Market
The Survival Story of FixedFloat

In February, the decentralized cryptocurrency exchange FixedFloat experienced a drainer attack, resulting in the loss of over $26 million worth of Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH). By late March, the exchange suffered a second exploit, leading to an additional loss of $2.8 million.
A few months later, FixedFloat shared the details of these incidents and ongoing investigation with BeInCrypto.
FixedFloat has been hacked twice this year. How did this happen?
The first hack occurred on the night of February 16-17. This was an external attack caused by vulnerabilities in our security structure. A hacker exploited a vulnerability in our security and was able to gain access to some of FixedFloat’s functions. The second breach took place on March 31, where the hacker exploited a vulnerability in a third-party service we were using at the time.
Was the second hack committed by the same hacker who committed the previous hack, or was it a different attacker?
We believe the same hacker committed both hacks because the attacks originated from the same IP address. We cannot provide all the details at the moment. However, we can report that hackers possess a large number of compromised servers.
On some of these servers, they have deployed the infrastructure for attacks. They likely did not store evidence on their own devices, instead using third-party servers. The hackers utilized numerous unique IP addresses; however, some were used to launch both attacks.
Do you have information about who exactly is behind the hacks?
We have been using Time4VPS hosting for a long time. This is a fairly large web hosting provider in Europe, operating since 2012. We chose Time4VPS for our purposes, since this hosting offers fairly cheap servers with low performance. This was a convenient and profitable option for implementing some technical solutions at the initial stage of development of our project.
Over the past years, we have migrated our subservers and wallets. At the beginning of 2024, several low-power nodes with wallets and some subsystems remained on the Time4VPS server. After the first hack, the hacker discovered the IP address of one of our technical servers rented from Time4VPS.
How did the hacker use the information?
The hacker logged into all our servers, rented from Time4VPS hosting, simultaneously, despite knowing only one IP address. We immediately changed all passwords on servers and accounts, but the hacker quickly changed the passwords again. We found a solution to prevent server authorization and started transitioning from this hosting provider.
However, the hacker gained access to all hoster functions, including global access to all servers, rendering our solutions ineffective. The hacker changed the account email to an invalid one, preventing us from logging in or receiving password change notifications. They connected to the servers without authorization.
At this point, we realized the need to destroy the servers and remove them from the whitelists immediately. Our delay in doing so allowed the hacker to send requests that enabled them to steal funds.

