Connect with us

Regulation

Binance US Legal Woes Intensify As Appeals Court Revives Lawsuit

Published

1 month ago

on


A United States appeals court has breathed new life into a class-action lawsuit against Binance US, one of the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchanges. The lawsuit, which alleges manipulation of the HEX token’s price, had previously been dismissed but has now been partially revived.

Appeals Court Reinstated Lawsuit Against Binance US

The United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has partially overturned the dismissal of a class-action lawsuit against Binance US. The lawsuit, centered on alleged price manipulation of the HEX cryptocurrency token, has been given new life following the court’s ruling on August 12.

The case, initially filed in 2021 by plaintiff Ryan Cox, accuses the crypto exchange and CoinMarketCap of unlawfully manipulating the HEX token’s price. Cox alleges that these entities artificially restricted HEX’s ranking on CoinMarketCap, a Binance-owned cryptocurrency price-tracking platform, trading at lower prices than Binance’s cryptocurrencies.

A panel of three judges disagreed with the district court’s earlier dismissal, which had ruled that Cox failed to establish a sufficient connection between specific actions in Arizona and Binance US. The appeals court found that the district court’s requirement for establishing “sufficient minimum contacts” was incorrect. It noted that both parties have significant connections with the broader United States due to their incorporation or principal place of business within the country.

The panel’s opinion stated that these connections satisfy the due process requirements for personal jurisdiction and determined that Cox’s claims of price manipulation against Binance.US were valid. As a result, the case has been remanded for further legal proceedings.

This ruling comes against increased scrutiny of the HEX token and its founder, Richard Heart. On July 31, 2023, the SEC filed a separate lawsuit against Heart for alleged violations of federal securities laws and defrauding investors of at least $12.1 million. The SEC claims that Heart misused investor funds for personal luxury purchases, including a 555-carat diamond, expensive watches, and high-end cars.

Reviving this lawsuit against them adds another layer of complexity to the ongoing legal challenges in the cryptocurrency industry, potentially setting precedents for how U.S. courts approach jurisdiction in cases involving digital asset exchanges and price manipulation allegations.

Binance Celebrates Partial Victory In SEC Case

In a separate legal matter, Binance is celebrating a significant milestone in its ongoing dispute with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). A federal court recently dismissed several of the SEC’s major claims against the exchange, including rulings that crypto tokens are not securities.

Also, sales of Binance Coin (BNB) on secondary exchanges were not sufficiently alleged to be securities, and Binance’s stablecoin, BUSD, is not classified as a security. Binance hailed this decision as a victory for the entire cryptocurrency industry, while Binance US stated it remains prepared for the next phases of this legal journey.

✓ Share:

Coingape Staff

CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Related Topics:
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Regulation

Texas Court Dismisses Consensys Suit Against SEC on Procedural Basis

Published

11 mins ago

on

September 19, 2024

By


The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas dismissed Consensys Software Inc.‘s case against the Securities and Exchange Commission. This was after a long legal battle to determine the status of Ethereum and other similar software products.

Texas Court Ends Consensys Suit Against SEC

The U.S. District Court in Fort Worth has thrown out the allegations made by Consensys against the Securities and Exchange Commission in a recent legal move. The court, presided over by Judge Reed O’Connor, ruled on procedural grounds. The judge determined the claims concerning Ethereum classification and the regulatory approach to MetaMask were not ripe for judicial review. This decision effectively puts an end to the current litigation initiated by Consensys in April of this year.

The dismissal focused particularly on the lack of final agency action from the SEC, which the court noted was a requisite for a substantial legal challenge. This procedural dismissal indicates that despite the issues raised, the court decided not to proceed with evaluating the merits of the case.

Legal Battle Over Ethereum and MetaMask

Initially, Consensys challenged the SEC’s classification of Ethereum and its derivatives as securities. The complaint highlighted concerns over the SEC’s focus on MetaMask, a software service provided by Consensys that facilitates crypto transactions and staking. 

Despite an earlier notification in June about the SEC dropping its investigation into Ethereum, the broader implications of this regulatory scrutiny remained a contentious issue.

Subsequent to the initial lawsuit, the SEC initiated a separate enforcement action in June, accusing Consensys of operating its MetaMask swaps service without proper registration. 

In addition, according to Judge O’Connor, this case lacked the necessary finality from the Securities and Exchange Commission side to be considered ready for court adjudication.

Reactions and Future Regulatory Steps

The court’s decision to dismiss on procedural grounds does not conclude the legal issues surrounding the regulation of Ethereum and other blockchain technologies. 

More so, Consensys has expressed its intention to continue advocating for blockchain developers and to challenge the SEC’s actions in other jurisdictions, indicating that the struggle over crypto regulation in the U.S. is far from over. The case’s dismissal in Texas does not preclude the blockchain company from pursuing other legal avenues to address their grievances.

In addition, most recently, a US Bankruptcy judge Brendan Shannon approved Terraform Labs plan to liquidate its assets following an ongoing SEC lawsuit.

