Market
AI Agents and Financial Protection: A Deep Dive with AgentLayer
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17454/17454bcc3cd9d19e56dd95b63bce1283be23c285" alt=""
AgentLayer is an innovative platform that increases the security and functionality of financial applications through advanced AI and blockchain integration. At its core, the platform’s AgentOS enables secure data management, multi-agent collaboration, and seamless communication, ensuring that financial operations are both efficient and protected.
With features like data encryption, access control, and proactive vulnerability detection, AgentLayer meets the demands of modern finance, safeguarding sensitive information. BeInCrypto sat down with the AgentLayer team to talk about how their platform is tackling real problems in financial tech using AI and blockchain. No fluff — just a deep dive into what’s working, what’s not, and where the industry is heading.
Can you detail how the core operating system, AgentOS, improves the security and functionality of financial applications? What special features or methods does it use to keep financial operations safe and efficient?
AgentOS allows to make financial applications both secure and efficient. It protects sensitive data by encrypting it during transmission and storage, ensuring that critical information like transaction history, ledger status, and smart contracts remain safe.
AgentOS leverages blockchain technology to decentralize and secure data, ensuring that no one can alter or tamper with it. The system also controls who can access and modify data through fine-tuned permission management. This ensures that only authorized agents can make changes, enhancing overall security.
AgentOS manages the network by regulating the nodes (connection points) that operate within it. These nodes are registered on the blockchain, and operators have to lock a deposit for each instance they own. If any node behaves maliciously, a fraud-proof mechanism penalizes the bad actor, which helps maintain the network’s integrity. The development team also uses tools like formal verification and static code scanning to proactively detect and fix vulnerabilities in the system’s code.
On the functionality side, AgentOS supports multi-agent collaboration through the AgentLink protocol. This allows different agents to communicate, collaborate, and share incentives, which improves decision-making and efficiency in financial applications. The system also integrates with blockchain technology, using its decentralized and transparent nature to increase
When developers create an agent, they can choose from a range of models, including the proprietary TrustLLM model, which is based on the Mixture of Experts (MoE) approach. This model helps to enhance performance, security, and multimodal generation capabilities, making it ideal for financial applications. AgentOS also facilitates service registration and management, allowing developers to deploy agents according to their business needs and register them on the blockchain with specified permissions.
The system’s routing protocol ensures that all agents can operate effectively together, allowing them to communicate and collaborate to complete complex tasks. This improves the overall performance and flexibility of financial applications.
How do AgentLink protocols help AI agents communicate and handle transactions securely? What specific security steps you take to keep these interactions safe and private?
AgentLink protocols ensure secure communication and transactions between AI agents, using several key mechanisms.
AgentLink defines how information is organized and shared across the network. This structure ensures efficient data transmission, even with limited bandwidth, reducing errors or interruptions. By simplifying and making messages more predictable, AgentLink improves the reliability of communication between AI agents.
To organize these interactions, AgentLink provides a structured framework within the AgentNetwork layer. This framework lays out clear communication protocols that dictate how agents share knowledge, exchange information, send commands, and retrieve results. Such a structured approach not only streamlines communication but also enhances security by minimizing the risk of miscommunication or unauthorized access. Agents always know where and how to send specific types of information, reducing vulnerabilities.
AgentLink also incorporates asynchronous data exchange through a shared message queue. This queue acts as a buffer, allowing agents to send and receive messages without needing immediate processing. This setup offers significant security advantages: if one agent faces issues or comes under attack, it won’t immediately affect the others. It also processes messages in a controlled manner, reducing the risk of overwhelming the system and preventing vulnerabilities.
To further secure communication, AgentLink formats and routes messages properly. Standardized formatting helps detect and filter out malicious or incorrect messages, while a clear routing system ensures messages reach the correct recipients without interception or misdirection by unauthorized parties.
Middleware, like the shared message queue, adds another layer of reliability. It acts as a safe holding area for messages, protecting against data loss or corruption during transmission. Strict access controls and encryption enhance security in the queue, ensuring only authorized agents access it and keep messages confidential.
Lastly, the separation of communication processes from real-time processing helps protect against attacks targeting the immediate handling of messages. If an attack occurs, the queue stores messages until resolving the issue.
