Connect with us

Market

Crypto Projects Face High CEX Listing Fees—Is Change Coming?

Published

on


The cryptocurrency community is abuzz following recent allegations surrounding the listing practices of prominent centralized exchanges (CEXs), notably Binance and Coinbase.

What began with a post by Simon Dedic, CEO of Moonrock Capital, has sparked widespread debate on how much power CEXs wield in determining the fate of new projects and tokens. Amid this controversy, industry leaders and community members are weighing in, exposing the growing divide between centralized and decentralized exchanges.

Allegations of High Demands for CEX Listings

In a post on X (formerly Twitter), Dedic shared details of a conversation he had with a “Tier 1” project that reportedly spent over a year in due diligence with Binance. According to Dedic, Binance eventually requested 15% of the project’s total token supply in exchange for a listing offer.

He estimated the cost for the listing could range from $50 million to $100 million, describing such demands as “unaffordable” for projects and a key reason for “bleeding charts” — a term referring to price declines following CEX listings.

In response, Andre Cronje, founder of Fantom, disputed Dedic’s claims about Binance. He disclosed that Coinbase, not Binance, had previously demanded substantial fees for listing (probably Fantom’s FTM token) with amounts ranging from $30 million to $300 million over time.

Read more: Binance Review 2024: Is It the Right Crypto Exchange for You?

Cronje’s stance highlights the growing concern over how listing demands might create barriers for projects aiming to gain visibility on major exchanges. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong soon addressed the controversy, aiming to set the record straight. Armstrong stated on X, “Asset listings on Coinbase are free,” while promoting decentralized exchanges (DEXs) as a viable alternative.

Armstrong’s post was backed by a Coinbase blog post explaining the Asset Hub, designed to streamline the listing process. Coinbase’s Asset Hub also ensures transparency and fairness, supposedly at no cost to token issuers.

Adding to the debate, TRON founder Justin Sun weighed in, sharing his experiences with both exchanges. Sun stated that while Binance did not charge TRON any listing fees, Coinbase required an $80 million deposit in TRX and a $250 million BTC deposit in Coinbase Custody.

Sun also suggested that such demands are excessive, adding another layer to the debate on whether listing fees are justified for projects of different sizes. The controversy has sparked a wave of community reactions, many voicing disillusionment with CEX practices.

“Kinda makes me not want to buy anything listed on Binance again. Knowing that they paid tens of millions to get on there, so they could get the most exit liquidity they could is a signal that maybe it is not worth that much. Real platforms don’t need to launch on Binance,” said Tuomas Holmberg, founder and CEO of Collector Crypt.

Tenset CEO and co-founder of Tenset Security Mat Millbury echoed the sentiment, criticizing the adverse effects of Binance listings on token prices. Some see the issue as an indication of excessive power wielded by CEXs over new projects.

“Exchanges hold too much power,” Animoca Brands’ Mo Ezeldin commented, suggesting that listing fees and token demands create an unhealthy cycle that ultimately harms projects and drains positive momentum.

Average returns by exchange
Exchange Performance Highlights. Source: Mo Ezeldin

Meanwhile, Mavryck Network founder Alex Davis voiced support for DEXs, arguing they could provide a more sustainable model for the future.

“All this drama surrounding CEXs simply highlights the need for (order book) DEXs and further transparency. Make the rules for listings clear, and list appropriately. The point of crypto was to disintermediate from 3rd parties, not create new ones raking in their own fees,” Davis expressed.

Binance Leadership Defends Policies

Binance’s former CEO Changpeng Zhao (CZ) also responded to the backlash, urging the industry to move away from “quote attacks.” CZ asserted that Bitcoin, the most prominent digital asset, never paid listing fees, advising projects to focus on their development rather than exchange listings. Justin Sun echoed the sentiment.

Similarly, Binance’s co-founder Yi He added that Binance’s listing processes are transparent and based on project merit. She encouraged the public to “do your own research” (DYOR) and dismissed the allegations as “gossip,” explaining that high token allocations for airdrops or promotions do not guarantee listings.

As accusations and rebuttals circulate, the role of decentralized exchanges (DEXs) is coming into sharper focus. Unlike CEXs, DEXs allow projects to list directly without intermediary demands or large token allocations, potentially offering a path toward more equitable access.

Read more: What Are Decentralized Exchanges and Why Should You Try Them?

While centralized exchanges offer liquidity, reach, and visibility, many in the community argue that their influence over project success may be overreaching. The ongoing debate highlights a need for change, whether through increased transparency from CEXs, the adoption of decentralized alternatives, or an industry-wide shift toward fairer practices.

Disclaimer

In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and ConditionsPrivacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.



Source link

Market

Aptos Partners with Circle and Stripe to Revitalize Network

Published

on


The Aptos Foundation announced a new partnership with Circle and Stripe, hoping to revolutionize its network functionality. Circle’s CCTP and USDC stablecoin will enhance blockchain interoperability, while Stripe will attract TradFi by simplifying fiat interactions.

Aptos has set ambitious goals with this partnership, but APT’s upward momentum has stagnated.

Aptos Partners with Circle and Stripe

According to a new announcement from the Aptos (APT) Foundation, its network is integrating Circle’s USDC stablecoin and Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol (CCTP). Additionally, Aptos is integrating the payment platform Stripe, generally streamlining fiat-related features. These include on- and off-ramps, payment processing, and TradFi ease of adoption.

“Once the integration is complete, users will be able to seamlessly transfer USDC between Aptos and 8 major blockchains. In addition to USDC and CCTP, Stripe will soon launch its payment services on Aptos, creating a reliable fiat on-ramp to streamline merchant pay-ins and payouts using Aptos-compatible wallets,” the firm claimed via press release.

In other words, Aptos aims to use this partnership to make itself “the ultimate hub for interoperable DeFi.” These companies will approach this goal from both ends: enticing new users and investors while substantially improving the core experience. This partnership marks a new development for Stripe’s integration with crypto.

Indeed, Stripe took a six-year hiatus from cryptocurrency payments, which only ended this April. Since then, however, it’s been engaging seriously with the industry. The firm entered an earlier partnership with Circle this June, hoping to promote USDC adoption. Additionally, Stripe acquired Bridge, a crypto payment platform, last month.

For its part, Aptos is undertaking a recovery process. Despite a major price spike in March, it suffered a lingering decline for most of 2024. The asset began regaining steam in October, and the November bull market has brought increased optimism. Still, its gains have stagnated for about a week.

Aptos Price in 2024
Aptos Price in 2024. Source: BeInCrypto

This partnership between Aptos, Circle, and Stripe may help APT regain its forward momentum. These ambitious new features will greatly add functionality and accessibility to Aptos’ network. Still, the firm has set a very ambitious goal for itself: to solidify “its place as a leader in interoperable DeFi and enterprise-grade blockchain technology.” Only time can tell its success level.

Disclaimer

In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and ConditionsPrivacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.



Source link

Continue Reading

Market

SEC Moves Toward Solana ETF Approval Amid Pro-Crypto Shift

Published

on


The SEC is quietly meeting with several issuers to discuss approving a Solana ETF, claims Fox Business reporter Eleanor Terrett. With Trump’s impending pro-crypto administration, the SEC seems more inclined to approve such a product.

However, anti-crypto figure Gary Gensler is still nominally in charge of the SEC, and public progress might not begin until 2025.

Solana ETF Approval Is Getting Closer

According to a scoop from Fox Business reporter Eleanor Terrett, the SEC and several ETF issuers are in talks to approve a Solana ETF. Currently, Brazil is the only country that has given this product a green light. As recently as September, Polymarket odds gave the SEC a dismal 3% chance of approving it. This reluctance, however, might soon be changing:

“Talks between SEC staff and issuers looking to launch a Solana spot ETF are “progressing” with the SEC now engaging on S-1 applications. Recent engagement from staff, coupled with the incoming pro-crypto administration, is sparking a renewed sense of optimism that a Solana ETF could be approved sometime in 2025,” Terrett claimed.

