Connect with us

Regulation

Crypto Exchange Gate.io Ceases Japan Operations, Here’s Why

Published

2 months ago

on


As of July 22, 2024, Gate.io has announced the termination of its services in Japan, citing the need to comply with local financial regulations. This decision is in line with the exchange’s policy of obeying the laws of the international community.

Gate.io Ends Services for Japanese Customers

Gate.io has temporarily suspended new account creation for individuals in Japan as of July 22, 2024. This is the first step towards meeting the Japanese financial regulations with a view of ensuring that the company is in line with the set legal requirements.

Existing users in Japan are requested to act according to their account management and get ready for the end of the services. Gate.io aims at assisting its customers to transfer their transactions to cryptocurrency exchanges that are regulated by Japanese laws.

As for the smooth transition, Gate.io will take the following actions. The platform will remove Japanese descriptions and limit the availability of Japanese language options, only as necessary during the transition. The exchange will also give information on the services that have been suspended, the plan that the exchange is going to use in migrating the affected assets, as well as the crypto assets that have been affected due to the FSA’s compliance orders.

Any customer with a concern or an issue is advised to contact the support team of Gate.io for help. The exchange apologizes for any inconvenience and reiterates its focus on compliance with the relevant rules across all its markets.

Gate.HK Ceases Operations

At the same time, Gate.io’s Hong Kong-based operation, Gate.HK has also closed down its operations. The exchange has withdrawn its applications for licensing under the Securities and Futures Ordinance (SFO) and the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Ordinance (AMLO).

All new registration of users and the deposit of assets was stopped and all tokens were delisted and trading was halted with effect from 28 May, 2024. Currently, the users have been given till August 28, 2024, for the withdrawal of their assets from the platform.

This change forms a part of a major platform revamp that is aimed at increasing security and following the rules. The exchange advises users to close their positions and withdraw their funds before the set timelines to avoid disruptions.

OKX’s Exit from Nigeria

Likewise, OKX has confirmed its withdrawal from Nigeria as of August 16, 2024, because of new legal and regulatory developments in the country. Nigerian users will not be able to open new trades or use other services but will be able to withdraw and close their existing positions.

OKX has given clear guidelines on how users can close their positions and withdraw their assets before the specified time.

This trend is a result of the ongoing regulatory issues that cryptocurrency exchanges encounter as several other companies have also withdrawn their applications in different jurisdictions. Nevertheless, there are such platforms as Crypto. Com, Bullish, and Matrixport are among the firms that are still trying to obtain licenses in areas such as Hong Kong.

Read Also: Spot Ethereum ETF: Here Is The Last Sign To Watch Ahead of Launch

✓ Share:

Kelvin is a distinguished writer specializing in crypto and finance, backed by a Bachelor’s in Actuarial Science. Recognized for incisive analysis and insightful content, he has an adept command of English and excels at thorough research and timely delivery.

The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Related Topics:
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Regulation

Texas Court Dismisses Consensys Suit Against SEC on Procedural Basis

Published

14 mins ago

on

September 19, 2024

By


The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas dismissed Consensys Software Inc.‘s case against the Securities and Exchange Commission. This was after a long legal battle to determine the status of Ethereum and other similar software products.

Texas Court Ends Consensys Suit Against SEC

The U.S. District Court in Fort Worth has thrown out the allegations made by Consensys against the Securities and Exchange Commission in a recent legal move. The court, presided over by Judge Reed O’Connor, ruled on procedural grounds. The judge determined the claims concerning Ethereum classification and the regulatory approach to MetaMask were not ripe for judicial review. This decision effectively puts an end to the current litigation initiated by Consensys in April of this year.

The dismissal focused particularly on the lack of final agency action from the SEC, which the court noted was a requisite for a substantial legal challenge. This procedural dismissal indicates that despite the issues raised, the court decided not to proceed with evaluating the merits of the case.

Legal Battle Over Ethereum and MetaMask

Initially, Consensys challenged the SEC’s classification of Ethereum and its derivatives as securities. The complaint highlighted concerns over the SEC’s focus on MetaMask, a software service provided by Consensys that facilitates crypto transactions and staking. 

Despite an earlier notification in June about the SEC dropping its investigation into Ethereum, the broader implications of this regulatory scrutiny remained a contentious issue.

Subsequent to the initial lawsuit, the SEC initiated a separate enforcement action in June, accusing Consensys of operating its MetaMask swaps service without proper registration. 

In addition, according to Judge O’Connor, this case lacked the necessary finality from the Securities and Exchange Commission side to be considered ready for court adjudication.

Reactions and Future Regulatory Steps

The court’s decision to dismiss on procedural grounds does not conclude the legal issues surrounding the regulation of Ethereum and other blockchain technologies. 

More so, Consensys has expressed its intention to continue advocating for blockchain developers and to challenge the SEC’s actions in other jurisdictions, indicating that the struggle over crypto regulation in the U.S. is far from over. The case’s dismissal in Texas does not preclude the blockchain company from pursuing other legal avenues to address their grievances.

In addition, most recently, a US Bankruptcy judge Brendan Shannon approved Terraform Labs plan to liquidate its assets following an ongoing SEC lawsuit.