✓ Share:

Ronny Mugendi

Ronny Mugendi is a seasoned crypto journalist with four years of professional experience, having contributed significantly to various media outlets on cryptocurrency trends and technologies. His work includes notable contributions to Cryptopolitan and Coingape News Media, where he shares his insights on the latest developments in the cryptocurrency market. Outside of his journalism career, Ronny enjoys the thrill of bike riding, exploring new trails and landscapes.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

UN Calls for Global AI Governance As Meta & OpenAI Face Challenges

Published

2 hours ago

on

September 19, 2024

By


AI News: The United Nations has issued seven recommendations for reducing the risks of artificial intelligence (AI) based on input from a UN advisory body. The final report of the council’s advisory body focuses on the importance of developing a unified approach to the regulation of AI and will be considered at a UN meeting scheduled for later this month.

AI News: UN Calls for Global AI Governance

The council of 39 experts noted that large multinational corporations have been able to dominate the development of AI technologies given the increasing rate of growth, which is a major concern. The panel stressed that there is an ‘unavoidable’ need for the governance of artificial intelligence on a global scale, since the creation and use of artificial intelligence cannot be solely attributed to market mechanisms.

According to the UN report, to counter the lack of information between the AI labs and the rest of the world, it is suggested that a panel should be formed to disseminate accurate and independent information on artificial intelligence.

The recommendations include the creation of a global AI fund to address the capacity and collaboration differences especially in the developing countries that cannot afford to use AI. The report also provides recommendations on how to establish a global artificial intelligencedata framework for the purpose of increasing transparency and accountability, and the establishment of a policy dialogue that would be aimed at addressing all the matters concerning the governance of artificial intelligence.

While the report did not propose a new International organization for the regulation, it pointed out that if risks associated with the new technology were to escalate then there may be the need for a more powerful global body with the mandate to enforce the regulation of the technology. The United Nation’s approach is different from that of some countries, including the United States, which has recently approved of ‘a blueprint for action’ to manage AI in military use – something China has not endorsed.

Calls for Regulatory Harmonization in Europe

Concurrent with the AI news, leaders, including Yann LeCun, Meta’s Chief AI Scientist and many CEOs and academics from Europe, have demanded to know how the regulation will work in Europe. In an open letter, they stated that the EU has the potential to reap the economic benefits of AI if the rules do not hinder the freedom of research and ethical implementation of AI.

Meta’s upcoming multimodal artificial intelligence model, Llama, will not be released in the EU due to regulatory restrictions, which shows the conflict between innovation and regulation.

The open letter argues that excessively stringent rules can hinder the EU’s ability to advance in the field, and calls on the policymakers to implement the measures that will allow for the development of a robust artificial intelligence industry while addressing the risks. The letter emphasizes the need for coherent laws that can foster the advancement of AI while not hindering its growth like the warning on Apple iPhone OS as reported by CoinGape.

OpenAI Restructures Safety Oversight Amid Criticism

In addition, there are concerns about how OpenAI has positioned itself where the principles of safety and regulation of AI are concerned. As a result of the criticism from the US politicians and the former employees, the CEO of the company, Sam Altman, stepped down from the company’s Safety and Security Committee. 

This committee was formed in the first place to monitor the safety of the artificial intelligence technology and has now been reshaped into an independent authority that can hold back on new model releases until safety risks are addressed.

The new oversight group comprises individuals like Nicole Seligman, former US Army General Paul Nakasone, and Quora CEO Adam D’Angelo, whose role is to ensure that the safety measures put in place by OpenAI are in line with the organization’s objectives. This United Nations AI news comes at the heels of allegations of internal strife, with former researchers claiming that OpenAI is more focused on profit-making than actual artificial intelligence governance.

✓ Share:

Kelvin Munene Murithi

Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

SEC requests for more time to produce documents in Coinbase case

Published

4 hours ago

on

September 19, 2024

By


The US SEC office Washington DC
  • SEC reportedly seeks an extension to February 2025 for it to provide case documents to Coinbase.
  • Coinbase, Binance and Kraken all facing SEC lawsuits.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission has filed for an extension from the court, asking for more time as it looks to provide documents related to its case against crypto exchange Coinbase. Cointelegraph reported this on Sept. 19

SEC asks for extension

Court documents filed on Sept. 18 reveal that the SEC wants the court to extend the timeline for them to furnish Coinbase with key material by four months.

The regulator filed its request at the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, and if granted, will see it have until February 2025 for the deadline to share over 133,000 documents.

SEC’s court filing comes a month to the end of the initial timeline on Oct. 18, which is when the securities watchdog was to hand over documents as part of the case’s discovery proceedings phase. According to the regulator, an extension will allow it to produce the necessary documents.

SEC has sued several crypto companies

These latest developments in the SEC vs. Coinbase lawsuit adds to several others in recent months and weeks. It includes court filings and verdicts in the regulator’s cases against crypto exchanges Binance and Kraken, which are the other major industry players in a legal battle with the SEC.

Both the courts and US lawmakers have taken issue with the SEC’s use of the term “digital asset securities’. This is part of the main allegations against crypto exchanges, with the regulator alleging securities laws violations by these firms.

In 2020, the agency sued Ripple Labs over the XRP cryptocurrency – a case that dragged for three years before a notable ruling in July 2023 declared XRP not a security. The regulator also reached a $4 billion settlement with Terraform Labs.

A judge denied Kraken’s motion to dismiss the SEC’s lawsuit agaisnt the exchange in August this year.

Share this article
Categories
Tags





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 coin2049.io