Market
Crypto Projects Face High CEX Listing Fees—Is Change Coming?

The cryptocurrency community is abuzz following recent allegations surrounding the listing practices of prominent centralized exchanges (CEXs), notably Binance and Coinbase.
What began with a post by Simon Dedic, CEO of Moonrock Capital, has sparked widespread debate on how much power CEXs wield in determining the fate of new projects and tokens. Amid this controversy, industry leaders and community members are weighing in, exposing the growing divide between centralized and decentralized exchanges.
Allegations of High Demands for CEX Listings
In a post on X (formerly Twitter), Dedic shared details of a conversation he had with a “Tier 1” project that reportedly spent over a year in due diligence with Binance. According to Dedic, Binance eventually requested 15% of the project’s total token supply in exchange for a listing offer.
He estimated the cost for the listing could range from $50 million to $100 million, describing such demands as “unaffordable” for projects and a key reason for “bleeding charts” — a term referring to price declines following CEX listings.
In response, Andre Cronje, founder of Fantom, disputed Dedic’s claims about Binance. He disclosed that Coinbase, not Binance, had previously demanded substantial fees for listing (probably Fantom’s FTM token) with amounts ranging from $30 million to $300 million over time.
Read more: Binance Review 2024: Is It the Right Crypto Exchange for You?
Cronje’s stance highlights the growing concern over how listing demands might create barriers for projects aiming to gain visibility on major exchanges. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong soon addressed the controversy, aiming to set the record straight. Armstrong stated on X, “Asset listings on Coinbase are free,” while promoting decentralized exchanges (DEXs) as a viable alternative.
Armstrong’s post was backed by a Coinbase blog post explaining the Asset Hub, designed to streamline the listing process. Coinbase’s Asset Hub also ensures transparency and fairness, supposedly at no cost to token issuers.
Adding to the debate, TRON founder Justin Sun weighed in, sharing his experiences with both exchanges. Sun stated that while Binance did not charge TRON any listing fees, Coinbase required an $80 million deposit in TRX and a $250 million BTC deposit in Coinbase Custody.
Sun also suggested that such demands are excessive, adding another layer to the debate on whether listing fees are justified for projects of different sizes. The controversy has sparked a wave of community reactions, many voicing disillusionment with CEX practices.
“Kinda makes me not want to buy anything listed on Binance again. Knowing that they paid tens of millions to get on there, so they could get the most exit liquidity they could is a signal that maybe it is not worth that much. Real platforms don’t need to launch on Binance,” said Tuomas Holmberg, founder and CEO of Collector Crypt.
Tenset CEO and co-founder of Tenset Security Mat Millbury echoed the sentiment, criticizing the adverse effects of Binance listings on token prices. Some see the issue as an indication of excessive power wielded by CEXs over new projects.
“Exchanges hold too much power,” Animoca Brands’ Mo Ezeldin commented, suggesting that listing fees and token demands create an unhealthy cycle that ultimately harms projects and drains positive momentum.

Meanwhile, Mavryck Network founder Alex Davis voiced support for DEXs, arguing they could provide a more sustainable model for the future.
“All this drama surrounding CEXs simply highlights the need for (order book) DEXs and further transparency. Make the rules for listings clear, and list appropriately. The point of crypto was to disintermediate from 3rd parties, not create new ones raking in their own fees,” Davis expressed.
Binance Leadership Defends Policies
Binance’s former CEO Changpeng Zhao (CZ) also responded to the backlash, urging the industry to move away from “quote attacks.” CZ asserted that Bitcoin, the most prominent digital asset, never paid listing fees, advising projects to focus on their development rather than exchange listings. Justin Sun echoed the sentiment.
Similarly, Binance’s co-founder Yi He added that Binance’s listing processes are transparent and based on project merit. She encouraged the public to “do your own research” (DYOR) and dismissed the allegations as “gossip,” explaining that high token allocations for airdrops or promotions do not guarantee listings.
As accusations and rebuttals circulate, the role of decentralized exchanges (DEXs) is coming into sharper focus. Unlike CEXs, DEXs allow projects to list directly without intermediary demands or large token allocations, potentially offering a path toward more equitable access.
Read more: What Are Decentralized Exchanges and Why Should You Try Them?
While centralized exchanges offer liquidity, reach, and visibility, many in the community argue that their influence over project success may be overreaching. The ongoing debate highlights a need for change, whether through increased transparency from CEXs, the adoption of decentralized alternatives, or an industry-wide shift toward fairer practices.
Disclaimer
In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
Market
Crypto Derivatives Get a Boost from US CFTC

