Regulation
Here’s Why Binance, OKX Withdew Licensing Applications In Hong Kong
Hong Kong’s ambitions to become the most-desired destination for Web3 and crypto seem to be taking a backseat as some of the top global exchanges have withdrawn their licensing applications from Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC).
Global Exchanges Withdraw from Hong Kong
As per the local news report, some of the top global exchanges like Binance, Huobi, and OKX have decided to withdraw their application during the last week of May. A total of 11 exchanges have withdrawn their applications leaving only 11 applicants on the list.
The Hong Kong SFC mandates that all applicants for virtual asset trading platform licenses sign a letter of commitment, ensuring they do not have mainland Chinese users in any region. This requirement poses a significant challenge for traditional offshore exchanges. OKX attempted to form an industry alliance to contest this stipulation but was ultimately unsuccessful.
Some of the industry insiders noted that the withdrawn entity could revise its legal entity or framework and reapply in the future. However, it should not use a brand similar to that of offshore exchanges in its application.
Are HK’s Web3 Ambitions Over?
With OKX exiting Hong Kong, many in the crypto community have started questioning whether Hong Kong’s Web3 ambitions are over.
Several individuals in Hong Kong’s WeChat circles have accused the authorities of timidity and excessive caution when implementing the new system. They argue that the authorities’ conservative and risk-averse approach, rooted in traditional financial thinking, has weakened the competitiveness and flexibility of the licenses. Consequently, some operators decided to withdraw their applications at the final stage, despite having invested substantial resources and upfront costs.
The author noted several areas of concern with the new licensing system. Firstly, various policies and measures related to the development of Hong Kong’s virtual asset market—such as VATP, stablecoin issuance, and virtual asset over-the-counter trading—were designed by different departments without cohesive strategic considerations for industrial development.
These policies entered the consultation stage or legislative process at different times, leading to a phased completion of the entire Web3 layout. This protracted process has struggled to keep pace with the rapid evolution of technology.
The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
A wave of controversy has erupted in the crypto community as Celsius Network faces backlash for suing users who withdrew funds prior to the company’s bankruptcy. David Schwartz, the Chief Technology Officer of Ripple, has weighed in on the matter. Moreover, he offered insights into why Celsius might have taken such drastic action.
Ripple CTO On Celsius’ Latest Move
According to a user on X, Celsius Network has initiated lawsuits against numerous users in New York courts. The user expressed frustration, stating, “Celsius Network has officially sued me and thousands of innocent users… because we happened to take our money off the platform 90 days before they declared bankruptcy.”
The crux of the issue lies in the concept of “clawback.” Clawback provisions allow bankrupt companies to recover funds withdrawn by users within a certain period before the bankruptcy filing. In this case, the period is 90 days. Hence, Ripple CTO Schwartz emphasized the legitimacy of these actions in specific contexts, particularly regarding “non-existent ‘profits.’”
He stated, “If you withdrew fake ‘profits’ that were never actually earned or generated, then you didn’t withdraw your own money.” A user responded to the Ripple CTO, highlighting the perceived injustice. They wrote, “Clawback attempt for people who had withdrawn within 90 days of filing for BK. Absolutely disgraceful behavior.”
Schwartz tried clarifying the nuances by asking, “Are they just trying to clawback non-existent ‘profits’? Or are they trying to clawback returns of principal?” Further discourse revealed that Celsius is allegedly pursuing the return of both profits and principal amounts withdrawn within the 90-day period. The original poster detailed, “They started off asking for 27% of all principal as a settlement, which came across as a giant scam.”
Schwartz’s stance on such actions is clear: “Usually, in schemes like this, they don’t go after people who withdrew their own principal unless there’s evidence that they had inside information or connections.” Moreover, the lawsuit’s impact on users has been severe.
Also Read: XRP Price Decline To $0.40; Can The Ripple’s New Try It Feature Change That?
The Other Perspective
The original poster mentioned, “They are asking for outrageous sums of money, basically my entire net worth.” This sentiment is echoed by many in the crypto community, who fear the broader implications of such legal actions. Another user questioned, “Why would they let you keep profits off assets they are saying you didn’t have the right to have?”
Replying to the user, the Ripple CTO provided a different perspective this time. He argued that the losses suffered by users are a result of Celsius’ fraudulent activities. He stated, “Why should an innocent party bear the costs of Celsius’ fraud? Why should the victim have to suffer the additional loss of bearing the costs of a free option they never agreed to give anyone?”
The lawsuits have not only financial repercussions but also emotional ones. The original poster described the emotional turmoil caused by the lawsuits and the substantial legal fees incurred. “I have to spend thousands to retain an attorney,” they lamented.
As the crypto community watches closely, prominent figures like Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong and TRON founder Justin Sun have been called upon to support the affected users. In addition, they also asked for aid from ZachXBT, a renowned crypto sleuth. The outcome of these lawsuits could set a significant precedent for the industry.
Also Read: Ripple CLO Slams US Authority Over Crypto Regulation Approach
The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
The U.S. House will vote next week to overturn President Joe Biden’s veto of Staff Accounting Bulletin 121, also known as SAB 121. The bulletin has stirred controversy in the crypto industry. It mandates that firms custodying crypto record customer holdings as liabilities.
House Majority Leader Steve Scalise indicated the vote might occur on Tuesday or Wednesday. Following the veto, the vote is a constitutional obligation. The measure previously passed the House with a 228-182 vote.
Bipartisan Push to Overturn SAB 121 Veto
SAB 121 requires firms holding crypto assets for customers to list these as liabilities. This rule has raised concerns among banks and the crypto industry. They argue it could hinder their ability to safeguard digital assets.
The resolution to overturn SAB 121 has seen bipartisan support. In May, the Senate passed it with a 60-38 vote, including support from Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer. However, overturning a veto requires a two-thirds majority in the House and Senate.
From venture capital firm Paradigm, Alexander Grieve noted the challenge but saw potential. “Remember when Biden vetoed the SAB121 rollback? It’s back on the House floor next week.” He pointed out the previous bipartisan support for the FIT21 crypto market structure bill.
Also Read: Craig Wright Faces $1.9M Legal Bill As London Court Issues Freezing Order
Challenges Mount in Overturning Crypto Rule Veto
Despite bipartisan support, overturning the veto remains challenging. The House needs 290 votes, 60 more than the initial 228 votes in favor. Cody Carbone from the Chamber of Digital Commerce expressed doubts about reaching this threshold.
Carbone emphasized the difficulty of changing 60 members’ minds in a week. He acknowledged the efforts for consumer protection and good governance. However, he believes the attempt to override the veto will ultimately fail.
The crypto industry remains hopeful but realistic about the upcoming vote. They recognize the steep hill to climb to overturn the veto. The focus now is on rallying additional support in the House.
The outcome of the vote has significant implications for the crypto industry. If the veto is overturned, it could ease concerns about banks’ ability to safeguard digital assets. Conversely, if it stands, firms may need help complying with SAB 121.
The crypto industry has been vocal about its concerns. They argue that the rule could stifle innovation and hinder the growth of digital assets. The upcoming vote is crucial for determining the regulatory landscape for crypto.
Supporters of overturning the veto emphasize the importance of flexibility for financial institutions. They argue that SAB 121 imposes undue burdens on firms holding crypto assets. The vote will be a crucial indicator of congressional support for the crypto industry.
Also Read: Venezuela’s Digital Asset Remittances Hit Yearly $460 Million
The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
- Starting Monday, July 8th, Kucoin will charge a 7.5% tax on all transactions made by users registered in Nigeria.
- This decision comes from a regulatory update from the Nigerian SEC.
Kucoin exchange took to Twitter (X) to announce that starting Monday, July 8th, Nigerian users will be charged a 7.5% value-added tax on all transactions. This move, spurred by the Nigerian SEC’s regulatory actions, comes a month after the regulator asked all crypto exchanges and businesses to re-register or risk enforcement action.
This levy may be a sign that the Nigerian SEC is at the early stages of recognising cryptocurrencies, three years after the country’s Central Bank ordered banks to stop transacting with cryptos either for themselves or corporate entities.
The Nigerian government has tried to impose a 10% levy on crypto transactions through the 2023 Finance Act but was unable to enforce it due largely to regulatory opacity.
While the SEC Chairman Emomotimi Agama has not commented on the new tax, the regulator admits that this new rule is part of its plan to regulate crypto.
Paraguay Fights Illegal Miners, and More
LayerZero ZRO Jumps 40% Amid Market Recovery, What’s Happening?
Congress to Vote on Overturning Biden’s SAB 121 veto
6 Cryptos To Stay Cautious Of As $177M Token Unlocks Approach
Justin Sun Potential $66 Million Loss Revealed As Ethereum Price Declines
XRP Flashes Buy Signal For $0.50 As Whales, Notable Investors Buy The Dip
Hong Kong’s Securities Association Tips Authorities On Crypto Self-Regulation
CFTC Appoints Dr. Ted Kaouk as First Chief AI Officer
Are Solana, Cardano, Polygon Commodities As US SEC Ends Ethereum Investigation?
TON Foundation’s Plan to Onboard 500 Million Users
Terraform Labs Refuses to Pay $5.3 Billion Fine, Says SEC Has No Evidence
New And Upcoming NFT Projects
Hong Kong’s Securities Association Tips Authorities On Crypto Self-Regulation
CFTC Appoints Dr. Ted Kaouk as First Chief AI Officer
Are Solana, Cardano, Polygon Commodities As US SEC Ends Ethereum Investigation?
TON Foundation’s Plan to Onboard 500 Million Users
Terraform Labs Refuses to Pay $5.3 Billion Fine, Says SEC Has No Evidence
New And Upcoming NFT Projects
-
Blockchain2 months agoHong Kong’s Securities Association Tips Authorities On Crypto Self-Regulation
-
Regulation2 months agoCFTC Appoints Dr. Ted Kaouk as First Chief AI Officer
-
Altcoin2 weeks ago
Are Solana, Cardano, Polygon Commodities As US SEC Ends Ethereum Investigation?
-
Market2 weeks ago
TON Foundation’s Plan to Onboard 500 Million Users
-
Regulation2 months agoTerraform Labs Refuses to Pay $5.3 Billion Fine, Says SEC Has No Evidence
-
NFT3 weeks agoNew And Upcoming NFT Projects
-
Market4 weeks agoAvalanche (AVAX) Under Pressure: Prolonged Downtrend Next?
-
Altcoin2 weeks ago2.52 Million Altcoins Are Ruining Crypto’s Future
✓ Share: