Regulation
Australia’s crypto casino ban came into effect last month – but there’s rapid growth in these top 10 countries
- Australia has banned the use of cryptocurrencies in online gambling
- The ban came into effect on 11th June with the introduction of the Interactive Gambling Amendment (Credit and Other Measures) Bill 2023
- Other countries are, however, seeing increased popularity for crypto casinos, including the US and UK.
Inevitably, crypto adoption is on the rise.
However, different countries and jurisdictions are taking varied approaches to regulating crypto, including its use as a payment option in online casinos.
For example, Australia, one of the countries seeing rapid adoption of cryptocurrencies, has prohibited using crypto and digital asset-linked credit cards on online gambling sites. The ban came into effect last week.
But are there other countries where the use of crypto in online casinos is legal or allowed within existing gambling laws?
Australia bans crypto for online gambling
The Australian gambling industry entered a new era last week with the implementation of a government ban on the use of cryptocurrencies in online betting.
Australia has also banned using crypto-linked credit cards, which means online casinos are prohibited from accepting deposits from credit cards linked to digital wallets.
The ban came into effect after a bill on the same passed in the House of Representatives and Senate in 2023, introducing an amendment to the country’s Interactive Gambling Act 2001. This aligned Australia’s traditional and online gambling sectors, with both now banned from accepting cryptocurrencies.
According to authorities, the restriction on crypto use in the gambling market aims at promoting responsible gambling as well as addressing financial risks. However, gambling remains legal, with all traditional payment methods allowed.
The law outlines hefty fines, with non-compliance attracting up to 234,750 Australian dollars.
While you can no longer gamble online with your cryptocurrency in Australia, there are several countries where crypto casinos are legal. Some countries also allow offshore casinos to accept Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies, which illustrates the evolving landscape of crypto regulation.
Here are the top 10 countries where Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are popular, legal, and increasingly accepted in crypto casinos.
United States
While the crypto regulatory landscape in the US continues to evolve, it’s notable that cryptocurrencies are legal. However, their use in gambling varies from state to state. As for offshore casinos, the landscape is predominantly “gray,” with many online crypto casino sites having terms and conditions that prohibit US-based players. No KYC does, however, mean anyone can access these mostly reliable, offshore-regulated online casinos.
United Kingdom
Crypto is legal in the United Kingdom, where the gambling market is one of the most popular in the world. Multiple providers offer online casinos and betting sites, but the Gambling Commission implements strict regulatory oversight.
Only licensed casinos can operate, and anti-money laundering and KYC regulations apply. One of the top sites is 10bet Online Crypto Casino, which accepts Bitcoin and other crypto assets.
Canada
Cryptocurrencies are legal in Canada, but regulators implement strict oversight, and online casinos must register. Canada also does not have specific laws against crypto use on offshore casino sites.
Norway
Norwegians have increasingly turned to crypto casinos amid monopoly by the government-controlled Norsk Tipping and Norsk Rikstoto sites. As such, the country is seeing rapid growth in crypto gambling, mostly on offshore platforms that accept Bitcoin and other digital assets.
According to a recent report, Norway is one of the countries with the highest Google searches for crypto casinos.
Sweden
Online gambling is legal in Sweden. However, regulatory oversight of foreign-based online casinos has seen players turn to cryptocurrency. Demand for crypto casinos in Sweden is also high, as with its Scandinavian neighbor.
New Zealand
New Zealand has not banned digital currencies, which is helping the gambling sector explore the benefits of crypto in online casinos.
Other countries with growing crypto casino market:
Netherlands
Online gambling is legal in the Netherlands, and the country is one of the most crypto-friendly in the EU.
India
Despite regulatory woes, India is a top crypto market, and increased adoption has put the country’s crypto casino space on an upward trajectory.
Switzerland
Switzerland requires that online gambling sites be licensed and have a domestic brick-and-mortar presence. However, crypto casinos are beginning to thrive.
Mexico
Mexico’s gambling market is set for a potential streamlining with new regulation, and with crypto legal, users can explore online sites for opportunities.
Crypto casinos are legal in Malta under the country’s legal framework that supports blockchain and crypto innovation.
Wrap up
As noted, there’s a growing demand for cryptocurrency-supported online casino games, and players worldwide continue to embrace benefits such as anonymity, fast transactions, and low fees. However, regulation is still in the early stages, and some countries have banned crypto from being used in gambling.
As Australia has shown, the question of innovation versus consumer protection is currently a key factor as crypto casinos explode in popularity.
The newly elected Indian government under Prime Minister Narendra Modi will present the Union Budget later this month on July 23. India’s crypto industry is looking forward to this budget with high hopes expecting some tax reliefs along the way. Furthermore, the crypto industry is also looking for clear guidelines from the Indian government.
India Budget: Will Govt. Reduce Crypto Tax Burden?
For the upcoming union budget, the crypto industry has a few hopes such as the reduction in crypto taxes, allowing the off-setting of crypto losses against the gains in a given financial year, as well as treating capital gains in crypto at par with other asset classes. Lastly, the industry expects India to build a conducive environment for crypto firms, in order to compete with other global economies.
Back in 2022, the Indian government had imposed a hefty 30% tax flat on crypto gains. This was irrespective of one’s income tax slab. Additionally, the government imposes a 1% tax deducted at source (TDS) on every transfer of crypto assets.
Ashish Singhal, co-founder of cryptocurrency app CoinSwitch, stated that to make the most out of India’s Web3 opportunity, the Indian government must reconsider the cryptocurrency tax treatment in the upcoming budget. He said:
“The flat rate of 30 percent applicable on income from the transfer of VDAs needs to be re-examined to ensure parity with other tech-enabled sectors. Additionally, the threshold of Rs 10,000 or Rs 50,000 can also be looked at. Most crypto sellers (mainly individuals) are in the low-income bracket. Increasing the threshold will reduce the administrative burden on the tax department in processing refunds”.
A key advantage of investing in traditional assets like stocks, gold, and bonds is the ability to offset losses in one asset against gains in another within the same year and to carry forward unadjusted losses for future adjustments. In contrast, losses from one crypto asset cannot be offset against gains from another, nor can they be carried forward. As a result, the industry is seeking a major revision to this rule.
Also read: CoinDCX Acquires BitOasis To Foray Into MENA Region
Furthermore, during the pre-budget consultations, the Bharat Web3 Association requested the government in order to reduce the TDS from 1 percent to 0.01 percent.
“The Indian VDA market has seen a sharp decline in business over the past two years since the 1 percent TDS and capital gains tax were implemented. The 1 percent TDS has significantly impacted our business. We expect the upcoming budget to address our grievances and reduce the TDS and capital gains taxes on VDA transactions to reasonable levels, allowing us a level playing field to function and prosper,” said Shivam Thakral, chief executive officer, BuyUcoin, a cryptocurrency exchange.
Learning Lessons from US Regulations
The US SEC’s approach to regulation through enforcement has faced a strong backlash from the crypto industry players in recent years. Such regulatory measures have forced several token innovators and crypto developers to set up their base outside the US.
One of the primary criticisms of US crypto regulation is the lack of clear, consistent guidelines. This uncertainty has placed startups and established companies in a challenging position, unsure of compliance requirements and wary of abrupt legal repercussions.
As India advances in shaping its crypto regulatory framework, it can draw lessons from the US to sidestep potential pitfalls and cultivate a more favorable environment for digital assets. India should aim for a balanced approach, akin to the Goldilocks zone, promoting innovation while safeguarding investors through regulations that are neither overly stringent nor lax.
Emphasizing the practical utility of blockchain technology beyond speculation can spur the creation of impactful solutions in sectors such as finance, supply chain management, and public administration.
Also Read: Voice of Web3 by Coingape : Showcasing India’s Cryptocurrency Potential
The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
A wave of controversy has erupted in the crypto community as Celsius Network faces backlash for suing users who withdrew funds prior to the company’s bankruptcy. David Schwartz, the Chief Technology Officer of Ripple, has weighed in on the matter. Moreover, he offered insights into why Celsius might have taken such drastic action.
Ripple CTO On Celsius’ Latest Move
According to a user on X, Celsius Network has initiated lawsuits against numerous users in New York courts. The user expressed frustration, stating, “Celsius Network has officially sued me and thousands of innocent users… because we happened to take our money off the platform 90 days before they declared bankruptcy.”
The crux of the issue lies in the concept of “clawback.” Clawback provisions allow bankrupt companies to recover funds withdrawn by users within a certain period before the bankruptcy filing. In this case, the period is 90 days. Hence, Ripple CTO Schwartz emphasized the legitimacy of these actions in specific contexts, particularly regarding “non-existent ‘profits.’”
He stated, “If you withdrew fake ‘profits’ that were never actually earned or generated, then you didn’t withdraw your own money.” A user responded to the Ripple CTO, highlighting the perceived injustice. They wrote, “Clawback attempt for people who had withdrawn within 90 days of filing for BK. Absolutely disgraceful behavior.”
Schwartz tried clarifying the nuances by asking, “Are they just trying to clawback non-existent ‘profits’? Or are they trying to clawback returns of principal?” Further discourse revealed that Celsius is allegedly pursuing the return of both profits and principal amounts withdrawn within the 90-day period. The original poster detailed, “They started off asking for 27% of all principal as a settlement, which came across as a giant scam.”
Schwartz’s stance on such actions is clear: “Usually, in schemes like this, they don’t go after people who withdrew their own principal unless there’s evidence that they had inside information or connections.” Moreover, the lawsuit’s impact on users has been severe.
Also Read: XRP Price Decline To $0.40; Can The Ripple’s New Try It Feature Change That?
The Other Perspective
The original poster mentioned, “They are asking for outrageous sums of money, basically my entire net worth.” This sentiment is echoed by many in the crypto community, who fear the broader implications of such legal actions. Another user questioned, “Why would they let you keep profits off assets they are saying you didn’t have the right to have?”
Replying to the user, the Ripple CTO provided a different perspective this time. He argued that the losses suffered by users are a result of Celsius’ fraudulent activities. He stated, “Why should an innocent party bear the costs of Celsius’ fraud? Why should the victim have to suffer the additional loss of bearing the costs of a free option they never agreed to give anyone?”
The lawsuits have not only financial repercussions but also emotional ones. The original poster described the emotional turmoil caused by the lawsuits and the substantial legal fees incurred. “I have to spend thousands to retain an attorney,” they lamented.
As the crypto community watches closely, prominent figures like Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong and TRON founder Justin Sun have been called upon to support the affected users. In addition, they also asked for aid from ZachXBT, a renowned crypto sleuth. The outcome of these lawsuits could set a significant precedent for the industry.
Also Read: Ripple CLO Slams US Authority Over Crypto Regulation Approach
The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
The U.S. House will vote next week to overturn President Joe Biden’s veto of Staff Accounting Bulletin 121, also known as SAB 121. The bulletin has stirred controversy in the crypto industry. It mandates that firms custodying crypto record customer holdings as liabilities.
House Majority Leader Steve Scalise indicated the vote might occur on Tuesday or Wednesday. Following the veto, the vote is a constitutional obligation. The measure previously passed the House with a 228-182 vote.
Bipartisan Push to Overturn SAB 121 Veto
SAB 121 requires firms holding crypto assets for customers to list these as liabilities. This rule has raised concerns among banks and the crypto industry. They argue it could hinder their ability to safeguard digital assets.
The resolution to overturn SAB 121 has seen bipartisan support. In May, the Senate passed it with a 60-38 vote, including support from Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer. However, overturning a veto requires a two-thirds majority in the House and Senate.
From venture capital firm Paradigm, Alexander Grieve noted the challenge but saw potential. “Remember when Biden vetoed the SAB121 rollback? It’s back on the House floor next week.” He pointed out the previous bipartisan support for the FIT21 crypto market structure bill.
Also Read: Craig Wright Faces $1.9M Legal Bill As London Court Issues Freezing Order
Challenges Mount in Overturning Crypto Rule Veto
Despite bipartisan support, overturning the veto remains challenging. The House needs 290 votes, 60 more than the initial 228 votes in favor. Cody Carbone from the Chamber of Digital Commerce expressed doubts about reaching this threshold.
Carbone emphasized the difficulty of changing 60 members’ minds in a week. He acknowledged the efforts for consumer protection and good governance. However, he believes the attempt to override the veto will ultimately fail.
The crypto industry remains hopeful but realistic about the upcoming vote. They recognize the steep hill to climb to overturn the veto. The focus now is on rallying additional support in the House.
The outcome of the vote has significant implications for the crypto industry. If the veto is overturned, it could ease concerns about banks’ ability to safeguard digital assets. Conversely, if it stands, firms may need help complying with SAB 121.
The crypto industry has been vocal about its concerns. They argue that the rule could stifle innovation and hinder the growth of digital assets. The upcoming vote is crucial for determining the regulatory landscape for crypto.
Supporters of overturning the veto emphasize the importance of flexibility for financial institutions. They argue that SAB 121 imposes undue burdens on firms holding crypto assets. The vote will be a crucial indicator of congressional support for the crypto industry.
Also Read: Venezuela’s Digital Asset Remittances Hit Yearly $460 Million
The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
TRON to Launch Gas-Free Stablecoin Transfers in Q4 2024
1 in 4 US Voters Likely to Invest in Ethereum ETFs
Where Will Bitcoin (BTC) Price Head Amidst Liquidations?
Bitcoin Cycle Peak: How The USDT Dominance Could Predict The Top
US CPI Inflation & Fed Chair Testimony To Shape Bitcoin & Altcoins Trading This Week
LayerZero On The Rise: ZRO Bullish Momentum Points To New Highs
Hong Kong’s Securities Association Tips Authorities On Crypto Self-Regulation
TON Foundation’s Plan to Onboard 500 Million Users
CFTC Appoints Dr. Ted Kaouk as First Chief AI Officer
Are Solana, Cardano, Polygon Commodities As US SEC Ends Ethereum Investigation?
New And Upcoming NFT Projects
Terraform Labs Refuses to Pay $5.3 Billion Fine, Says SEC Has No Evidence
Hong Kong’s Securities Association Tips Authorities On Crypto Self-Regulation
TON Foundation’s Plan to Onboard 500 Million Users
CFTC Appoints Dr. Ted Kaouk as First Chief AI Officer
Are Solana, Cardano, Polygon Commodities As US SEC Ends Ethereum Investigation?
New And Upcoming NFT Projects
Terraform Labs Refuses to Pay $5.3 Billion Fine, Says SEC Has No Evidence
-
Blockchain2 months agoHong Kong’s Securities Association Tips Authorities On Crypto Self-Regulation
-
Market3 weeks ago
TON Foundation’s Plan to Onboard 500 Million Users
-
Regulation2 months agoCFTC Appoints Dr. Ted Kaouk as First Chief AI Officer
-
Altcoin3 weeks ago
Are Solana, Cardano, Polygon Commodities As US SEC Ends Ethereum Investigation?
-
NFT4 weeks agoNew And Upcoming NFT Projects
-
Regulation2 months agoTerraform Labs Refuses to Pay $5.3 Billion Fine, Says SEC Has No Evidence
-
Market4 weeks agoAvalanche (AVAX) Under Pressure: Prolonged Downtrend Next?
-
Altcoin3 weeks ago2.52 Million Altcoins Are Ruining Crypto’s Future
✓ Share: