Connect with us

Regulation

US Supreme Court to Hear Nvidia Crypto Mining Revenue Case

Published

on


The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear an appeal by Nvidia Corporation seeking to dismiss a securities fraud lawsuit alleging that the company misled investors about the extent of its revenue derived from the cryptocurrency industry.

Nvidia’s Appeal to Supreme Court

Nvidia’s appeal was heard by the justices after the 9th U. S. Circuit Court of Appeals reinstanced a class action lawsuit filed by shareholders against Nvidia and its CEO, Jensen Huang

The legal proceeding was filed by the Swedish investment management company E. Ohman J Fonder AB and asks for an undisclosed amount of money damages.

Nvidia and its top executives, consequently, are accused of issuing false statements in 2017 and 2018 regarding the significance of cryptocurrency-related sales in the company’s revenue.

Lawsuit History and Allegations

The case was launched back in 2018 with the main allegation of Nvidia violating the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The plaintiffs alleged that Nvidia did not provide accurate information about the percentage of its revenue that came from cryptomining, a process that involves the use of GPUs to solve mathematical problems in the mining of digital currencies such as Bitcoin.

This alleged omission concealed the fact that cryptomining had a negative and significant effect on Nvidia’s business from investors and analysts. 

The lower court had however rejected the case in 2021, but the 9th Circuit in a 2-1 decision decided in the latter half of 2021 that the lawsuit can go forward, because the plaintiffs plausibly alleged that Nvidia made “false or misleading statements knowingly or recklessly. “

Previous Settlements and Ongoing Litigation

Nvidia has posited that the 9th Circuit’s decision can result in “abusive and speculative litigation”, this is why the company has called on the Supreme Court to get involved. In the year 2022, Nvidia was charged by the U.S. authorities, and the company resolved to pay $5. 5 million for not adequately disclosing the effect of cryptomining on its gaming unit. This settlement however did not stop the shareholder lawsuit from continuing to the next level.

In addition, the justices have also consented to hear another such case concerning Meta Platforms Inc. where the shareholders of the social media company have alleged that the company misled the investors about the abuse of users’ data.

Earlier this month, US regulators opened an investigation into Nvidia alongside Microsoft and OpenAI on possible antitrust issues in the AI market. These probes that are in progress are led by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) and are directed towards handling cases of market power and competition.

Read Also: Top US SEC Executive Quits After 9 Years Of Service

✓ Share:

Kelvin is a distinguished writer specializing in crypto and finance, backed by a Bachelor’s in Actuarial Science. Recognized for incisive analysis and insightful content, he has an adept command of English and excels at thorough research and timely delivery.

The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Regulation

Nigerian Kucoin users to pay 7.5% VAT on all transactions

Published

on

By


  • Starting Monday, July 8th, Kucoin will charge a 7.5% tax on all transactions made by users registered in Nigeria.
  • This decision comes from a regulatory update from the Nigerian SEC.

Kucoin exchange took to Twitter (X) to announce that starting Monday, July 8th, Nigerian users will be charged a 7.5% value-added tax on all transactions. This move, spurred by the Nigerian SEC’s regulatory actions, comes a month after the regulator asked all crypto exchanges and businesses to re-register or risk enforcement action.

This levy may be a sign that the Nigerian SEC is at the early stages of recognising cryptocurrencies, three years after the country’s Central Bank ordered banks to stop transacting with cryptos either for themselves or corporate entities.

The Nigerian government has tried to impose a 10% levy on crypto transactions through the 2023 Finance Act but was unable to enforce it due largely to regulatory opacity.

While the SEC Chairman Emomotimi Agama has not commented on the new tax, the regulator admits that this new rule is part of its plan to regulate crypto.



Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

Binance’s Illegal Operations Highlighted in Court by Central Bank

Published

on

By


In a court hearing in Abuja, Nigerian authorities intensified their legal battle against the cryptocurrency exchange Binance. Central Bank officials testified that Binance operated without a license, which aligns with allegations of facilitating illegal transactions on its platform.

Binance Accused of Unlicensed Operations in Nigeria

Olubukola Akinwunmi, a key figure from Nigeria’s central bank, claimed Binance had no authority to enable cryptocurrency trades in Nigeria. The lack of a formal license emerged as a significant point during the court proceedings. The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission leveraged this point, underscoring potential legal violations by Binance.

Akinwunmi explained that Binance’s services equated to a money brokerage requiring specific regulatory approval. He highlighted the peer-to-peer platform’s ability to exchange naira for other fiat currencies. Such operations typically necessitate central bank authorization as a recognized exchange or a bureau de change.

Moreover, the central bank official criticized Binance for allowing pseudonymous trading on its platform. Despite Binance’s stringent identity verification measures for Nigerian users, these practices have been questioned. Binance mandates local banking details and government-issued IDs for Nigerian traders.

