Bitcoin
OKX Chief Marketing Officer Highlights Economic Dangers of a US Strategic Bitcoin Reserve

Bitcoin enthusiasts have long touted the creation of a strategic Bitcoin reserve as a hedge against inflation that can reduce the national debt and reinforce the United States’ position as a global financial leader.
Its implementation could also unleash several damaging effects on the US economy, with consequences rippling across the globe. BeInCrypto spoke with Haider Radique, the Chief Marketing Officer at OKX Exchange, to break down the risks of creating a strategic Bitcoin reserve.
Strategic Bitcoin Reserves Grow in Popularity
The concept of a strategic Bitcoin reserve has gained notable popularity over the years, both in the United States and worldwide.
A strategic reserve is a stock of crucial resources acquired by the federal government that can be used to address significant supply disruptions. Many crypto enthusiasts have been campaigning for governments to adopt Bitcoin as a strategic reserve.
In the United States, 15 states have already introduced or passed bills to do just this. Republican Wyoming Senator Cynthia Lummis was one of the first politicians to introduce this type of legislation at a federal level.
Lummis calls for the US Treasury to acquire one million Bitcoin over five years in her proposed BITCOIN Act. The Bitcoin reserve would be kept intact for at least 20 years.
Countries like Germany, Switzerland, Russia, Brazil, and Poland have also taken steps in the same direction. However, several major players in the finance industry fear intense economic instability and pervasive market volatility if a strategic Bitcoin reserve is created.
This fear is particularly relevant if the United States were to establish such a reserve, given its role as the custodian of global trade and issuer of the world’s reserve currency.
“On its face, the idea of a Bitcoin National Reserve seems like a good one – it would serve as an endorsement of Bitcoin by the United States, and it would certainly have the potential to ignite markets in the short term. But if you look under the hood, there may be a number of downsides that should cause the industry to pause and reflect on potential negative long-term consequences,” Radique told BeInCrypto.
Understanding how a reserve works is vital to comprehend the associated risks.
Bitcoin Stockpiles vs. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve
With Donald Trump as the new US president, Bitcoin enthusiasts are bracing themselves for a real shot at creating the long-awaited reserve.
Two weeks ago, Trump signed an executive order to establish a national digital stockpile. The order called for the creation of a working group to explore this possibility. The group has until July to submit a report on the criteria for such a stockpile.
Some participants in the crypto community were disheartened by this move, given that the nature of the order was particularly distinct from a Bitcoin reserve. While the concept of a stockpile derives from seized assets mainly produced from illicit activity, a reserve implies purchasing additional Bitcoin.
The United States already has the biggest Bitcoin stockpile in the world. The federal government holds at least 198,800 BTC acquired through government seizures, currently valued at approximately $19 billion. Countries that trail behind it are China, the United Kingdom, El Salvador, and Ukraine.