Have you contacted Time4VPS support?
On March 31, immediately after discovering unauthorized access to our servers, we contacted Time4VPS to report the hack. We were extremely surprised by their inaction. Technical support informed us that the technicians had the day off and could not assist us. The following day, the Time4VPS team remained inactive. They merely advised us to change the passwords on our account.
We eventually convinced them to verify that certain actions could not be performed through their personal account. Only then did they confirm the hack and promise to provide a report on the incident the next day.
Have you received a hack report from Time4VPS?
More than three months have passed, and there is still no report from Time4VPS. Instead, they requested that we provide some documents through their system. We refused because Time4VPS representatives have not confirmed that they found and fixed the vulnerability. Their demands have created the risk of another information leak.
We agreed to cooperate only with the direct involvement of law enforcement or after they confirmed the vulnerability had been corrected. Additionally, our lawyer was prepared to provide the necessary documents directly at the company’s office to receive reports and assistance. However, Time4VPS management rejected this offer.
Why do you think Time4VPS was inactive at the time of the hack and did not provide assistance after it?
We do not exclude the possibility that a hoster’s employee could have facilitated the hacking. However, we are more inclined to believe that Time4VPS and the Lithuanian company behind it are simply careless. We believe the hoster’s critical vulnerabilities remain unfixed, leaving all their clients’ data unprotected from hacker attacks.
Did the hack impact your customers?
This incident caused problems not only for us but also for our users. As soon as we detected the hack, we turned off FixedFloat and suspended all ongoing exchanges.
FixedFloat is an automated, non-custodial, centralized cryptocurrency exchange service, so we don’t store our users’ funds. Additionally, FixedFloat is not a cryptocurrency mixer. We send funds to exchanges only from our addresses, and this information is public.
Due to the hack, we had obligations to clients who made exchanges at that time. We have since fulfilled all obligations to our users, and completed all orders that stopped due to the service outage. Only our service suffered from the hacking and theft of funds.
What measures did you take after the hack?
The first breach was due to a security vulnerability, which we have since fixed. Unfortunately, we did not anticipate an attack from third parties. Following the second hack, our service was under maintenance for over two months. During this period, our specialists worked extensively to enhance our infrastructure and protect against such attacks.
We have radically revised our security system. This included conducting a comprehensive audit, implementing additional security measures, and improving our threat detection and prevention systems.
Have you completed the technical work?
Yes, FixedFloat has resumed operations. Most cryptocurrencies are already available for exchange, and our specialists are working on adding new currencies. We have been providing high-quality, convenient, and fast cryptocurrency exchange services for six years, and we intend to continue our work.
From a hack survivor perspective, can you give a few recommendations to other platforms and its users on how to increase security?
As a service that has experienced two hacks for different reasons, we’d recommend the following:
- Conduct frequent audits of your security systems. Identify and address all vulnerabilities promptly.
- Plan for Provider Vulnerabilities. The second hack exploited a vulnerability in our hosting provider, Time4VPS. Platforms should anticipate such scenarios and have a robust procedure for dealing with service provider hacks.
- Always prioritize user safety. Implement strict security measures and protocols to protect user data and funds.
What steps are you taking to regain the trust of your users following these accidents?
We are actively engaging with our users through various communication channels, including social networks and forums. This allows us to inform them about the changes we have made. Currently, not all users are aware that FixedFloat has resumed operations, but we are working to spread this information.
We understand that many were concerned about the hack’s impact on our users. However, we emphasize that we are a non-custodial service and do not store user funds. Orders that were not fulfilled due to the emergency shutdown have been completed. At present, we have no financial obligations to our users.
Disclaimer
In compliance with the Trust Project guidelines, this opinion article presents the author’s perspective and may not necessarily reflect the views of BeInCrypto. BeInCrypto remains committed to transparent reporting and upholding the highest standards of journalism. Readers are advised to verify information independently and consult with a professional before making decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
Market
Binance Faces Community Backlash and Boycott Calls

Controversies surrounding token listings, the depegging of the FDUSD stablecoin, and allegations of unethical behavior have raised a crucial question: Is Binance losing its credibility?
These issues threaten to erode trust and challenge Binance’s standing in the crypto industry.
Binance Struggles to Meet the Standard
One of Binance‘s most pressing issues is the poor performance of the tokens listed on the exchange. As BeInCrypto reported earlier, 89% of the tokens listed on the platform in 2025 recorded negative returns.
Even more concerning, another report reveals that most of the tokens listed in 2024 also experienced negative performance.
Listing on Binance was once considered a “launchpad” for new projects. However, it no longer guarantees success.
A prime example is the ACT token, a meme coin listed on the exchange that quickly plummeted. Earlier this week, Wintermute—a major market maker—dumped a large amount of ACT, exerting strong downward pressure on its price and raising concerns about the transparency of Binance’s listing process.
Such criticism has led the community to believe Binance prioritizes listing fees over users’ interests.
Connection to FDUSD
The FDUSD stablecoin has also become a focal point of controversy, with Binance at its center. FDUSD lost its peg, dropping to $0.89 after reports surfaced that its issuing company had gone bankrupt.
Wintermute, one of the largest FDUSD holders outside of Binance, withdrew 31.36 million FDUSD from the exchange at 11:15 AM UTC. This move is believed to have exacerbated the depegging situation, sparking panic in the market.
More concerning, a community member claimed that some Binance employees leaked internal information about the FDUSD incident so they could select whale chat groups.
If true, this would severely damage Binance’s reputation and raise major questions about the platform’s transparency and ethics.
Overall, the community’s dissatisfaction is growing, with many users calling for a boycott of the exchange. Such negative reactions are shaking user confidence in the platform, which was once considered a symbol of credibility in the crypto space.
“Binance today caused massive liquidations on alts listed on their exchange. I warned you all yesterday about their very dirty tactics, specifically GUN. I refuse to use Binance #BoycottBinance,” wrote popular crypto YouTuber Jesus Martinez.
These accusations stem from a central issue that Binance prioritizes profits over user interests. Over the past few months, the community has constantly criticized its listing strategy, arguing that the exchange focuses on “shitcoins” to collect high listing fees without considering project quality.
Although the exchange recently introduced a community voting mechanism to decide on listings, this might not be enough to silence the criticism.
As a Tier-1 exchange, the company is evaluated based on trading volume, security, regulatory compliance, and community trust. However, recent events suggest that the exchange is struggling to maintain these standards.
Disclaimer
In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
Market
Stellar (XLM) Falls 5% as Bearish Signals Strengthen

Stellar (XLM) is down more than 5% on Thursday, with its market capitalization dropping to $8 billion. XLM technical indicators are flashing strong bearish signals, suggesting continued downward momentum that could test critical support levels around $0.22.
While a reversal scenario remains possible with resistance targets at $0.27, $0.29, and $0.30, such an upside move would require a substantial shift in market sentiment.
XLM RSI Shows Sellers Are In Control
Stellar’s Relative Strength Index (RSI) has dropped sharply to 38.99, down from 59.54 just two days ago—signaling a notable shift in momentum.
The RSI is a widely used momentum oscillator that measures the speed and magnitude of recent price changes, typically ranging between 0 and 100.
Readings above 70 suggest overbought conditions, while levels below 30 indicate oversold territory. A reading between 30 and 50 often reflects bearish momentum but is not yet extreme enough to trigger an immediate reversal.

With Stellar’s RSI now below the key midpoint of 50 and approaching the oversold threshold, the current reading of 38.99 suggests that sellers are gaining control.
While it’s not yet in oversold territory, it does signal weakening buying pressure and increasing downside risk.
If the RSI continues to fall, XLM could face further price declines unless buyers step in soon to stabilize the trend and prevent a slide into more deeply oversold levels.
Stellar CMF Heavily Dropped Since April 1
Stellar’s Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) has plunged to -10, a sharp decline from 0.19 just two days ago, signaling a significant shift in capital flow dynamics.
The CMF is an indicator that measures the volume-weighted average of accumulation and distribution over a set period—essentially tracking whether money is flowing into or out of an asset.
Positive values suggest buying pressure and accumulation, while negative values point to selling pressure and capital outflow.

With XLM’s CMF now deep in negative territory at -10, it indicates that sellers are firmly in control and substantial capital is leaving the asset.
This level of negative flow can put downward pressure on price, especially if it aligns with other bearish technical signals. Unless buying volume returns to offset this outflow, XLM could continue to weaken in the near term.
Will Stellar Fall To Five-Month Lows?
Stellar price action presents concerning signals as EMA indicators point to a strong bearish trend with significant downside potential.
Technical analysis suggests this downward momentum could push XLM to test critical support around $0.22. It could breach this level and fall below the psychologically important $0.20 threshold—a price not seen since November 2024.
This technical deterioration warrants caution from traders and investors as selling pressure appears to be intensifying.

Conversely, a trend reversal scenario would require a substantial shift in market sentiment. Should bulls regain control, XLM could challenge the immediate resistance at $0.27, with further upside targets at $0.29 and the key $0.30 level.
However, this optimistic outlook faces considerable obstacles, as only a dramatic sentiment shift coupled with the emergence of a powerful uptrend would enable such a recovery.
Until clearer bullish signals manifest, the prevailing technical structure continues to favor the bearish case.
Disclaimer
In line with the Trust Project guidelines, this price analysis article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. BeInCrypto is committed to accurate, unbiased reporting, but market conditions are subject to change without notice. Always conduct your own research and consult with a professional before making any financial decisions. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
Market
Solana (SOL) Crashes 11%—Is More Pain Ahead?

Solana (SOL) is under heavy pressure, with its price down more than 10% in the last 24 hours as bearish momentum intensifies across key indicators. The Ichimoku Cloud, BBTrend, and price structure all point to continued downside risk, with SOL now hovering dangerously close to critical support levels.
Technical signals show sellers firmly in control, while the widening gap from resistance zones makes a near-term recovery increasingly difficult.
Solana’s Ichimoku Cloud chart is currently flashing strong bearish signals. The price has sharply broken below both the Tenkan-sen (blue line) and Kijun-sen (red line), confirming a clear rejection of short-term support levels.
Both of these lines are now angled downward, reinforcing the view that bearish momentum is gaining strength.
The sharp distance between the latest candles and the cloud further suggests that any recovery would face significant resistance ahead.

Looking at the Kumo (cloud) itself, the red cloud projected forward is thick and sloping downward, indicating that bearish pressure is expected to persist in the coming sessions.
The price is well below the cloud, which typically means the asset is in a strong downtrend.
For Solana to reverse this trend, it would need to reclaim the Tenkan-sen and Kijun-sen and push decisively through the entire cloud structure—an outcome that looks unlikely in the short term, given the current momentum and cloud formation.
Solana’s BBTrend Signals Prolonged Bearish Momentum
Solana’s BBTrend indicator currently sits at -6, having remained in negative territory for over five consecutive days. Just two days ago, it hit a bearish peak of -12.72, showing the strength of the recent downtrend.
Although it has slightly recovered from that low, the sustained negative reading signals that selling pressure remains firmly in control and that the bearish momentum hasn’t yet been reversed.
The BBTrend (Bollinger Band Trend) measures the strength and direction of a trend using Bollinger Bands. Positive values suggest bullish conditions and upward momentum, while negative values indicate bearish trends.

Generally, values beyond 5 are considered strong trend signals. With Solana’s BBTrend still well below -5, it implies that downside risk remains elevated.
Unless a sharp shift in momentum occurs, this persistent bearish reading may continue to weigh on SOL’s price in the near term.
Solana Eyes $112 Support as Bears Test February Lows
Solana’s price has broken below the key $115 level, and the next major support lies around $112. A confirmed move below this threshold could trigger further downside. That could potentially push the price under $110 for the first time since February 2024.
The recent momentum and strong bearish indicators suggest sellers remain in control, increasing the likelihood of testing these lower support levels in the near term.

However, if Solana manages to stabilize and reverse its current trajectory, a rebound toward the $120 resistance level could follow.
Breaking above that would be the first sign of recovery, and if bullish momentum accelerates, SOL price could aim for higher targets at $131 and $136.
Disclaimer
In line with the Trust Project guidelines, this price analysis article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. BeInCrypto is committed to accurate, unbiased reporting, but market conditions are subject to change without notice. Always conduct your own research and consult with a professional before making any financial decisions. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
-
Altcoin23 hours ago
Binance Sidelines Pi Network Again In Vote To List Initiative, Here’s All
-
Altcoin20 hours ago
Analyst Forecasts 250% Dogecoin Price Rally If This Level Holds
-
Market19 hours ago
Cardano (ADA) Downtrend Deepens—Is a Rebound Possible?
-
Market18 hours ago
Ethereum Price Recovery Stalls—Bears Keep Price Below $2K
-
Market24 hours ago
XRP Price Reversal Toward $3.5 In The Works With Short And Long-Term Targets Revealed
-
Market20 hours ago
XRP Price Under Pressure—New Lows Signal More Trouble Ahead
-
Market15 hours ago
IP Token Price Surges, but Weak Demand Hints at Reversal
-
Market14 hours ago
HBAR Foundation Eyes TikTok, Price Rally To $0.20 Possible