Could you provide a real-world example where the AI agents can successfully detect and prevent a security breach?
One great example is the AGIS agent, which has proven to be incredibly effective at spotting and preventing security breaches, particularly in the world of blockchain. AGIS is an AI-driven tool that audits smart contracts by scanning the code for potential vulnerabilities. Impressively, it identified 21 vulnerabilities on its own before its full rollout, demonstrating its power and effectiveness.
AGIS uses advanced AI models, like its proprietary TrustLLM, which are specifically built to dig deep into smart contract code. These models scan the code for any signs of trouble, such as security flaws or logical errors. AGIS goes through a detailed process where it continuously scans and validates these potential problems, reducing the chances of false alarms and making sure it catches even the trickiest issues. During a recent competition, AGIS not only found these vulnerabilities but also won a significant prize, highlighting its top-notch capabilities.
Once the system detects a threat, AGIS takes a collaborative approach to auditing. It allows users to create tasks and set parameters, like rewards and deadlines, to attract auditors who can bring different perspectives. These auditors then discuss and agree on the issues, ensuring a thorough review. To keep everyone honest, AGIS uses a staking system with its own token, $AGIS. Auditors need to stake these tokens to participate, which means they have skin in the game. If they mess up, they risk losing their stake, which encourages careful and accurate work.
AGIS also tracks the reputation of its auditors and validators, rewarding those who do a good job and penalizing those who don’t. If there’s ever a disagreement over the findings, AGIS has a dispute resolution process in place, which can even involve a third-party arbitrator if necessary.
Overall, AGIS acts as a highly reliable “intelligent guardian” for blockchain security, continuously learning and improving to stay ahead of potential threats. It’s available on the AgentLayer testnet, where it collaborates with other AI agents to push the boundaries of what’s possible in Web3 security. Looking forward, AGIS will keep refining its auditing skills and expanding its capabilities.
How do large language models (LLMs) help detect fraud and improve security in the AgentLayer system? Can you give examples of where LLMs have been especially effective?
Large language models play a significant role in boosting security and detecting fraud within the AgentLayer ecosystem by thoroughly analyzing code and monitoring interactions.
One key way LLMs help is by conducting detailed audits of smart contracts. Tools like AGIS, which is part of AgentLayer, use advanced LLMs such as GPT-4, Llama 3, and TrustLLM to scan code for security flaws, logical errors, and inefficiencies. These models excel at spotting vulnerabilities that fraudsters could exploit. They can even catch complex, hidden issues that might slip past human auditors, making smart contracts much more secure.
LLMs are also crucial in understanding context and reviewing content in real-time. For example, when chatbots interact with users, LLMs can distinguish between legitimate requests and potentially harmful ones. If someone tries to manipulate a chatbot into revealing sensitive information, the LLM can detect the malicious intent and respond accordingly, preventing a security breach. This real-time monitoring helps ensure that chatbots only provide safe and appropriate responses, further safeguarding sensitive information.
When it comes to integrating chatbots with backend systems, LLMs help by making smarter decisions about access control. They can evaluate whether a request for sensitive data is legitimate based on predefined rules, preventing unauthorized access. Even if someone tries to exploit a vulnerability, the secure integration managed by LLMs ensures that critical backend data remains protected.
LLMs also play a role in verifying external data sources. They can analyze the content and origins of data from outside the system to determine whether it’s trustworthy. The LLM can block risky or unreliable data from entering the system, reducing the chance of compromising it.
In terms of real-world applications, LLMs have proven their effectiveness in high-profile smart contract auditing competitions. For instance, AGIS, equipped with LLMs, identified 21 potential vulnerabilities on its own. This early detection helps prevent fraud, such as unauthorized access to smart contracts or manipulation of contract terms.
What strategies and technologies does AgentLayer employ to protect data privacy, particularly when dealing with sensitive financial information? Can you discuss the platform’s approach to compliance with data protection regulations and any encryption standards used?
AgentLayer uses a variety of strategies and technologies to ensure data privacy, especially when handling sensitive financial information.
To start, the platform integrates advanced input validation and cleaning tools into its chatbots. These tools identify and block any malicious prompts that could target financial data. For example, if someone inputs something suspicious — like keywords associated with fraud — the system can catch it and prevent it from being processed.
AgentLayer also takes extra steps to secure how its chatbots interact with backend systems. It uses strict access controls, meaning that chatbots can only access the information necessary for their tasks. For instance, a chatbot might only see aggregated data rather than individual transactions. When pulling in data from external sources, the system carefully checks the source’s reputation, security certificates, and content to ensure it’s safe. This helps prevent any malicious data from sneaking in.
The platform also employs advanced context understanding and content review mechanisms. These help the chatbots distinguish between legitimate financial requests and those that could be harmful. If a chatbot is about to respond with sensitive financial information, the system reviews the response in real-time to ensure it doesn’t expose any critical details.
When it comes to compliance with data protection regulations like GDPR, AgentLayer takes this very seriously. The platform likely has a team or process dedicated to ensuring that its practices meet all necessary legal requirements. Regular audits and reviews keep everything in line with regulations. Users also have control over their data privacy settings, including the ability to opt out of certain data collection activities or request that their data be deleted.
How do AI agents on the AgentLayer platform use predictive analytics to identify and reduce financial risks? What types of data and analysis methods do they use to predict and address these risks?
The AI agents on the AgentLayer platform use predictive analytics to spot and manage potential financial risks in a few key ways. They start by performing detailed audits of smart contracts. For example, AGIS, one of the AI agents, carefully examines the code for any vulnerabilities, like security flaws or logical errors, that could lead to financial problems. By catching these issues early, the platform helps ensure the integrity of financial transactions.
Another way the platform gathers useful data is through its chatbots, which interact with users. These chatbots can pick up on concerns or questions related to financial transactions, and this information is analyzed to spot emerging risks. The system is also equipped to detect potentially harmful prompts during these interactions, which helps prevent fraud before it happens.
AgentLayer doesn’t stop there — it also taps into external data sources, like financial market data and industry trends. This helps the platform understand the broader context in which transactions are taking place, giving it a better chance to foresee risks.
On the technical side, the platform uses advanced language models like GPT-4 and TrustLLM to analyze the data it collects. These models can identify patterns or anomalies that might indicate financial risks. For instance, if a chatbot conversation includes signs of confusion or concern, the system can flag this as a potential issue.
The platform is also great at understanding the context of these interactions. It can tell the difference between legitimate financial requests and ones that might be suspicious. By continuously monitoring and reviewing chatbot outputs in real-time, it can catch and address potential risks before they escalate.
When it comes to predicting specific risks, the AI agents use sophisticated models to assign risk scores to different scenarios. By looking at past data, they can predict the likelihood of certain risks, like the chance of a smart contract being exploited. This allows the platform to take proactive steps, like notifying users, tightening security, or adjusting contract settings to minimize exposure.
When a risk is detected, the platform can take immediate action. This might include sending alerts to the relevant parties or beefing up security measures, such as stricter access controls or increased encryption. The platform also supports collaborative auditing, where experienced auditors can work together to review and resolve potential risks.
Finally, AgentLayer constantly monitors the effectiveness of these measures and uses the feedback to improve its predictive analytics. By learning from past experiences, the AI agents get better at spotting and managing risks in the future.
How do AgentLink protocols help AI agents work together securely and efficiently when handling financial data? What key security measures are in place to prevent data breaches and ensure smooth data management?
AgentLink protocols make sure that multiple AI agents can work together efficiently and securely, especially when managing sensitive financial data. They define how information and messages are formatted and transmitted across the network, optimizing the process even under limited bandwidth conditions. This reduces the likelihood of errors or interruptions that could compromise financial data.
The platform provides a structured framework for interaction, making it easier for agents to share knowledge, exchange information, send commands, and retrieve results. This well-organized communication process helps minimize the risk of miscommunication or unauthorized access, as agents know exactly where and how to send specific types of information.
AgentLink also uses asynchronous data exchange, with a shared message queue allowing agents to send and receive messages without needing immediate processing. This is particularly beneficial when managing financial data, as it ensures that if one agent encounters a problem or comes under attack, it doesn’t affect the others. The message queue also controls the flow of information, preventing system overload and reducing security risks.
Additionally, separating the communication process from immediate processing helps protect against real-time attacks. If an attacker tries to disrupt the processing of financial messages, the queue can still hold and store these messages until the issue is resolved. This separation allows for more thorough security checks on messages, enhancing overall security when agents handle financial data.