A Bitcoin reserve, by contrast, would require the purchase of more Bitcoin. Lummis proposes this approach in her BITCOIN Act. According to her plan, Bitcoin would be directly linked to the US dollar in order to bolster the currency. Essentially, this vision entails a monetary system where Bitcoin takes on an active role.
The pressing need to introduce such a drastic change to the United States’ current monetary system remains unclear.
Debate Over Bitcoin’s Role as a Reserve Asset
Returning to the definition of a strategic reserve, the federal government purchases these commodities in times of economic need. Most economists refer to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve as a key example of the concept.
In 1975, President Gerald Ford created the reserve when Arab members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) imposed an oil embargo against the United States that sent shockwaves throughout the American economy.
The legislation mandated the storage of up to one billion barrels of petroleum, recognizing its critical role in the economy. Without petroleum, economic activity would cease.
These reserves continue to serve a critical purpose. In response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, President Biden recently tapped into these reserves to ease the strain on energy prices.
On the other hand, Bitcoin does not serve a critical purpose that warrants this sort of urgent stashing, nor is its use crucial to the functioning of the US economy. Its role as a strategic asset remains largely unclear.
Furthermore, acquiring large amounts of Bitcoin would likely lead to significant market volatility rather than economic stability. If the United States were to purchase large quantities, it would quickly reduce the supply available on the market.
“If the US government decided to acquire large swathes of Bitcoin, the short term liquidity in markets would be constrained, which could entail massive volatility in both directions. We should remember that the vast majority of Bitcoin addresses –nearly 72% according to CoinMarketCap– are long-term holders of more than one year. A mass acquisition of Bitcoin could therefore constrain liquidity further in the short term,” Radique explained.
These sharp movements in Bitcoin supply would also worry investors.
Impact on Dollar Confidence
If the United States were to create a strategic Bitcoin reserve, investors could interpret this as the federal government deciding to back the US dollar with the digital asset rather than gold. In other words, the US would send signals of a loss of confidence in the current dollar-based system.
In a recent opinion article, Nic Carter used this argument to advocate against creating a Bitcoin reserve.
“The US considering a near term abandonment of the current, relatively stable monetary system and replacing it with a monetary standard not based on gold, but a highly volatile, emerging asset, would cause utter panic among its creditors. In my view, if we even got close to a Lummis-style reserve, markets would anticipatorily start to go berserk, and Trump would be forced to withdraw the policy,” he stated.
The same effect would occur if the United States chose to sell part of its Bitcoin reserves.
Liquidation Risks
If the United States were to purchase additional Bitcoin, it would also choose when to sell it.
“Despite the emergence of bipartisan support for crypto in the US political system recently, government policy can change quickly. Therefore, as circumstances change over time, the concentration of large amounts of Bitcoin on a country’s balance sheet could represent a liquidation risk,” Radique told BeInCrypto.
Previous instances where governments sold portions of their Bitcoin stockpile holdings have shown how such actions can significantly impact the market.
“We only need to look to last year, when the German government sold around 50,000 BTC, to see what such a move could do to markets. This is often cited as a key downside of a strategic Bitcoin reserve by critics,” Radique added.
Germany sold all of its Bitcoin holdings last July to comply with a federal law that mandates the liquidation of seized digital assets. The large Bitcoin sell-off in a short period caused the price of Bitcoin to drop.
In November, a similar situation occurred in the United States when the government transferred over $2 billion in Bitcoin to third-party wallets. This move sparked price drops and raised concerns among investors about potential future auctions.
Questions would also arise over the implications of the federal government’s ownership over such large amounts of Bitcoin.
Concerns Over Centralization
For many, the idea of a strategic Bitcoin reserve could appear to conflict with one of Bitcoin’s core principles: decentralization.
This philosophy, which lies at the heart of Bitcoin, ensures that no single entity can control the entire network. However, if the US government were to start acquiring Bitcoin in large volumes, it could spark concerns about centralization.
If the US Treasury were to control a significant portion of the Bitcoin supply, it could influence the market. Such control might allow the government to impact Bitcoin prices, which goes against its decentralized nature.
Overregulation risks also arise as institutional adoption of digital assets expands across public and private sectors.
“It is our collective responsibility as Bitcoiners to advocate for this technology to be as accessible as possible while preserving its original philosophy and peer-to-peer utility,” said Radique.
As the debate over the adoption of a strategic Bitcoin reserve continues, a measured approach will benefit its implementation.
The Case for Patience
One reassuring aspect of this ongoing debate is the understanding that expediting the process might be unnecessary. Since Bitcoin is not an essential commodity for the proper functioning of the US economy, establishing a strategic reserve is not an immediate priority.
Bitcoin has existed for less than two decades. Allowing the market more time to mature also reduces the asset’s volatility in the long run.
“Bitcoin has gone from a little-known cypherpunk invention to a global cultural phenomenon and accessible, institutionalized asset in a remarkably short time,” Radique explained.
By taking a wait-and-see approach, Bitcoin could evolve into a more reliable and liquid asset, making it a viable option for the US government to include in its portfolios in the future.
The post OKX Chief Marketing Officer Highlights Economic Dangers of a US Strategic Bitcoin Reserve appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Bitcoin
Four Weeks of Crypto Outflows: Is Investor Confidence Collapsing?

Crypto outflows totaled $876 million last week, completing a successive streak of negative flows in the previous four weeks.
This continued sell-off has resulted in cumulative outflows of $4.75 billion over the past month, significantly reducing the year-to-date inflows to $2.6 billion. Resultantly, total assets under management (AuM) have declined by $39 billion from their peak, now standing at $142 billion—the lowest level since mid-November 2024.
Crypto Outflows Reach $876 Million
The latest CoinShares report indicates that US investors primarily drove the outflows, withdrawing $922 million from digital asset investment products. This bearish sentiment in the US contrasted with other regions, where investors saw the recent market pullback as a buying opportunity.

Meanwhile, Bitcoin remained the primary focus of crypto outflows last week. According to the report, investors pulled $756 million from BTC investment products over the past week. Notably, short-Bitcoin products—designed to profit from price declines—also saw outflows of $19.8 million, the largest since December 2024.
This suggests that some investors may be nearing a point of capitulation in their Bitcoin investments, closing their short positions as uncertainty looms.
Notwithstanding, last week’s crypto outflows marked another significant decline following prior weeks of sustained withdrawals. In the first week of March, digital asset investment products saw record-breaking outflows of $2.9 billion. As BeInCrypto reported, this was fueled by weak investor sentiment and heightened market fear.
This had come on the heels of $508 million in outflows the previous week, amid investor caution, and $415 million in withdrawals before that, following the Federal Reserve’s hawkish rhetoric and concerns over inflation.
The Federal Reserve’s stance on monetary policy has shaped investor behavior in recent months. As inflation exceeds expectations, the Fed has signaled that interest rates may remain elevated for an extended period, reducing liquidity in financial markets and weighing on risk assets like crypto.
“We do not need to be in a hurry, and are well positioned to wait for greater clarity,” Fed chair Jerome Powell stated last week.
With four straight weeks of outflows and persistent macroeconomic headwinds, the crypto market remains under pressure. While certain assets like Solana (SOL) and XRP continue to attract inflows, the overall sentiment remains bearish, particularly among US investors.
If market conditions fail to improve, further outflows could follow in the coming weeks, reinforcing the cautious approach among investors.
Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs Reflect Bearish Sentiment
The negative sentiment extended beyond Bitcoin, affecting blockchain-related equity exchange-traded products (ETPs). CoinShares’ latest report indicates outflows of $48 million during the same period for these financial instruments.
This decline reflects a broader risk-off sentiment, with investors exercising caution across the digital asset sector. It aligns with a recent BeInCrypto report, which showed that Bitcoin ETFs (exchange-traded funds) recorded four weeks of net outflows surpassing $4.5 billion.
Similarly, Ethereum ETFs continued their negative trend, logging a second consecutive week of net outflows. These negative flows come despite anticipation of last week’s White House Crypto Summit. The outflows suggest macroeconomic concerns and strategic market positioning overshadowed the event’s impact.
The general sentiment is that Trump’s tariffs cause the sour sentiment and weaken investor confidence. However, some crypto analysts hold different opinions, ascribing outflows from crypto investment products to hedge funds’ trading strategies.
“…hedge funds don’t care about Bitcoin. They were farming low-risk yield. Now that the trade is dead, they’re pulling liquidity—leaving the market in free fall…This is a classic case of liquidity games. ETFs didn’t just bring in long-term holders—they brought in hedge funds running short-term arbitrage,” crypto analyst Kyle Chassé explained.
Disclaimer
In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
Bitcoin
Solana ETF, BTC Summit, and More

This week in crypto, several big news are in the pipeline, capable of influencing the portfolios of respective ecosystem participants.
From key deadlines and network developments to crucial summits and launches, traders and investors have the following headlines to watch.
Next Solana ETF Deadline
The next Solana ETF (exchange-traded fund) approval deadline is tomorrow, March 11. This deadline marks the end of a 240-day review period for some of the initial Solana ETF filings, such as those from VanEck and 21Shares, submitted in mid-2024 and acknowledged by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
For other filings, like Grayscale’s application, the final deadline might be extended to October 2025. However, posts on X (Twitter) and some analyses suggest March 11 as a critical date for an initial or unified SEC response to multiple applications.
Crypto market participants are cautiously optimistic. Prediction market Polymarket estimates a high likelihood (up to 80%) of approval in 2025.

