Market
VP Matt Sorg on How Solana’s Scaling and Transaction Issues
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7dedf/7dedff10f01bbdcf8303fd941c6144f95844dd0a" alt=""
As the blockchain ecosystem expands, Solana aims to stay ahead of increasing demand through technical innovation and proactive problem-solving. Solana’s ability to handle more transactions than all other blockchains combined demonstrates its live operational capabilities. However, with growth comes the inevitable need to continually enhance infrastructure.
In a recent exclusive interview with BeInCrypto, Matt Sorg, the Vice President of Technology at Solana Foundation, discussed a range of topics — from Solana’s technical challenges and its efforts to tackle transaction congestion to maintaining decentralization and network security.
What makes Solana an attractive ecosystem for startups and developers?
Solana is representative of an ecosystem with which to collaborate with your application. Both of those things are pretty attractive for a startup.
You do not have to carve out a whole new ecosystem and make sure there are wallets and on- or off-ramps and USDC and USDT. You don’t have to worry about that. That is all there for you on Solana.
So, it’s really important for a startup to focus on its core competency. You’re not having to reinvent the wheel.
Developing on Solana really kickstarts people from that, and they don’t have to think about it. I think that’s part of the reason why the Solana applications have been relatively successful. The applications can concentrate on the unique thing they’re delivering to the world, not the infrastructure.
What do you see as the key technical challenges developers face when trying to enter the Solana ecosystem?
First off, it’s kind of like the same thing with focus. I think there are so many chains and infrastructure out there.
There’s this joke that there are more chains than apps, which I think is actually kind of true right now. There’s just an enormous amount of different chains and L2s and whatever pops up. So, I think that lack of clarity can make it hard for a founder to know where to shift to.
Solana is like a very low-friction, high-performance chain, but everybody promises that. The thing that we have is that we show it live. It’s not just like a promise of that.
Solana does more transactions per day than all the blockchains combined. That both means a supply and demand thing. Both chains are capable of doing it live and at very low fees.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55a93/55a93894cee14e71c7b96f8a0080400706bae871" alt="Interview with Matt Sorg During X-Founders Bootcamp."
Solana is known for its high throughput and low latency. What challenges arise when trying to maintain these performance levels as the network scales?
We have really pushed the needle on this. You can see we’re pushing it so hard that, as a lot of people saw in the early days, there were some outages.
The severity and duration of those are overblown, but any outage is not great. That has definitely improved over time. Part of it is just if you’re going to try to stretch the limits.
A lot of the other chains are single sequencers, very, very by design. They have low throughput and less room for error. There are fewer things that can trigger things. It’s just less complex.
But you’re only going to do 17 TPS if you lock yourself into that kind of thing. There’s no other EVM chain that really does more than 100, whereas Solana has, in live environments, done over 8,000. And that’s just from applications, not including votes.
Can you explain how Solana proactively addresses bottlenecks as demand continues to increase?
Every single time you 10x, you run into a new 10x demand and a new infrastructure challenge. It’s just the way things work generally.
One of our challenges is when that happens, it’s usually just some engineering concern. The most recent one that happened in April was some consistent congestion. It was hard to land transactions and stuff.
And there was all this FUD about failing transactions and all this noise. Failing transactions aren’t a big deal. The issue was actually earlier in the stack.
It was the Web2 components of the stack, the way that we implemented QUIC. It was using a library called Quinn, which is an open-source library from Google. We just had to rewrite it.
Are there any tools or SDKs within Solana’s ecosystem that developers should be excited about?
There’s a lot. There’s actually a very robust ecosystem. First, the chain itself has some properties that are basically SDKs to mint NFTs or mint tokens. You can use SPL tokens, Metaplex NFTs, or a variety of both of those things to mint them.
As a developer, you’re using already on-chain code that’s already audited. All I’m doing is submitting my configuration, which can be JavaScript, a game engine, Python, or Rust.
But it’s just normal front-end stuff. You don’t have to get re-audited in order to do that. If you want custom on-chain code, then yes, you need to do SVM, Rust, and on-chain stuff, but a lot of collaborative apps are out there that you don’t need to do that kind of thing.
Solana recently made headlines due to the rise of meme coins on the network. How does the Foundation view this surge in interest?
It’s a wild ecosystem. Legitimately, two of the founders of Solana will say anything on Twitter, and there’s just a meme coin of it, like five seconds later or usually multiple meme coins that are making fun of whatever they said.
I would say you can map it pretty closely to a lottery or casino. These are zero-sum games. You have people competing with each other at the end of the day. You don’t need infrastructure or development underneath it—just the narrative because that’s what you’re trading on with L2s.
I think part of why many L2s and L1s have struggled is because if they don’t have users yet, why not just trade the meme coins? If all you’re trading on is narrative, just go straight to the most liquid memes.
Cross-chain interoperability is becoming increasingly important. Does Solana have plans to enhance its interoperability with other chains?
Solana itself is very composable. All the transactions are composed of multiple instructions. Those instructions can be across a variety of smart contracts or what we call programs. Part of the reason Solana is so great is like Jupiter; for example, whenever it does a swap, it interacts with any number of DEXs to find you the best prices across a variety of them.
Solana is very composable and atomic, meaning all transactions happen or none do. So, it’s a very good user experience. Like I want to do something, oh, it’s going to happen, or it’s not, which, by the way, gets back into what I was mentioning earlier.
That’s where failed transactions come from. Sometimes, one of the conditions of the trade isn’t met, so it fails, and that should fail. If that condition isn’t met, it’s like something that you have defined for it.
It’s not the chain itself that is processing that failed transaction perfectly fine. It’s just that the condition wasn’t met. And that’s the first thing: Solana is already, at its core, all about composability.
The extra things that we’re concentrating on are bridges. The idea that we’ve talked about a couple of times now is that Solana has this low friction, and that’s where finance will go. So, being as connected to as many places that issue assets as possible is really important.
This isn’t us trying to replace any other chain or whatever, but if valuable assets are on some other chain and they want to interface with the liquidity and functionality of Solana, we want to make that as easy as possible to lower the friction so it flows to Solana, where there’s other liquidity and other functionality. So yeah, tons of bridges are coming out.
This is called intents, which are basically cross-chain, implicitly defined things that you want. Usually, there’s a bunch of fancy technologies underneath, like ZK, to prove that the intent was fulfilled. We’re working with some of the intent providers that are doing that.
As Solana validators continue to expand, what measures are in place to optimize decentralization and network security?
First, I want to make sure that it’s clear that the Solana validators are permissionless. They can enter and exit just as they please, and the protocol just adjusts. This is very different from many L2s and other L1s.
Ethereum is also permissionless, but even that requires 32 Ethereum to be minimal. Solana’s minimum is one. To be profitable, you need a lot more than that, but it is a permissionless protocol.
For security, there are a lot of developments. The most notable one that you’ll hear more about in the coming weeks is Firedancer, the second validator client on Solana, which gives validators more options on which client they want to run and also offers some redundancies. So if there’s ever a fault in one, the validators can hot-swap to the other. It’s a pretty powerful paradigm in terms of resiliency.
What is Solana’s long-term vision for decentralization and scalability?
The goal of Solana is to be this global synchronization of any data. Obviously, if you care about global synchronization, it probably had some value — financial data for sure, as well as DePIN data.
We’re less opinionated on exactly how it’s used. It’s a permissionless chain that we want to be able to facilitate finance and businesses. No animosity at all; we just want businesses to be set up for success.
Disclaimer
In compliance with the Trust Project guidelines, this opinion article presents the author’s perspective and may not necessarily reflect the views of BeInCrypto. BeInCrypto remains committed to transparent reporting and upholding the highest standards of journalism. Readers are advised to verify information independently and consult with a professional before making decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
Market
Bitcoin Could Rebound to $100,000 Soon Despite Bearish Pressure
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6ed1/b6ed17c5a07d31e586797774db8f80eb15b628c6" alt=""
Bitcoin (BTC) has been trading below $100,000 since February 5, facing continued resistance despite attempts at recovery. Recent indicators suggest that sellers have gained control, with BTC’s Directional Movement Index (DMI) showing increased bearish pressure.
However, the Ichimoku Cloud points to a potential reversal if Bitcoin can break above key resistance zones. If bullish momentum returns, BTC could test the $97,756 resistance and possibly retake the $100,000 level, with $102,668 as the next target.
BTC DMI Shows that Sellers Gained Control In the Last 24 Hours
Bitcoin’s Directional Movement Index (DMI) shows its Average Directional Index (ADX) currently at 21.2, after briefly touching 22.9, rising from 15.5 two days ago.
ADX measures the strength of a trend without indicating its direction, ranging from 0 to 100. Typically, values above 25 indicate a strong trend, while values below 20 suggest a weak or ranging market.
With ADX hovering around 21.2, Bitcoin’s trend is relatively weak, signaling a potential transition period.
This suggests that the previous uptrend momentum is losing steam, possibly leading to a reversal or the beginning of a downtrend.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68239/6823931b95b923bf4d3be44cb9fdd3817e54deb5" alt="BTC DMI."
Meanwhile, Bitcoin’s +DI is at 15.5, down from 23.3 just one day ago, indicating a decline in bullish momentum, while -DI has climbed to 21.9 from 9.2, reflecting growing bearish pressure.