Terrett was very clear about the impetus for this progress in negotiations: Donald Trump’s re-election. On the campaign trail, Trump vowed to significantly reform US crypto policy, and one cornerstone was firing anti-crypto SEC Chair Gary Gensler. Gensler has apparently conceded to his impending ouster, and his replacement will undoubtedly support the industry.

Previous attempts have floundered at an early step in the process. Once the SEC officially acknowledges an application, it must confirm or deny it within a 240-day window. Previous filings have lingered in limbo at this stage. However, the list of candidates is now growing: Canary Capital filed for a Solana ETF in October, and BitWise did the same earlier today.

Timeline of Solana ETF Applications, with Previous Frozen Attempts
Timeline of Solana ETF Applications, with Previous Frozen Attempts. Source: Eric Balchunas

Nonetheless, these positive negotiations still only consist of anonymous rumors. The Commission has not publicly moved to begin this process, and Gensler is still nominally in charge. Terrett posits that the SEC will only make serious progress on the Solana ETF at the start of 2025. Compared to previous pessimism, however, this is a complete sea change.

Disclaimer

In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and ConditionsPrivacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.



Source link

Continue Reading

Market

ETH/BTC Ratio Plummets to 42-Month Low Amid Bitcoin Surge

Published

on


The ETH/BTC ratio, a metric measuring Ethereum’s price performance compared to Bitcoin, has reached its lowest point since March 2021. This development comes amid BTC’s brief rise to $98,000.

While the flagship cryptocurrency has increased by 7.45% in the last seven days, ETH has hovered around the same region, with investors raising concerns about the altcoin’s future.

Ethereum Continues to Lag Behind Bitcoin

In February, the ETH/BTC ratio climbed to a yearly high of 0.060. During that time, speculation spread that Ethereum’s price would begin to outperform Bitcoin and validate the altcoin season. However, that has not happened, as Bitcoin’s price has continued to make new highs

Ethereum, on the other hand, is yet to retest to reclaim its all-time high despite reaching $4,000 earlier in the year. This disparity in performance could be linked to several factors. For instance, both cryptocurrencies saw approval for exchange-traded funds (ETFs) this year.

However, while Bitcoin has seen billions of dollars in inflows, ETH has been inconsistent in attracting capital. Hence, the institutional inflow has driven BTC toward $100,000, ensuring that the ETH/BTC ratio drops to $0.033 — the lowest level in 42 months.

ETH/BTC performance
ETH/BTC Ratio. Source: TradingView

Further, the disparity in Ethereum’s performance can largely be attributed to sustained selling pressure. For instance, CryptoQuant data reveals that exchange inflows into the top 10 exchanges have climbed to 461,901 ETH, valued at approximately $1.50 billion as of this writing.

This surge in exchange inflow reflects large deposits by investors, indicating a heightened willingness to sell. Such movements typically increase the supply of ETH on exchanges, raising the likelihood of a price drop.

In contrast, a low exchange inflow generally indicates that investors are holding onto their assets, which is not the current scenario for ETH.

Ethereum Exchange Inflow
Ethereum Exchange Inflow. Source: CryptoQuant

ETH Price Prediction: Crypto Could Retrace

As of this writing, ETH trades at $3,317, which is a higher close than yesterday’s. Despite that, the altcoin is still below the Parabolic Stop And Reverse (SAR) indicator. The Parabolic SAR generates a series of dots that track the price movement, positioning above the price during a downtrend and below the price during an uptrend. 

A “flip” in the dots — shifting from one side to the other — often signals a potential trend reversal. As seen below, the indicator is above ETH’s price, suggesting that the cryptocurrency could reverse its recent gains.

Ethereum price analysis
Ethereum Daily Analysis. Source: TradingView

If this is the case and the ETH/BTC ratio declines, Ethereum’s price could decline to $3,083. However, if buying pressure increases, that might not happen. Instead, the value could surge above $3,500 and toward 4,000.

Disclaimer

In line with the Trust Project guidelines, this price analysis article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. BeInCrypto is committed to accurate, unbiased reporting, but market conditions are subject to change without notice. Always conduct your own research and consult with a professional before making any financial decisions. Please note that our Terms and ConditionsPrivacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 coin2049.io