The optimism draws from expectations of a more crypto-friendly regulatory environment under the Trump administration and the leadership of Paul Atkins at the SEC. However, some experts caution that approval might not occur until 2026 due to ongoing regulatory hurdles.
“The greatest Solana win coming from the new Trump Presidency will be our long-awaited ETF in 2025 or 2026. No surprise, the incredible VanEck team will lead the charge here with support from 21Shares and Canary Capital,” said Dan Jablonski, head of growth at news and research firm Syndica.
The SEC has previously labeled Solana (SOL) an unregistered security in lawsuits against exchanges like Coinbase and Binance. For an ETF to be approved as a commodity-based product, the SEC must shift its stance or resolve these legal challenges. A dismissal or softening of these lawsuits could significantly boost approval odds.
AAVE DAO Proposal
The Aave DAO is exploring a proposal to introduce sGHO, a savings product tied to its native stablecoin GHO. This will enhance GHO’s utility and adoption within the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem.
The network’s sGHO is envisioned as a low-risk, yield-bearing savings product built on Aave’s GHO stablecoin. It is a decentralized, over-collateralized, USD-pegged asset launched in 2023. The proposal highlighted by Aave founder Stani Kulechov positions sGHO as a mechanism to provide GHO holders with passive income opportunities while maintaining stability.
“sGHO will introduce a staple on-chain savings rate for Aave users, great entry-product for new users on-chain,” Kulechov explained recently.
It draws inspiration from models like Sky’s sUSDS (formerly MakerDAO), which offers stablecoin holders a savings rate.
Senator Lummis’ Bitcoin Strategy Summit
Senator Cynthia Lummis, a vocal Bitcoin advocate, will co-host the “Bitcoin for America” summit on March 11 in Washington, D.C., organized by the Bitcoin Policy Institute. This invite-only event, which will be streamed online in some parts, aims to shape the US Bitcoin strategy.
Recently, she proposed selling Federal Reserve gold to fund the Bitcoin reserve. In her opinion, the reserve could help tackle the country’s $36 trillion national debt. Key attendees at the summit include industry leaders like Strategy’s Michael Saylor, policymakers, and financial executives, signaling bipartisan momentum for Lummis’ BITCOIN Act.
This legislation proposes a US strategic Bitcoin reserve, targeting 1 million BTC (5% of the total supply) over five years and held for 20 years to bolster the dollar and reduce national debt.
With Trump’s pro-crypto stance and a Republican-led Congress, approval odds are rising, potentially within his first 100 days. For the crypto market, this could mean heightened institutional adoption, price volatility if the US starts buying BTC, and a precedent for other nations.
“Senator Lummis is stirring the pot, suggesting an arms race over Bitcoin instead of weapons. If the U.S. starts hoarding BTC, we’re talking a seismic shift in global dynamics—military power taking a backseat to digital asset dominance,” one user on X noted.
However, regulatory hurdles and Bitcoin’s volatility remain risks. Participants should watch for summit outcomes, as they could redefine Bitcoin’s role in US finance.
Frax Finance Expands Stablecoin to Solana
Frax Finance, known for its fractional-algorithmic stablecoin FRAX, recently announced plans to expand its stablecoin ecosystem to Solana, a high-performance blockchain. This move, teased in early 2025, aims to leverage Solana’s speed, low costs, and growing DeFi ecosystem to boost FRAX adoption.
Crypto market participants should note that FRAX is currently pegged to the USD with a mix of collateral (like USDC) and algorithmic stabilization. It could enhance Solana’s stablecoin liquidity, challenging dominant players like USDT and USDC.
The expansion aligns with Frax’s multi-chain strategy, which spans Ethereum, Polygon, and Avalanche. Solana’s $1 billion+ in native stablecoin issuance and scalability make it a strategic fit.
Therefore, this expansion could bring yield opportunities via Frax’s lending and liquidity pools, though peg stability risks remain.
Movement Mainnet Launch
Movement, an ecosystem of modular Move-based Layer-2 (L2) blockchains, launches its mainnet today, March 10, at 15:00 UTC. It marks a significant milestone as Ethereum’s first Move Virtual Machine (MoveVM) L2.
Built by Movement Labs, this launch promises up to 160,000 transactions per second (TPS). It leverages Move’s secure, Rust-based programming language originally developed for Meta’s Diem.
Its Ethereum compatibility enables seamless settlement and a multi-asset liquidity program to kickstart DeFi adoption.

