‬Trump‬‭’s economic policies‬‭ have‬‭ created‬‭ much‬‭ uncertainty in the past few months,‬‭ stunting stock markets and rocking investor confidence. However, as the United States faces a significant debt maturity of $7 trillion and high yields, theorists wonder whether Trump’s tariffs can get the Federal Reserve to bring interest rates down.

BeInCrypto spoke with Erwin Voloder, Head of Policy of the European Blockchain Association, and Vincent Liu, Chief Investment Officer at Kronos Research, to understand why Trump might be using tariff threats to boost American consumers’ purchasing power. They warn, however, that the risks far outweigh the benefits.

The US Debt Dilemma

The United States currently has a national debt of $36.2 trillion, the highest of any country in the world. This figure reflects the total sum of funds the federal government has acquired through borrowing to finance past expenditures.

In other words, the US owes foreign and domestic investors a lot of money. It will also have to repay certain loans in the next few months. 

When the government borrows money, it issues debt securities, like Treasury bills, notes, and bonds. These securities have a specific maturity date. Before this deadline, the government must pay back the original amount borrowed. In the next six months, the United States will have to pay back around $7 trillion in debt. 

The government has two options: It can either use available funds to repay the maturity debt or refinance it. If the federal government opts for the latter, it must take out further loans to repay the current debt, increasing the already ballooning national debt.

Since the US has a history of opting for the refinancing option, direct repayment seems unlikely. However, steep interest rates currently complicate refinancing.

High Interest Rates: An Obstacle to Debt Refinancing

Refinancing allows the government to roll over the debt, meaning it doesn’t need to find the money from available funds to pay off the old debt immediately. Instead, it can issue new debt to cover the old one. 

However, the Federal Reserve’s interest rate decisions significantly impact the federal government’s ability to refinance its debt. 

This week, the Federal Reserve announced that it will keep interest rates between 4.25% and 4.50%. The Reserve has steadily increased percentages past the 4% benchmark since 2022 to control inflation.

While this is good news for investors who expect higher yield returns on their bonds, it’s a bad outlook for the federal government. If it issues new debt to cover the old one, it would have to pay more in interest, which will strain the federal budget.

“In‬‭ practical‬‭ terms,‬‭ even‬‭ a‬‭ 1%‬‭ higher‬‭ interest‬‭ rate‬‭ on‬‭ $7‬‭ trillion equates to‬‭ $70 billion more in interest expense‬‭ per‬‭ year.‬‭ A‬‭ 2%‬‭ difference‬‭ would be $140‬‭ billion‬‭ extra‬‭ annually‬‭–‬‭ real‬‭ money that‬‭ could‬‭ otherwise‬‭ fund‬‭ programs‬‭ or‬‭ reduce‬‭ deficits,” Voloder told BeInCrypto, adding that “the‬‭ US‬‭ already‬‭ has‬‭ a‬‭ national‬‭ debt‬‭ exceeding‬‭ $36‬‭ trillion.‬‭ Higher‬‭ refinancing‬‭ rates‬‭ compound‬‭ the‬‭ debt‬‭ problem,‬‭ as‬‭ more‬‭ tax‬‭ revenue‬‭ must‬‭ go‬‭ just‬‭ to‬‭ pay‬‭ interest,‬‭ creating‬‭ a‬‭ vicious‬‭ cycle‬‭ of‬‭ larger‬‭ deficits‬‭ and‬‭ debt.”

This scenario indicates that the United States needs to proceed cautiously with its monetary policies. With looming debt repayment deadlines and concerns over inflation, the government should embrace stability over uncertainty. 

However, the Trump administration seems to be doing the opposite by threatening its neighbors with steep tariffs. The main question is: Why? 

Trump’s Tariff Policies: A Strategy or a Gamble?

During Trump’s first and second terms in office, he has continuously toyed with a tariff policy targeting his neighbors Canada and Mexico and his longtime rival China. 

In his most recent inaugural address, Trump reaffirmed his commitment to this trade policy, claiming it would bring money back into the United States.

“I will immediately begin the overhaul of our trade system to protect American workers and families. Instead of taxing our citizens to enrich other countries, we will tariff and tax foreign countries to enrich our citizens. For this purpose, we are establishing the External Revenue Service to collect all tariffs, duties, and revenues. It will be massive amounts of money pouring into our Treasury, coming from foreign sources,” Trump said.

