Connect with us

Market

MrBeast Accused of Shady Crypto Deals, Coffeezilla Reveals

Published

on



YouTube investigative journalist Coffeezilla, known for his deep dives into influencer-driven scams and questionable financial schemes, released a detailed video examining MrBeast’s alleged involvement in cryptocurrency ventures.

In the exposé, Coffeezilla scrutinizes MrBeast’s financial gains from crypto investments. He confronts serious accusations of insider trading and exploitation of his public platform for profit. However, MrBeast’s team reportedly declined to provide detailed comments, instead issuing a carefully worded legal statement.

Coffeezilla Investigation on MrBeast’s Potential Scams

According to Coffeezilla, this complex story blurs the line between “shady” and outright “illegal.” The investigation was prompted by allegations circulating online.

Some claim MrBeast profited as much as $23 million through manipulative and deceptive practices. Coffeezilla, known for his thorough research and impartiality, reached out to various sources—researchers, crypto project heads, and even MrBeast himself.

According to Coffeezilla, the accusations stem from two main sources. The first is a report by SomaXBT, which alleges MrBeast made $10 million by backing low-cap cryptocurrency tokens, which later plunged in value.

“An investigation into Mr. Beast, how he allegedly made $10 million+ by backing low-cap IDO crypto tokens promoted by influencers like Lark Davis, CryptoBanter, KSI, and others. Many of these projects are now down over 90%, with some rebranding after major losses,” SomaXBT shared on X (formerly Twitter).

Another group, look.io, claimed he made even more through “scams, shady deals, and his network of connections.” Coffeezilla asserts that while some allegations seem exaggerated, there is credible evidence supporting others, making it difficult to offer a single, definitive judgment.

Key Allegations: Inside Deals and Suspicious Tweets

Coffeezilla begins by dissecting a few specific cases involving cryptocurrency projects in which MrBeast allegedly participated, including Super and Earnity Chain. According to the report, MrBeast invested in these projects, later promoting them publicly while secretly selling off his shares. This led some to believe he was engaging in unethical, if not illegal, market manipulation.

For instance, Coffeezilla discusses leaked screenshots showing MrBeast’s alleged involvement in Super’s pre-sale. According to these images, MrBeast invested $100,000, ultimately cashing out over $10 million. Coffeezilla points out that MrBeast tweeted twice about Super, one of which came suspiciously close to a sale of tokens by a wallet linked to him.

In another tweet, he hinted at the project’s value, saying “super” in response to a comment about the token’s potential growth. Coffeezilla suggests this could have influenced MrBeast’s followers to buy in while he was secretly offloading his investment, a potential conflict of interest.

According to Coffeezilla, this pattern is repeated in the cryptocurrency Earnity Chain. MrBeast’s name was prominently featured on the Earnity Chain website. He even allegedly promoted an associated NFT (non-fungible token) charity auction meant to benefit his “Team Seas” initiative.

Yet, records show his alleged wallet sold millions of Earnity tokens during the auction’s two-month campaign. Coffeezilla acknowledges that the charity auction itself performed poorly. Nevertheless, the investigator criticizes the timing, labeling it a “terrible look” for MrBeast, known as the “charity guy.”

A Complicated Network of Influences and Power Players

According to Coffeezilla, one of the most complex elements of the story is MrBeast’s involvement in crypto beyond his direct actions. The detective uncovers links between MrBeast’s investments and Jason Williams, a figure in the cryptocurrency space who appears to have managed some of these funds.

Coffeezilla found that Williams was connected to the same wallet linked to MrBeast’s investments. Reportedly, he often promoted and sold tokens associated with MrBeast’s name. This association could potentially absolve MrBeast of some responsibility, but as Coffeezilla points out, the boundaries remain unclear.

Of note is that MrBeast has occasionally spoken publicly about his investments, including a now-infamous conversation with Logan Paul, where he discussed purchasing CryptoPunks after a call with influencer Gary Vee.

“So, it seems like MrBeast was very much aware of, and in some cases directly involved in, decisions to buy and sell crypto,” Coffeezilla concludes.

While MrBeast’s team denies he was directly involved in trading, Coffeezilla finds it hard to believe MrBeast was entirely hands-off.

MrBeast’s Team’s Response (Or Lack Thereof)

In response to these allegations, MrBeast’s team provided a statement. In it, they assert that his investments were managed through a fund that consulted with industry experts and adhered to all “appropriate regulations.”

According to the team, MrBeast did not control the day-to-day trades. Yet, as Coffeezilla observes, the statement “takes zero accountability” and fails to address specific claims about MrBeast’s tweets and sales.

Critics say MrBeast’s brand is being used as a marketing tool in cryptocurrency projects, leading to inflated values that hurt regular investors. This becomes especially problematic given MrBeast’s vast following and reputation as a philanthropist.

For Coffeezilla, the issue is not merely about legality; it is about ethics. He suggests that while MrBeast’s actions may not be criminal, they still raise questions about his responsibility to his audience.

“I think to MrBeast and probably to his fund, this is just business. They set out to make a lot of money, and they made a lot of money—what’s the problem, right?” Coffeezilla quipped.

Indeed, Coffeezilla’s exposé is a compelling, if unsettling, reminder of the blurred lines between fame, finance, and influence within the crypto playing field.

Disclaimer

In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and ConditionsPrivacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.



Source link

Market

Binance Faces Community Backlash and Boycott Calls

Published

on



Controversies surrounding token listings, the depegging of the FDUSD stablecoin, and allegations of unethical behavior have raised a crucial question: Is Binance losing its credibility?

These issues threaten to erode trust and challenge Binance’s standing in the crypto industry.

Binance Struggles to Meet the Standard

One of Binance‘s most pressing issues is the poor performance of the tokens listed on the exchange. As BeInCrypto reported earlier, 89% of the tokens listed on the platform in 2025 recorded negative returns.

Even more concerning, another report reveals that most of the tokens listed in 2024 also experienced negative performance.

Listing on Binance was once considered a “launchpad” for new projects. However, it no longer guarantees success.

A prime example is the ACT token, a meme coin listed on the exchange that quickly plummeted. Earlier this week, Wintermute—a major market maker—dumped a large amount of ACT, exerting strong downward pressure on its price and raising concerns about the transparency of Binance’s listing process.

Such criticism has led the community to believe Binance prioritizes listing fees over users’ interests.

Connection to FDUSD

The FDUSD stablecoin has also become a focal point of controversy, with Binance at its center. FDUSD lost its peg, dropping to $0.89 after reports surfaced that its issuing company had gone bankrupt.

Wintermute, one of the largest FDUSD holders outside of Binance, withdrew 31.36 million FDUSD from the exchange at 11:15 AM UTC. This move is believed to have exacerbated the depegging situation, sparking panic in the market.

More concerning, a community member claimed that some Binance employees leaked internal information about the FDUSD incident so they could select whale chat groups.

If true, this would severely damage Binance’s reputation and raise major questions about the platform’s transparency and ethics.

Overall, the community’s dissatisfaction is growing, with many users calling for a boycott of the exchange. Such negative reactions are shaking user confidence in the platform, which was once considered a symbol of credibility in the crypto space.

“Binance today caused massive liquidations on alts listed on their exchange. I warned you all yesterday about their very dirty tactics, specifically GUN. I refuse to use Binance #BoycottBinance,” wrote popular crypto YouTuber Jesus Martinez.

These accusations stem from a central issue that Binance prioritizes profits over user interests. Over the past few months, the community has constantly criticized its listing strategy, arguing that the exchange focuses on “shitcoins” to collect high listing fees without considering project quality.

Although the exchange recently introduced a community voting mechanism to decide on listings, this might not be enough to silence the criticism.

As a Tier-1 exchange, the company is evaluated based on trading volume, security, regulatory compliance, and community trust. However, recent events suggest that the exchange is struggling to maintain these standards.

Disclaimer

In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and ConditionsPrivacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.





Source link

Continue Reading

Market

Stellar (XLM) Falls 5% as Bearish Signals Strengthen

Published

on


Stellar (XLM) is down more than 5% on Thursday, with its market capitalization dropping to $8 billion. XLM technical indicators are flashing strong bearish signals, suggesting continued downward momentum that could test critical support levels around $0.22.

While a reversal scenario remains possible with resistance targets at $0.27, $0.29, and $0.30, such an upside move would require a substantial shift in market sentiment.

XLM RSI Shows Sellers Are In Control

Stellar’s Relative Strength Index (RSI) has dropped sharply to 38.99, down from 59.54 just two days ago—signaling a notable shift in momentum.

The RSI is a widely used momentum oscillator that measures the speed and magnitude of recent price changes, typically ranging between 0 and 100.

Readings above 70 suggest overbought conditions, while levels below 30 indicate oversold territory. A reading between 30 and 50 often reflects bearish momentum but is not yet extreme enough to trigger an immediate reversal.

XLM RSI.
XLM RSI. Source: TradingView.

With Stellar’s RSI now below the key midpoint of 50 and approaching the oversold threshold, the current reading of 38.99 suggests that sellers are gaining control.

While it’s not yet in oversold territory, it does signal weakening buying pressure and increasing downside risk.

If the RSI continues to fall, XLM could face further price declines unless buyers step in soon to stabilize the trend and prevent a slide into more deeply oversold levels.

Stellar CMF Heavily Dropped Since April 1

Stellar’s Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) has plunged to -10, a sharp decline from 0.19 just two days ago, signaling a significant shift in capital flow dynamics.

The CMF is an indicator that measures the volume-weighted average of accumulation and distribution over a set period—essentially tracking whether money is flowing into or out of an asset.

