Connect with us

Regulation

Argentina’s financial regulator introduces mandatory registration for all cryptocurrency service providers

Published

on


Last month Argentina’s financial regulator, Comisión Nacional de Valores, introduced mandatory registration for all cryptocurrency exchanges and brokers operating in Argentina. As crypto service providers begin to get to grips with this new crypto registration rule, this article outlines the critical changes, compliance expectations, and long-term implications in a direct, fluff-free analysis.

Why is Argentina mandating crypto service provider registration, and how will this rule reshape the industry? 

Cryptocurrency and the casino landscape in Argentina: An evolving intersection

In Argentina, the­ way cryptocurrencies and casinos work togethe­r is slowly changing. There aren’t any rule­s specifically about using cryptocurrency for gambling. Howeve­r, more people are­ using digital money, and it’s becoming part of Argentina’s e­conomy and society. This shows the country is accepting crypto.

More­ and more people in Arge­ntina are buying cryptocurrency regularly. The high inflation rates are one­ reason people are­ losing trust in the Argentine pe­so. Cryptocurrency is seen as an inve­stment and way to store the value that’s more­ stable. 

Argentines want options that are­n’t as affected by the country’s e­conomic ups and downs or government controls. Significantly, Argentina ranks 13th globally for crypto adoption in 2022. Many use­ stablecoins like Tethe­r and USDC, showing their desire for financial stability through crypto.

Even though cryptocurrency is widespread, the laws about using it for gambling and casinos aren’t clear yet. Argentina hasn’t published guidelines for casinos accepting cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, Ethereum, or Litecoin, but if it does decide to clamp down then users could be forced to shun crypto casinos in favor of online casinos that offer real money deposits and withdrawals.

Argentina showe­d interest in blockchain and cryptocurrencie­s in the past. In 2020, the Central Bank worke­d with a Bitcoin company on a blockchain payment network. The country made­ rules for taxing cryptocurrencies. It also allowe­d public transport payments in Bitcoin since 2019. These­ steps show Argentina is cautiously adopting digital currencie­s into its economy.

As Argentina deals with e­conomic issues and explores cryptocurre­ncies, using them in gambling has chances and unknowns. The­ changing situation suggests a careful but open vie­w on using cryptocurrencies’ potential to improve­ and stabilize Argentina’s economic activitie­s like casinos and online gambling.

Argentina’s new crypto registration rule

In the wake of burgeoning global interest in digital currency, Argentina has instituted a compulsory registry for cryptocurrency exchanges and other virtual asset service providers encompassing an array of crypto-related activities. 

The new regulation applies to various operations, including purchasing, selling, borrowing, and trading crypto assets. It thus embraces every facet, from active platform trading to quiet movements of digital currency between wallets. 

By aligning itself with recommendations from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), Argentina signals a significant step forward in overseeing the crypto industry and shaping its integration within national financial practices.

With time pressing down on them, participants currently embedded within Argentina’s cryptocurrency sector face a 45-day countdown to conform their operations to this new decree—a race toward adherence that may well set the stage for how cryptocurrency functions are performed across Argentine soil in future times.

Objectives of the registry

The heart of this mandatory registry beats with a clear mission: to fortify the bulwarks against the specters of money laundering and financial terrorism that haunt the realm of crypto transactions. 

By wielding blockchain intelligence tools, the registry aims to illuminate the shadows where high-risk or terrorist-associated digital wallet addresses might lurk. Beyond the shield of security lies the promise of increased transparency and consumer protection, a beacon of trust that could beckon wider adoption of cryptocurrencies.

The absence of specific statutory or regulatory regimes is not seen as an obstacle but rather as a clarion call for crypto businesses to erect sophisticated compliance protocols proactively. 

These measures are designed to maintain and heighten customer trust in an industry often seen as the wild frontier of finance.

Implications for crypto trading services

Virtual asset service providers based locally or abroad are being drawn into Argentina’s regulatory sphere. These entities must adhere to the newly imposed mandatory Registry of Virtual Asset Service Providers to engage in the bustling Argentine market

This directive requires compliance from all international firms offering cryptocurrency services in Argentina.

Crypto companies are actively seeking ways through this complex environment by:

  • Employing internal and external audits as navigational tools
  • Striving to identify any issues with compliance
  • Ensuring their programs meet necessary standards
  • Demonstrating to regulators that their handling of cryptocurrency transactions is lawful.

The crypto industry’s reaction

The promulgation of the VASP registry has sent ripples through the Argentine crypto community, echoing concerns that the measure may serve the state bureaucracy and compliance industries more than the cryptocurrency sector itself. 

The air was thick with the scent of disappointment among Bitcoin enthusiasts who had anticipated a regulatory environment reminiscent of El Salvador’s Bitcoin embrace.

Implementing stringent VASP regulations under President Javier Milei’s watch has left these supporters grappling with a reality far removed from their libertarian dreams. The industry was taken aback by the government’s sudden strict regulatory approach, which clashed with the new leader’s libertarian stance, raising eyebrows and questions alike.

