A US federal appeals court struck down sanctions imposed by the Treasury Department on Tornado Cash. This popular crypto-mixing service enables users to anonymize their cryptocurrency transactions through smart contracts.

The ruling, delivered by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, marks a significant victory for decentralized technology proponents and privacy advocates. At the same time, it reignites debates about how to regulate the use of blockchain tools in connection with criminal activities.

Treasury Department’s Sanctions Against Tornado Cash Overturned

The Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) had sanctioned Tornado Cash in 2022. According to the agency, the platform was a key tool for illicit actors, including North Korea’s Lazarus Group, to launder stolen funds.

However, the court ruled that OFAC overstepped its authority. It emphasized that the immutable smart contracts underpinning Tornado Cash cannot be considered property under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

The appellate court’s decision hinged on the nature of Tornado Cash’s smart contracts. These are autonomous lines of code designed to function without human intervention.

These contracts, deployed on the Ethereum blockchain, are unalterable and accessible to anyone. The court found that such contracts do not meet the legal definition of “property” because they cannot be owned, controlled, or restricted.

“The immutable smart contracts at issue are not property because they are not capable of being owned,” the court wrote.

The court further noted that while sanctions might block certain individuals from using Tornado Cash, the technology’s decentralized nature ensures that no one, including North Korean hackers, can be entirely prevented from accessing it. Paul Grewal, Coinbase’s Chief Legal Officer, hailed the ruling.

“This is a historic win for crypto and all who cares about defending liberty…These smart contracts must now be removed from the sanctions list and US persons will once again be allowed to use this privacy-protecting protocol. Put another way, the government’s overreach will not stand… No one wants criminals to use crypto protocols, but blocking open source technology entirely because a small portion of users are bad actors is not what Congress authorized. These sanctions stretched Treasury’s authority beyond recognition, and the Fifth Circuit agreed.” Grewal wrote on X (formerly Twitter),

Grewal also emphasized the importance of distinguishing between tools and their misuse. Of note, Coinbase, a leading cryptocurrency exchange, was among the entities that sued the government over the sanctions.

Broader Implications for Crypto Regulation

The ruling exposes the challenges of applying existing legal frameworks to decentralized technologies. Crypto-mixing services like Tornado Cash occupy a legal gray area, prompting calls for scrutiny by US lawmakers.

They are neither traditional financial (TradFi) institutions nor entities capable of being controlled by a central authority. Critics of the ruling argue that it could embolden bad actors to exploit blockchain technology further.

“If you think Tornado Cash has been used by good people for worthwhile purposes then make your case…If privacy protects good people it’s good, if it protects bad people it’s bad. The vast majority of people that Tornado Cash has protected are doing bad,” one user on X quipped.

Some lawmakers have previously pressed the Treasury to adopt stricter measures against crypto mixers. In 2022, members of Congress highlighted concerns about their role in facilitating money laundering and funding terrorism. A bipartisan push aimed to ensure that tools like Tornado Cash, often associated with criminal networks, face regulatory scrutiny.

However, privacy advocates argue that targeting the tools rather than the actors undermines the principles of decentralization and privacy. Bill Hughes, a lawyer at ConsenSys, applauded the court’s nuanced understanding of the issue but highlighted a key issue. He cautioned that regulatory risks remain.

“This does NOTmean that the rest of Tornado Cash is out of bounds for Treasury/OFAC too. The issue was about smart contracts with no admin key,” Hughes wrote.

This means that the court’s decision does not shield Tornado Cash from other legal challenges, particularly those concerning its founders. As BeInCrypto reported, they face accusations of facilitating money laundering. Moreover, the broader debate over how to regulate decentralized technologies remains unresolved.

Following the ruling, however, Tornado Cash’s native token, TORN, is up almost 400% to trade for $17.63 as of this writing.

This surge reflects investor optimism about the protocol’s potential resurgence and its implications for decentralized finance (DeFi) projects.

Ethereum price remained supported above the $3,220 zone. ETH is consolidating and might aim for a move above the $3,400 resistance.

• Ethereum started a fresh increase from the $3,250 support zone.
• The price is trading above $3,350 and the 100-hourly Simple Moving Average.
• There was a break above a connecting bearish trend line with resistance at $3,320 on the hourly chart of ETH/USD (data feed via Kraken).
• The pair could gain bullish momentum if it clears the $3,400 resistance zone.

Ethereum Price Remains Stable and Eyes More Upsides

Ethereum price remained supported above $3,200 and started a fresh increase while Bitcoin corrected gains. ETH is stable above $3,250 and is currently rising.

There was a move above the $3,300 and $3,350 resistance levels. The price surpassed the 23.6% Fib retracement level of the downward move from the $3,545 swing high to the $3,254 low. There was also a break above a connecting bearish trend line with resistance at $3,320 on the hourly chart of ETH/USD.

Ethereum price is now trading above $3,350 and the 100-hourly Simple Moving Average. On the upside, the price seems to be facing hurdles near the $3,400 level. It is close to the 50% Fib retracement level of the downward move from the $3,545 swing high to the $3,254 low.

The first major resistance is near the $3,450 level. The main resistance is now forming near $3,500. A clear move above the $3,500 resistance might send the price toward the $3,550 resistance. An upside break above the $3,550 resistance might call for more gains in the coming sessions. In the stated case, Ether could rise toward the $3,680 resistance zone or even $3,750.

Downsides Limited In ETH?

If Ethereum fails to clear the $3,400 resistance, it could start another decline. Initial support on the downside is near the $3,300 level. The first major support sits near the $3,250 zone.

A clear move below the $3,250 support might push the price toward $3,150. Any more losses might send the price toward the $3,050 support level in the near term. The next key support sits at $3,000.

Technical Indicators

Hourly MACD – The MACD for ETH/USD is gaining momentum in the bullish zone.

Hourly RSI – The RSI for ETH/USD is now above the 50 zone.

Major Support Level – $3,250

Major Resistance Level – $3,400

After over 10 months of silence, Ren Protocol announced on social media that it made progress on the long-awaited v2 network upgrade. However, Binance delisted the REN token today, and the community derided this “announcement” as a liquidity farming scam.

Prominent commentators like ZachXBT voiced heavy skepticism about Ren Protocol development, and the firm’s reputation cratered alongside its token value.

Ren Protocol Delisted

In a surprising development, Ren Protocol made its first social media update in over 10 months today. The firm discussed its long-awaited Ren v2 upgrade, promising that work is continuing and further announcements should be coming soon. Ren Protocol initially announced it would shutter its 1.0 network in 2022, but the firm has done little to replace it.

However, the community immediately noticed a much more cynical explanation for this update. The same day, the leading exchange, Binance, announced that it was delisting REN, the protocol’s token. After December 10, Binance users will not be able to trade, deposit, or withdraw REN tokens. The asset’s price subsequently cratered.

In other words, the Ren Protocol was completely silent for nearly an entire year, and it made vague promises of future growth immediately after an impending disaster. Several figures in the community openly accused these developers of conducting a scam: they would briefly pump liquidity through social media hype.

“Sounds like you’re farming for exit liquidity tbh. Where can we read about development?” said one user.

Even on-chain sleuth ZachXBT criticized the project. ZachXBT’s condemnation of this announcement is particularly noteworthy, considering his sterling reputation for unmasking frauds. Most comments on Ren Protocol’s initial post echoed this sentiment.

In other words, even if its developers truly made substantial progress on the v2 upgrade, Ren Protocol’s reputation has sustained a serious blow.