Can you explain the steps involved in training an AI agent on the AgentLayer platform for specific financial tasks? What are the key stages, from collecting data to fine-tuning models, and how is the agent’s performance measured?
Training an AI agent on the AgentLayer platform to handle specific financial tasks involves several key stages. It begins with data acquisition, where the agent accesses various types of data. For instance, it can analyze smart contract audits to detect vulnerabilities and potential risks by looking for security flaws, logical errors, and inefficiencies that might impact financial transactions.
Chatbot interactions are another valuable data source. As chatbots engage with users, they collect data on financial inquiries and concerns, providing insights into common issues and user needs. Additionally, the agent can integrate external data sources, such as financial market data, economic indicators, and industry trends, to better understand the broader context of the financial tasks at hand.
Once the data is collected, it undergoes preprocessing and preparation. This involves cleaning the data to remove noise and irrelevant information, such as filtering out malicious prompts or incorrect financial inputs. For sensitive financial information, the data stays anonymous to protect user privacy.
Next comes model selection and initial training. On the AgentLayer platform, developers choose an appropriate base model from options like Mistral, Llama, or the proprietary TrustLLM. The initial training involves feeding the preprocessed data into the model and adjusting its parameters to learn patterns and relationships within the financial data.
After the initial training, the model undergoes fine-tuning. This step uses specific financial datasets related to the targeted task—such as analyzing financial statements—allowing the model to become more specialized. Techniques like transfer learning and domain adaptation allow to make the model more effective for financial applications, while advanced methods like Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) technology and knowledge matching enhance the model’s ability to handle complex financial data.
Finally, performance evaluation is critical to ensure the agent meets its objectives. This involves measuring the accuracy of the agent’s predictions or outputs, such as how well it predicts financial risks or analyzes financial data. User feedback helps to understand how the agent performs in real-world applications, including ratings and suggestions for improvement. Real-world testing is also conducted by applying the agent in actual financial scenarios or controlled environments to simulate real transactions and tasks, ensuring that it performs effectively outside of the training environment.
How does AgentLayer make sure its AI agents follow global financial regulations and standards? What processes are in place to keep them updated with changing regulations?
AgentLayer takes several steps to ensure that its AI agents comply with global financial regulations and standards. To start, the platform uses input validation and data cleaning tools in its chatbots to block any malicious prompts and anonymize sensitive financial information. This helps protect user privacy and ensures that the handling of personal and financial data meets regulatory requirements. Additionally, AgentLayer integrates with backend systems using strict access controls and role management, which limits who can access sensitive financial data, ensuring compliance with data security regulations.
Auditing and monitoring are also key components of AgentLayer’s compliance strategy. AI agents like AGIS perform thorough smart contract audits to detect vulnerabilities that could affect financial transactions. By securing these operations, AgentLayer aligns with the regulatory standards that govern financial systems. The platform also employs content understanding and review mechanisms within its chatbots to monitor and filter responses, preventing the leakage of sensitive information and adhering to data protection regulations.
To keep up with changes in global regulations, AgentLayer likely has a dedicated team or process that continuously monitors regulatory updates. This might involve subscribing to industry newsletters, participating in regulatory forums, and working with legal and financial experts to stay informed about new or emerging standards. Regular reviews of these regulatory changes help the platform assess their impact and ensure that its AI agents remain compliant.
The platform is designed to be flexible, allowing it to quickly adapt to new regulatory requirements. This means that AgentLayer can easily update its AI agents and systems as needed, such as enhancing encryption standards or tightening access controls in response to new regulations.
Collaboration is another key aspect of AgentLayer’s approach. The platform works with regulatory bodies, industry associations, and academic institutions to gain insights into the latest trends and best practices. This proactive approach helps AgentLayer anticipate regulatory changes and adjust its operations accordingly. The platform also seeks expert advice from legal and financial professionals to ensure ongoing compliance, which may include regular audits and reviews by external experts.
Can you share any new features or updates that AgentLayer? How will these changes help the platform better handle emerging threats?
AgentLayer is making key updates across its platform. On September 10, the staking feature for AGENT tokens and APGN Yields launched, allowing investors to earn substantial returns. With only a week left before the Token Generation Event (TGE), investors are urged to take advantage of the staking opportunity.
We’re also preparing for the listing of AgentLayer’s native token on major cryptocurrency exchanges like Gate.io, BingX, Uniswap, and Aerodrome. The listing, set for September 18, 2024, at 19:00 Singapore Time, will increase trading opportunities for investors and enhance the financial ecosystem.
AgentLayer is also upgrading its use of large language models (LLMs) like TrustLLM to better detect complex fraud and unusual patterns in financial data. By working with more diverse datasets and applying advanced techniques, the platform aims to catch new types of scams.
The platform is enhancing its risk analysis tools, using machine learning to study past data and market trends, which will help identify threats early. It will also monitor financial activities in real-time to catch suspicious behavior, such as unusual transaction patterns.
On the security front, AgentLayer is exploring advanced encryption technologies, including quantum-resistant methods, to better protect financial data. Multi-factor and biometric authentication will also be introduced to boost security for users.
Disclaimer
In compliance with the Trust Project guidelines, this opinion article presents the author’s perspective and may not necessarily reflect the views of BeInCrypto. BeInCrypto remains committed to transparent reporting and upholding the highest standards of journalism. Readers are advised to verify information independently and consult with a professional before making decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
Market
3 Meme Coins to Watch For The Last Week of February 2025
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86c8c/86c8cefa66acb6938f2dad9d94aa6ff2603248ab" alt=""
DOGEai, TST, and BROCCOLI are three meme coins drawing attention for the last week of February. DOGEai, launched on Solana, is up 110% in the past seven days, positioning itself as a leading AI meme coin.
TST remains one of the most popular meme coins on the BNB chain despite a recent correction. At the same time, BROCCOLI, inspired by Binance co-founder CZ’s dog, has also seen significant volatility.
DOGEai (DOGEAI)
DOGEai is an artificial intelligence coin launched on Solana. Its market cap is now $32 million, up 82% in the last seven days. This rise has positioned DOGEai as one of the most talked-about AI meme coins in recent days.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc5d3/bc5d30537dec8a8458470d8555e55401d44373da" alt="DOGEAI Price Analysis."
DOGEai leverages multiple narratives, including Dogecoin’s popularity, the growing interest in DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency), and the broader AI cryptos trend. It defines itself as “an autonomous AI agent here to uncover waste and inefficiencies in government spending and policy decisions,” offering bill summaries and insights into government expenditures.
If the current uptrend continues, DOGEai could test the resistance at $0.048, with potential targets at $0.059 and $0.069. However, if a downtrend emerges, DOGEai has support at $0.030, and if that level is lost, it could drop to $0.018 or even $0.0092.
Test (TST)
TST has emerged as one of the most popular meme coins on the BNB chain, benefiting from the chain’s growing volume, which recently even surpassed Solana.
In the days following its launch, TST reached a market cap close to $500 million, then entered a strong correction phase. Its market cap has since dropped to $78 million.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/443c2/443c25e3ca4aa3bd5e2a1d4d7cc94ddb9c568c05" alt="TST Price Analysis."
If the BNB narrative gains strength again, TST could benefit as one of its most popular meme coins and may test the resistance at $0.10. A breakout above this level could push TST to $0.20 or even $0.25 if buying pressure intensifies.
However, if TST fails to regain strong upward momentum, it could test the support at $0.0719 and potentially drop to its lowest levels since February 9.
CZ’S Dog (BROCCOLI)
BROCCOLI was launched a few weeks ago after Binance co-founder CZ revealed his dog’s name, sparking a flood of BROCCOLI tokens on the market.
The largest of these tokens quickly surged to a $249 million market cap in its early days but has since dropped to $52 million.
Like TST, BROCCOLI benefited from the recent rise of the BNB ecosystem but has since entered a strong correction phase. It is down 40% in the last seven days.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0eaf/e0eafad0b8f5f8853a1a9776e73fca3d4426ce0a" alt="BROCCOLI Price Analysis."
If the downtrend continues, BROCCOLI could test support near $0.04, and a break below this level could push it to its lowest price since launch.