However, not all view the regulations through a lens of skepticism. Industry figures such as Manuel Ferrari and Nicolas Bourbon consider the new rules as steps towards satisfying international standards, albeit without an immediate impact on users.

Concerns over Bitcoin’s classification

In Argentina, the status of Bitcoin is mired in a web of contradiction and ambiguity, presenting a complex challenge that remains unresolved. The absence of a consistent framework for classification leads to ongoing uncertainty regarding the cryptocurrency’s legal position.

Contrastingly, El Salvador has embraced Bitcoin by conferring it with legal tender status. Argentina has decidedly resisted adopting crypto assets. This deviation from accepting Bitcoin and incorporating crypto-friendly measures into policy has dampened spirits among Argentine proponents of Bitcoin, who are now faced with reconciling this reality with their earlier hopes.

Criticisms from industry leaders

Industry experts have raised their objections, with individuals like Manuel Ferrari sharply criticizing the newly mandated registration policy for cryptocurrency exchange platforms like Bitcoin. 

Describing it as a ‘terrible idea’, Ferrari argues that Bitcoin ought to be regarded as money rather than a security, emphasizing that imposing comparable regulatory demands on currency exchange houses is nonsensical and misguided. The predicament could have been avoided if these exchange entities were treated distinctively.

There’s a noticeable sense of frustration given Argentina’s hesitation to emulate El Salvador’s endorsement of Bitcoin, especially considering the increasing significance of cryptocurrency within the regional market.



Source link

Regulation

FTX Founder Sam Bankman-Fried’s Family Accused Of $100M Illicit Political Donation

Published

on

By


New allegations have surfaced surrounding Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF), the founder of the now-collapsed crypto exchange FTX. SBF’s family is now accused of being involved in a $100 million illicit political donation scheme. Moreover, these claims can lead to intense legal trouble for the accused.

Sam Bankman-Fried’s Family Accused Of Illegal Political Donation

Emails disclosed by The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) have brought to light the extensive involvement of SBF’s family in orchestrating these political contributions. Furthermore, an important point to note is that these donations were allegedly funded by misappropriated FTX customer assets.

Prosecutors asserted that Bankman-Fried orchestrated a sprawling influence campaign ahead of the 2022 election, leveraging stolen customer funds to the tune of over $100 million. The newly revealed emails suggest that key family members played pivotal roles in the scheme. These include SBF’s parents, Joe Bankman and Barbara Fried, along with his brother, Gabriel Bankman-Fried. They managed these funds and directed donations to various political causes and candidates.

Moreover, Joe Bankman, a Stanford University law professor, is accused of advising on financial strategies to facilitate these political donations. The WSJ reports that emails show Joe Bankman’s direct involvement in the illicit operations, indicating he was well aware of the illegal straw-donor scheme.

Barbara Fried, who co-founded the political action committee (PAC) Mind the Gap, allegedly used her position to channel funds towards progressive groups and initiatives. Meanwhile, Gabriel Bankman-Fried is accused of directing donations to pandemic prevention efforts. This coordinated effort to disperse funds across the political spectrum aimed to amplify their influence and support favored causes without drawing attention to the origin of the donations.

Also Read: Fmr Obama Solicitor Says Regulators Are “Deliberately Debanking Crypto”

Former FTX Execs Also Involved

David Mason, ex-chairman of the Federal Election Commission (FCE), weighed in on the matter. Mason highlighted that the evidence presented in the emails constituted “strong evidence” of Joe Bankman’s knowledge and participation in the scheme.

The political donation scheme, as detailed by the WSJ, also involved Ryan Salame and Nishad Singh, two former FTX executives. They have already pleaded guilty to participating in the illegal straw-donor scheme. According to prosecutors, Salame directed funds to Republican candidates to dissociate the contributions from Bankman-Fried, while Singh supported liberal candidates.

The allegations have led to several legal proceedings, with the potential for significant legal liabilities for those involved. Moreover, Mason’s remarks underscore the gravity of the situation. It suggests that Joe Bankman could face direct legal consequences under campaign finance laws if the allegations are substantiated.

Despite the mounting evidence, a spokesperson for Joe Bankman has refuted claims of his involvement. They stated that Bankman had “no knowledge of any alleged campaign finance violations.” This defense, however, stands in stark contrast to the detailed emails that have surfaced.

Also Read: Just-In: Mt. Gox Starts Repaying Creditors, Bitcoin To Dip Further?

✓ Share:

Kritika boasts over 2 years of experience in the financial news sector. Currently working as a crypto journalist at Coingape, she has consistently shown a knack for blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies. Kritika combines insightful analysis with a deep understanding of market trends. With a keen interest in technical analysis, she brings a nuanced perspective to her reporting, exploring the intersection of finance, technology, and emerging trends in the crypto space.

