Market
Linea’s Blockchain Halt Ignites Decentralization Debate
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46719/46719591ed23d17f658258f262756880def2ea27" alt=""
The recent halt of Linea’s blockchain has ignited discussions about its commitment to decentralization as an Ethereum Layer-2 (L2) solution.
Significant security concerns drove the decision, and industry experts weighed in on the implications for the project’s decentralized future.
Linea’s Effort in Balancing Decentralization and Security
Following Linea’s decision to halt block production, Alex Gluchowski, CEO of Matter Labs, emphasized the importance of decentralization in L2 projects. He noted that central control could undermine the principles that Ethereum L2 projects aim to uphold.
“Decentralizing the sequencer isn’t optional. Every serious L2 stack must race to do first,” he said.
Responding to Gluchowski’s statement, Declan Fox, the Product Lead at Linea, asserted their commitment to decentralizing all aspects of their network. Fox expressed confidence in their progress despite being a newer project compared to others.
Read more: Layer-2 Crypto Projects for 2024: The Top Picks
“Agree that decentralization is not an option. Linea is on a solid path to decentralizing all aspects of the network in a very aggressive time window. Given that many Rollup frameworks more than 2 years older than us are no further ahead, I’m pretty delighted with our pace,” Fox stated.
The Linea team also affirmed its commitment to decentralize its network, including the sequencer. They highlighted that achieving a decentralized, censorship-resistant environment would prevent them from halting block production or censoring addresses in the future.
“Linea’s goal is to decentralize our network—including the sequencer. When our network matures to a decentralized, censorship-resistant environment, Linea’s team will no longer have the ability to halt block production and censor addresses—this is a primary goal of our network. Most L2s, including Linea, still rely on centralized technical operations, which can be leveraged to protect ecosystem participants. Linea’s core value is a permissionless, censorship-resistant environment, so it was not a decision we took lightly,” the team wrote.
Linea stopped its blockchain activities after a security breach occurred on Velocore, a decentralized exchange (DEX) that operates on its network. The breach led to the unauthorized transfer of $2.6 million from the Linea network via an undisclosed bridge service.
Linea suspended its sequencer to prevent the attacker from illegally moving more assets, as they could not reach the Velocore exchange team in time. Additionally, Linea blocked the hacker’s addresses to minimize the impact on its users.
Linea defended its actions, stating that the hacker was starting to sell a significant amount of tokens for ETH. This could have led to additional user problems beyond the liquidity pool-draining exploit.
Despite the controversy, Yu Xian, founder of cybersecurity firm SlowMist, defended the suspension. He argued that it was plausible considering the project’s early stage. Furthermore, Xian stressed the importance of ensuring robust security before achieving full decentralization.
“Choosing to suspend itself and blacklist the L2 of the relevant address to stop the loss of an ecological project being hacked is understandable in the early stage, but it will become more and more impossible as time goes by. The challenges of security and trust are so great,” Xian opined.
Read more: Crypto Project Security: A Guide to Early Threat Detection
Throughout history, there have been cases where developers have temporarily stopped their blockchain operations in response to major security breaches. For instance, in 2022, Binance’s BNB Chain was halted in response to a debilitating bridge hack worth $566 million. Despite the debate, many regard these measures as essential to safeguard the network’s integrity and user security.
Disclaimer
In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
Market
3 Meme Coins to Watch For The Last Week of February 2025
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86c8c/86c8cefa66acb6938f2dad9d94aa6ff2603248ab" alt=""
DOGEai, TST, and BROCCOLI are three meme coins drawing attention for the last week of February. DOGEai, launched on Solana, is up 110% in the past seven days, positioning itself as a leading AI meme coin.
TST remains one of the most popular meme coins on the BNB chain despite a recent correction. At the same time, BROCCOLI, inspired by Binance co-founder CZ’s dog, has also seen significant volatility.
DOGEai (DOGEAI)
DOGEai is an artificial intelligence coin launched on Solana. Its market cap is now $32 million, up 82% in the last seven days. This rise has positioned DOGEai as one of the most talked-about AI meme coins in recent days.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc5d3/bc5d30537dec8a8458470d8555e55401d44373da" alt="DOGEAI Price Analysis."
DOGEai leverages multiple narratives, including Dogecoin’s popularity, the growing interest in DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency), and the broader AI cryptos trend. It defines itself as “an autonomous AI agent here to uncover waste and inefficiencies in government spending and policy decisions,” offering bill summaries and insights into government expenditures.
If the current uptrend continues, DOGEai could test the resistance at $0.048, with potential targets at $0.059 and $0.069. However, if a downtrend emerges, DOGEai has support at $0.030, and if that level is lost, it could drop to $0.018 or even $0.0092.
Test (TST)
TST has emerged as one of the most popular meme coins on the BNB chain, benefiting from the chain’s growing volume, which recently even surpassed Solana.
