Market
DeFi in Crisis: Restaking Protocols Are Devouring Liquidity

The DeFi space is expanding, with liquid staking and restaking protocols gaining more and more attention. These developments allow users to stake and reuse assets multiple times, offering the potential for higher yields. However, as these systems become more complex, they also introduce potential systemic vulnerabilities.
Projects like EigenLayer are pushing the limits of yield maximization, but are these returns sustainable? The question remains whether these innovations are setting DeFi up for lasting success or creating the next wave of risks.
The Growing Influence
Restaking protocols, led by platforms like EigenLayer, have become a major force in the decentralized finance (DeFi) sector. Restaking refers to the process where users take assets staked on one protocol, such as Ethereum’s liquid staking tokens (LSTs), and stake them again on another platform to earn additional yields.
This process has unlocked significant earning potential, driving restaking’s rise. In 2024, liquid restaking tokens (LRTs) saw an enormous 4,900% growth in Total Value Locked (TVL), surpassing $15 billion from a mere $280 million in early 2024.
“The push for higher yields is a key to keeping staking attractive, especially as the total amount of ETH staked on the Beacon Chain grows and the average APY (annual percentage yield) declines. This is one of the main reasons DeFi and restaking protocols have been so well-received,” Alon Muroch, CEO and Founder at SSV.Labs, told BeInCrypto in an exclusive interview.
Read more: Ethereum Restaking: What Is it and How Does it Work?

Restaking protocols offer users opportunities to maximize returns on their staked assets without having to sacrifice liquidity. However, as restaking scales, concerns about liquidity and security risks are emerging.
“Each additional layer in restaking increases both risk and reward, making it a choice that users must make based on their risk tolerance. While it introduces more potential points of failure, it also opens up opportunities for significantly greater returns. Ultimately, the user has the freedom to decide the level of exposure they are comfortable with,” Muroch added.
Balancing the Promise and Peril of Restaking
Although the ability to re-use staked assets has been celebrated as an innovation, it simultaneously introduces new layers of exposure. In essence, restaking involves leveraging staked assets across different protocols, which may sound appealing for yield optimization, but it creates systemic vulnerabilities.
Muroch identified several main problems associated with restaking:
- Smart Contract Vulnerabilities. The complexity of restaking mechanisms increases the potential for bugs and exploits in the smart contracts governing these protocols. Users may lose funds if a contract is compromised.
- Complexity and Lack of Understanding. As restaking strategies become more complex, there is a risk that users may not fully understand the risks they are taking on. Some Actively Validated Services (AVSs) have higher risk than others due to more/complex slashing criteria for different AVSs.
- Slashing Risks. If a validator is found guilty of malicious behavior, a portion of their restaked ETH can be slashed. This risk is compounded because node operators are subject to slashing conditions for both the Ethereum base layer and any additional AVSs.
Moreover, the financial architecture behind restaking has left DeFi exposed to potential liquidity drains. For example, EigenLayer’s current restaking system allows users to restake liquid staking tokens (LSTs) multiple times, amplifying liquidity challenges. These risks were evident in the Ankr exploit, where a hacker minted 6 quadrillion fake aBNBc tokens, crashing the price of liquid staking derivatives across various protocols.
The unclear regulatory frameworks add to the complexity of restaking. Muroch cautions that regulators will likely take a cautious approach to restaking, seeing it as distinct from traditional staking because of its added layers of risk and complexity. They may impose stricter regulations to protect investors and ensure the stability of the financial ecosystem as these protocols gain traction.
The Threat of Over-Restaking
EigenLayer, one of the biggest restaking protocols, has garnered over $19 billion in TVL by mid-2024. While this impressive expansion demonstrates the market’s appetite for higher yields, it raises questions about the sustainability of these protocols.
The dominance of EigenLayer also poses a unique threat to Ethereum’s overall security. Since these restaking platforms are handling large quantities of staked ETH, any major failure could directly impact Ethereum’s security model.
Experts, including Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin, have voiced concerns that if a restaking protocol failed, it could lead to calls for a hard fork of Ethereum to “undo” the damage, an outcome that threatens the network’s decentralized consensus.
Read more: How to Participate in an EigenLayer Airdrop: A Step-by-Step Guide

