambling which is only allowed in France by licensed operators. According to local media, the regulator has the power to ban access to unlicensed gambling sites and is expected to restrict access to Polymarket soon.
An ANJ insider said: “Polymarket is just betting on something that is completely uncertain, which is exactly what gambling is.”
If put in place, the ban would prevent the usage of the application in France, despite the fact that users can still try to avoid the restriction by connecting to VPN. The ANJ could also try to influence media outlets and directories to stop advertising or linking to Polymarket and, thus, limit its audiences even more.
Regulatory Concerns Over Market Manipulation
The high level of activity on Polymarket has led to speculations that the platform may be used for market manipulation. Two blockchain analysis firms, Chaos Labs and Inca Digital, recently revealed that there was potential wash trading within Polymarket’s U.S. presidential betting market where the same assets are bought and sold to simply create a fake market. This type of trading is rather manipulative and can lead to the distortion of signals on the market and mislead other participants.
The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission also has concerns about prediction markets and put forward a rule in May aiming at stricter regulation of such markets due to the potential for manipulation.
Although no final decision has been reached, regulatory actions could impact Polymarket’s ability to operate freely in other markets, including the U.S.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Regulation
FTX Co Founder Gary Wang Appeals For No Jail Time, Here’s Why
FTX co-founder Gary Wang has requested a federal judge not to send him to prison. He noted that he is testifying against the former business partner, Sam Bankman-Fried, someone he has known for a long time in a fraud case.
The lawyer for Wang submitted a sentencing memo in Manhattan federal court wherein he claimed that his client should not be incarcerated as he provided assistance to the prosecutors as well as his role in the scheme was comparatively less.
Wang, who pleaded guilty to fraud and conspiracy when FTX went bankrupt in 2022, is to receive his sentencing on the 20th of November.
FTX Co-Founder Gary Wang Appeals for No Jail Time
The defense counsel for FTX co-founder Gary Wang highlighted his client’s early cooperation with the federal prosecutors as one of the key reasons why the court should consider him for mercy. According to Graff, Wang was one of the first FTX executives to meet with the authorities and share information on the FTX and Alameda Research. Wang gave a testimony in the trial that led to the recent conviction of Bankman-Fried who was sentenced to 25 years in prison.
Speaking at the trial, Wang described how he was ordered to change the code of FTX in order to enable Alameda Research to use the assets of the company’s clients, which is one of the key points of Bankman-Fried’s fraud.
FTX co-founder’s lawyer noted that his involvement in the fraud was less than some of the other former executives, including Caroline Ellison, former CEO of Alameda Research, and Nishad Singh, FTX’s former head of engineering. Wang, his lawyer said, did not start or operate the scheme and was not personally involved in the provision of false information to the investors.
“Gary was not involved in the scheme at its inception, was never provided with details of the scheme, and, in contrast to Bankman-Fried, Ellison and Singh, never engaged in any affirmative action of deception,” Graff wrote.
Sentencing Comparisons to Other Executives
Wang’s attorney argued that a prison sentence would create an “unwarranted sentencing disparity” with Nishad Singh, who avoided jail time after pleading guilty and cooperating with the government. Singh, who faced potential decades-long sentences, was ultimately sentenced to time served and three years of supervised release.
Ellison, another major cooperator, received a two-year prison sentence. FTX co-founder Gary Wang contended that Wang’s level of involvement was even lower than Singh’s, supporting a non-custodial sentence for Wang as well.
Graff also noted Wang’s personal circumstances, stating that Wang is expecting the birth of his first child shortly after his sentencing date. Wang’s attorney suggested that allowing him to remain with his family would align with the court’s treatment of other cooperators in the case.
“Gary wants nothing more than to be a good husband and father and to continue his work to facilitate FTX victims’ recovery,” Graff wrote.
Separately, the U.S. government is working to reclaim approximately $13.25 million in political donations made by FTX executives, including Bankman-Fried and Singh. Judge Lewis Kaplan however granted the government additional time to negotiate the return of these funds, extending discussions with the PACs until January 15, 2025.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Regulation
US SEC Files Motion for Judgment Against Kraken, Challenges Key Defenses
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a motion seeking judgment in its case against cryptocurrency exchange Kraken, focusing on defenses such as “fair notice” and the “major questions doctrine.”
This move, led by SEC Chairman Gary Gensler’s team, aims to limit further discovery into the agency’s regulatory policies, particularly those affecting the crypto sector. The timing of the filing has drawn attention, as some in the industry view it as a strategic attempt to shield the SEC’s methods from closer examination.
US SEC Files Motion for Judgment Against Kraken
The SEC’s motion seeks to dismiss defenses put forward by Kraken that include the fair notice defense and the major questions doctrine. The fair notice defense argues that Kraken did not receive adequate regulatory guidance regarding its crypto-related activities.
Meanwhile, the major questions doctrine suggests that regulatory agencies, such as the SEC, should not make major policy decisions without clear direction from Congress.
Subsequently, the US SEC’s motion appears intended to prevent further discovery into its policies, which Kraken and other crypto advocates have criticized as inconsistent and unclear. A similar motion was filed in Ripple case, where the US SEC failed to secure a judgment. Michael O’Connor, an attorney representing Kraken expects a similar outcome in the Kraken case, though Kraken has indicated that it has additional defenses should this motion proceed.
This Is A Breaking News, Please Check Back For More
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
-
Ethereum17 hours ago
Ethereum Analyst Sets $3,400 Target Once ETH Breaks Key Resistance – Details
-
Market15 hours ago
Bitcoin Price Pushes Rally Further: Bulls in Full Force
-
Market13 hours ago
Solana (SOL) Rallies Strongly, Setting Sights on $200
-
Ethereum8 hours ago
MrBeast faces allegations of crypto insider trading
-
Regulation19 hours ago
FTX Co Founder Gary Wang Appeals For No Jail Time, Here’s Why
-
Regulation17 hours ago
Polymarket Faces French Ban After Massive Bets On US Election Results
-
Bitcoin15 hours ago
Bitcoin Price Might Never Dip Below $70,000 Again After The US Elections, Here’s Why
-
Market14 hours ago
Will Bulls Push It Higher?
✓ Share: