Regulation
Billionaire Mark Cuban Says Gary Gensler Can Cost Joe Biden the Election
There’s been a major shift in the Biden administration’s approach toward the crypto market recently, however, the top industry market players aren’t quite satisfied with the way SEC Chair Gary Gensler has been dealing with crypto-related issues. Billionaire Mark Cuban has literally warned that Gary Gensler can cost President Joe Biden the 2024 Presidential Election.
Mark Cuban Lashes Out At Gary Gensler
Fox Business Reported Eleanor Terret stated that billionaire Mark Cuban has voiced strong criticism against the SEC Chair Gary Gensler suggesting that he can play a spoilsport for Biden in the upcoming elections.
Cuban also added that Gensler’s stand on digital assets could possibly alienate young crypto-owning voters. “If he has a political career in mind, he’s done,” Cuban remarked about Gensler.
Speaking at the Coinbase State of Crypto event, Cuban told the attendees that he is informing governors, senators, and representatives that the SEC registration process poses major challenges to American crypto companies. He called this issue a “uniquely American Gary Gensler problem”.
SEC Should Prioritize on Crypto Regulatory Clarity
Cuban is not alone in calling out SEC’s laggard approach towards crypto regulations. Senator Bill Hagerty has also urged Gary Gensler to prioritize the clarity of crypto regulations. The Senator further stated that there’s a need for a proper ecosystem in order to prevent pushing the crypto industry offshore. “This industry needs to have a proper ecosystem…so we’re not shoving it offshore,” Hagerty stated.
However, responding to this, the SEC chair countered saying that breaking the law and disliking the law are not the same as lack of clarity. However, one positive thing is that the SEC chair has assured the spot Ethereum ETF approval by this summer.
Despite this statement from Gensler, Hagerty maintained that there’s still major uncertainty and ambiguity from the SEC, adding that it “need not be that way”.
Furthermore, Senator Dick Durbin also questioned Gary Gensler on whether the Commodities and Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has sufficient resources in order to regulate the crypto industry.
Responding to this, Gensler said that it “depends on what they’re given,” noting that the CFTC lacks the established disclosure regime that the SEC has in place.
The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
The newly elected Indian government under Prime Minister Narendra Modi will present the Union Budget later this month on July 23. India’s crypto industry is looking forward to this budget with high hopes expecting some tax reliefs along the way. Furthermore, the crypto industry is also looking for clear guidelines from the Indian government.
India Budget: Will Govt. Reduce Crypto Tax Burden?
For the upcoming union budget, the crypto industry has a few hopes such as the reduction in crypto taxes, allowing the off-setting of crypto losses against the gains in a given financial year, as well as treating capital gains in crypto at par with other asset classes. Lastly, the industry expects India to build a conducive environment for crypto firms, in order to compete with other global economies.
Back in 2022, the Indian government had imposed a hefty 30% tax flat on crypto gains. This was irrespective of one’s income tax slab. Additionally, the government imposes a 1% tax deducted at source (TDS) on every transfer of crypto assets.
Ashish Singhal, co-founder of cryptocurrency app CoinSwitch, stated that to make the most out of India’s Web3 opportunity, the Indian government must reconsider the cryptocurrency tax treatment in the upcoming budget. He said:
“The flat rate of 30 percent applicable on income from the transfer of VDAs needs to be re-examined to ensure parity with other tech-enabled sectors. Additionally, the threshold of Rs 10,000 or Rs 50,000 can also be looked at. Most crypto sellers (mainly individuals) are in the low-income bracket. Increasing the threshold will reduce the administrative burden on the tax department in processing refunds”.
A key advantage of investing in traditional assets like stocks, gold, and bonds is the ability to offset losses in one asset against gains in another within the same year and to carry forward unadjusted losses for future adjustments. In contrast, losses from one crypto asset cannot be offset against gains from another, nor can they be carried forward. As a result, the industry is seeking a major revision to this rule.
Also read: CoinDCX Acquires BitOasis To Foray Into MENA Region
Furthermore, during the pre-budget consultations, the Bharat Web3 Association requested the government in order to reduce the TDS from 1 percent to 0.01 percent.
“The Indian VDA market has seen a sharp decline in business over the past two years since the 1 percent TDS and capital gains tax were implemented. The 1 percent TDS has significantly impacted our business. We expect the upcoming budget to address our grievances and reduce the TDS and capital gains taxes on VDA transactions to reasonable levels, allowing us a level playing field to function and prosper,” said Shivam Thakral, chief executive officer, BuyUcoin, a cryptocurrency exchange.
Learning Lessons from US Regulations
The US SEC’s approach to regulation through enforcement has faced a strong backlash from the crypto industry players in recent years. Such regulatory measures have forced several token innovators and crypto developers to set up their base outside the US.
One of the primary criticisms of US crypto regulation is the lack of clear, consistent guidelines. This uncertainty has placed startups and established companies in a challenging position, unsure of compliance requirements and wary of abrupt legal repercussions.
As India advances in shaping its crypto regulatory framework, it can draw lessons from the US to sidestep potential pitfalls and cultivate a more favorable environment for digital assets. India should aim for a balanced approach, akin to the Goldilocks zone, promoting innovation while safeguarding investors through regulations that are neither overly stringent nor lax.
Emphasizing the practical utility of blockchain technology beyond speculation can spur the creation of impactful solutions in sectors such as finance, supply chain management, and public administration.
Also Read: Voice of Web3 by Coingape : Showcasing India’s Cryptocurrency Potential
The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
A wave of controversy has erupted in the crypto community as Celsius Network faces backlash for suing users who withdrew funds prior to the company’s bankruptcy. David Schwartz, the Chief Technology Officer of Ripple, has weighed in on the matter. Moreover, he offered insights into why Celsius might have taken such drastic action.
Ripple CTO On Celsius’ Latest Move
According to a user on X, Celsius Network has initiated lawsuits against numerous users in New York courts. The user expressed frustration, stating, “Celsius Network has officially sued me and thousands of innocent users… because we happened to take our money off the platform 90 days before they declared bankruptcy.”
The crux of the issue lies in the concept of “clawback.” Clawback provisions allow bankrupt companies to recover funds withdrawn by users within a certain period before the bankruptcy filing. In this case, the period is 90 days. Hence, Ripple CTO Schwartz emphasized the legitimacy of these actions in specific contexts, particularly regarding “non-existent ‘profits.’”
He stated, “If you withdrew fake ‘profits’ that were never actually earned or generated, then you didn’t withdraw your own money.” A user responded to the Ripple CTO, highlighting the perceived injustice. They wrote, “Clawback attempt for people who had withdrawn within 90 days of filing for BK. Absolutely disgraceful behavior.”
Schwartz tried clarifying the nuances by asking, “Are they just trying to clawback non-existent ‘profits’? Or are they trying to clawback returns of principal?” Further discourse revealed that Celsius is allegedly pursuing the return of both profits and principal amounts withdrawn within the 90-day period. The original poster detailed, “They started off asking for 27% of all principal as a settlement, which came across as a giant scam.”
Schwartz’s stance on such actions is clear: “Usually, in schemes like this, they don’t go after people who withdrew their own principal unless there’s evidence that they had inside information or connections.” Moreover, the lawsuit’s impact on users has been severe.
Also Read: XRP Price Decline To $0.40; Can The Ripple’s New Try It Feature Change That?
The Other Perspective
The original poster mentioned, “They are asking for outrageous sums of money, basically my entire net worth.” This sentiment is echoed by many in the crypto community, who fear the broader implications of such legal actions. Another user questioned, “Why would they let you keep profits off assets they are saying you didn’t have the right to have?”
Replying to the user, the Ripple CTO provided a different perspective this time. He argued that the losses suffered by users are a result of Celsius’ fraudulent activities. He stated, “Why should an innocent party bear the costs of Celsius’ fraud? Why should the victim have to suffer the additional loss of bearing the costs of a free option they never agreed to give anyone?”
The lawsuits have not only financial repercussions but also emotional ones. The original poster described the emotional turmoil caused by the lawsuits and the substantial legal fees incurred. “I have to spend thousands to retain an attorney,” they lamented.
As the crypto community watches closely, prominent figures like Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong and TRON founder Justin Sun have been called upon to support the affected users. In addition, they also asked for aid from ZachXBT, a renowned crypto sleuth. The outcome of these lawsuits could set a significant precedent for the industry.
Also Read: Ripple CLO Slams US Authority Over Crypto Regulation Approach
The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
The U.S. House will vote next week to overturn President Joe Biden’s veto of Staff Accounting Bulletin 121, also known as SAB 121. The bulletin has stirred controversy in the crypto industry. It mandates that firms custodying crypto record customer holdings as liabilities.
House Majority Leader Steve Scalise indicated the vote might occur on Tuesday or Wednesday. Following the veto, the vote is a constitutional obligation. The measure previously passed the House with a 228-182 vote.
Bipartisan Push to Overturn SAB 121 Veto
SAB 121 requires firms holding crypto assets for customers to list these as liabilities. This rule has raised concerns among banks and the crypto industry. They argue it could hinder their ability to safeguard digital assets.
The resolution to overturn SAB 121 has seen bipartisan support. In May, the Senate passed it with a 60-38 vote, including support from Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer. However, overturning a veto requires a two-thirds majority in the House and Senate.
From venture capital firm Paradigm, Alexander Grieve noted the challenge but saw potential. “Remember when Biden vetoed the SAB121 rollback? It’s back on the House floor next week.” He pointed out the previous bipartisan support for the FIT21 crypto market structure bill.
Also Read: Craig Wright Faces $1.9M Legal Bill As London Court Issues Freezing Order
Challenges Mount in Overturning Crypto Rule Veto
Despite bipartisan support, overturning the veto remains challenging. The House needs 290 votes, 60 more than the initial 228 votes in favor. Cody Carbone from the Chamber of Digital Commerce expressed doubts about reaching this threshold.
Carbone emphasized the difficulty of changing 60 members’ minds in a week. He acknowledged the efforts for consumer protection and good governance. However, he believes the attempt to override the veto will ultimately fail.
The crypto industry remains hopeful but realistic about the upcoming vote. They recognize the steep hill to climb to overturn the veto. The focus now is on rallying additional support in the House.
The outcome of the vote has significant implications for the crypto industry. If the veto is overturned, it could ease concerns about banks’ ability to safeguard digital assets. Conversely, if it stands, firms may need help complying with SAB 121.
The crypto industry has been vocal about its concerns. They argue that the rule could stifle innovation and hinder the growth of digital assets. The upcoming vote is crucial for determining the regulatory landscape for crypto.
Supporters of overturning the veto emphasize the importance of flexibility for financial institutions. They argue that SAB 121 imposes undue burdens on firms holding crypto assets. The vote will be a crucial indicator of congressional support for the crypto industry.
Also Read: Venezuela’s Digital Asset Remittances Hit Yearly $460 Million
The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Craig Wright Assets Frozen Over Defamation Suit
Crunching The Bitcoin Data: CEO Analyzes Impact Of Recent Gov’t Sales
Court Sets Deadlines For Motions And Hearings
How Is BONK Price in Jeopardy From Its Investors?
Are Andrew Tate Tokens Recovering Amid Slow July?
Bitcoin Mining Facing Profitability Squeeze
Hong Kong’s Securities Association Tips Authorities On Crypto Self-Regulation
CFTC Appoints Dr. Ted Kaouk as First Chief AI Officer
Are Solana, Cardano, Polygon Commodities As US SEC Ends Ethereum Investigation?
TON Foundation’s Plan to Onboard 500 Million Users
Terraform Labs Refuses to Pay $5.3 Billion Fine, Says SEC Has No Evidence
New And Upcoming NFT Projects
Hong Kong’s Securities Association Tips Authorities On Crypto Self-Regulation
CFTC Appoints Dr. Ted Kaouk as First Chief AI Officer
Are Solana, Cardano, Polygon Commodities As US SEC Ends Ethereum Investigation?
TON Foundation’s Plan to Onboard 500 Million Users
Terraform Labs Refuses to Pay $5.3 Billion Fine, Says SEC Has No Evidence
New And Upcoming NFT Projects
-
Blockchain2 months agoHong Kong’s Securities Association Tips Authorities On Crypto Self-Regulation
-
Regulation2 months agoCFTC Appoints Dr. Ted Kaouk as First Chief AI Officer
-
Altcoin2 weeks ago
Are Solana, Cardano, Polygon Commodities As US SEC Ends Ethereum Investigation?
-
Market2 weeks ago
TON Foundation’s Plan to Onboard 500 Million Users
-
Regulation2 months agoTerraform Labs Refuses to Pay $5.3 Billion Fine, Says SEC Has No Evidence
-
NFT3 weeks agoNew And Upcoming NFT Projects
-
Market4 weeks agoAvalanche (AVAX) Under Pressure: Prolonged Downtrend Next?
-
Altcoin2 weeks ago2.52 Million Altcoins Are Ruining Crypto’s Future
✓ Share: