Market
CyberCapital’s Justin Bons Slams Pi Network as a Scam

Pi Network is facing renewed scrutiny after Justin Bons, founder of CyberCapital, publicly branded the project a “scam.”
Bons raised concerns about the project’s technology, business model, and tokenomics, arguing that they are deeply flawed and potentially harmful to investors.
Is Pi Network a Scam? Justin Bons Thinks So
In a series of posts on X (formerly Twitter), Bons pointed out several issues with the network. He suggested that contrary to its claims of decentralization, Pi Network remains heavily centralized.
“PI is fully permissioned (centralized) and everything requires KYC, even simple transactions! PI is an investment scam; it is that bad,” he wrote.
Bons also criticized the five-year-delayed mainnet launch, calling the network’s promises of innovation and decentralization misleading. Notably, one of the major claims the executive made was that Pi Network’s core technology was copied from Stellar (XLM).
Despite this, he argued that the absence of a Turing-complete virtual machine (VM) limits Pi Network’s potential for decentralized finance (DeFi), making it a “pipedream.” Moreover, he explained that this renders the network neither scalable nor programmable.
Bons also drew attention to the network’s referral program, which he likened to a Multi-Level Marketing (MLM) scheme. He argued that this system generates unnecessary costs for the network without providing real benefits to users.
Further compounding his concerns, Bons highlighted a Ponzi-like mechanism within Pi Network’s “mining” process. He revealed that the lockup period benefits insiders by inflating the token price, allowing early investors to exit with profits.
Transparency, or the lack thereof, was another significant issue Bons flagged. He criticized the Pi network for not revealing insider token allocations despite enforcing Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures. He noted that insiders might control as much as 20% of the network’s supply, which contradicts the project’s fairness claims.
“PI made it into the top 20 is an embarrassment to our industry,” Bons concluded.
Previously, Bybit CEO Ben Zhou had shared similar concerns, calling PI a scam and describing it as “more dangerous than meme coins.”
Will Pi Coin (PI) be listed on Binance?
Meanwhile, the latest wave of criticism comes amid mounting discontent among pioneers toward Binance. On March 19, the exchange revealed its first batch of Vote to List projects. The list included meme coins associated with the former CEO’s dog and the Mubarak (MUBARAK) token, among others.

Nonetheless, despite Pi Coin (PI) receiving an 86% vote in favor, the community expressed frustration over Binance’s failure to list it.
“Stop acting like some third rate junk exchange and fulfill your promises before you start the next vote. I don’t know if CZ would have behaved like this if he was still at Binance, he wouldn’t be proud of your behavior,” a user wrote on X.
The community has even gone as far as giving Binance a 1-star rating on the Google Play Store. However, this might have worsened PI’s prospects rather than improving them.
“Do not try to pressure us into listing your coin by spreading FUD or negative comments about Binance, or you will be blacklisted,” Binance noted.
The dual blows of Bons’ criticism and Binance’s snub have coincided with a devastating market slump for PI. The token’s price plummeted below $1.0 today for the first time since late February.

Over the past day, PI has declined by 20.1%, with weekly losses extending to 48.7%. At press time, Pi Coin was trading at $0.91. Its ranking has also taken a hit, sliding to 27th place on CoinGecko, a significant drop from its earlier position.
Disclaimer
In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
Market
Tether Is Preparing Audits to Meet US Stablecoin Regulation

