Market
This Is How DePIN Can Solve AI’s Global Energy Crisis
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e903b/e903b442c611afa3e23a8194e9a6b4b5154b6fb4" alt=""
The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) and generative AI technologies has been meteoric in the past two years. For some tech-savvy people, every morning begins with the help of AI, from the smart alarm that tracks their sleep cycle to the news app that curates articles based on their interests.
But behind these seamless conveniences lies a hidden reality – these technologies are part of a growing energy crisis. As AI technologies like generative AI advance, they are not just transforming our lives; they’re demanding a huge share of the world’s electricity.
Impact of AI on Energy Infrastructures
The challenge is stark. As one of the most energy-intensive modern IT endeavors, AI systems require considerable carbon emissions and electricity. Indeed, the world might not be ready for their demands.
In 2023, the world became acquainted with the implications of generative AI, and by 2024, its utilization in various sectors magnified. Hence, data centers that power these AI models are becoming massive consumers of electricity.
Indeed, Forbes noted that GPT-4 required over 50 gigawatt-hours to train—equivalent to 0.02% of California’s annual electricity production. Moreover, it requires 50 times more energy than its predecessor, GPT-3.
The statistics are staggering. Globally, data centers and their transmission networks now contribute to 3% of global energy consumption, emitting as much carbon dioxide as Brazil.
Moreover, the escalating energy requirements show no signs of abating. According to an International Energy Agency (IEA) projection, global electricity demand will surge from 460 terawatt-hours (TWh) in 2022 to 1000 TWh by 2026.
Read more: How To Build Your Personal AI Chatbot Using the ChatGPT API
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01abb/01abba50d6017e3c508b681563f19042f4626389" alt="Global Electricity Demand Projections"
In the United States alone, the power demand from data centers is expected to increase from 200 TWh in 2022 to 260 TWh by 2026, marking a 6% share of the country’s total power usage. Projections suggest this demand will double by 2030.
Amid this backdrop, Ayush Ranjan, CEO of Huddle01, highlighted in an interview with BeInCrypto the urgent need for solutions like DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Network).
“AI data centers require a substantial amount of electricity for computation and cooling. If AI applications continue to grow at the current rate, we will see a significant strain on both local and global energy grids that will prove unsustainable. This burden will continue to increase as AI systems get more and more complex with time. This will again lead to higher emissions and grid instability,” Ranjan explained.
The geographic clustering of data centers compounds the challenges. For instance, Northern Virginia hosts the largest hub of data centers globally, consuming electricity equivalent to that of 800,000 homes. This concentration creates dangerous fluctuations in power demand, posing severe risks to energy infrastructures.
How DePIN Solves the Challenges
In response, DePIN offers a promising solution by leveraging underutilized hardware resources to distribute computational tasks more efficiently. By decentralizing energy consumption and incentivizing the use of edge computing, DePIN networks could significantly alleviate the energy burden imposed by AI, offering a pathway to more sustainable and democratized access to AI resources.
Ranjan further elucidated that DePINs distribute energy consumption and workload, easing the burden on any single point. Instead of relying on huge centralized data centers, DePIN deploys multiple nodes—often utilizing underused infrastructure to offload computations closer to end-users.
“This reduces the workload on servers and spreads energy consumption more evenly across regions, easing the burden on energy grids,” Ranjan told BeInCrypto.
Currently, 84% of the data centers are concentrated around the United States, Europe, and China, making data transfers less energy efficient. However, edge computing, integral to DePIN, minimizes long-distance, energy-intensive data transfers typical of centralized data centers.
“Splitting the energy consumption across multiple devices and regions, reducing the load on data centers and energy grids by leveraging existing devices or resources to build the network will prove critical in solving this issue,” Ranjan affirmed.
Read more: What Is DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks)?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55a6c/55a6c6f5d0f2118dc6a13af6e77cf81bbb704f14" alt="Data Centers Distribution"
DePin Projects Addressing AI’s Demands
According to Ranjan, several DePIN projects, like Filecoin Green, Akash Network, Render, and Grass, focus on addressing AI’s energy demands.
Notably, the Daylight Energy project, backed by prominent venture capitalist firm Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), aims to transform energy grid operations through distributed energy resources (DERs). This initiative enhances grid responsiveness and facilitates sustainable energy practices by leveraging real-time data from DERs such as solar panels and smart batteries.
Moreover, on September 10, Daylight Energy announced a partnership with DIMO Network to enable electric vehicles (EVs) to support power grids. This collaboration utilizes DIMO’s EV application programming interfaces (APIs) to integrate EVs into the energy management ecosystem, thereby facilitating clean energy usage and real-time energy management for all EV owners.