However, the ensuing uncertainty about trade relationships and consequent retaliatory actions from affected countries have inevitably created instability, causing investors to react sharply to the news.

Earlier this month, markets experienced a widespread selloff, driven by anxieties surrounding Trump’s tariff policies. These resulted in a sharp decline in US stocks, a drop in Bitcoin’s value, and a surge in Wall Street’s fear index to its highest point of the year.

A similar scenario also played out during Trump’s first presidency.

“Intentionally rising economic uncertainty via tariffs carries steep risks: markets could overreact, plunging and increasing percentages for a possible recession, as seen in 2018’s trade war drop,” Liu said. 

Whenever traditional financial markets are affected, crypto also suffers by association.

“In the immediate term, Trump’s production-first, America-First economics means digital asset markets‬‭ must‬‭ grapple‬‭ with‬‭ higher‬‭ volatility‬‭ and‬‭ less‬‭ predictable‬‭ policy‬‭ inputs.‬‭ Crypto‬‭ is‬‭ not‬‭ isolated‬‭ from‬‭ macro‬‭ trends‬‭ and‬‭ is‬‭ trading‬‭ increasingly‬‭ in‬‭ tandem‬‭ with‬‭ tech‬‭ stocks‬‭ and‬‭ risk‬‭ conditions,” Voloder said.

While some view Trump’s measures as careless and erratic, others see them as calculated. Some analysts have viewed these policies as a means to get the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates. 

Is Trump Using Tariffs to Influence the Federal Reserve?

In a recent video, Anthony‬ Pompliano, CEO of Professional‬ Capital‬ Management‬‭, argued that Trump was trying to lower Treasury yields by intentionally creating economic uncertainty.

Tariffs can disrupt trade relationships by acting as taxes on imported goods, consequently increasing the cost of goods for consumers and businesses. Given that these policies are often a great source of economic uncertainty, they can create a sense of instability in the economy. 

As evidenced by the market’s strong reaction to Trump’s tariff announcements, investors were spooked out of fear of an economic slowdown or looming recession. Consequently, businesses might reduce risky investments while consumers limit spending to prepare for price spikes. 

Investor habits may also change. With less confidence in a volatile stock market, investors may shift from stocks to bonds to seek safe-haven assets. US Treasury bonds are considered one of the safest investments in the world. In turn, this flight to safety increases their demand.

When demand for bonds increases, bond prices go up. This series of events indicates that investors are bracing themselves for prolonged economic uncertainty. In response, the Federal Reserve may be more inclined to lower interest rates. 

Trump achieved this during his first presidency.

“The theory that tariffs could lift bond demand hinges on fear sparking market shifts. Tariff‬ uncertainty might trigger equity sell-offs, boosting Treasuries and lowering yields to ease $7 trillion in US debt refinancing evidenced by 2018, when trade shocks cut yields from 3.2% to‬ 2.7%. Yet, with inflation at 3-4% and yields at 4.8%, success is not guaranteed. This will require tariffs to be credible enough to adjust markets without stoking inflation,” Liu told BeInCrypto.

If the Reserve lowers interest rates, Trump can acquire new debt at a lower price to pay off the impending debt maturity. 

The plan may also benefit the average American consumer– to an extent.

Potential Benefits

Treasury yields are a benchmark for many other interest rates in the economy. Therefore, if Trump’s trade policies get Treasury yields to fall, this could have a trickle effect. The Federal Reserve could lower interest rates on other loans, such as mortgages, car loans, and student loans. 

In turn, borrowing rates would drop, and disposable income would increase. Thus, the average American citizen can contribute to overall economic growth with greater purchasing power. 

“For‬‭ an‬‭ American‬‭ family,‬‭ a‬‭ drop‬‭ in‬‭ mortgage‬‭ rates‬‭ can‬‭ mean‬‭ substantial‬‭ savings‬‭ on‬‭ monthly‬‭ payments‬‭ for‬‭ a‬‭ new‬‭ home‬‭ or‬‭ refinance.‬‭ Businesses‬‭ might‬‭ find‬‭ it‬‭ easier‬‭ to‬‭ finance‬‭ expansions‬‭ or‬‭ hire‬‭ new‬‭ workers‬‭ if‬‭ they‬‭ can‬‭ borrow‬‭ at‬‭ 3%‬‭ instead‬‭ of‬‭ 6%.‬‭ In‬‭ theory,‬‭ greater‬‭ access‬‭ to‬‭ low-interest‬‭ loans‬‭ could‬‭ stimulate‬‭ economic‬‭ activity‬‭ on‬‭ Main‬‭ Street,‬‭ aligning‬‭ with‬‭ Trump’s‬‭ goal‬‭ of‬‭ revving‬‭ growth,” Voloder explained. 