The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

OpenAI Challenges NYT to Prove Originality of Articles in Copyright Case

Published

on

By


In a notable legal confrontation, OpenAI has requested that the New York Times (NYT) validate the originality of its articles. The AI firm demands the court mandate NYT disclose detailed source materials for each copyrighted article. This move is part of an ongoing lawsuit in which the NYT accuses OpenAI of using its content without permission.

OpenAI Requests Transparency from NYT

OpenAI’s legal team has approached a New York court with a significant demand. They insist that the NYT provide comprehensive details about the creation process of its articles. The request includes access to the reporter’s notes, interview records, and other source materials. OpenAI argues that this information is crucial to determine the originality and authorship of the articles in question.

 

The court filing by OpenAI aims to explore the depth and authenticity of the NYT’s journalistic process. Their lawyers argue that the NYT’s claim of substantial investment in high-quality journalism prompts a need for transparency. They believe understanding the creation process is essential for the court to make a fair judgment.

 

OpenAI argues that such disclosure is necessary for its defense. Detailed insight into the NYT’s authorship process will help ascertain whether the articles are original works. The NYT made this request following allegations that OpenAI unauthorizedly used its content to train AI models.

 

Also Read: German Lawmaker Wants Government To HODL Bitcoin (BTC), Not Sell

NYT Fights Back on Copyright Infringement

Responding swiftly, the NYT’s legal team filed a motion to dismiss OpenAI’s request on July 3. They argue that OpenAI’s demands are excessive and could set a troubling precedent for copyright law. The NYT contends that the intricacies of their journalistic practices are irrelevant to the issue of copyright infringement.

 

The NYT’s opposition stresses that the request undermines the basic principles of copyright law. They believe that proving the content creation process does not pertain to the alleged misuse. The NYT’s lawyers highlight that the focus should remain whether OpenAI used the copyrighted articles without authorization.

 

Furthermore, the NYT accuses OpenAI of attempting to divert the court’s attention from the real issue at hand. They maintain that the lawsuit should concentrate on the legality of OpenAI’s use of the NYT’s copyrighted content. The newspaper defends its rights to its intellectual property, arguing that the creation process should remain protected.

Also Read: Core Scientific Founder Claims Bitcoin’s True Value Not Yet Realized

✓ Share:

Maxwell is a crypto-economic analyst and Blockchain enthusiast, passionate about helping people understand the potential of decentralized technology. I write extensively on topics such as blockchain, cryptocurrency, tokens, and more for many publications. My goal is to spread knowledge about this revolutionary technology and its implications for economic freedom and social good.

The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

Former Solicitor General Paul Clement Joins Crypto Industry Fight

Published

on

By


A week after Custodia Bank filed an appeal in the 10th Circuit Court challenging the Fed’s power to deny it a master account, former Solicitor General Paul Clement has now filed an amicus brief on behalf of the crypto industry.

Paul Clement Takes Custodia Bank vs Fed Fight Ahead

As said, in the recent Custodia Bank vs. Fed case, Paul Clement filed an Amicus brief on Wednesday, July 3, while supporting the crypto industry. Clement has gained popularity in his recent success in overturning the Chevron Defence in the Supreme Court case in the Supreme Court case involving Loper Bright fishermen.

Also Read: US SEC Takes Major Blow In Chevron Howey Test Case, Implication For Crypto

In this ongoing legal fight, The Digital Chamber (TDC) and the Global Business Blockchain Council-USA (GBBC-USA) have expressed their significant interest and unique perspective. With extensive experience in the digital assets industry, the two organizations have argued that denying state-chartered banks a reliable path to participate in the national banking just because of the involvement with digital assets will threaten the growth and success of the trillion-dollar blockchain industry.

The two organization argue that upholding the lower court’s decision will give politically unaccountable federal officials and unchecked power to stiffle innovation thereby cutting off legitimate businesses from having crucial access to the global financial system.

The District Court stated that the “Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (“FRBKC”) has unreviewable discretion to denynonmember depository institutionsa master account”.

TDC and GBBC argued that despite following the legal boundaries, this court decision set dangerous precedence for any industry that might fall out with the Fed officials.

Paul Clement Raises Constitutional Concerns on Fed’s Structure

In the amicus brief, the former Solicitor General has raised some constitutional questions regarding the Fed’s structure. Clement states: “In sum, by affording Federal Reserve Bank presidents significant and largely unconstrained discretionary power, the district court’s decision raises serious constitutional questions under Article II.”

“The district court’s decision threatens the dual system by granting Federal Reserve Bank officials unreviewable discretion to “effectively crippl[e]” state-chartered banks operating legally,” he added.

Also Read: Custodia Bank CEO Predicts “Rip Roaring” Bitcoin Bull Market

✓ Share:

Bhushan is a FinTech enthusiast and holds a good flair in understanding financial markets. His interest in economics and finance draw his attention towards the new emerging Blockchain Technology and Cryptocurrency markets. He is continuously in a learning process and keeps himself motivated by sharing his acquired knowledge. In free time he reads thriller fictions novels and sometimes explore his culinary skills.

The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2024 coin2049.io