DePIN networks also solve other challenges of centralized infrastructure, such as frequent outages. For instance, a recent IT outage involving Microsoft and CrowdStrike disrupted major services worldwide. However, DePIN networks are less susceptible to such outages because they do not have a single point of failure.
Currently, the total market capitalization of DePIN projects stands above $20.5 billion. Additionally, the total number of DePIN devices has crossed 18 million. However, DePIN still faces scalability challenges as the mainstream adoption of these networks requires high computational power.
“Many DePINs rely on a mix of devices, from low-powered edge devices to small-scale data centers. Scaling the network and coordinating the deployed resources to match the computational power of a centralized data center remains a formidable industry challenge,” Ranjan noted.
Read more: Top 10 Web3 Projects That Are Revolutionizing the Industry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb57b/eb57bb9a4e7f5cfad77b1b990eb4e3679f629fb6" alt="DePIN Market Cap, Volume, and Total Devices."
However, while the idea of DePIN rescuing the world from a global energy crisis remains nascent, further innovation and adoption are essential. Ranjan believes that token incentives can help bring more adoption.
“Because of hardware limitations of edge devices to handle AI workload, wide adoption is crucial for any DePIN to scale and see a mainstream use case. Token incentives help drive intent to use and participate,” Ranjan concluded.
Disclaimer
Following the Trust Project guidelines, this feature article presents opinions and perspectives from industry experts or individuals. BeInCrypto is dedicated to transparent reporting, but the views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of BeInCrypto or its staff. Readers should verify information independently and consult with a professional before making decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
Market
Ethereum Rollback Debate Intensifies After Bybit Hack
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5bb5a/5bb5ac1d2291f2f418ab6299d4adab2c2f5c7640" alt=""
The crypto community is divided over calls for an Ethereum blockchain rollback following a massive security breach at Bybit.
On February 21, the exchange lost nearly $1.5 billion in ETH to hackers, sparking discussions about whether Ethereum should intervene to recover the stolen funds.
What is a Blockchain Rollback?
A blockchain rollback, also known as a reorganization, involves reversing confirmed transactions to restore the network to an earlier state.
This process usually happens after a major security breach or exploit. Validators must reach a consensus to discard the affected blocks, effectively erasing the malicious transactions.
Despite its potential benefits, a rollback remains a controversial and rarely used measure due to its impact on a blockchain’s trust and decentralization.
Blockchains operate on the principle of immutability, meaning transactions are expected to be final once confirmed. So, rolling back transactions challenges this principle, raising concerns about the security and reliability of the network.
Crypto Leaders Clash Over Ethereum Rollback Proposal
BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes has been vocal in advocating for a rollback to solve the ByBit hack. He pointed to the 2016 DAO hack, where Ethereum underwent a hard fork to recover stolen funds, as precedent.
Hayes argued that since Ethereum previously compromised on immutability, another intervention should not be off the table.
“My own view as a mega ETH bag holder is ETH stopped being money in 2016 after the DAO hack hardfork. If the community wanted to do it again, I would support it because we already voted no on immutability in 2016,” Hayes said.
JAN3 CEO Samson Mow also supported the rollback, stating it could prevent North Korea from using the stolen funds to fund its nuclear weapons program.
However, not everyone agrees. Pseudonymous crypto trader Borovik strongly opposed the idea, arguing that a rollback would jeopardize Ethereum’s credibility and neutrality.
Bitcoin advocate Jimmy Song also dismissed the possibility, stating that the Bybit hack cannot be compared to the 2016 DAO exploit. Song emphasized that the DAO hack allowed for a 30-day intervention, whereas the Bybit attack is already finalized, making a rollback impractical.
“I know people are expecting the Ethereum Foundation to roll back the chain, but I suspect it’s already too much of a mess to do it cleanly,” Song added.
Meanwhile, Ethereum supporter Adriano Feria introduced an alternative perspective. He argued that Bybit could have avoided this situation by using a Layer 2 (L2) solution with conditional reversible transactions.
According to Feria, blockchain technology needs some form of reversibility to ensure real-world adoption.
“Whether through social recovery or another pre-determined, immutable, and transparent decision-making process, real-world mass adoption will not work without reversible transactions. Without this capability, transactional activity will inevitably gravitate toward TradFi systems that already provide it,” Feria stated.
This debate raises a fundamental question for Ethereum: should it prioritize immutability or intervene in extreme cases?
While some see a rollback as a necessary response to an unprecedented loss, others fear it could undermine the core principles of decentralization. Ethereum’s next steps will likely shape its long-term credibility and trust within the crypto space.