The US Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) scrapped a key directive that had previously signaled increased scrutiny for digital asset derivatives.
This decision indicates a friendlier regulatory climate for digital assets in the US, given the Trump administration’s pro-crypto stance.
CFTC Loosens Oversight for Crypto Derivatives
The CFTC withdrew Staff Advisory No. 23-07 and No. 18-14 by its Division of Clearing and Risk (DCR).
The former, issued in May 2023, focused on the risks of clearing digital assets. Meanwhile, the latter targeted virtual currency derivatives listings.
Upon establishment, both directives hinted at the singling out of crypto products for tougher oversight.
However, both have now been deemed unnecessary, effective immediately, amid the commodities’ regulator’s push toward regulatory consistency.
The decision indicates a shift to treating digital asset derivatives like those on Ethereum (ETH) as traditional finance (TradFi) products.
“As stated in today’s withdrawal letter, DCR determined to withdraw the advisory to ensure that it does not suggest that its regulatory treatment of digital asset derivatives will vary from its treatment of other products,” the CFTC explained.
This move will eliminate the perceived distinctions between digital asset derivatives and TradFi instruments.
It also paves the way for enhanced market participation, which will facilitate broader involvement from financial institutions in the digital asset derivatives market. This could lead to increased liquidity and market maturity.
Nevertheless, the advisory warned derivatives clearing organizations (DCOs) to prepare for risk assessments specific to digital products’ unique characteristics.
Therefore, while it reflects the CFTC’s commitment to promoting innovation, it also suggests the intention to maintain strong financial oversight.
Meanwhile, this decision comes only weeks after the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) allowed US banks to offer crypto and stablecoin services without prior approval.
However, the OCC had articulated that despite lifting the approval requirement, banks must maintain strong risk management controls akin to those required for traditional banking operations.
“The OCC expects banks to have the same strong risk management controls in place to support novel bank activities as they do for traditional ones,” said Rodney E. Hood, the acting Comptroller of the Currency.
Therefore, the CFTC’s move to eliminate regulatory bias for crypto derivatives marks a major divide in US policy. On the one hand, the CFTC seeks to scrap the distinction between crypto derivatives and TradFi instruments.
On the other hand, the FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) and OCC want banks to maintain risk management controls similar to those required for traditional banking operations despite providing crypto and stablecoin services.
Notwithstanding, these efforts mirror a growing trend among US financial regulators to lower barriers and foster responsible innovation in the crypto industry.
Disclaimer
In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
Market
XRP Falls 12% in a Week as Network Activity Declines

XRP is under heavy selling pressure, down more than 5% in the last 24 hours and over 12% in the past seven days. The recent downturn has been accompanied by increasingly bearish technical indicators, including a sharp spike in trend strength and a collapse in on-chain activity.
With price momentum weakening and user engagement dropping, concerns are mounting over XRP’s ability to hold key support levels. Unless sentiment shifts quickly, the path of least resistance appears to remain to the downside.
DMI Chart Shows The Current Downtrend Is Very Strong
XRP’s Directional Movement Index (DMI) is currently flashing strong bearish signals, with the Average Directional Index (ADX) surging to 47.14 from 25.43 just a day ago.
The ADX measures the strength of a trend, regardless of its direction, and values above 25 generally indicate that a trend is gaining momentum.
A reading above 40—like XRP’s current level—suggests a very strong trend is in play. Given that XRP is currently in a downtrend, this rising ADX points to intensifying bearish momentum and a market leaning heavily toward further declines.

Digging deeper into the DMI components, the +DI, which tracks upward price pressure, has dropped sharply from 20.13 to 5.76. Meanwhile, the -DI, which tracks downward price pressure, has surged from 8.97 to 33.77.
This stark divergence reinforces the bearish trend, indicating that sellers are aggressively taking control while buyer strength fades.
With ADX confirming the strength of this move and directional indicators tilting heavily to the downside, XRP’s price could remain under pressure in the short term unless a significant reversal in sentiment occurs.
XRP Active Addresses Are Heavily Down
XRP’s 7-day active addresses have seen a sharp decline over the past week, following a recent surge to new all-time highs. On March 19, the metric peaked at 1.22 million, signaling strong network activity and user engagement.
However, since then, it has plummeted to just 331,000—a drop of over 70%. This sudden fall suggests that interest in transacting on the XRP has cooled off significantly in a short span of time.

Tracking active addresses is a key way to gauge on-chain activity and overall network health. A rising number of active addresses typically reflects growing user participation, increased demand, and potential investor interest—factors that can support price strength.
Conversely, a sharp decline like the one XRP is currently experiencing can point to weakening momentum and fading interest, which could put additional pressure on price.
Unless user activity begins to rebound, this drop in network engagement may continue to weigh on XRP’s short-term outlook.
XRP Could Drop Below $2 Soon
XRP’s Exponential Moving Average (EMA) lines are currently signaling a strong downtrend, with the short-term EMAs positioned below the longer-term ones—a classic bearish alignment.
This setup indicates that recent price momentum is weaker than the longer-term average, often seen during sustained corrections. If this downtrend continues, XRP could retest the support level at $1.90.
A break below that could open the door to a deeper drop toward $1.77 in April.