Positive values suggest buying pressure and accumulation, while negative values point to selling pressure and capital outflow.

XLM CMF. Source: TradingView.

With XLM’s CMF now deep in negative territory at -10, it indicates that sellers are firmly in control and substantial capital is leaving the asset.

This level of negative flow can put downward pressure on price, especially if it aligns with other bearish technical signals. Unless buying volume returns to offset this outflow, XLM could continue to weaken in the near term.

Will Stellar Fall To Five-Month Lows?

Stellar price action presents concerning signals as EMA indicators point to a strong bearish trend with significant downside potential.

Technical analysis suggests this downward momentum could push XLM to test critical support around $0.22. It could breach this level and fall below the psychologically important $0.20 threshold—a price not seen since November 2024.

This technical deterioration warrants caution from traders and investors as selling pressure appears to be intensifying.

XLM Price Analysis.
XLM Price Analysis. Source: TradingView.

Conversely, a trend reversal scenario would require a substantial shift in market sentiment. Should bulls regain control, XLM could challenge the immediate resistance at $0.27, with further upside targets at $0.29 and the key $0.30 level.

However, this optimistic outlook faces considerable obstacles, as only a dramatic sentiment shift coupled with the emergence of a powerful uptrend would enable such a recovery.

Until clearer bullish signals manifest, the prevailing technical structure continues to favor the bearish case.

Disclaimer

In line with the Trust Project guidelines, this price analysis article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. BeInCrypto is committed to accurate, unbiased reporting, but market conditions are subject to change without notice. Always conduct your own research and consult with a professional before making any financial decisions. Please note that our Terms and ConditionsPrivacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.



Source link

Continue Reading

Market

Solana (SOL) Crashes 11%—Is More Pain Ahead?

Published

on


Solana (SOL) is under heavy pressure, with its price down more than 10% in the last 24 hours as bearish momentum intensifies across key indicators. The Ichimoku Cloud, BBTrend, and price structure all point to continued downside risk, with SOL now hovering dangerously close to critical support levels.

Technical signals show sellers firmly in control, while the widening gap from resistance zones makes a near-term recovery increasingly difficult.

Solana’s Ichimoku Cloud chart is currently flashing strong bearish signals. The price has sharply broken below both the Tenkan-sen (blue line) and Kijun-sen (red line), confirming a clear rejection of short-term support levels.

Both of these lines are now angled downward, reinforcing the view that bearish momentum is gaining strength.

The sharp distance between the latest candles and the cloud further suggests that any recovery would face significant resistance ahead.

SOL Ichimoku Cloud.
SOL Ichimoku Cloud. Source: TradingView.

Looking at the Kumo (cloud) itself, the red cloud projected forward is thick and sloping downward, indicating that bearish pressure is expected to persist in the coming sessions.

The price is well below the cloud, which typically means the asset is in a strong downtrend.

For Solana to reverse this trend, it would need to reclaim the Tenkan-sen and Kijun-sen and push decisively through the entire cloud structure—an outcome that looks unlikely in the short term, given the current momentum and cloud formation.

Solana’s BBTrend Signals Prolonged Bearish Momentum

Solana’s BBTrend indicator currently sits at -6, having remained in negative territory for over five consecutive days. Just two days ago, it hit a bearish peak of -12.72, showing the strength of the recent downtrend.

Although it has slightly recovered from that low, the sustained negative reading signals that selling pressure remains firmly in control and that the bearish momentum hasn’t yet been reversed.

The BBTrend (Bollinger Band Trend) measures the strength and direction of a trend using Bollinger Bands. Positive values suggest bullish conditions and upward momentum, while negative values indicate bearish trends.

SOL BBTrend.
SOL BBTrend. Source: TradingView.

Generally, values beyond 5 are considered strong trend signals. With Solana’s BBTrend still well below -5, it implies that downside risk remains elevated.

Unless a sharp shift in momentum occurs, this persistent bearish reading may continue to weigh on SOL’s price in the near term.

Solana Eyes $112 Support as Bears Test February Lows

Solana’s price has broken below the key $115 level, and the next major support lies around $112. A confirmed move below this threshold could trigger further downside. That could potentially push the price under $110 for the first time since February 2024.

The recent momentum and strong bearish indicators suggest sellers remain in control, increasing the likelihood of testing these lower support levels in the near term.

SOL Price Analysis.
SOL Price Analysis. Source: TradingView.

However, if Solana manages to stabilize and reverse its current trajectory, a rebound toward the $120 resistance level could follow.

Breaking above that would be the first sign of recovery, and if bullish momentum accelerates, SOL price could aim for higher targets at $131 and $136.

Disclaimer

In line with the Trust Project guidelines, this price analysis article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. BeInCrypto is committed to accurate, unbiased reporting, but market conditions are subject to change without notice. Always conduct your own research and consult with a professional before making any financial decisions. Please note that our Terms and ConditionsPrivacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 coin2049.io