Disclaimer
In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
Market
Berachain (BERA) Falls 15% After Recent Rally Surge
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed333/ed3331c19c9a764a4759fe2f1befc99c5679666d" alt=""
Berachain (BERA) is down almost 15% in the last 24 hours, with its market cap now at $778 million, although its price remains up nearly 20% over the past seven days. This sharp pullback comes after a strong rally between February 18 and February 20, when BERA reached levels above $8.5.
BERA’s Relative Strength Index (RSI) has dropped from overbought levels, signaling a loss of bullish momentum, while its Directional Movement Index (DMI) shows growing bearish pressure. As BERA navigates this correction phase, it faces key support at $6.1, with potential resistance levels at $8.5, $9.1, and $10 if bullish momentum returns.
BERA RSI Is Dropping Steadily After Touching Overbought Levels
Berachain Relative Strength Index (RSI) is currently at 50.6, down sharply from 86.7 just two days ago when its price surged above $8.5. RSI is a momentum oscillator that measures the speed and change of price movements, ranging from 0 to 100.
It is commonly used to identify overbought or oversold conditions, with values above 70 indicating overbought levels and below 30 suggesting oversold territory.
The steep decline in BERA’s RSI reflects a significant loss of bullish momentum after reaching overbought levels above 86, where a correction was likely.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fdb7f/fdb7f04bcb855e5a19437d3270be3ea659bfdb1c" alt="BERA RSI."
With RSI now at 50.6, BERA is in a neutral zone, suggesting that buying and selling pressures are relatively balanced.
This could indicate a period of consolidation as the market digests recent gains. If RSI continues to decline below 50, it could signal increasing bearish momentum. This could lead to a further price drop for BERA.
Conversely, if RSI stabilizes and begins to rise, it could suggest renewed buying interest and a potential recovery in Berachain price.
BERA DMI Chart Shows Buyers Are Losing Control
Berachain Directional Movement Index (DMI) chart shows its Average Directional Index (ADX) currently at 50.5, after peaking at 60.2 yesterday, up from just 13.3 five days ago. ADX is an indicator used to measure the strength of a trend, regardless of its direction, ranging from 0 to 100.
Values above 25 typically indicate a strong trend, while values below 20 suggest a weak or sideways market. The sharp rise in ADX reflects a significant increase in trend strength, confirming that BERA has been experiencing strong directional movement recently.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10597/105973409ada12968dbea00cdf3992a6e6d7e2fc" alt="BERA DMI."
Meanwhile, BERA’s +DI is at 24.4, down from 48.4 two days ago, indicating weakening bullish momentum. Meanwhile, -DI has risen to 15.1 from 4.9, suggesting growing bearish pressure.
This shift signals that the bullish trend that drove prices higher is losing steam, and selling interest is beginning to increase.
If -DI continues to rise above +DI, it could indicate a bearish crossover, signaling a potential reversal or deeper correction in BERA’s price. However, if +DI stabilizes and moves upward again, it could suggest a continuation of the uptrend, albeit with reduced momentum.
Will Berachain Fall Below $6 Soon?
Berachain surged 53% between February 18 and February 20, pushing its price above $8.5 after the coin struggled following its airdrop. However, after this sharp rally, BERA entered a correction phase and is currently down almost 15% in the last 24 hours.
This pullback suggests profit-taking and a shift in market sentiment as buyers hesitate to push prices higher. If the downtrend continues, BERA could soon test the support at $6.1, and a break below this level could lead to a further decline towards $5.48, reflecting increased selling pressure.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68ef7/68ef76913d796be08c3aa53190ef03840c6d9d0c" alt="BERA Price Analysis."
On the other hand, if Berachain can regain its bullish momentum from a few days ago, it could rise above $8.5 again, potentially testing the next resistance levels at $9.1 or even $10.
To confirm this bullish scenario, Berachain would need to see renewed buying interest and strong upward momentum. If buyers can defend key support levels and push the price above resistance zones, it could indicate the continuation of the uptrend.
Disclaimer
In line with the Trust Project guidelines, this price analysis article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. BeInCrypto is committed to accurate, unbiased reporting, but market conditions are subject to change without notice. Always conduct your own research and consult with a professional before making any financial decisions. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
Market
Bitcoin Could Rebound to $100,000 Soon Despite Bearish Pressure
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6ed1/b6ed17c5a07d31e586797774db8f80eb15b628c6" alt=""
Bitcoin (BTC) has been trading below $100,000 since February 5, facing continued resistance despite attempts at recovery. Recent indicators suggest that sellers have gained control, with BTC’s Directional Movement Index (DMI) showing increased bearish pressure.
However, the Ichimoku Cloud points to a potential reversal if Bitcoin can break above key resistance zones. If bullish momentum returns, BTC could test the $97,756 resistance and possibly retake the $100,000 level, with $102,668 as the next target.
BTC DMI Shows that Sellers Gained Control In the Last 24 Hours
Bitcoin’s Directional Movement Index (DMI) shows its Average Directional Index (ADX) currently at 21.2, after briefly touching 22.9, rising from 15.5 two days ago.
ADX measures the strength of a trend without indicating its direction, ranging from 0 to 100. Typically, values above 25 indicate a strong trend, while values below 20 suggest a weak or ranging market.
With ADX hovering around 21.2, Bitcoin’s trend is relatively weak, signaling a potential transition period.
This suggests that the previous uptrend momentum is losing steam, possibly leading to a reversal or the beginning of a downtrend.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68239/6823931b95b923bf4d3be44cb9fdd3817e54deb5" alt="BTC DMI."
Meanwhile, Bitcoin’s +DI is at 15.5, down from 23.3 just one day ago, indicating a decline in bullish momentum, while -DI has climbed to 21.9 from 9.2, reflecting growing bearish pressure.
This crossover, where -DI has moved above +DI, indicates that sellers are gaining control over the market, potentially signaling a shift from an uptrend to a downtrend.
If -DI continues to rise and +DI remains weak, Bitcoin could see increased selling pressure and a potential price decline. However, if +DI stabilizes and rebounds, Bitcoin might consolidate before choosing a more definitive directional move.
Bitcoin Ichimoku Cloud Paints A Bearish Picture, But It Could Change Soon
The Ichimoku Cloud chart for Bitcoin shows a mixed outlook with early signs of potential recovery. The blue Tenkan-sen line is currently above the red Kijun-sen line.
This crossover suggests that buying pressure is trying to recover, which could support a potential upward move.
However, Bitcoin’s price is still below the Kumo cloud, signaling that the overall trend remains bearish and that resistance is strong above the current levels.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e883/6e8832f4c3f30216aec471c6e0e703914d4244c3" alt="BTC Ichimoku Cloud."
The Kumo cloud ahead is thin and slightly shifting upwards, suggesting that the bearish momentum might be weakening. If Bitcoin can break above the cloud, it would signal a potential trend reversal, especially if the Tenkan-sen continues to lead above the Kijun-sen.
Conversely, if Bitcoin fails to break above the cloud and the Tenkan-sen drops below the Kijun-sen again, it would confirm a continuation of the bearish trend.
For now, Bitcoin faces a crucial resistance zone, and the next move will depend on whether it can clear the cloud or get rejected downward.e
Bitcoin Could Return to $100,000 Very Soon
Bitcoin was on the verge of forming a new golden cross yesterday before the Bybit hack triggered a sharp price drop from $98,000 to roughly $95,000 within four hours.
Its Exponential Moving Average (EMA) lines are still bearish, with short-term EMAs positioned below long-term ones, indicating ongoing downward momentum.
This bearish setup suggests that selling pressure remains dominant. If sellers continue to control the market, Bitcoin could retest the support at $94,818, which was maintained during yesterday’s decline.
If this support breaks, Bitcoin could drop further to $93,415, and a continued downtrend could push it as low as $91,300.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f962f/f962f69aa20dfe89ff76b55cd89f7fd9c42d160c" alt="BTC Price Analysis."
However, if Bitcoin price manages to recover from this drop, there are signs that the downtrend may not be as strong as it seems.
Both the ADX and Ichimoku Cloud indicate weakening bearish momentum, suggesting that a reversal is possible. In this case, Bitcoin could test the resistance at $97,756, and if this level is broken, it could rise to $100,000.
Should the uptrend gain more momentum, Bitcoin could continue climbing to test $102,668, marking its highest levels since early February.
Disclaimer
In line with the Trust Project guidelines, this price analysis article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. BeInCrypto is committed to accurate, unbiased reporting, but market conditions are subject to change without notice. Always conduct your own research and consult with a professional before making any financial decisions. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
-
Market24 hours ago
What It Means for the XRP Lawsuit
-
Ethereum23 hours ago
Extremely Strong Support And Monthly 55 EMA Says ETH Is Headed For $4,867
-
Market23 hours ago
PI Surges, CZ Comments, Safe Denies Breach
-
Regulation22 hours ago
ConsenSys Submits Letter to SEC on DeFi Rule Amendment Concerns
-
Market22 hours ago
FARTCOIN, POPCAT Decline, BRETT Rallies
-
Ethereum11 hours ago
Grayscale’s Ethereum ETF On The Brink Of Major Change With NYSE’s Staking Proposal
-
Market18 hours ago
Franklin Templeton Files For Solana Staking ETF
-
Altcoin18 hours ago
Will XRP Price Hit $300 If US SEC Calls Off Ripple Lawsuit?