Connect with us

Regulation

Crypto Titans Bet On Donald Trump Win For SEC Shake-Up

Published

on


As the 2024 US presidential election approaches, crypto leaders are anticipating significant changes in regulatory oversight if Donald Trump returns to the White House. The crypto industry is dissatisfied with current administration’s stringent approach led by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under Chair Gary Gensler. This has prompted hopes among crypto advocates that a Trump presidency could usher in a more lenient regulatory environment.

How Donald Trump’s Win Could Reshape Crypto Regulations

Michael Selig, a partner at Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, suggests that a Trump administration could “reset and rethink the SEC’s crypto regulatory policy.” It could potentially resolve ongoing enforcement actions and investigations initiated during the Biden administration. This sentiment reflects a broader expectation within the crypto community that Trump’s return could lead to a reduction in regulatory pressure.

Under President Joe Biden, the SEC has intensified its scrutiny of the cryptocurrency sector, especially following the collapse of the FTX exchange in late 2022. The regulator has pursued numerous enforcement actions against exchanges and broker-dealers, alleging failures to comply with securities laws.

Gensler has asserted that many cryptocurrencies qualify as securities and should therefore adhere to SEC registration requirements. This position has sparked contention within the industry.

Despite some settlements, significant litigation involving major players like Ripple, Coinbase, Kraken, and Binance remains unresolved. Recently, he SEC has also closed investigations into Ethereum and Binance USD (BUSD), a USD-backed stablecoin issued by Paxos. However, the debate over whether specific tokens should be classified as securities persists.

A critical case in point is the SEC’s lawsuit against Ripple Labs Inc., which alleges that Ripple conducted an unregistered securities offering through the sale of XRP tokens, raising over $1.3 billion.

Although a federal judge ruled last July that XRP sales to retail investors did not constitute investment contracts, the case’s outcome remains uncertain. However, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse recently indicated that a resolution could be forthcoming. He noted, “We expect a resolution very soon.”

Also Read: Charles Hoskinson Disputes Elon Musk & Robert Kiyosaki On Trump RNC Speech

SEC Reform After Trump Win?

The prospect of Donald Trump‘s victory has fueled speculation about a potential shake-up at the SEC. Austin Campbell, a blockchain consultant and adjunct professor at Columbia Business School, pointed out that a new administration could swiftly alter the SEC’s leadership.

“Remember, if Trump gets elected, the Republicans can immediately change who the chair is,” Campbell said. He predicts that this shift could lead to the settlement of many current cases, potentially ending the “highly variable decisions that are increasing confusion.”

However, some experts caution against assuming that a Trump presidency would automatically lead to a dramatic change in enforcement practices. Emily Meyers, general counsel at venture capital firm Electric Capital, argues that securities enforcement cases are typically “apolitical” and not subject to significant staff turnover with political shifts.

“It’s unlikely that any ongoing cases get dropped, especially those that are already being argued in federal court,” Meyers added, according to a Bloomberg report. Instead, she suggests that a new administration might focus on different types of enforcement cases rather than dismissing existing ones.

Hester Pierce To Replace Gary Gensler?

Similarly, Ji Kim, chief legal and policy officer at the Crypto Council for Innovation, also weighed in. He believes that while Donald Trump administration might alter the regulatory landscape, such changes would depend on the new leadership and the composition of the SEC commissioners.

“If President Trump were reelected and Chair Gensler steps down, we could see the current regulation-by-enforcement norm change,” Kim said. He further added, “However, that would depend on the leadership and the make-up of the commissioners — nothing is guaranteed.”

Meanwhile, Rep. French Hill believes that SEC Commissioner Hester Pierce could replace Gary Gensler after Trump’s Win. In a recent interview, the SEC Commissioner noted, “If the president changes, typically the chairman of the SEC will also change in response to that.” However, Pierce refrained from making any predictions about who would succeed Gensler.

Also Read: Donald Trump To Reportedly Announce Bitcoin Strategic Reserve

✓ Share:

Kritika boasts over 2 years of experience in the financial news sector. Currently working as a crypto journalist at Coingape, she has consistently shown a knack for blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies. Kritika combines insightful analysis with a deep understanding of market trends. With a keen interest in technical analysis, she brings a nuanced perspective to her reporting, exploring the intersection of finance, technology, and emerging trends in the crypto space.

The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Regulation

Pro-XRP Lawyer Deems SEC’s ‘Crypto Asset Securities’ Warning A Scam

Published

on

By


Pro-XRP lawyer Fred Rispoli has publicly criticized the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) latest investor alert, calling it misleading and suggesting it’s part of a larger scam. This comes amid backlash after the recent switch on the “crypto assets securities” stance.

SEC Attracts Backlash On ‘Crypto Asset Securities’ Saga

In a post on X, Rispoli deemed the investor alert to be a “scam” as the agency used the term “crypto assets securities.” He stated, “This post in and of itself is a scam as the SEC the same day swore to a federal judge that there is no such thing as ‘crypto asset securities.’” He also also mentioned that he had requested X Community Notes to be added to the SEC’s post.

The criticism comes as the SEC faces backlash over its sudden shift in stance on the classification of crypto assets. In a surprising move, the SEC recently filed a motion to amend its original complaint against Binance, Binance.US, and Changpeng Zhao.

In the amendment, the SEC now acknowledges that several major crypto tokens are not considered securities under its revised framework. These include Solana (SOL), Cardano (ADA), Polygon (MATIC), and other seven tokens.

The shift in stance follows a U.S. district court ruling in a related case against the crypto exchange Kraken, where the SEC’s previous broad definitions of crypto assets as securities were challenged. Hence, in its amended complaint, the SEC clarified that it uses the term “crypto asset securities” not to refer to the tokens themselves, but to the investment contracts and agreements tied to their sales.

The SEC stated in its filing: “As the SEC has consistently maintained since the very first crypto asset Howey case, the term is a shorthand reference… the security is not simply the [crypto asset], which is little more than an alphanumeric cryptographic sequence.”

eToro Settlement In Spotlight

Moreover, this change in stance has been met with strong reactions from the crypto community. Jake Chervinsky, Chief Legal Officer of Variant, expressed his frustration on X, saying:

“I genuinely can’t get over how insane this is. The SEC used the term ‘crypto asset securities’ eight times in the eToro settlement order they issued on THE SAME DAY they told a federal eToro settlement order that they wouldn’t use it to avoid confusion.”

Chervinsky’s comment reflects the growing confusion surrounding the SEC’s inconsistent language and its shifting position on crypto enforcement. Despite the SEC’s apparent shift in its legal stance, the regulatory body continues to warn investors about potential scams involving crypto assets.

In a recent investor alert, the SEC’s Office of Investor Education and Advocacy issued a warning about fraudsters exploiting the popularity of cryptocurrencies, coins, and tokens. The alert emphasizes that fraudsters often use new technologies to perpetrate investment scams and exploit the complexity of crypto assets to lure retail investors.

This alert also attracted criticism from FOX Business journalist Eleanor Terrett. She weighed in on the issue, noting, “Is now a good time to point out that the SEC is still using the term ‘crypto asset securities’ in its investor alert blasts?” Her comment underscores the ongoing use of the term despite the SEC’s legal assertion that it no longer applies to certain tokens.

✓ Share:

Kelvin Munene Murithi

Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

John Deaton Promises XRP Investors To Hold SEC Accountable

Published

on

By


Pro-XRP lawyer John Deaton has promised to hold the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) accountable for the $15 billion loss that XRP investors suffered due to the SEC’s Ripple lawsuit. The legal expert, who is contesting against Senator Elizabeth Warren, famous for her anti-crypto stance, intends to fulfill this promise when he gets elected to the Senate. The lawyer has already outlined some of the ways which he intends to hold the Commission accountable.

John Deaton Promises To Hold The SEC Accountable

In an X post, The pro-XRP lawyer promised to hold the SEC accountable for the 75,000 small XRP investors he represented in the SEC’s case against Ripple. The legal expert added that he isn’t willing to accept an apology from the Commission. Instead, he plans to hold people at the SEC accountable when he gets to the Senate since Senator Warren won’t do it. Specifically, the lawyer claimed these small investors lost over $15 billion thanks to the “SEC’s misconduct and gross overreach.”

The Senatorial candidate highlighted how the federal court declared that the Commission’s lawyers lacked “faithful allegiance to the law” and were only concerned about winning the suit against Ripple rather than protecting investors, which they are mandated to do. The lawyer also noted how he fought to protect these investors and did it for free.

John Deaton acted as amicus counsel for these investors, considering their interest in the Ripple lawsuit. The lawsuit is believed to have stifled XRP’s price, especially when it was instituted in 2020, just around the time of the 2021 bull market, preventing these investors from enjoying their desired profits from the crypto.

In trying to protect these investors in the early stages of the Ripple lawsuit, John Deaton revealed that he had filed a Writ of Mandamus against the SEC, stating that the Commission had violated 75 years of legal precedent by claiming that XRP was a security. He argued that the underlying asset could not have been a security even if it was sold as an investment contract.

The court eventually adopted Deaton’s reasoning as Judge Analisa Torres gave a landmark ruling in the case in 2023 that XRP wasn’t a security in itself, even if Ripple’s XRP sales were investment contracts.

Senator Warren Failed To Act In The Ripple Case

John Deaton also revealed that Senator Warren failed to act in the XRP lawsuit despite 627 token holders he represented living in Massachusetts, the area she represents in the Senate. The lawyer added that he specifically reached out to Warren back then because she was also a member of the banking committee overseeing the SEC. However, she did nothing despite his calls for her to act. Warren and SEC chair Gary Gensler have earned a reputation for their public anti-crypto stance. As such, her failure to defend these token holders might not surprise many.

As part of his efforts to hold the Commission accountable, Deaton unveiled two bills he intends to push when he gets to the Senate. The first would focus on exposing regulatory capture within the SEC. Meanwhile, the second bill will propose that a 3-5 year statutory bar should be placed on preventing regulators from working in an industry that was under their purview in their regulatory capacity.

✓ Share:

Boluwatife Adeyemi

Boluwatife Adeyemi is a well-experienced crypto news writer and editor who has covered topics that cut across DeFi, NFTs, smart contracts, and blockchain interoperability, among others. Boluwatife has a knack for simplifying the most technical concepts and making it easy for crypto newbies to understand. Away from writing, Boluwatife is an avid basketball lover and a part-time degen.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

Will Kraken’s Jury Trial Request Tilt SEC Crypto Crackdown?

Published

on

By


Kraken has officially requested a jury trial in its ongoing legal battle against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The request was made after a U.S. district court in California ruled that the lawsuit, which alleges the exchange operated as an unregistered securities exchange, broker, and clearing agent, would proceed to trial. This decision mirrors outcomes in similar cases against other major crypto exchanges such as Binance and Coinbase.

Kraken Requests Jury Trial in SEC Litigation

In a recent court filing, Kraken formally demanded a jury trial to contest the allegations brought forward by the US SEC. The exchange has denied all claims of illegal conduct, asserting that it has not engaged in activities that would classify it as a securities exchange, broker, or clearing agent under existing federal laws. 

This request for a jury trial comes after the court denied Kraken’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit in August. The firm aims to present its case before a panel of peers, seeking a fair evaluation of its defenses.

More so, this decision highlights the broader tension between cryptocurrency platforms and regulatory bodies.

Kraken’s Defense Arguments Against SEC

Kraken has presented several defenses in response to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission lawsuit. The company emphasizes that the digital assets listed on its platform do not qualify as securities.

Furthermore, the exchange maintains that it was not required to register with the US SEC. It argues that it does not meet the definitions of a broker or clearinghouse as outlined in the Securities Act and the Exchange Act.

The crypto platform also contends that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission lacks the authority to regulate its operations. It asserts that the digital assets themselves do not carry the obligations typical to traditional financial securities.

Additionally, the firm has accused the SEC of acting without due process and fair notice, suggesting that the regulatory actions were taken in violation of the First Amendment. The exchange maintains that the terms used by the SEC, such as “crypto asset securities” are ambiguous and lack clear definitions, making it difficult to comply with crypto regulations effectively.

Industry Reactions and Regulatory Clarifications

The SEC has faced criticism from various crypto firms for using vague terminology to justify its securities violation charges. Though not a direct response to Kraken’s filing, the regulatory body clarified its stance in its amended complaint against Binance, stating that “crypto asset securities” do not refer to the crypto assets themselves. 

This clarification was met with skepticism by industry leaders, including Ripple’s chief legal officer Stuart Alderoty. Stuart criticized the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for creating confusion with inconsistent terminology.

However, the SEC continues to pursue its enforcement strategy, asserting that these tokens are sold as investment contracts in secondary markets. Coinbase’s chief legal officer, Paul Grewal, highlighted the SEC’s ongoing challenges in defining and regulating digital assets. He indicated that the crackdown on major exchanges is likely to persist.

Kraken continues to face legal hurdles beyond the United States. Recently, Australia’s Federal Court ruled that the firm’s fiat margin extensions are regulated, but its crypto margin extensions are not.

✓ Share:

Ronny Mugendi

Ronny Mugendi is a seasoned crypto journalist with four years of professional experience, having contributed significantly to various media outlets on cryptocurrency trends and technologies. His work includes notable contributions to Cryptopolitan and Coingape News Media, where he shares his insights on the latest developments in the cryptocurrency market. Outside of his journalism career, Ronny enjoys the thrill of bike riding, exploring new trails and landscapes.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2024 coin2049.io