Market
The Evolution of the Governance Model
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13de8/13de850c6bb477350604c0848c116d6a07e0c596" alt=""
Co-AuthoredbySteveYun,President-TheOpenNetworkFoundation&JackBooth, Co-Founder – TON Society
The TON community has matured impressively in the past year. TON keeps connecting the crypto industry to a mass audience of new users, while successful projects constantly emerge. Advocating for decentralization and reactive to community growth and maturity, The Open Network Foundation (“Foundation”) introduces Society DAO, a new governance model.
TON has been community-driven from day one. From its inception, the network has thrived thanks to dedicated community validators, securing its integrity, and resilience. The platform’s growth has been led by developers who won public contests, becoming the leading contributors committed to TON’s vision. TON’s launch was uniquely fair, with initial distribution powered by Proof-of-Work mining, allowing participants to earn a stake. As the ecosystem expanded, the TON Foundation took the helm in business development, fueling a robust and dynamic ecosystem loyal to its decentralized, community-first ethos.
Honoring this DNA, The Open Network Foundation (“Foundation”) introduces Society DAO, a new governance model. We envision a governance framework that enhances decentralization, transparency, inclusion, competition, autonomy, participation, and resilience by democratizing access to the financial, socio-political, and human capital.
Decentralization is an ongoing process. Over the past year, many founders have relied heavily on the Foundation for success, as it often serves as a central hub for capital. However, the Foundation sees this as a centralization risk—one that could lead to a single point of failure.
How can the Foundation evolve to mitigate this risk and empower a more resilient, decentralized ecosystem?
L1 governance faces complex challenges, starting with a concentration of capital. Across the blockchain industry, platforms often adopt a corporate model, with foundations overseeing strategy, partnerships, marketing, technical support, funding, and more. This centralized model can be efficient in the early stages, providing direction and producing initial use cases.
However, as the ecosystem matures and independent, competitive participants emerge, this model reveals its limitations. Capital and resources—financial, social, human, and political— accumulate around the foundation, making it difficult for projects to succeed without its official
support. This concentration creates a gated environment, stifling the competition that’s crucial for a thriving ecosystem.
Additionally, operational inefficiencies arise as projects focus on navigating foundation processes instead of building products, leading to a lack of competitive innovation. Over time, this dependency risks undermining the original goal of ecosystem building, which requires decentralized, open support for incoming builders.
To address the challenges of centralized governance the answer lies in democratized access to capital and fostering competition within a community-centric framework. By implementing
open-source access to capital, projects earn resources transparently, rewarded for achieving key performance indicators (KPIs), which shift their focus to delivering exceptional products and results. In line with this, the Foundation is advancing a Community Model that redistributes resource allocation power back to the community. Under this approach, respected and proven community members are empowered to coordinate vision, goals, and strategies, collectively determining resource allocation in alignment with TON’s overall growth.
This model also upholds a principle of competition, supporting at least two projects in each category, encouraging projects to excel, and fueling a vibrant innovative ecosystem. Previously monopolized roles within the Foundation can now be filled by competitive, independent teams, enhancing efficiency and resilience. Thanks to TON’s explosive growth and the emergence of widely respected ecosystem leaders, the Community Model enables proactive, autonomous, and competitive participation in the network.
Since its inception in 2023 as a Swiss non-profit, the Foundation has tested this model with a few leading teams, who have excelled in their roles. This competitive and decentralized model accelerates growth, promotes autonomy, and empowers community-led development, providing a scalable framework and better results for all TON ecosystem participants.
With blockchain technology, the technical path to decentralization is clear. However, building a community capable of collective, coordinated action requires a more strategic approach. As the TON ecosystem grows, decentralizing at its core is essential to ensure resilience and long-term success.
Today, The Foundation is pleased to introduce Society DAO and its founding members; teams that have already been operating independently yet aligned with TON’s mission. Society DAO will become the organizing body for core ecosystem functions, its founding members comprise:
- TONCore:Core development, upgrading, and maintenance of the blockchain
- TONStudio:Developer experience
- TONSociety:Community operations
- WalletinTelegram:Payment adoption
The Foundation will support this DAO by reporting on its goals, KPIs, and strategies, ensuring compliance, and providing grants and other resources. Society DAO will grow to include proven and reputable community teams that can propose and execute a plan that supports the ecosystem’s objectives. It will welcome new contributors across roles such as marketing, app development, technology, stablecoin integration, DeFi, community growth, identity, and more.
This model will make the community’s brightest minds the key stakeholders in the growth and adoption of TON.
The TON ecosystem is committed to a transparent path for accomplishing its goals. Like our network’s dynamic sharding architecture, smaller, independent, and focused teams can create better, more scalable outcomes. Our public goals are revisited every six months, ensuring they remain relevant and aligned with our community’s vision.
- TONEcosystemGoals: Society DAO will publish The TON Ecosystem goals
- CommunityProposals: DAO members can propose relevant strategies, expected time-bound, and specific key results for achieving the ecosystem goals.
- WorkingGroupReviews: Relevant DAO members will evaluate proposals across specialized working groups.
- GrantProvided: After DAO approval, The Foundation funds the plans, with the community team assuming responsibility for progress and performance.
Today, Society DAO sets the following initial goals:
- PositionTONasTheGatewaytoReal-WorldCryptocurrencyUseCases.
- EstablishTONastheMostStableandScalableBlockchain.
- GrowtheDeveloperandUserCommunityinSuperAppmarkets.
By January 2025, Society DAO will publicly publish the key initiatives and expected key results for H1 2025. With a public view over Society DAO’s objectives, the community can contribute their opinions and help guide the DAO on how best to achieve the Ecosystem goals. Shortly, Society DAO will continue to decentralize by inviting proposals from proven and reputable community teams. Successful proposals that align with our ecosystem goals can join the DAO as members, becoming core contributors to The Open Network.
In 2025, Society DAO will enhance its transparency and community-driven focus by launching a public debate and voting platform. This platform will use TON Society onchain badges as a reputation marker, empowering active community members to have a voice in decision-making processes.
Over 3.6 million users have earned onchain badges on society.ton.org. This activity-driven reputation reflects your contribution and engagement within the ecosystem and will open access to contributing to debates and onchain votes.
Once the platform is live, DAO members will be supported by the real opinions of the active community. Together, we will cultivate an ecosystem of DAO members that self-regulates autonomously by collective insight and engagement.
To ensure a decentralized approach, Society DAO is establishing the Principle of Competition as a core guideline for allocating all public resources, including financial, social, human, political capital, and incentive programs. This principle requires that at least two competing projects be provided with the opportunity to fulfill the KPIs in the same category.
Competition creates decentralization. Competitive environments make it difficult for single players to dominate. When an ecosystem depends on multiple players, it becomes more resilient to failures. If one competitor encounters issues or fails, others can take their place without significant disruption. Competitive ecosystems lead to higher transparency, as entities are motivated to act in users’ best interests to maintain loyalty.
Moreover, competition encourages different approaches and ideas to address user needs. Each competitor brings unique strengths or innovations, leading to a richer ecosystem where multiple solutions coexist, reducing reliance on any single provider. Ultimately, this leads to a better user experience.
Society DAO positions the TON community on the right trajectory to become more competitive, decentralized, and resilient. Overall, it aims to create a robust and scalable organizational structure. As this model continues to be proven further, it will lead to an autonomous community capable of collective action.
With a growing community of over 20 million members, we are stronger than ever and have the potential to make cryptocurrency accessible to everyone. Together, we can drive meaningful change and put crypto in every pocket.
Disclaimer
In compliance with the Trust Project guidelines, this guest expert article presents the author’s perspective and may not necessarily reflect the views of BeInCrypto. BeInCrypto remains committed to transparent reporting and upholding the highest standards of journalism. Readers are advised to verify information independently and consult with a professional before making decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
Market
3 Meme Coins to Watch For The Last Week of February 2025
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86c8c/86c8cefa66acb6938f2dad9d94aa6ff2603248ab" alt=""
DOGEai, TST, and BROCCOLI are three meme coins drawing attention for the last week of February. DOGEai, launched on Solana, is up 110% in the past seven days, positioning itself as a leading AI meme coin.
TST remains one of the most popular meme coins on the BNB chain despite a recent correction. At the same time, BROCCOLI, inspired by Binance co-founder CZ’s dog, has also seen significant volatility.
DOGEai (DOGEAI)
DOGEai is an artificial intelligence coin launched on Solana. Its market cap is now $32 million, up 82% in the last seven days. This rise has positioned DOGEai as one of the most talked-about AI meme coins in recent days.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc5d3/bc5d30537dec8a8458470d8555e55401d44373da" alt="DOGEAI Price Analysis."
DOGEai leverages multiple narratives, including Dogecoin’s popularity, the growing interest in DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency), and the broader AI cryptos trend. It defines itself as “an autonomous AI agent here to uncover waste and inefficiencies in government spending and policy decisions,” offering bill summaries and insights into government expenditures.
If the current uptrend continues, DOGEai could test the resistance at $0.048, with potential targets at $0.059 and $0.069. However, if a downtrend emerges, DOGEai has support at $0.030, and if that level is lost, it could drop to $0.018 or even $0.0092.
Test (TST)
TST has emerged as one of the most popular meme coins on the BNB chain, benefiting from the chain’s growing volume, which recently even surpassed Solana.
In the days following its launch, TST reached a market cap close to $500 million, then entered a strong correction phase. Its market cap has since dropped to $78 million.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/443c2/443c25e3ca4aa3bd5e2a1d4d7cc94ddb9c568c05" alt="TST Price Analysis."
If the BNB narrative gains strength again, TST could benefit as one of its most popular meme coins and may test the resistance at $0.10. A breakout above this level could push TST to $0.20 or even $0.25 if buying pressure intensifies.
However, if TST fails to regain strong upward momentum, it could test the support at $0.0719 and potentially drop to its lowest levels since February 9.
CZ’S Dog (BROCCOLI)
BROCCOLI was launched a few weeks ago after Binance co-founder CZ revealed his dog’s name, sparking a flood of BROCCOLI tokens on the market.
The largest of these tokens quickly surged to a $249 million market cap in its early days but has since dropped to $52 million.
Like TST, BROCCOLI benefited from the recent rise of the BNB ecosystem but has since entered a strong correction phase. It is down 40% in the last seven days.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0eaf/e0eafad0b8f5f8853a1a9776e73fca3d4426ce0a" alt="BROCCOLI Price Analysis."
If the downtrend continues, BROCCOLI could test support near $0.04, and a break below this level could push it to its lowest price since launch.
However, if the BNB ecosystem and meme coins regain traction, BROCCOLI could benefit, especially given the popularity of dog-related meme coins like Dogecoin and Shiba Inu. In this bullish scenario, BROCCOLI could rise to test the resistance at $0.113.
Disclaimer
In line with the Trust Project guidelines, this price analysis article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. BeInCrypto is committed to accurate, unbiased reporting, but market conditions are subject to change without notice. Always conduct your own research and consult with a professional before making any financial decisions. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
Market
Ethereum Rollback Debate Intensifies After Bybit Hack
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5bb5a/5bb5ac1d2291f2f418ab6299d4adab2c2f5c7640" alt=""
The crypto community is divided over calls for an Ethereum blockchain rollback following a massive security breach at Bybit.
On February 21, the exchange lost nearly $1.5 billion in ETH to hackers, sparking discussions about whether Ethereum should intervene to recover the stolen funds.