✓ Share:

Ronny Mugendi

Ronny Mugendi is a seasoned crypto journalist with four years of professional experience, having contributed significantly to various media outlets on cryptocurrency trends and technologies. His work includes notable contributions to Cryptopolitan and Coingape News Media, where he shares his insights on the latest developments in the cryptocurrency market. Outside of his journalism career, Ronny enjoys the thrill of bike riding, exploring new trails and landscapes.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

UN Calls for Global AI Governance As Meta & OpenAI Face Challenges

Published

2 hours ago

on

September 19, 2024

By


AI News: The United Nations has issued seven recommendations for reducing the risks of artificial intelligence (AI) based on input from a UN advisory body. The final report of the council’s advisory body focuses on the importance of developing a unified approach to the regulation of AI and will be considered at a UN meeting scheduled for later this month.

AI News: UN Calls for Global AI Governance

The council of 39 experts noted that large multinational corporations have been able to dominate the development of AI technologies given the increasing rate of growth, which is a major concern. The panel stressed that there is an ‘unavoidable’ need for the governance of artificial intelligence on a global scale, since the creation and use of artificial intelligence cannot be solely attributed to market mechanisms.

According to the UN report, to counter the lack of information between the AI labs and the rest of the world, it is suggested that a panel should be formed to disseminate accurate and independent information on artificial intelligence.

The recommendations include the creation of a global AI fund to address the capacity and collaboration differences especially in the developing countries that cannot afford to use AI. The report also provides recommendations on how to establish a global artificial intelligencedata framework for the purpose of increasing transparency and accountability, and the establishment of a policy dialogue that would be aimed at addressing all the matters concerning the governance of artificial intelligence.

While the report did not propose a new International organization for the regulation, it pointed out that if risks associated with the new technology were to escalate then there may be the need for a more powerful global body with the mandate to enforce the regulation of the technology. The United Nation’s approach is different from that of some countries, including the United States, which has recently approved of ‘a blueprint for action’ to manage AI in military use – something China has not endorsed.

Calls for Regulatory Harmonization in Europe

Concurrent with the AI news, leaders, including Yann LeCun, Meta’s Chief AI Scientist and many CEOs and academics from Europe, have demanded to know how the regulation will work in Europe. In an open letter, they stated that the EU has the potential to reap the economic benefits of AI if the rules do not hinder the freedom of research and ethical implementation of AI.

Meta’s upcoming multimodal artificial intelligence model, Llama, will not be released in the EU due to regulatory restrictions, which shows the conflict between innovation and regulation.

The open letter argues that excessively stringent rules can hinder the EU’s ability to advance in the field, and calls on the policymakers to implement the measures that will allow for the development of a robust artificial intelligence industry while addressing the risks. The letter emphasizes the need for coherent laws that can foster the advancement of AI while not hindering its growth like the warning on Apple iPhone OS as reported by CoinGape.

OpenAI Restructures Safety Oversight Amid Criticism

In addition, there are concerns about how OpenAI has positioned itself where the principles of safety and regulation of AI are concerned. As a result of the criticism from the US politicians and the former employees, the CEO of the company, Sam Altman, stepped down from the company’s Safety and Security Committee. 

This committee was formed in the first place to monitor the safety of the artificial intelligence technology and has now been reshaped into an independent authority that can hold back on new model releases until safety risks are addressed.

The new oversight group comprises individuals like Nicole Seligman, former US Army General Paul Nakasone, and Quora CEO Adam D’Angelo, whose role is to ensure that the safety measures put in place by OpenAI are in line with the organization’s objectives. This United Nations AI news comes at the heels of allegations of internal strife, with former researchers claiming that OpenAI is more focused on profit-making than actual artificial intelligence governance.

✓ Share:

Kelvin Munene Murithi

Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

SEC requests for more time to produce documents in Coinbase case

Published

4 hours ago

on

September 19, 2024

By


The US SEC office Washington DC
  • SEC reportedly seeks an extension to February 2025 for it to provide case documents to Coinbase.
  • Coinbase, Binance and Kraken all facing SEC lawsuits.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission has filed for an extension from the court, asking for more time as it looks to provide documents related to its case against crypto exchange Coinbase. Cointelegraph reported this on Sept. 19

SEC asks for extension

Court documents filed on Sept. 18 reveal that the SEC wants the court to extend the timeline for them to furnish Coinbase with key material by four months.

The regulator filed its request at the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, and if granted, will see it have until February 2025 for the deadline to share over 133,000 documents.

SEC’s court filing comes a month to the end of the initial timeline on Oct. 18, which is when the securities watchdog was to hand over documents as part of the case’s discovery proceedings phase. According to the regulator, an extension will allow it to produce the necessary documents.

SEC has sued several crypto companies

These latest developments in the SEC vs. Coinbase lawsuit adds to several others in recent months and weeks. It includes court filings and verdicts in the regulator’s cases against crypto exchanges Binance and Kraken, which are the other major industry players in a legal battle with the SEC.

Both the courts and US lawmakers have taken issue with the SEC’s use of the term “digital asset securities’. This is part of the main allegations against crypto exchanges, with the regulator alleging securities laws violations by these firms.

In 2020, the agency sued Ripple Labs over the XRP cryptocurrency – a case that dragged for three years before a notable ruling in July 2023 declared XRP not a security. The regulator also reached a $4 billion settlement with Terraform Labs.

A judge denied Kraken’s motion to dismiss the SEC’s lawsuit agaisnt the exchange in August this year.

Share this article
Categories
Tags





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 coin2049.io