Also Read: Venezuela’s Digital Asset Remittances Hit Yearly $460 Million

Gambaryan’s Health Ignored by Nigerian Officials

Tigran Gambaryan, Binance’s US-based compliance executive, faces charges alongside the firm. Since his arrest in February, Gambaryan has been held at Kuje Prison and has encountered severe health issues, including malaria and pneumonia. His condition worsened, leading to a collapse at the trial’s outset in May.

Despite a judicial order for medical attention, prison officials delayed compliance, only conducting tests weeks later. The results have not been disclosed to Gambaryan’s defense team. This neglect sparked criticism from Justice Emeka Nwite, who admonished the prosecution and prison authorities for disregarding his directives.

Justice Nwite warned of consequences if the medical reports are not presented by the next court date, set for July 16. Meanwhile, prison officials have dismissed allegations of mistreatment, asserting that Gambaryan is not in a severe health condition. The ongoing trial has drawn attention to the broader implications of cryptocurrency regulation in Nigeria.

Following these legal challenges, Binance ceased its operations for Nigerian users, affecting an estimated 13 million customers. The sudden withdrawal has left many seeking alternative trading platforms.

Also Read: Multicoin Capital To Fund Crypto-Friendly US Candidates In Solana

✓ Share:

Maxwell is a crypto-economic analyst and Blockchain enthusiast, passionate about helping people understand the potential of decentralized technology. I write extensively on topics such as blockchain, cryptocurrency, tokens, and more for many publications. My goal is to spread knowledge about this revolutionary technology and its implications for economic freedom and social good.

The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

FTX Founder Sam Bankman-Fried’s Family Accused Of $100M Illicit Political Donation

Published

on

By


New allegations have surfaced surrounding Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF), the founder of the now-collapsed crypto exchange FTX. SBF’s family is now accused of being involved in a $100 million illicit political donation scheme. Moreover, these claims can lead to intense legal trouble for the accused.

Sam Bankman-Fried’s Family Accused Of Illegal Political Donation

Emails disclosed by The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) have brought to light the extensive involvement of SBF’s family in orchestrating these political contributions. Furthermore, an important point to note is that these donations were allegedly funded by misappropriated FTX customer assets.

Prosecutors asserted that Bankman-Fried orchestrated a sprawling influence campaign ahead of the 2022 election, leveraging stolen customer funds to the tune of over $100 million. The newly revealed emails suggest that key family members played pivotal roles in the scheme. These include SBF’s parents, Joe Bankman and Barbara Fried, along with his brother, Gabriel Bankman-Fried. They managed these funds and directed donations to various political causes and candidates.

Moreover, Joe Bankman, a Stanford University law professor, is accused of advising on financial strategies to facilitate these political donations. The WSJ reports that emails show Joe Bankman’s direct involvement in the illicit operations, indicating he was well aware of the illegal straw-donor scheme.

Barbara Fried, who co-founded the political action committee (PAC) Mind the Gap, allegedly used her position to channel funds towards progressive groups and initiatives. Meanwhile, Gabriel Bankman-Fried is accused of directing donations to pandemic prevention efforts. This coordinated effort to disperse funds across the political spectrum aimed to amplify their influence and support favored causes without drawing attention to the origin of the donations.

Also Read: Fmr Obama Solicitor Says Regulators Are “Deliberately Debanking Crypto”

Former FTX Execs Also Involved

David Mason, ex-chairman of the Federal Election Commission (FCE), weighed in on the matter. Mason highlighted that the evidence presented in the emails constituted “strong evidence” of Joe Bankman’s knowledge and participation in the scheme.

The political donation scheme, as detailed by the WSJ, also involved Ryan Salame and Nishad Singh, two former FTX executives. They have already pleaded guilty to participating in the illegal straw-donor scheme. According to prosecutors, Salame directed funds to Republican candidates to dissociate the contributions from Bankman-Fried, while Singh supported liberal candidates.

The allegations have led to several legal proceedings, with the potential for significant legal liabilities for those involved. Moreover, Mason’s remarks underscore the gravity of the situation. It suggests that Joe Bankman could face direct legal consequences under campaign finance laws if the allegations are substantiated.

Despite the mounting evidence, a spokesperson for Joe Bankman has refuted claims of his involvement. They stated that Bankman had “no knowledge of any alleged campaign finance violations.” This defense, however, stands in stark contrast to the detailed emails that have surfaced.

Also Read: Just-In: Mt. Gox Starts Repaying Creditors, Bitcoin To Dip Further?

✓ Share:

Kritika boasts over 2 years of experience in the financial news sector. Currently working as a crypto journalist at Coingape, she has consistently shown a knack for blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies. Kritika combines insightful analysis with a deep understanding of market trends. With a keen interest in technical analysis, she brings a nuanced perspective to her reporting, exploring the intersection of finance, technology, and emerging trends in the crypto space.

The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2024 coin2049.io