However, if the BNB ecosystem and meme coins regain traction, BROCCOLI could benefit, especially given the popularity of dog-related meme coins like Dogecoin and Shiba Inu. In this bullish scenario, BROCCOLI could rise to test the resistance at $0.113.
Disclaimer
In line with the Trust Project guidelines, this price analysis article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. BeInCrypto is committed to accurate, unbiased reporting, but market conditions are subject to change without notice. Always conduct your own research and consult with a professional before making any financial decisions. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
Market
Ethereum Rollback Debate Intensifies After Bybit Hack
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5bb5a/5bb5ac1d2291f2f418ab6299d4adab2c2f5c7640" alt=""
The crypto community is divided over calls for an Ethereum blockchain rollback following a massive security breach at Bybit.
On February 21, the exchange lost nearly $1.5 billion in ETH to hackers, sparking discussions about whether Ethereum should intervene to recover the stolen funds.
What is a Blockchain Rollback?
A blockchain rollback, also known as a reorganization, involves reversing confirmed transactions to restore the network to an earlier state.
This process usually happens after a major security breach or exploit. Validators must reach a consensus to discard the affected blocks, effectively erasing the malicious transactions.
Despite its potential benefits, a rollback remains a controversial and rarely used measure due to its impact on a blockchain’s trust and decentralization.
Blockchains operate on the principle of immutability, meaning transactions are expected to be final once confirmed. So, rolling back transactions challenges this principle, raising concerns about the security and reliability of the network.
Crypto Leaders Clash Over Ethereum Rollback Proposal
BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes has been vocal in advocating for a rollback to solve the ByBit hack. He pointed to the 2016 DAO hack, where Ethereum underwent a hard fork to recover stolen funds, as precedent.
Hayes argued that since Ethereum previously compromised on immutability, another intervention should not be off the table.
“My own view as a mega ETH bag holder is ETH stopped being money in 2016 after the DAO hack hardfork. If the community wanted to do it again, I would support it because we already voted no on immutability in 2016,” Hayes said.
JAN3 CEO Samson Mow also supported the rollback, stating it could prevent North Korea from using the stolen funds to fund its nuclear weapons program.
However, not everyone agrees. Pseudonymous crypto trader Borovik strongly opposed the idea, arguing that a rollback would jeopardize Ethereum’s credibility and neutrality.
Bitcoin advocate Jimmy Song also dismissed the possibility, stating that the Bybit hack cannot be compared to the 2016 DAO exploit. Song emphasized that the DAO hack allowed for a 30-day intervention, whereas the Bybit attack is already finalized, making a rollback impractical.
“I know people are expecting the Ethereum Foundation to roll back the chain, but I suspect it’s already too much of a mess to do it cleanly,” Song added.
Meanwhile, Ethereum supporter Adriano Feria introduced an alternative perspective. He argued that Bybit could have avoided this situation by using a Layer 2 (L2) solution with conditional reversible transactions.
According to Feria, blockchain technology needs some form of reversibility to ensure real-world adoption.
“Whether through social recovery or another pre-determined, immutable, and transparent decision-making process, real-world mass adoption will not work without reversible transactions. Without this capability, transactional activity will inevitably gravitate toward TradFi systems that already provide it,” Feria stated.
This debate raises a fundamental question for Ethereum: should it prioritize immutability or intervene in extreme cases?
While some see a rollback as a necessary response to an unprecedented loss, others fear it could undermine the core principles of decentralization. Ethereum’s next steps will likely shape its long-term credibility and trust within the crypto space.
Disclaimer
In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
Market
Berachain (BERA) Falls 15% After Recent Rally Surge
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed333/ed3331c19c9a764a4759fe2f1befc99c5679666d" alt=""
Berachain (BERA) is down almost 15% in the last 24 hours, with its market cap now at $778 million, although its price remains up nearly 20% over the past seven days. This sharp pullback comes after a strong rally between February 18 and February 20, when BERA reached levels above $8.5.
BERA’s Relative Strength Index (RSI) has dropped from overbought levels, signaling a loss of bullish momentum, while its Directional Movement Index (DMI) shows growing bearish pressure. As BERA navigates this correction phase, it faces key support at $6.1, with potential resistance levels at $8.5, $9.1, and $10 if bullish momentum returns.
BERA RSI Is Dropping Steadily After Touching Overbought Levels
Berachain Relative Strength Index (RSI) is currently at 50.6, down sharply from 86.7 just two days ago when its price surged above $8.5. RSI is a momentum oscillator that measures the speed and change of price movements, ranging from 0 to 100.
It is commonly used to identify overbought or oversold conditions, with values above 70 indicating overbought levels and below 30 suggesting oversold territory.
The steep decline in BERA’s RSI reflects a significant loss of bullish momentum after reaching overbought levels above 86, where a correction was likely.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fdb7f/fdb7f04bcb855e5a19437d3270be3ea659bfdb1c" alt="BERA RSI."
With RSI now at 50.6, BERA is in a neutral zone, suggesting that buying and selling pressures are relatively balanced.
This could indicate a period of consolidation as the market digests recent gains. If RSI continues to decline below 50, it could signal increasing bearish momentum. This could lead to a further price drop for BERA.
Conversely, if RSI stabilizes and begins to rise, it could suggest renewed buying interest and a potential recovery in Berachain price.
BERA DMI Chart Shows Buyers Are Losing Control
Berachain Directional Movement Index (DMI) chart shows its Average Directional Index (ADX) currently at 50.5, after peaking at 60.2 yesterday, up from just 13.3 five days ago. ADX is an indicator used to measure the strength of a trend, regardless of its direction, ranging from 0 to 100.
Values above 25 typically indicate a strong trend, while values below 20 suggest a weak or sideways market. The sharp rise in ADX reflects a significant increase in trend strength, confirming that BERA has been experiencing strong directional movement recently.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10597/105973409ada12968dbea00cdf3992a6e6d7e2fc" alt="BERA DMI."
Meanwhile, BERA’s +DI is at 24.4, down from 48.4 two days ago, indicating weakening bullish momentum. Meanwhile, -DI has risen to 15.1 from 4.9, suggesting growing bearish pressure.
This shift signals that the bullish trend that drove prices higher is losing steam, and selling interest is beginning to increase.
If -DI continues to rise above +DI, it could indicate a bearish crossover, signaling a potential reversal or deeper correction in BERA’s price. However, if +DI stabilizes and moves upward again, it could suggest a continuation of the uptrend, albeit with reduced momentum.
Will Berachain Fall Below $6 Soon?
Berachain surged 53% between February 18 and February 20, pushing its price above $8.5 after the coin struggled following its airdrop. However, after this sharp rally, BERA entered a correction phase and is currently down almost 15% in the last 24 hours.
This pullback suggests profit-taking and a shift in market sentiment as buyers hesitate to push prices higher. If the downtrend continues, BERA could soon test the support at $6.1, and a break below this level could lead to a further decline towards $5.48, reflecting increased selling pressure.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68ef7/68ef76913d796be08c3aa53190ef03840c6d9d0c" alt="BERA Price Analysis."
On the other hand, if Berachain can regain its bullish momentum from a few days ago, it could rise above $8.5 again, potentially testing the next resistance levels at $9.1 or even $10.
To confirm this bullish scenario, Berachain would need to see renewed buying interest and strong upward momentum. If buyers can defend key support levels and push the price above resistance zones, it could indicate the continuation of the uptrend.
Disclaimer
In line with the Trust Project guidelines, this price analysis article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. BeInCrypto is committed to accurate, unbiased reporting, but market conditions are subject to change without notice. Always conduct your own research and consult with a professional before making any financial decisions. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
-
Altcoin18 hours ago
BTC, ETH Drop As $566M Liquidated Amid Bybit Hack
-
Market17 hours ago
FTX Survey Shows Crypto ReInvestment and Possible Bias
-
Ethereum16 hours ago
Grayscale’s Ethereum ETF On The Brink Of Major Change With NYSE’s Staking Proposal
-
Altcoin21 hours ago
Analyst Identifies Key Support For Cardano Price Bullish Momentum
-
Market20 hours ago
Solana Price Shows Recovery Signs as Bearish Pressure Eases
-
Market19 hours ago
Onyxcoin (XCN) Technical Indicators Hint at Major Breakout
-
Market18 hours ago
Top AI Coins From This Week: IP, CLANKER, $DOGEAI
-
Market22 hours ago
Franklin Templeton Files For Solana Staking ETF