This crossover, where -DI has moved above +DI, indicates that sellers are gaining control over the market, potentially signaling a shift from an uptrend to a downtrend.
If -DI continues to rise and +DI remains weak, Bitcoin could see increased selling pressure and a potential price decline. However, if +DI stabilizes and rebounds, Bitcoin might consolidate before choosing a more definitive directional move.
Bitcoin Ichimoku Cloud Paints A Bearish Picture, But It Could Change Soon
The Ichimoku Cloud chart for Bitcoin shows a mixed outlook with early signs of potential recovery. The blue Tenkan-sen line is currently above the red Kijun-sen line.
This crossover suggests that buying pressure is trying to recover, which could support a potential upward move.
However, Bitcoin’s price is still below the Kumo cloud, signaling that the overall trend remains bearish and that resistance is strong above the current levels.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e883/6e8832f4c3f30216aec471c6e0e703914d4244c3" alt="BTC Ichimoku Cloud."
The Kumo cloud ahead is thin and slightly shifting upwards, suggesting that the bearish momentum might be weakening. If Bitcoin can break above the cloud, it would signal a potential trend reversal, especially if the Tenkan-sen continues to lead above the Kijun-sen.
Conversely, if Bitcoin fails to break above the cloud and the Tenkan-sen drops below the Kijun-sen again, it would confirm a continuation of the bearish trend.
For now, Bitcoin faces a crucial resistance zone, and the next move will depend on whether it can clear the cloud or get rejected downward.e
Bitcoin Could Return to $100,000 Very Soon
Bitcoin was on the verge of forming a new golden cross yesterday before the Bybit hack triggered a sharp price drop from $98,000 to roughly $95,000 within four hours.
Its Exponential Moving Average (EMA) lines are still bearish, with short-term EMAs positioned below long-term ones, indicating ongoing downward momentum.
This bearish setup suggests that selling pressure remains dominant. If sellers continue to control the market, Bitcoin could retest the support at $94,818, which was maintained during yesterday’s decline.
If this support breaks, Bitcoin could drop further to $93,415, and a continued downtrend could push it as low as $91,300.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f962f/f962f69aa20dfe89ff76b55cd89f7fd9c42d160c" alt="BTC Price Analysis."
However, if Bitcoin price manages to recover from this drop, there are signs that the downtrend may not be as strong as it seems.
Both the ADX and Ichimoku Cloud indicate weakening bearish momentum, suggesting that a reversal is possible. In this case, Bitcoin could test the resistance at $97,756, and if this level is broken, it could rise to $100,000.
Should the uptrend gain more momentum, Bitcoin could continue climbing to test $102,668, marking its highest levels since early February.
Disclaimer
In line with the Trust Project guidelines, this price analysis article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. BeInCrypto is committed to accurate, unbiased reporting, but market conditions are subject to change without notice. Always conduct your own research and consult with a professional before making any financial decisions. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
Market
Myanmar Junta Leader’s Social Media Hijacaked for Crypto Fraud
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fdc90/fdc901c3e32cba8ecc73a732d1fa02f3835d9b0e" alt=""
Hackers potentially took control of the official X account of Myanmar’s military junta leader on Saturday, using it to promote a fraudulent cryptocurrency.
This incident could be the part of a growing trend where scammers exploit high-profile political figures to add credibility to scam tokens, deceiving unsuspecting investors.
Another Political Crypto Scam Now Targeting the Myanmar Government
On February 22, the X (formerly Twitter) account belonging to Myanmar’s junta leader, Min Aung Hlaing, began posting about a so-called national cryptocurrency launch.
The posts described it as “Myanmar first national crypto,” attempting to present it as an official digital asset.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57fbb/57fbb4abd06c08688bcb7a26c1a06df4ab44ec93" alt="Myanmar’s Junta Leader Promotion of Meme Coin."
Crypto users on X quickly noticed irregularities. The hackers initially shared multiple cryptocurrency wallet addresses before deleting them.
Soon after, they claimed the launch was postponed and provided a new wallet address, raising further suspicion.
“This account from the government of Myanmar has been hacked . Dropped several CAs and deleted, as well as announcing a space then deleted 3 minutes later,” one user wrote on X.
Meanwhile, market observers questioned whether a military-led government could successfully launch a cryptocurrency. They noted that such an initiative contradicts the principles of decentralization.
One user pointed out that state-backed digital assets often serve as a tool for financial control rather than innovation. The analyst also speculated that countries under economic sanctions might explore cryptocurrency as a way to bypass traditional financial systems.
“Signals a shift: more nations exploring state-backed crypto to sidestep sanctions & SWIFT dependence Geopolitically, it’s a test case If it works, expect more isolated regimes to follow This isn’t about innovation but it’s about sovereignty vs financial gatekeeping,” Cedric Beau stated.
Meanwhile, this attack on Myanmar’s junta leader follows a broader pattern of cyber threats targeting political figures.
Earlier this month, the Central African Republic’s President, Faustin-Archange Touadéra, introduced an official meme coin called CAR. The token was meant to highlight the country’s confidence in blockchain technology.
While that initiative was legitimate, hackers have used similar tactics to deceive users by falsely linking government officials to fake token launches.
Just days ago, scammers impersonated Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman to promote a fraudulent cryptocurrency.
In another case, anonymous hackers took over the X account of former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad to push a fake meme coin.
These incidents reveal a troubling pattern of hackers hijacking political figures’ social media accounts to promote fraudulent cryptocurrency schemes. By exploiting their identities, scammers create a false sense of legitimacy for fake tokens.
As these scams become more common, users must stay vigilant and verify sources before engaging with any token promotions linked to public figures.
Disclaimer
In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
Market
Kanye West is Launching His Token Despite Past Criticism
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/350ed/350edd126c40ea6dd2aa4f1faebb2c6dbae0b3df" alt=""
Kanye West, now known as Ye, has denied any involvement with the YZY tokens circulating in the market, asserting that he will introduce his own cryptocurrency next week.
This statement follows his earlier dismissal of any interest in digital assets, adding a fresh twist to the speculation surrounding his stance on crypto.
Kanye West Says Existing YZY Tokens Are Fake
In a post on February 22, Ye made it clear that he has no ties to the YZY tokens currently in circulation. He emphasized that all existing coins using his brand are illegitimate and reaffirmed his intention to launch his own cryptocurrency soon.
“All current coins are fake. I’m launching next week,” Ye wrote on X.
His announcement has sparked mixed reactions within the crypto community. Some critics believe his project could turn into another celebrity-backed rug pull.
Others pointed out that his latest move contradicts his earlier statement, where he distanced himself from launching any token. Meanwhile, some supporters advised him to time the launch carefully to avoid market volatility.
Nate Geraci, President of ETF Store, issued a warning to investors, stating that anyone choosing to invest in Ye’s crypto should be prepared for potential losses.
“If he (ye) launches and you buy & lose…it’s on you. Nobody to blame. I don’t want to hear about crypto regulation, rug pulls, scams, etc. It’s a wealth transfer from you to insiders. You’re spinning broken roulette wheel,” Geraci added.
Speculation Grows Around Ye’s Crypto Move
Ye’s announcement follows reports of multiple YZY-branded tokens appearing on the Solana-based launchpad Pump.fun. These developments fueled speculation that he was indeed planning a token launch.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2b189/2b189114939960572d4840ae409b2c252a11339d" alt="YZY-Themed Tokens."
Other reports claim that Ye is actively working on a YZY token linked to his Yeezy fashion brand. Publications like CoinDesk allegedly received a press release from Hussein Lalani, who is said to be Yeezy’s Chief Financial Officer, along with other sources familiar with the project.
Details surrounding the token’s structure indicate that Ye could control 70% of the supply, with 20% allocated to investors and 10% reserved for liquidity. A portion of his holdings would reportedly be subject to a one-year vesting period, preventing immediate access.
While an official launch date remains uncertain, speculation continues to build. Data from Polymarket, a decentralized prediction platform, currently suggests a 71% probability of the token debuting this month, with more than $18 million wagered on its release.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aab0b/aab0bfee6f6df878d92479db0f95754550f586a7" alt="Kanye West's Probability of Launching a Token."
Ye’s latest move adds to the unpredictable phase of celebrity and political meme coins that’s plaguing the industry right now. Such endorsed tokens have caused notable chaos in the market in the past weeks.
Disclaimer
In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
-
Ethereum23 hours ago
Ethereum Holds Key Support – Analyst Doubts Bears Can Defend $4K Anymore
-
Market22 hours ago
What It Means for the XRP Lawsuit
-
Ethereum21 hours ago
Extremely Strong Support And Monthly 55 EMA Says ETH Is Headed For $4,867
-
Market21 hours ago
PI Surges, CZ Comments, Safe Denies Breach
-
Regulation20 hours ago
ConsenSys Submits Letter to SEC on DeFi Rule Amendment Concerns
-
Market24 hours ago
Bybit Reportedly Hacked for Over $1.5 Billion
-
Market18 hours ago
XRP Whales Decline As Price Remains Consistently Below $3
-
Ethereum9 hours ago
Grayscale’s Ethereum ETF On The Brink Of Major Change With NYSE’s Staking Proposal