What is a Blockchain Rollback?
A blockchain rollback, also known as a reorganization, involves reversing confirmed transactions to restore the network to an earlier state.
This process usually happens after a major security breach or exploit. Validators must reach a consensus to discard the affected blocks, effectively erasing the malicious transactions.
Despite its potential benefits, a rollback remains a controversial and rarely used measure due to its impact on a blockchain’s trust and decentralization.
Blockchains operate on the principle of immutability, meaning transactions are expected to be final once confirmed. So, rolling back transactions challenges this principle, raising concerns about the security and reliability of the network.
Crypto Leaders Clash Over Ethereum Rollback Proposal
BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes has been vocal in advocating for a rollback to solve the ByBit hack. He pointed to the 2016 DAO hack, where Ethereum underwent a hard fork to recover stolen funds, as precedent.
Hayes argued that since Ethereum previously compromised on immutability, another intervention should not be off the table.
“My own view as a mega ETH bag holder is ETH stopped being money in 2016 after the DAO hack hardfork. If the community wanted to do it again, I would support it because we already voted no on immutability in 2016,” Hayes said.
JAN3 CEO Samson Mow also supported the rollback, stating it could prevent North Korea from using the stolen funds to fund its nuclear weapons program.
However, not everyone agrees. Pseudonymous crypto trader Borovik strongly opposed the idea, arguing that a rollback would jeopardize Ethereum’s credibility and neutrality.
Bitcoin advocate Jimmy Song also dismissed the possibility, stating that the Bybit hack cannot be compared to the 2016 DAO exploit. Song emphasized that the DAO hack allowed for a 30-day intervention, whereas the Bybit attack is already finalized, making a rollback impractical.
“I know people are expecting the Ethereum Foundation to roll back the chain, but I suspect it’s already too much of a mess to do it cleanly,” Song added.
Meanwhile, Ethereum supporter Adriano Feria introduced an alternative perspective. He argued that Bybit could have avoided this situation by using a Layer 2 (L2) solution with conditional reversible transactions.
According to Feria, blockchain technology needs some form of reversibility to ensure real-world adoption.
“Whether through social recovery or another pre-determined, immutable, and transparent decision-making process, real-world mass adoption will not work without reversible transactions. Without this capability, transactional activity will inevitably gravitate toward TradFi systems that already provide it,” Feria stated.
This debate raises a fundamental question for Ethereum: should it prioritize immutability or intervene in extreme cases?
While some see a rollback as a necessary response to an unprecedented loss, others fear it could undermine the core principles of decentralization. Ethereum’s next steps will likely shape its long-term credibility and trust within the crypto space.
Disclaimer
In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
Market
Berachain (BERA) Falls 15% After Recent Rally Surge
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed333/ed3331c19c9a764a4759fe2f1befc99c5679666d" alt=""
Berachain (BERA) is down almost 15% in the last 24 hours, with its market cap now at $778 million, although its price remains up nearly 20% over the past seven days. This sharp pullback comes after a strong rally between February 18 and February 20, when BERA reached levels above $8.5.
BERA’s Relative Strength Index (RSI) has dropped from overbought levels, signaling a loss of bullish momentum, while its Directional Movement Index (DMI) shows growing bearish pressure. As BERA navigates this correction phase, it faces key support at $6.1, with potential resistance levels at $8.5, $9.1, and $10 if bullish momentum returns.
BERA RSI Is Dropping Steadily After Touching Overbought Levels
Berachain Relative Strength Index (RSI) is currently at 50.6, down sharply from 86.7 just two days ago when its price surged above $8.5. RSI is a momentum oscillator that measures the speed and change of price movements, ranging from 0 to 100.
It is commonly used to identify overbought or oversold conditions, with values above 70 indicating overbought levels and below 30 suggesting oversold territory.
The steep decline in BERA’s RSI reflects a significant loss of bullish momentum after reaching overbought levels above 86, where a correction was likely.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fdb7f/fdb7f04bcb855e5a19437d3270be3ea659bfdb1c" alt="BERA RSI."
With RSI now at 50.6, BERA is in a neutral zone, suggesting that buying and selling pressures are relatively balanced.
This could indicate a period of consolidation as the market digests recent gains. If RSI continues to decline below 50, it could signal increasing bearish momentum. This could lead to a further price drop for BERA.
Conversely, if RSI stabilizes and begins to rise, it could suggest renewed buying interest and a potential recovery in Berachain price.
BERA DMI Chart Shows Buyers Are Losing Control
Berachain Directional Movement Index (DMI) chart shows its Average Directional Index (ADX) currently at 50.5, after peaking at 60.2 yesterday, up from just 13.3 five days ago. ADX is an indicator used to measure the strength of a trend, regardless of its direction, ranging from 0 to 100.
Values above 25 typically indicate a strong trend, while values below 20 suggest a weak or sideways market. The sharp rise in ADX reflects a significant increase in trend strength, confirming that BERA has been experiencing strong directional movement recently.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10597/105973409ada12968dbea00cdf3992a6e6d7e2fc" alt="BERA DMI."
Meanwhile, BERA’s +DI is at 24.4, down from 48.4 two days ago, indicating weakening bullish momentum. Meanwhile, -DI has risen to 15.1 from 4.9, suggesting growing bearish pressure.
This shift signals that the bullish trend that drove prices higher is losing steam, and selling interest is beginning to increase.
If -DI continues to rise above +DI, it could indicate a bearish crossover, signaling a potential reversal or deeper correction in BERA’s price. However, if +DI stabilizes and moves upward again, it could suggest a continuation of the uptrend, albeit with reduced momentum.
Will Berachain Fall Below $6 Soon?
Berachain surged 53% between February 18 and February 20, pushing its price above $8.5 after the coin struggled following its airdrop. However, after this sharp rally, BERA entered a correction phase and is currently down almost 15% in the last 24 hours.
This pullback suggests profit-taking and a shift in market sentiment as buyers hesitate to push prices higher. If the downtrend continues, BERA could soon test the support at $6.1, and a break below this level could lead to a further decline towards $5.48, reflecting increased selling pressure.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68ef7/68ef76913d796be08c3aa53190ef03840c6d9d0c" alt="BERA Price Analysis."
On the other hand, if Berachain can regain its bullish momentum from a few days ago, it could rise above $8.5 again, potentially testing the next resistance levels at $9.1 or even $10.
To confirm this bullish scenario, Berachain would need to see renewed buying interest and strong upward momentum. If buyers can defend key support levels and push the price above resistance zones, it could indicate the continuation of the uptrend.
Disclaimer
In line with the Trust Project guidelines, this price analysis article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. BeInCrypto is committed to accurate, unbiased reporting, but market conditions are subject to change without notice. Always conduct your own research and consult with a professional before making any financial decisions. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
-
Altcoin19 hours ago
BTC, ETH Drop As $566M Liquidated Amid Bybit Hack
-
Market18 hours ago
FTX Survey Shows Crypto ReInvestment and Possible Bias
-
Ethereum16 hours ago
Grayscale’s Ethereum ETF On The Brink Of Major Change With NYSE’s Staking Proposal
-
Market21 hours ago
Solana Price Shows Recovery Signs as Bearish Pressure Eases
-
Market20 hours ago
Onyxcoin (XCN) Technical Indicators Hint at Major Breakout
-
Market19 hours ago
Top AI Coins From This Week: IP, CLANKER, $DOGEAI
-
Market23 hours ago
Franklin Templeton Files For Solana Staking ETF
-
Altcoin23 hours ago
Will XRP Price Hit $300 If US SEC Calls Off Ripple Lawsuit?