However, if market sentiment shifts and XRP price manages to reverse course, the first key level to watch is the resistance at $2.22.
A successful breakout above this point could trigger renewed bullish momentum, potentially driving the price up to $2.47.
If that level also gets breached, XRP could push further to test the $2.59 mark.
Disclaimer
In line with the Trust Project guidelines, this price analysis article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. BeInCrypto is committed to accurate, unbiased reporting, but market conditions are subject to change without notice. Always conduct your own research and consult with a professional before making any financial decisions. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
Market
ONDO Whales Retreat as Price Risks Dropping Below $0.70

ONDO is facing notable downside pressure. It has been down over 5% in the last 24 hours and corrected more than 19% over the past 30 days. With its market cap now sitting around $2.5 billion, the coin is way below competitors like Chainlink and Mantra in terms of market cap.
Recent technical indicators and whale behavior suggest that the current weakness may not be over, despite a slight recovery in momentum.
ONDO RSI Is Recovering From Oversold Levels
ONDO’s Relative Strength Index (RSI) is currently sitting at 34 after rebounding slightly from an earlier dip to 27.5. Just two days ago, the RSI was at 54.39, indicating how quickly momentum has shifted.
The RSI is a momentum oscillator that measures the speed and magnitude of recent price changes. It ranges from 0 to 100.
Readings below 30 are typically considered oversold, suggesting the asset may be undervalued and due for a bounce, while readings above 70 are viewed as overbought, indicating potential for a pullback.

With ONDO’s RSI now at 34, it has technically exited oversold territory but remains near the lower end of the scale. This suggests that while the sharpest selling pressure may have eased, the market is still fragile ,and sentiment remains cautious.
If the RSI continues to recover and climbs above 40 or 50, it could signal a shift toward more bullish momentum.
However, if selling resumes and RSI falls back below 30, it would indicate renewed downside risk and potential for further price declines.
Whales Recently Stopped Their Accumulation
The number of ONDO whales—addresses holding between 1 million and 10 million ONDO—fluctuated in late March, initially increasing from 188 to 195 between March 22 and March 26 before declining to 191 in recent days.
This whale activity pattern is significant as these large holders often influence market sentiment and price movements, with their accumulation or distribution phases potentially foreshadowing broader market trends.
Tracking whale addresses provides valuable insights into how influential investors are positioning themselves, which can help predict potential price action.

The failure of Whale addresses to maintain the breakout above 195 and the subsequent return to 191 could signal bearish sentiment among larger investors.
This retreat might indicate that whales are taking profits or reducing exposure, which could create downward price pressure on ONDO in the short term.
When large holders begin to reduce their positions after a period of accumulation, it often precedes price corrections, suggesting that ONDO may experience resistance in maintaining upward momentum until whale confidence returns and accumulation resumes.
Will ONDO Fall Below $0.70 For The First Time Since November?
ONDO’s Exponential Moving Average (EMA) lines are currently aligned in a bearish formation, suggesting the ongoing downtrend may persist. If this weakness continues, ONDO could drop to test the key support level at $0.73.
A break below that would be significant, potentially sending the price under $0.70 for the first time since November 2024.
The token has been struggling to keep pace with other Real World Asset (RWA) coins like Mantra, and this underperformance adds further pressure to ONDO’s short-term outlook.

However, if sentiment shifts and ONDO manages to reverse its trend, the first key level to watch is the resistance at $0.82.
A breakout above this level could trigger a broader recovery, with price targets at $0.90 and $0.95.
If the RWA sector as a whole regains momentum, ONDO could even rise above the $1 mark and aim for the next major resistance at $1.23.
Disclaimer
In line with the Trust Project guidelines, this price analysis article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. BeInCrypto is committed to accurate, unbiased reporting, but market conditions are subject to change without notice. Always conduct your own research and consult with a professional before making any financial decisions. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
-
Bitcoin20 hours ago
El Salvador’s Nayib Bukele Open to White House Visit
-
Altcoin20 hours ago
Did XRP Price Just Hit $21K? Live TV Display Error Goes Viral
-
Altcoin14 hours ago
Pepe Coin Whale Sells 150 Billion Tokens, Price Fall Ahead?
-
Ethereum19 hours ago
Ethereum Breakdown, Analyst Eyes $1,130–$1,200 Price Target
-
Market13 hours ago
XRP Falls 12% in a Week as Network Activity Declines
-
Bitcoin19 hours ago
Bitcoin Price Could Surge To $95,000 — But Analyst Sounds ‘Bull Trap’ Alarm
-
Market19 hours ago
Dark Web Criminals Are Selling Binance and Gemini User Data
-
Altcoin16 hours ago
Expert Predicts Listing Date For WLFI’s USD1 Stablecoin, Here’s When