Recent reports claim that Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino is in talks with the Big Four accounting firms to finally conduct a third-party audit. However, some members of the community are skeptical, citing a lack of firm commitments.
Such an audit would be mandated by upcoming stablecoin regulations, and an absolute requirement for future cooperation with the US government.
Is Tether Finally Getting An Audit?
Tether, the issuer of the world’s largest stablecoin, may soon seek closer integration with the US government. In a speech yesterday, President Trump alluded to his vision of stablecoins’ role in promoting dollar dominance.
To achieve this partnership, however, Tether will finally need to agree to a third-party audit.
According to a new report from Reuters, Tether is engaging with a Big Four accounting firm to make this audit happen. It didn’t specify which of these firms, PwC, EY, Deloitte, and KPMG, were in these talks or what progress had happened.
“It’s our top priority. Now we are living in a landscape where it’s actually feasible. If the President of the United States says this is top priority for the US, Big Four auditing firms will have to listen,” Ardoino claimed.
However, the news followed a lot of skepticism from the wider community. Despite regular internal reports, a new CFO, and years of promises, Tether has never once submitted to a third-party audit. This has created a certain jaded attitude in some parts of the community.
Some speculated that the firm may try to secure a reserve-only audit, but the Big Four will likely only agree to a full accounting. Ardoino’s comment about Trump’s “top priority” seems revealing from this angle.
Why would the Big Four need an incentive like that for a normal audit? Tether made $13 billion in profit last year; surely it can afford their services.
Stablecoin Regulation May Hold Up A Deal
A third-party audit is critical for Tether because of the upcoming potential US stablecoin regulations. According to the proposed GENIUS Act, stablecoin issuers will need to submit to independent audits and hold much of their reserves in assets like Treasury bonds.
So, stablecoin issuers will not be able to operate in the US market without an audit of their US Treasury-based reserve assets.
Yesterday, the firm revealed that it purchased $33 billion in Treasury bonds last year. However, Ardoino claimed that 99% of these are held by Cantor Fitzgerald, a firm with long-standing ties to Tether.
The company’s CEO was Howard Lutnick until this January when he stepped down to become the US Secretary of Commerce. These political ties have drawn some ire.
“Tether has a challenged reputation to say the least. It should be banned from buying US Treasuries until they pass a series of deep audits by US regulators — and that audit should go back to their inception. We’re taking a huge, unnecessary risk by letting this firm into our financial system,” Jason Calcanis claimed.
In other words, Tether skeptics are still not convinced that the stablecoin issuer will go through a large-scale public audit. Thanks to these political ties and substantial Treasury bonds, Tether is well-positioned to make a serious partnership with the US.
However, unless it passes an audit, as mandated by forthcoming regulations, Tether’s US presence might be at risk.
Disclaimer
In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
Market
Bitcoin Faces Resistance at $85,000 As Whale Buying Levels Off

Bitcoin (BTC) sparked higher following the recent FOMC meeting but is now correcting, down nearly 3% in the last 24 hours. The price is struggling below key resistance as short-term momentum weakens.
Technical indicators, including the Ichimoku Cloud and EMA lines, are signaling potential challenges ahead for BTC. Meanwhile, whale activity has stabilized after a sharp accumulation phase, raising questions about whether BTC can reclaim higher levels this month.
BTC Ichimoku Cloud Shows Challenges Are Coming
Bitcoin is currently trading below the Ichimoku Cloud, signaling a bearish trend in the short term. The price has fallen beneath both the Tenkan-sen (blue line) and Kijun-sen (red line), reinforcing the downside pressure.
The cloud ahead is thin and flat, suggesting weak momentum and the possibility of sideways movement or further bearish continuation unless the price reclaims higher levels.

The Lagging Span (green line) is also positioned below the price action and the cloud, confirming the prevailing bearish sentiment. However, the price is approaching the edge of the cloud’s lower boundary, which could act as immediate support.
If buyers fail to defend this zone, bearish momentum could extend further. On the other hand, any pushback above the Tenkan-sen and Kijun-sen could be an early signal of recovery, but the cloud resistance above remains a major hurdle.
Bitcoin Whales Are Now More Stable After A Recent Surge
The number of Bitcoin whales has recently surged, with wallets holding at least 1,000 BTC rising from 2,040 on March 5 to 2,079 by March 18, marking the highest level since mid-December 2024.
While the sharp increase indicates strong accumulation during that period, the count has slightly stabilized at 2,077 over the past few days, suggesting the pace of accumulation has cooled for now.

Monitoring whale activity is crucial because, due to the size of their positions, these large holders can significantly influence Bitcoin’s price. A growing number of whales often signals rising confidence among major investors, which can lead to upward price pressure.
The recent surge in whale addresses may suggest institutional or high-net-worth investors are positioning for a potential price rally or at least seeking to accumulate during perceived dips or consolidation phases, as has been happening with BTC in the last few weeks.
Can Bitcoin Return Above $90,000 In March?
Bitcoin price is currently consolidating between resistance at $85,124 and support at $81,187, with its EMA lines showing a lack of clear direction as they move closely together. The recent price spike following the FOMC meeting appears to be losing steam, aligning with insights from Nic Puckrin, who suggests the rally may be short-lived based on current market conditions:
“The slight “Powell pump” we saw in crypto markets after (…) FOMC meeting has brought Bitcoin back above its 200-day moving average, which is certainly a bullish sign. Whether it can continue on this trajectory, however, is another question. If BTC does continue its current surge, a key resistance level to watch will be around $92,000-$93,000. If it manages to break out above this, we could see it extend the rally toward its previous all-time high. However, there is likely too much uncertainty in markets to provide the necessary support for such a move,” Puckrin told BeInCrypto.

If Bitcoin breaks above the $85,000 resistance zone, it could open the door for a push toward $92,920 or even $96,484 if bullish momentum strengthens.
However, failure to maintain support at $81,187 could trigger a move down to $79,955, with the risk of further downside to $76,642 if sellers gain more control.
Disclaimer
In line with the Trust Project guidelines, this price analysis article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. BeInCrypto is committed to accurate, unbiased reporting, but market conditions are subject to change without notice. Always conduct your own research and consult with a professional before making any financial decisions. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
Market
XRP Network’s DEX Trading Volume Is Less Than $50,000

The XRP community is concerned about the network’s utility as its DEX trading volumes and TVL remain extremely low. Despite XRP’s impressive $137 billion market cap, the network recorded only $44,000 in daily DEX trading volume yesterday, raising questions about its overall utility and adoption.
When compared to leading blockchain networks, the XRP ledger suffers from a shortage of nodes, validators, and smart contract token holdings. This discrepancy highlights a clear misalignment between the altcoin’s market valuation and the practical usability of its blockchain network.
XRP Ledger Reflects Massive Issues
Since Donald Trump’s re-election in November 2024, XRP has become one of the most trending crypto assets in the market. Under the SEC’s pro-crypto regulatory shift, XRP has surged nearly 300% in the past four months, and become the 4th largest asset in the market.
Most notably, the SEC dropped its long-running lawsuit against Ripple, sparking hope that the token could reach an all-time high. Despite all of these positive developments, the XRP Ledger has shown little to no improvement in trading activity.
“I think XRP is the biggest financial scam the world has ever seen. There has never been something which has produced less value that has reached this market cap ($140 billion). The XRP ledger did $44,000 in volume in the last 24 hours, according to DefiLlama,” on-chain researcher Aylo claimed on X.
One look at DefiLlama’s data reveals the problem. So far, the network’s volume in March was a measly $1.5 million, and its TVL is $80 million. In other words, there’s practically zero utility for its size.

This trade volume and TVL data is an important window into the state of XRP, but there are other vital clues. For example, according to its own website, XRP currently has 386 nodes and 96 validators.
Compare this to other leading assets, Bitcoin has nearly 22,000 nodes, Ethereum has 11,000, and Solana has 4,700.
In other words, general crypto traders don’t seem to be interested in the network’s utility. It’s a concerning indication that the majority of the community considers XRP primarily as a speculative asset.

However, there is a counter perspective that the XRP community needs to consider. While XRPL DEX volume remains modest, Ripple continues to establish itself as a key infrastructure provider for global banking institutions.
Ripple’s technology streamlines cross-border payments by reducing settlement times and lowering costs, attracting leading banks and financial service providers worldwide. This strong institutional focus drives interest in XRP, as it supports efficient liquidity management.
In this context, XRP’s value proposition extends beyond conventional crypto trading. It plays a larger strategic role in modernizing global financial transactions and bridging traditional finance with emerging digital payment solutions.
So, XRPL’s low trading volume is concerning, but there is a good reason why it doesn’t align with the altcoin’s valuation.
Disclaimer
In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
-
Ethereum17 hours ago
Ethereum Needs to Break This Key Level For A ‘Bullish Flip’, Analyst Predicts
-
Ethereum24 hours ago
Ethereum Trades At A Critical Level – Major Reclaim Or Steep Drop Ahead?
-
Altcoin23 hours ago
What’s Next for Dogecoin Price As Key Support Retests, Analysts Weigh In
-
Market22 hours ago
Who Is the 50X Hyperliquid Whale? ZachXBT Reveals Details
-
Market19 hours ago
Analysts Predict Choppy Price Action
-
Market17 hours ago
Tether Buys $33 Billion US Bonds Amid Forthcoming Regulation
-
Altcoin17 hours ago
Ethereum Price Eyes 50% Drop Amid Heavy ETH Whale Profit Booking
-
Market23 hours ago
Hedera (HBAR) Sellers Are Taking Control Below $0.20