The MOVE token powers gas fees, staking, and governance. It was launched in December 2024 with a 10% airdrop via MoveDrop. Investors should brace for price volatility around MOVE, trading for $0.46 as of this writing.
Disclaimer
In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
Bitcoin
Trump Won’t Buy Bitcoin Until It Hits $60,000: Bitwise Exec


Jeff Park, Head of Alpha Strategies at Bitwise, asserted on Sunday, March 9, that US President Donald Trump will hold off on further Bitcoin purchases until it reaches a price close to $60,000. Park’s remarks, shared via his official account on X, were made against the backdrop of growing speculation around so-called “budget-neutral” methods the administration might use to acquire additional BTC for the recently established US Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.
Why Trump Needs Bitcoin To Drop First
On March 6, 2025, President Trump issued an Executive Order creating the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, positioning the United States to maintain a leading role in the digital asset space. The administration confirmed that it already controls roughly 200,000 BTC—valued at around $17 billion at current prices—seized primarily through criminal and civil asset forfeiture proceedings – pending an audit. While the Executive Order prohibits selling Bitcoin within the reserve, it directs the Secretaries of the Treasury and Commerce to study “budget-neutral” ways of accumulating additional BTC in the future, ensuring no extra cost to taxpayers.
Jeff Park’s perspective cuts through the standard market commentary, focusing instead on the political realities that, he believes, heavily influence any presidential decision to buy BTC. In one of his posts, Park writes: “I’m going to let you in on a little secret from my primary field experience on how the BTC pitch works… I know one thing better about institutions than almost anyone else: public officials almost never buy bitcoin on trend/momentum and certainly not at the highs. The reason is simple – they don’t want to get fired when the inevitable drawdown hits or worse, ruin their reputation in the public domain.”
He goes on to argue that political figures, especially one as scrutinized as the US President, face an asymmetric risk profile. The fallout from buying at a higher price—only to see the market correct—can be devastating from a public-relations standpoint. Park surmises that the incentives for officials shift dramatically when BTC dips to more attractive levels.
He notes: “Can you imagine the headlines that will come for Trump if he buys bitcoin at $100k and it goes to $70k? On the positive side, if BTC gets to very cheap levels, the incentives for politicians and sovereigns to buy will increase… It is always +EV for the incentive calculation of an executive branch (which must win elections) to wait for BTC to get to $60k and buy and take credit.”
Park stresses that while a strategic reserve might be intended as a long-term store of value, public officials seek to avoid backlash in the event of immediate downside price volatility. This underlying political pressure, he contends, makes them less likely to make “high-risk” moves—especially ones that might expose them to questions about accountability.
The newly formed Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, often branded by the administration as a “digital Fort Knox,” is explicitly designed to remain untouched over the long haul. White House Crypto and AI Czar David Sacks has likened it to “a 21st-century bulwark of national financial security,” underscoring the administration’s ambitions for American cryptocurrency leadership.
However, Park argues that certain conditions must be met for a reserve program to gain genuine traction. Among them are “programmatic buying vs discretionary ‘studies,’” shared decision-making (to distribute accountability), and an element of permanence—either through legislative safeguards or authoritative action undertaken behind closed doors.
Park’s admiration for public pension Chief Investment Officers who have proactively incorporated Bitcoin also highlights the contrast in decision-making timelines: “This is at the core why I give so much RESPECT to the public pension CIOs that have bought BTC or invested in crypto strategies. They are simply true patriots – committed to long-term thinking for the benefit of all against the potential privatized loss of one’s self. Heroes.”
His applause underscores how these executives, unlike politicians seeking reelection or mindful of wide public scrutiny, often have more leeway to invest for the long haul, provided they have fiduciary guardrails in place.
At press time, BTC traded at $82,389.

Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.
-
Market19 hours ago
Shiba Inu Whales Cut Holdings—Is a Bigger Price Drop Ahead?
-
Market23 hours ago
Fintech Leaders Push for US Federal Regulatory Sandbox
-
Bitcoin21 hours ago
Bitcoin Liquidation Heatmap Signals Potential Bitcoin Price Swings – What’s Next
-
Market20 hours ago
SafeMoon (SFM) Selling Pressure Threatens Previous Gains
-
Altcoin12 hours ago
Expert Reveals Why Bitcoin And Solana Have An Edge Over Ethereum
-
Market22 hours ago
Berachain Price Drops 30%—More Losses Ahead?
-
Altcoin18 hours ago
Pro XRP Lawyer Outlines Reasons To Accumulate Despite Crypto Market Crash
-
Market17 hours ago
5 Token Unlocks to Watch for the Second Week of March