In the days following its launch, TST reached a market cap close to $500 million, then entered a strong correction phase. Its market cap has since dropped to $78 million.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/443c2/443c25e3ca4aa3bd5e2a1d4d7cc94ddb9c568c05" alt="TST Price Analysis."
If the BNB narrative gains strength again, TST could benefit as one of its most popular meme coins and may test the resistance at $0.10. A breakout above this level could push TST to $0.20 or even $0.25 if buying pressure intensifies.
However, if TST fails to regain strong upward momentum, it could test the support at $0.0719 and potentially drop to its lowest levels since February 9.
CZ’S Dog (BROCCOLI)
BROCCOLI was launched a few weeks ago after Binance co-founder CZ revealed his dog’s name, sparking a flood of BROCCOLI tokens on the market.
The largest of these tokens quickly surged to a $249 million market cap in its early days but has since dropped to $52 million.
Like TST, BROCCOLI benefited from the recent rise of the BNB ecosystem but has since entered a strong correction phase. It is down 40% in the last seven days.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0eaf/e0eafad0b8f5f8853a1a9776e73fca3d4426ce0a" alt="BROCCOLI Price Analysis."
If the downtrend continues, BROCCOLI could test support near $0.04, and a break below this level could push it to its lowest price since launch.
However, if the BNB ecosystem and meme coins regain traction, BROCCOLI could benefit, especially given the popularity of dog-related meme coins like Dogecoin and Shiba Inu. In this bullish scenario, BROCCOLI could rise to test the resistance at $0.113.
Disclaimer
In line with the Trust Project guidelines, this price analysis article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. BeInCrypto is committed to accurate, unbiased reporting, but market conditions are subject to change without notice. Always conduct your own research and consult with a professional before making any financial decisions. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
Market
Ethereum Rollback Debate Intensifies After Bybit Hack
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5bb5a/5bb5ac1d2291f2f418ab6299d4adab2c2f5c7640" alt=""
The crypto community is divided over calls for an Ethereum blockchain rollback following a massive security breach at Bybit.
On February 21, the exchange lost nearly $1.5 billion in ETH to hackers, sparking discussions about whether Ethereum should intervene to recover the stolen funds.
What is a Blockchain Rollback?
A blockchain rollback, also known as a reorganization, involves reversing confirmed transactions to restore the network to an earlier state.
This process usually happens after a major security breach or exploit. Validators must reach a consensus to discard the affected blocks, effectively erasing the malicious transactions.
Despite its potential benefits, a rollback remains a controversial and rarely used measure due to its impact on a blockchain’s trust and decentralization.
Blockchains operate on the principle of immutability, meaning transactions are expected to be final once confirmed. So, rolling back transactions challenges this principle, raising concerns about the security and reliability of the network.
Crypto Leaders Clash Over Ethereum Rollback Proposal
BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes has been vocal in advocating for a rollback to solve the ByBit hack. He pointed to the 2016 DAO hack, where Ethereum underwent a hard fork to recover stolen funds, as precedent.
Hayes argued that since Ethereum previously compromised on immutability, another intervention should not be off the table.
“My own view as a mega ETH bag holder is ETH stopped being money in 2016 after the DAO hack hardfork. If the community wanted to do it again, I would support it because we already voted no on immutability in 2016,” Hayes said.
JAN3 CEO Samson Mow also supported the rollback, stating it could prevent North Korea from using the stolen funds to fund its nuclear weapons program.
However, not everyone agrees. Pseudonymous crypto trader Borovik strongly opposed the idea, arguing that a rollback would jeopardize Ethereum’s credibility and neutrality.
Bitcoin advocate Jimmy Song also dismissed the possibility, stating that the Bybit hack cannot be compared to the 2016 DAO exploit. Song emphasized that the DAO hack allowed for a 30-day intervention, whereas the Bybit attack is already finalized, making a rollback impractical.
“I know people are expecting the Ethereum Foundation to roll back the chain, but I suspect it’s already too much of a mess to do it cleanly,” Song added.
Meanwhile, Ethereum supporter Adriano Feria introduced an alternative perspective. He argued that Bybit could have avoided this situation by using a Layer 2 (L2) solution with conditional reversible transactions.
According to Feria, blockchain technology needs some form of reversibility to ensure real-world adoption.
“Whether through social recovery or another pre-determined, immutable, and transparent decision-making process, real-world mass adoption will not work without reversible transactions. Without this capability, transactional activity will inevitably gravitate toward TradFi systems that already provide it,” Feria stated.
This debate raises a fundamental question for Ethereum: should it prioritize immutability or intervene in extreme cases?
While some see a rollback as a necessary response to an unprecedented loss, others fear it could undermine the core principles of decentralization. Ethereum’s next steps will likely shape its long-term credibility and trust within the crypto space.
Disclaimer
In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
Market
Berachain (BERA) Falls 15% After Recent Rally Surge
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed333/ed3331c19c9a764a4759fe2f1befc99c5679666d" alt=""
Berachain (BERA) is down almost 15% in the last 24 hours, with its market cap now at $778 million, although its price remains up nearly 20% over the past seven days. This sharp pullback comes after a strong rally between February 18 and February 20, when BERA reached levels above $8.5.
BERA’s Relative Strength Index (RSI) has dropped from overbought levels, signaling a loss of bullish momentum, while its Directional Movement Index (DMI) shows growing bearish pressure. As BERA navigates this correction phase, it faces key support at $6.1, with potential resistance levels at $8.5, $9.1, and $10 if bullish momentum returns.
BERA RSI Is Dropping Steadily After Touching Overbought Levels
Berachain Relative Strength Index (RSI) is currently at 50.6, down sharply from 86.7 just two days ago when its price surged above $8.5. RSI is a momentum oscillator that measures the speed and change of price movements, ranging from 0 to 100.
It is commonly used to identify overbought or oversold conditions, with values above 70 indicating overbought levels and below 30 suggesting oversold territory.
The steep decline in BERA’s RSI reflects a significant loss of bullish momentum after reaching overbought levels above 86, where a correction was likely.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fdb7f/fdb7f04bcb855e5a19437d3270be3ea659bfdb1c" alt="BERA RSI."
With RSI now at 50.6, BERA is in a neutral zone, suggesting that buying and selling pressures are relatively balanced.
This could indicate a period of consolidation as the market digests recent gains. If RSI continues to decline below 50, it could signal increasing bearish momentum. This could lead to a further price drop for BERA.
Conversely, if RSI stabilizes and begins to rise, it could suggest renewed buying interest and a potential recovery in Berachain price.
BERA DMI Chart Shows Buyers Are Losing Control
Berachain Directional Movement Index (DMI) chart shows its Average Directional Index (ADX) currently at 50.5, after peaking at 60.2 yesterday, up from just 13.3 five days ago. ADX is an indicator used to measure the strength of a trend, regardless of its direction, ranging from 0 to 100.
Values above 25 typically indicate a strong trend, while values below 20 suggest a weak or sideways market. The sharp rise in ADX reflects a significant increase in trend strength, confirming that BERA has been experiencing strong directional movement recently.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10597/105973409ada12968dbea00cdf3992a6e6d7e2fc" alt="BERA DMI."
Meanwhile, BERA’s +DI is at 24.4, down from 48.4 two days ago, indicating weakening bullish momentum. Meanwhile, -DI has risen to 15.1 from 4.9, suggesting growing bearish pressure.
This shift signals that the bullish trend that drove prices higher is losing steam, and selling interest is beginning to increase.
If -DI continues to rise above +DI, it could indicate a bearish crossover, signaling a potential reversal or deeper correction in BERA’s price. However, if +DI stabilizes and moves upward again, it could suggest a continuation of the uptrend, albeit with reduced momentum.
Will Berachain Fall Below $6 Soon?
Berachain surged 53% between February 18 and February 20, pushing its price above $8.5 after the coin struggled following its airdrop. However, after this sharp rally, BERA entered a correction phase and is currently down almost 15% in the last 24 hours.
This pullback suggests profit-taking and a shift in market sentiment as buyers hesitate to push prices higher. If the downtrend continues, BERA could soon test the support at $6.1, and a break below this level could lead to a further decline towards $5.48, reflecting increased selling pressure.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68ef7/68ef76913d796be08c3aa53190ef03840c6d9d0c" alt="BERA Price Analysis."
On the other hand, if Berachain can regain its bullish momentum from a few days ago, it could rise above $8.5 again, potentially testing the next resistance levels at $9.1 or even $10.
To confirm this bullish scenario, Berachain would need to see renewed buying interest and strong upward momentum. If buyers can defend key support levels and push the price above resistance zones, it could indicate the continuation of the uptrend.
Disclaimer
In line with the Trust Project guidelines, this price analysis article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. BeInCrypto is committed to accurate, unbiased reporting, but market conditions are subject to change without notice. Always conduct your own research and consult with a professional before making any financial decisions. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
-
Altcoin22 hours ago
BTC, ETH Drop As $566M Liquidated Amid Bybit Hack
-
Market21 hours ago
FTX Survey Shows Crypto ReInvestment and Possible Bias
-
Ethereum19 hours ago
Grayscale’s Ethereum ETF On The Brink Of Major Change With NYSE’s Staking Proposal
-
Market24 hours ago
Solana Price Shows Recovery Signs as Bearish Pressure Eases
-
Market23 hours ago
Onyxcoin (XCN) Technical Indicators Hint at Major Breakout
-
Market22 hours ago
Top AI Coins From This Week: IP, CLANKER, $DOGEAI
-
Altcoin18 hours ago
Can Shiba Inu Price Breakout 300%? 128M SHIB Burn Sparks Optimism
-
Ethereum15 hours ago
Bitcoin Pepe set to reap big from its virality, fundamentals, and timing