Connect with us

Regulation

OpenAI Challenges NYT to Prove Originality of Articles in Copyright Case

Published

on


In a notable legal confrontation, OpenAI has requested that the New York Times (NYT) validate the originality of its articles. The AI firm demands the court mandate NYT disclose detailed source materials for each copyrighted article. This move is part of an ongoing lawsuit in which the NYT accuses OpenAI of using its content without permission.

OpenAI Requests Transparency from NYT

OpenAI’s legal team has approached a New York court with a significant demand. They insist that the NYT provide comprehensive details about the creation process of its articles. The request includes access to the reporter’s notes, interview records, and other source materials. OpenAI argues that this information is crucial to determine the originality and authorship of the articles in question.

 

The court filing by OpenAI aims to explore the depth and authenticity of the NYT’s journalistic process. Their lawyers argue that the NYT’s claim of substantial investment in high-quality journalism prompts a need for transparency. They believe understanding the creation process is essential for the court to make a fair judgment.

 

OpenAI argues that such disclosure is necessary for its defense. Detailed insight into the NYT’s authorship process will help ascertain whether the articles are original works. The NYT made this request following allegations that OpenAI unauthorizedly used its content to train AI models.

 

Also Read: German Lawmaker Wants Government To HODL Bitcoin (BTC), Not Sell

NYT Fights Back on Copyright Infringement

Responding swiftly, the NYT’s legal team filed a motion to dismiss OpenAI’s request on July 3. They argue that OpenAI’s demands are excessive and could set a troubling precedent for copyright law. The NYT contends that the intricacies of their journalistic practices are irrelevant to the issue of copyright infringement.

 

The NYT’s opposition stresses that the request undermines the basic principles of copyright law. They believe that proving the content creation process does not pertain to the alleged misuse. The NYT’s lawyers highlight that the focus should remain whether OpenAI used the copyrighted articles without authorization.

 

Furthermore, the NYT accuses OpenAI of attempting to divert the court’s attention from the real issue at hand. They maintain that the lawsuit should concentrate on the legality of OpenAI’s use of the NYT’s copyrighted content. The newspaper defends its rights to its intellectual property, arguing that the creation process should remain protected.

Also Read: Core Scientific Founder Claims Bitcoin’s True Value Not Yet Realized

✓ Share:

Maxwell is a crypto-economic analyst and Blockchain enthusiast, passionate about helping people understand the potential of decentralized technology. I write extensively on topics such as blockchain, cryptocurrency, tokens, and more for many publications. My goal is to spread knowledge about this revolutionary technology and its implications for economic freedom and social good.

The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Regulation

Ripple Could Defeat the SEC If This Happens

Published

on

By


Legal expert Fred Rispoli has stated that Ripple has a better chance of winning the US Securities and Exchange’s (SEC) appeal in their lawsuit if an unbiased panel is sitting on the case. However, he claimed that the Commission would likely have a 70% to 80% chance of winning if the Judges who sit on the case have a long history of agreeing with the government.

How Ripple Could Defeat The SEC

In an interview on the Thinking Crypto podcast, Rispoli mentioned that the odds would be 70% to 30% in favor of Ripple if the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeal Judges were unbiased. The lawyer noted that the “sad part” about the probabilities of who will win is that it hinges on who the three Judges that get assigned the case are.

CoinGape reported that the US SEC is appealing Judge Analisa Torres’s final judgment on August 7. However, the XRP community has continued questioning whether the appeal will only apply to the $125 million penalty or extend to Judge Torres’ ruling on the programmatic sales last year.

Fred Rispoli gave his opinion, stating that the SEC will likely appeal everything. He noted that the notice of appeal was about the summary judgment and not just the penalty ruling. As such, the Commission can appeal any of the rulings included in the summary judgment.

The legal expert believes that the Commission will focus on programmatic sales, which involves Judge Torres ruling that XRP isn’t a security in itself. He added that they will also seek a higher fine than the $125 million that Judge Torres awarded.

Fred Rispoli noted that the 2nd Circuit’s potential ruling on programmatic sales is most important for XRP holders and the broader crypto community. According to him, the SEC will move to cite the court’s ruling on its case against crypto firms like Binance, Coinbase, and Kraken if the court rules in the Commission’s favor on the programmatic sales.

How The SEC Could Lose It All

Fred Rispoli cited a scenario in which the 2nd Circuit could overturn Judge Torres’s rulings in favor of the SEC. He claimed that this would happen if Ripple got a really good panel. The lawyer also alluded to Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer (CLO) Stuart Alderoty’s comments that they intend to file a cross-appeal.

The legal expert remarked that it would be “foolish” if the crypto firm didn’t file a cross-appeal. He claimed that a cross-appeal would further solidify the company’s 70% chance of winning the appeal as the court will likely reach a “split the baby decision” if this happens. Rispoli explained that this means that the 2nd Circuit will decide to affirm all Judge Torres’ rulings rather than give a different opinion.

Meanwhile, the lawyer predicts the case will likely continue until at least January 2026. This aligns with the timeline for both parties to file their court processes. For instance, he stated that the SEC would likely not file its opening brief until December of this year. After that, he expects Ripple’s reply brief won’t come until March.

Therefore, the lawyer believes the crypto firm should push forward on the legislative front, considering how long the case could take. However, he noted that the good thing is that Judge Torres’ ruling on XRP not being a security remains the law of the land until regulatory clarity or a ruling is made in the appeal.

The Ripple SEC lawsuit negatively impacted the XRP price in the 2021 bull run as the Commission instituted the lawsuit in December 2020. However, crypto analyst Egrag Crypto predicted that the XRP Price will cross $5 despite the SEC appeal.

✓ Share:

Boluwatife Adeyemi

Boluwatife Adeyemi is a well-experienced crypto news writer and editor who has covered topics that cut across DeFi, NFTs, smart contracts, and blockchain interoperability, among others. Boluwatife has a knack for simplifying the most technical concepts and making it easy for crypto newbies to understand. Away from writing, He is an avid basketball lover and a part-time degen.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

Alabama grants Transak a Money Transmitter License (MTL)

Published

on

By


Alabama grants Transak a Money Transmitter License (MTL)
  • Transak secures its first Money Transmitter License (MTL) in Alabama.
  • The license boosts security, speed, and compliance for US cryptocurrency services.
  • Transak targets further state licenses as it enhances its Web3 payments infrastructure.

On October 3, 2024, Transak USA LLC achieved a significant milestone by securing its first Money Transmitter License (MTL) from the Alabama Securities Commission.

This regulatory approval positions Transak as a fully licensed financial institution in the state, a key step in its mission to provide secure and accessible cryptocurrency services across the United States.

Transak expanding its foothold in the US

The Alabama MTL solidifies Transak’s commitment to regulatory compliance, underscoring the company’s efforts to build a secure and transparent infrastructure for crypto transactions in the US.

With cryptocurrency purchases already enabled in 46 states, the company is actively working to secure additional licenses across the country. This proactive approach highlights Transak’s determination to make cryptocurrency widely accessible and compliant with stringent financial regulations.

As a registered Money Service Business with FinCEN, Transak’s new license is a significant trust signal for its users. It allows the company to provide enhanced security, faster transactions, and a more seamless user experience for crypto purchases in Alabama. The move also benefits decentralized platforms integrated with Transak’s services, enabling them to offer their users a smoother and more compliant crypto purchasing experience.

Bryan Keane, the Compliance Officer at Transak, remarked, “Obtaining the Money Transmitter License in Alabama showcases our commitment to compliance and our mission to make cryptocurrency accessible and secure for everyone.”

In the same breath, Sami Start, the CEO of Transak, emphasized the importance of the US market, stating, “Securing state licenses like this one is essential to delivering the best possible services here.”

With over 5.7 million users across 160 countries, Transak continues to expand its presence as the largest Web3 payments infrastructure provider. Headquartered in Miami, with additional offices and tech hubs globally, Transak remains focused on obtaining more state licenses in the US, ensuring its users enjoy an increasingly reliable and legally compliant crypto experience.

The Alabama MTL marks a major step forward for Transak as it strengthens its foothold in one of the world’s most regulated and lucrative markets.



Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

CFTC votes on allowing DLT-based collateral in commodities and derivatives trading

Published

on

By


CFTC votes on allowing DLT-based collateral in commodities and derivatives trading
  • CFTC’s subcommittee recommends using DLT-based collateral in trading.
  • Approval could broaden access to digital assets for smaller market participants.
  • Strong ETF inflows signal growing institutional interest in digital assets.

In a significant development for the digital assets market, the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) is reportedly considering a proposal that would enable the use of digital ledger technology (DLT)-based collateral in commodities and derivatives trading.

According to Bloomberg, a subcommittee of the CFTC’s Global Markets Advisory Committee recently voted to recommend this proposal, which, if approved, could streamline transactions and promote broader adoption of digital assets in traditional finance.

A step toward mainstream adoption

If the proposal receives final approval from the main committee, it could lead to a paradigm shift in how trading collateral is managed.

The adoption of DLT-based collateral would allow traders to settle transactions using digital assets with the same speed and efficiency that digital ledger and blockchain technology offers.

This change would enable brokers to accept tokenized assets, such as BlackRock’s USD Institutional Digital Liquidity Fund (BUIDL) token, through market-embedded systems.

While the use of blockchain-based assets as collateral is already gaining traction among major financial institutions like BlackRock and JP Morgan, the CFTC’s potential approval would catalyze broader adoption across the industry.

As it stands, only large firms have been able to utilize these innovative financial instruments, but this move could open the doors for smaller market participants to access similar benefits.

Uncertainty ahead

Despite the positive momentum surrounding the proposal, several steps remain before it can be formally submitted for CFTC approval. The main committee must first review and endorse the subcommittee’s recommendation, and there are no guarantees that the CFTC will approve the proposal in its current form.

Regulatory concerns may arise regarding which institutions and blockchains are permitted to participate, which could introduce potential restrictions that may limit the scope of the initiative.

Furthermore, the broader context of digital assets in traditional finance cannot be ignored. Recent trends, such as strong inflows into spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs), indicate a growing acceptance and interest in digital assets among institutional investors.

For instance, BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF has recently outperformed its peers, witnessing the highest daily inflow of any fund on September 25, marking a five-day streak of inflows across all spot Bitcoin ETFs in the United States.

This surge in interest may influence the CFTC’s decision-making process as they consider the implications of allowing digital assets as collateral.

As this unfolds, stakeholders will be watching closely as the regulatory landscape continues to evolve, potentially paving the way for a more integrated future for digital assets in commodities and derivatives trading.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 coin2049.io