However, the theory relies on investors reacting very specifically, which is not guaranteed. 

“It’s a high-stakes bet with a narrow margin for error for success depending on many different economic‬ factors,” Liu said. 

In the end, the risks heavily outweigh the potential benefits. In fact, consequences can be grave. 

Inflation and Market Instability

The theory of deliberately causing market uncertainty hinges on the fact that the Federal Reserve would bring down interest rates. However, the Reserve is intentionally keeping interest rates high to contain inflation. A tariff war threatens to spur inflation.

“Yields‬‭ could‬‭ hit‬‭ 5%‬‭ if‬‭ inflation spikes, not drop, and [Jerome] Powell’s‬‭ high‬‭ odds‬‭ of‬‭ holding‬‭ rates‬‭ steadily‬‭ undermine‬‭ the‬‭ plan,” Liu said. 

To that point, Voloder added:

“If‬‭ the‬‭ plan‬‭ backfires‬‭ and‬‭ yields‬‭ don’t‬‭ fall‬‭ enough,‬‭ the‬‭ US might‬‭ end‬‭ up‬ ‭refinancing‬‭ at‬‭ high‬‭ rates‬‭ anyway‬‭ and‬‭ with‬‭ a‬‭ weaker‬‭ economy,‬‭ which‬‭ would‬‭ be‬‭ the‬‭ worst‬‭ outcome.”

Meanwhile, since tariffs directly increase the cost of imported goods, this cost is often passed on to consumers. This scenario creates higher prices for a wide range of products and causes inflationary pressures, eroding purchasing power and destabilizing the economy. 

“Inflation‬‭ stemming‬‭ from‬‭ tariffs‬‭ means‬‭ each‬‭ dollar‬‭ earned‬‭ buys‬‭ less.‬‭ This‬‭ stealth‬‭ tax‬‭ hurts‬‭ lower-income‬‭ families‬‭ the‬‭ most,‬‭ as‬‭ they‬‭ spend‬‭ a‬‭ higher‬‭ fraction‬‭ of‬‭ their‬‭ income‬‭ on‬‭ affected essentials,” Voloder said. 

In this context, the Reserve would likely hike Treasury yields. The scenario could also gravely affect the health of the United States’ job market economy.

Impact on Jobs and Consumer Confidence

The economic uncertainty of tariffs can deter businesses from continuing to invest in the United States. In this context, companies may delay or cancel expansion plans, reduce hiring, and cut back on research and development projects. 

“‬‭The‬‭ impact‬‭ on‬‭ jobs‬‭ is‬‭ a‬‭ major‬‭ concern.‬‭ Intentionally‬‭ cooling‬‭ the‬‭ economy‬‭ to‬‭ force‬‭ rate‬‭ cuts‬‭ is‬ ‭ essentially‬‭ flirting‬‭ with‬‭ higher‬‭ unemployment.‬‭ If‬‭ markets‬‭ drop‬‭ and‬‭ business‬‭ confidence‬‭ wanes,‬ ‭ companies‬‭ often‬‭ respond‬‭ by‬‭ cutting‬‭ back‬‭ on‬‭ hiring‬‭ or‬‭ even‬‭ laying‬‭ off‬‭ workers,” Voloder said.‭

Rising prices and market volatility could also damage consumer confidence. This dynamic would reduce consumer spending, which is a major driver of overall economic growth.

“Americans‬‭ face‬‭ higher‬‭ prices‬‭ and‬‭ eroded‬‭ purchasing‬‭ power‬‭ as‬‭ a‬‭ direct‬‭ result‬‭ of‬‭ tariffs‬‭ and‬‭ uncertainty.‬‭ Tariffs‬‭ on‬‭ everyday‬‭ goods‬‭ –‬‭from‬‭ groceries‬‭ to‬‭ electronics‬‭–‬‭ act‬‭ like‬‭ a‬‭ sales‬‭ tax‬‭ that‬‭ consumers‬‭ ultimately‬‭ pay.‬‭ These‬‭ costs‬‭ hit‬‭ consumers‬‭ at‬‭ a‬ ‭ time‬‭ when‬‭ wage‬‭ growth‬‭ may‬‭ stall‬‭ if‬‭ the‬‭ economy‬‭ slows.‬‭ So,‬‭ any‬‭ extra‬‭ cash‬‭ saved‬‭ from‬‭ lower‬ ‭interest‬‭ payments‬‭ could‬‭ be‬‭ offset‬‭ by‬‭ rising‬‭ prices‬‭ for‬‭ consumer‬‭ goods‬‭ and‬ ‭ possibly‬‭ higher‬‭ taxes‬‭ down‬‭ the‬‭ road‬‭,” Voloder told BeInCrypto.

The consequences are not just limited to the United States, however. As with any trade dispute, countries will feel inclined to respond– and recent weeks have proven that they already have.

Trade Wars and Diplomatic Tensions

Both countries responded sharply when Trump imposed 25% tariffs on products entering the US from Canada and Mexico.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau called the trade policy a “very dumb thing to do.” He then announced retaliatory tariffs on American exports and gave notice that a trade war would have consequences for both countries. Mexico’s President Claudia Sheinbaum did the same.

In response to Trump’s 20% tariff on Chinese imports, Beijing imposed retaliatory tariffs of up to 15% on various significant US agricultural products, including beef, chicken, pork, and soybeans.

Additionally, ten American companies now face restrictions in China after being placed on the country’s ‘reliable entity list.’ This list prevents them from engaging in import/export trade with China and limits their ability to make new investments there.

The Chinese Embassy in the United States also said that it wasn’t scared by intimidation. 

Tariffs will also have consequences beyond harming international relations.

Global Supply Chain Disruptions

International trade wars could disrupt global supply chains and harm export-oriented businesses. 

“From‬‭ a‬‭ macro‬‭ perspective‬‭ there‬‭ is‬‭ also‬‭ the‬‭ fear‬‭ of‬‭ trade‬‭ war‬‭ escalation‬‭ globally‬‭ which‬‭ could‬‭ have‬‭ the‬‭ boomerang‬‭ effect‬‭ of‬‭ denting‬‭ US‬‭ exports‬‭ and‬‭ manufacturing,‬‭ meaning‬‭ US‬‭ farmers‬‭ losing‬‭ export‬‭ markets‬‭ or‬‭ factories‬‭ facing‬‭ costlier‬‭ inputs.‬‭ This‬‭ global‬‭ tit-for-tat‬‭ could‬‭ amplify‬‭ the‬‭ downturn‬‭ and‬‭ also‬‭ strain‬‭ diplomatic‬‭ relations.‬‭ Additionally,‬‭ if‬‭ international‬‭ investors‬‭ see‬‭ US‬‭ policy‬‭ as‬‭ chaotic,‬‭ they‬‭ might‬‭ reduce‬‭ investment‬‭ in‬‭ the‬‭ US over‬‭ the‬‭ longer‬‭ term,” Voloder told BeinCrypto. 

Inflationary pressures and economic downturns could also push individuals to embrace digital assets.

“Additionally,‬‭ if‬‭ the‬‭ US pursues‬‭ mercantilist‬‭ policies‬‭ that‬‭ alienate‬‭ foreign‬‭ creditors‬‭ or‬‭ weaken‬‭ confidence‬‭ in‬‭ the‬‭ dollar’s‬‭ stability,‬‭ some‬‭ investors‬‭ might‬‭ increase‬‭ allocations‬‭ to‬‭ alternative‬‭ stores‬‭ of‬‭ value‬‭ like‬‭ gold‬‭ or‬‭ Bitcoin‬‭ as‬‭ a‬‭ hedge‬‭ against‬‭ currency‬‭ or‬‭ debt‬‭ crises,” Voloder explained.

Consumers might experience shortages of essential goods, while businesses would see increased production costs. Those that rely on imported materials and components would be particularly affected. 

A High-Risk Strategy: Is it Worth it?

The theory that tariffs could lower yields by creating uncertainty is a highly risky and potentially damaging strategy. The negative effects of tariffs, such as inflation, trade wars, and economic uncertainty, far outweigh potential short-term benefits.

As products become more expensive and businesses reduce their workforce to equilibrate their balance sheets, the average American consumer will experience the brunt of the consequences. 

Layer-1 (L1) coin KAVA emerged as the market’s top gainer on Friday, defying the broader downturn to post gains over the past 24 hours. While most cryptocurrencies have struggled within a narrow range in recent weeks, KAVA has surged, setting itself apart from the pack.

Now trading at a 30-day high, the altcoin shows strong bullish momentum and could be gearing up for even more upside. 

KAVA Defies Market Downtrend, Surges to 30-Day High 

KAVA is up 7% over the past day. It trades at a 30-day high of $0.55, bucking the general market decline to record 21% gains over the past month. With a strengthening bullish bias, the L1 coin eyes more gains. 

On the KAVA/USD one-day chart, the coin’s Aroon Up Line is at 100%, confirming the strength of its current uptrend. 

The indicator measures the strength of an asset’s price trends. It consists of two lines: Aroon Up, which tracks the time since the highest high, and Aroon Down, which tracks the time since the lowest low.

When the Aroon Up line is at 100% or near it, the asset has recently hit a new high and is in a strong uptrend. This is true of KAVA, which trades at its highest price in 30 days.  It reflects the strong bullish momentum in the coin’s spot markets, indicating that buyers are in control and its price may continue rising.

Further, the coin’s Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) setup confirms this bullish outlook. At press time, KAVA’s MACD line (blue) rests above its signal line (orange).

The MACD indicator measures the strength and direction of an asset’s momentum. It helps traders identify potential trend reversals and momentum shifts.

When the MACD line is above the signal line, it is a bullish signal, often interpreted by traders as a buy signal.

KAVA’s Uptrend Remains Intact, Eyeing a Three-Month High at $0.74

KAVA has traded within an ascending parallel channel since March 10. This bullish pattern is formed when an asset’s price moves between two upward-sloping parallel trendlines, indicating a sustained uptrend. 

It signals consistent higher highs and higher lows, showing strong bullish pressure as KAVA buyers dominate the market. If this continues, the coin’s price could break past resistance at $0.58 and climb toward a three-month high of $0.74. 

On the other hand, if buying activity weakens, KAVA could shed its recent gains and fall to $0.48.

Binance has recently launched two mechanisms that empower the community to decide on token listings (Vote to List) and delistings (Vote to Delist).

However, behind these two initiatives, a critical question arises: Is there any bias in how Binance manages its token portfolio?

BNB Chain Projects Dominate “Vote to List”

On March 20, 2025, Binance kicked off the first batch of “Vote to List.” Following this announcement, multiple new BNB Chain tokens, including Broccoli, KOMA, and BANANAS31, secured their listings on the world’s largest exchange.

This is similar to how Binance had opened a vote for the community to decide whether to list Pi Network’s Pi Coin.

A day later, on March 21, 2025, Binance made headlines again by introducing “Vote to Delist“. The first 21 tokens selected for potential delisting were JASMY, ZEC, FTT, ELF, SNT, STPT, BAL, ARK, GPS, MBL, PROS, CTXC, HARD, BETA, CREAM, FIRO, VIDT, NULS, TROY, ALPACA, and UFT. 

These events highlight Binance’s ambition to grant more decision-making power to the community. However, they also raise a critical question: Is there bias in how Binance manages its token portfolio? While BNB Chain dominates “Vote to List,” does “Vote to Delist” truly provide a fair playing field for projects from other blockchains?

“Vote to Delist”: Is Binance Favoring Its Ecosystem?

Interestingly, only ALPACA belongs to the BNB Chain among the 21 tokens targeted for delisting. The remaining represent Ethereum, Base, and other blockchain ecosystems. These tokens were flagged with a “Monitoring Tag” due to low liquidity, lack of team updates, or weak community engagement.

At this stage, the contrast between “Vote to List” and “Vote to Delist” reveals an interesting pattern. The process seems to lack balance in blockchain diversity, potentially favoring BNB Chain in listings while targeting external projects for delisting.

At the same time, while Binance’s listing criteria, like liquidity, project development, and community activity, apply to all tokens, non-BNB Chain projects often struggle to compete with the inherent advantages of tokens within the BNB Chain ecosystem.

Binance’s “Vote to List” and “Vote to Delist” mechanisms are significant steps toward community-driven governance. However, the disparity in blockchain representation raises concerns about fairness in token management.

Binance currently says this is a trial. It remains to be seen whether Binance will make adjustments to ensure a more level playing field or whether BNB Chain will continue to enjoy a privileged position on the exchange.