Muroch, however, downplayed the severity of the situation, describing it as “theoretically bad, but practically quite unlikely.”
“If a significant amount of Ether is locked in EigenLayer and a large operator suffers a major slashing event, it could lead to a cascade of slashing damage. In a worst-case scenario, this could compromise the extended security of the Ethereum network. However, it would take the slashed operator not fixing the problem for a long period of time for Ethereum’s security to be threatened,” he explained.
He also highlighted an important upside, noting that restaking raises the cost of corruption for potential attackers. This shift strengthens security by focusing not just on individual protocols but on the total sum of all staked assets.
Hidden Dangers of Yield Optimization
The pursuit of higher yields has led stakers to adopt increasingly complex strategies, which carries both financial and technical risks. Financially, restaking protocols encourage users to stake their assets across multiple platforms, tying up more capital in interconnected systems. This raises systemic financial risks, as vulnerabilities in one protocol could trigger broader consequences across the ecosystem.
Muroch cautions that restaking is still a relatively new concept, making it difficult to predict its long-term effects. The potential for unforeseen issues, especially in volatile markets, adds uncertainty to the future of these strategies.
“Staking rewards have only recently been introduced, meaning it will take some time to fully understand their long-term effects. As always, there are ‘unknown unknowns’ that could arise. In the future, if the value of restaked assets were to drop sharply, the heavy reliance on rehypothecation and complex financial derivatives could trigger a liquidity crisis,” he said.
This would likely cause users to liquidate their positions en masse, worsening market volatility. In such a case, confidence in the underlying protocols might erode further, potentially causing widespread destabilization in the DeFi space.
“At this point it’s really speculative. Looking back to the past in DeFi, trying to milk yields as hard as possible tends to end badly,” Muroch warned.
Ultimately, the success of restaking protocols hinges on their ability to balance maximizing yields with managing the inherent financial and technical risks they introduce. As these systems mature, the sector is beginning to diversify. New competitors are launching their own restaking solutions, which could help decentralize risk currently concentrated in platforms like EigenLayer.
This shift may reduce the systemic vulnerabilities tied to one dominant protocol, leading to a more stable and resilient DeFi ecosystem over time.
“As excitement wanes, the sustainability of these protocols will be tested, and their true value will need to be assessed in a more stable market environment. This transition could reveal whether the innovations are robust or merely speculative trends,” Muroch concluded.
Disclaimer
Following the Trust Project guidelines, this feature article presents opinions and perspectives from industry experts or individuals. BeInCrypto is dedicated to transparent reporting, but the views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of BeInCrypto or its staff. Readers should verify information independently and consult with a professional before making decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
Market
Ethereum Reclaims Top DeFi Spot As Solana DEX Volume Drops

Ethereum (ETH) has regained its position as the leading blockchain for decentralized exchange (DEX) trading volume.
On this metric, Ethereum has effectively surpassed Solana (SOL) for the first time since September 2024.
Ethereum Surpasses Solana in DEX Trading Volume
According to data from DefiLlama, Ethereum-based DEXs recorded approximately $63 billion in trading volume throughout March 2025. This traction saw Ethereum overtake Solana’s $51 billion during the same period.

The shift marks a significant moment in the ongoing competition between Ethereum and Solana in the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem.
Solana had dominated the DEX space for months, bolstered by its low fees and high transaction throughput. Franklin Templeton noticed the trend and predicted Solana’s DeFi surge could rival Ethereum’s valuation.
“Solana DeFi valuation multiples trade on average lower than their Ethereum counterparts despite significantly higher growth profiles. This highlights an apparent valuation asymmetry between the two ecosystems,” read an excerpt in Franklin Templeton’s report.
However, recent declines in trading volume on key Solana-based platforms suggest a changing market dynamic. The drop in Solana’s DEX trading volume is closely tied to decreased activity on major platforms like Raydium (RAY) and Pump.fun.
Pump.fun, in particular, has seen a sharp decline in trading volume since the beginning of the year. Monthly volumes fell from a January peak of $7.75 billion to just $2.53 billion in March, representing a 67% drop.

Data on Dune shows that this downturn aligns with a slowdown in the platform’s token graduation rate, which has fallen from 0.8% to 0.65% per week.
The graduation rate reflects the percentage of new tokens reaching the $100,000 market capitalization threshold required to migrate from Pump.fun to the Raydium platform.
A lower graduation rate suggests fewer tokens are reaching this threshold, which is reducing overall trading activity on Solana’s DEX ecosystem.
Ethereum’s Strength in the DEX Market
While Solana’s DEX activity has faltered, Ethereum’s trading volume has remained resilient. This is likely bolstered by the strong performance of platforms like Uniswap (UNI) and Curve Finance (CRV).
In March, Uniswap alone facilitated over $30 billion in trading volume, significantly contributing to Ethereum’s overall market dominance.
Ethereum’s ability to reclaim the top spot is also attributed to its established infrastructure and network effects. Despite higher gas fees than Solana, Ethereum continues attracting high-value trades, institutional interest, and liquidity. These reinforce its position as the primary blockchain for DeFi activity.
Against this backdrop, industry analysts believe that while Solana is very competitive, it still has a long way to go before it can dethrone Ethereum.
Meanwhile, others say Ethereum’s resurgence may extend into the second quarter (Q2), driven by upcoming network upgrades and broader market trends.
“On-chain developments offer some hope for ETH…With Pectra now successfully deployed on the Holesky testnet and a mainnet upgrade expected in Q2, could we see a reversal of the downward ETH/BTC trend in the coming quarter?” analysts at QCP Capital noted.
The Pectra upgrade, once implemented on the Ethereum mainnet, is expected to improve scalability and efficiency, potentially boosting user adoption and trading activity.
Adding to the positive momentum, spot Ethereum ETFs (exchange-traded funds) saw net inflows on Monday, contrasting with net outflows from Bitcoin ETFs. This trend suggests growing investor confidence in Ethereum’s market position.
This shift in ETF flows could indicate a broader reallocation of capital within the crypto market, particularly as Ethereum strengthens its DeFi ecosystem and prepares for key upgrades.
Disclaimer
In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
Market
Coinbase Stock Plunges 30% in Worst Quarter Since FTX Collapse

Coinbase, the largest US crypto exchange, has recorded its worst quarter since the dramatic collapse of FTX in late 2022.
Coinbase’s stock (COIN) plummeted by 30% in Q1 2025, mirroring the steep losses seen across the broader crypto market.
Crypto Stocks and Assets Bleed Red in Q1
According to Bloomberg, the sharp decline has hit several other major crypto-related stocks as well. This includes Galaxy Digital, Riot Blockchain, and Core Scientific, all of which have experienced significant downturns.

Furthermore, the broader crypto market is facing tough times. Bitcoin, which has long been considered the bellwether of digital assets, has dropped by 10% this quarter. More dramatically, Ethereum (ETH) has seen a staggering 45% decline. These losses reflect a broader downturn in the crypto market, fueled by several macroeconomic factors.
Analysts point to the global uncertainty surrounding the US economy, including concerns over Trump’s tariffs and recession fears. This has resulted in a general “risk-off” mood among investors.
“In a risk-off mood, no asset is safe stocks, crypto, all get hit. It’s more about sentiment than fundamentals in those moments,” an investor commented on X.
While some point to these macroeconomic pressures as the primary cause, others argue that the market’s underperformance is more due to lingering fears of trade wars and broader geopolitical instability.
“Trump’s trade wars are driving markets into a panic. As much as he is doing for crypto, the macro market conditions are speaking louder – as bullish as the news is from the white house – His trash trade war is squelching any price surge,” another X user remarked.
Coinbase has been hit especially hard in this downturn. Coinbase’s revenue model is heavily reliant on altcoins and transaction volumes beyond Bitcoin. Hence, the overall market drop could have made a mark on the exchange’s stock prices. Moreover, the news comes as Coinbase users have collectively lost more than $46 million to scams in March.
While crypto has been in a freefall, other assets have fared much better. Gold, for example, has surged, posting its best quarter since 1986 as investors flock to safer assets amid the market turmoil. The shift toward traditional assets is particularly noticeable as the post-election crypto hype, which briefly boosted Bitcoin’s value to $109,000, begins to fade.
Despite the overall market challenges, some crypto-related firms have shown resilience. MicroStrategy, led by CEO Michael Saylor, remains in the green year-to-date, bolstered by its substantial Bitcoin holdings.
For now, the crypto market is left to weather the storm, with analysts continuing to scrutinize the interplay of macroeconomic factors and its impact on digital assets.
Disclaimer
In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
Market
Fake Gemini Bankruptcy Emails Target Users

Crypto scams are surging as more people flock to digital currencies, with fraudsters exploiting the industry’s rapid growth to deceive investors.
Recently, numerous crypto users reported receiving fraudulent emails claiming that the Gemini exchange had filed for bankruptcy. Meanwhile, Coinbase Exchange has admitted that an employee illegally accessed user account information.
Gemini Exchange Addresses Bankruptcy Allegations
Multiple accounts highlighted the scam on social media, indicating that an email circulating falsely claims that Gemini has filed for bankruptcy. The email instructed users to withdraw to an Exodus wallet and provided a seed phrase.
These phishing emails, shared on April 1, urged recipients to withdraw their funds into a specified crypto wallet to protect their assets. This was an attempt to deceive users into transferring their cryptocurrencies to wallets controlled by scammers.
“Do not follow these directions. Please retweet to protect those that may have been doxxed and sent this email,” wrote Jason Williams, a contributor to Fox Business.

The deceptive emails alleged a substantial loss of $1.2 billion by Gemini Exchange. Understandably, some novice investors would heed this email and even move their assets to the address. After all, some victims of FTX Exchange contagion continue to pursue their funds even years after the incident.
“I got one also. It is better than your typical ‘Coin Base’ one, but still not quite there. Might fool a boomer though,” one X user remarked.
However, security experts advise users to always verify information through official channels, avoid clicking on unsolicited links, and refrain from sharing personal data. Gemini issued an official warning in response to the scam, acknowledging the threat against its users.
“We recently learned that some Gemini customers are being targeted with scam emails requesting users to transfer their crypto to outside wallets. Please be aware that Gemini will never request that you send crypto to outside wallets,” the exchange articulated.
Coinbase Admits Employee Illegally Accessed User Account Data
Coinbase exchange acknowledged a privacy violation by one of its staff in a somewhat related development. Specifically, a customer service employee accessed user account information without authorization.
This breach has raised concerns about potential scams targeting Coinbase users. Mike Dudas, a crypto investor and co-founder at The Block, shared an email from Coinbase acknowledging the incident.
“That explains the fake Coinbase phishing emails and phone calls today,” he stated.

This breach coincides with reports of phishing attempts, as users have received fake emails and calls purporting to be from Coinbase. These incidents reflect a broader wave of crypto-related fraud.
Blockchain investigator ZachXBT reported that Coinbase users lost over $65 million to social engineering scams between December 2024 and January 2025.
“Coinbase did not detect it; I sent them the intel,” the blockchain investigated noted.
Additionally, crypto analyst Cobie suggested Kraken might be experiencing a similar issue. Per his post, a new attack may be budding, where attackers infiltrate customer service roles to exfiltrate data.
“Kraken also recently hit with this too. Maybe a new scheme from attackers (get a CS agent employee in, exfil data),” the analyst remarked.
Amidst these events, ZachXBT recently explained how to avoid crypto scams. He emphasizes the importance of conducting thorough research before engaging with new DeFi protocols, especially those forked from existing projects on newly launched EVM chains.
Additionally, he advises caution when dealing with projects with few credible followers, as these may indicate potential scams.
Therefore, it is imperative that users remain vigilant against sophisticated phishing scams and unauthorized data breaches.
Disclaimer
In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
-
Market20 hours ago
Trump Family Gets Most WLFI Revenue, Causing Corruption Fears
-
Ethereum19 hours ago
Ethereum’s Price Dips, But Investors Seize The Opportunity To Stack Up More ETH
-
Regulation22 hours ago
USDC Issuer Circle Set To File IPO In April, Here’s All
-
Market22 hours ago
Pi Network Struggles, On Track for New All-Time Low
-
Bitcoin21 hours ago
Strategy Adds 22,048 BTC for Nearly $2 Billion
-
Market21 hours ago
BNB Breaks Below $605 As Bullish Momentum Fades – What’s Next?
-
Market24 hours ago
3 Altcoins to Watch in the First Week of April 2025
-
Market23 hours ago
Bitcoin Mining Faces Tariff Challenges as Hashrate Hits New ATH